ABSTRACT
Introduction Infectious keratitis (IK) represents the 5th leading cause of blindness worldwide. A delay in diagnosis is often a major factor in progression to irreversible visual impairment and/or blindness from IK. The diagnostic challenge is further compounded by low microbiological culture yield, long turnaround time, poorly differentiated clinical features, and polymicrobial infections. In recent years, deep learning (DL), a subfield of artificial intelligence, has rapidly emerged as a promising tool in assisting automated medical diagnosis, clinical triage and decision making, and improving workflow efficiency in healthcare services. Recent studies have demonstrated the potential of using DL in assisting the diagnosis of IK, though the accuracy remains to be elucidated. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to critically examine and compare the performance of various DL models with clinical experts and/or microbiological results (the current “gold standard”) in diagnosing IK, with an aim to inform practice on the clinical applicability and deployment of DL-assisted diagnostic models.
Methods and analysis This review will consider studies that included application of any DL models to diagnose patients with suspected IK, encompassing bacterial, fungal, protozoal and/or viral origins. We will search various electronic databases, including EMBASE and MEDLINE. There will be no restriction to the language and publication date. Two independent reviewers will assess the titles, abstracts and full-text articles. Extracted data will include details of each primary studies, including title, year of publication, authors, types of DL models used, populations, sample size, decision threshold, and diagnostic performance. We will perform meta-analyses for the included primary studies when there are sufficient similarities in outcome reporting.
Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is required for this systematic review. We plan to disseminate our findings via presentation/publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
Protocol registration This systematic review protocol will be registered with the PROSPERO after peer review.
STRENGTH AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY
- This study will serve as the most up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis specifically evaluating the diagnostic performance of deep learning in infectious keratitis.
- The quality of the study will depend on the quality of the available published literature related to this topic.
- This study will help identify the gaps in the current clinical evidence, which may be related to study design, quality of the research methodologies, setting of reference standard, risk of bias, and outcome reporting.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
MJB is supported by the Wellcome Trust (Grant number 207472/Z/17/Z). DSJT is supported by Medical Research Council / Fight for Sight Clinical Research Fellowship (MR/T001674/1). The funder has not role in developing this protocol.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
