Abstract
Objectives To report the recovery of patients receiving primary allied healthcare after a COVID-19 infection at a six-month follow-up, and to explore which patient characteristics are associated with the changes in outcomes between the baseline and six-month follow-up.
Design Prospective cohort study.
Setting Allied healthcare in Dutch primary care.
Participants 1,452 adult patients recovering from COVID-19 and receiving treatment from one or more primary care allied health professional(s) (i.e., dietitian, exercise therapist, occupational therapist, physical therapist and/or speech and language therapist).
Results For participation (USER-P range 0 to 100), estimated mean differences of at least 2.3 points were observed after six months. For HRQoL (EQ-VAS range 0 to 100), the mean increase was 12.31 at six months. Furthermore, significant improvements were found for fatigue (FSS range 1 to 7): the mean decrease was –0.7 at six months. For physical functioning (PROMIS-PF range 13.8 to 61.3), the mean increase was 5.9 at six months. Mean differences of –0.8 for anxiety (HADS range 0 to 21), and –1.5 for depression (HADS range 0 to 21), were found after six months. A better baseline score, hospital admission and male sex were associated with a positive change in score between the baseline and six-month follow-up, whereas age, BMI, comorbidities and smoking status were not associated with mean changes in any outcome measure.
Conclusions Patients recovering from COVID-19 who receive primary allied healthcare make progress in recovery, but still experience many limitations in their daily activities after six months. Our findings provide reference values to healthcare providers and healthcare policy-makers regarding what to expect from the recovery of patients who received health care from one or more primary care allied health professionals.
Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov registry (NCT04735744).
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT04735744
Clinical Protocols
https://medicaljournalssweden.se/jrm/article/view/2506
Funding Statement
This project was funded by ZonMw Efficiency Studies (10390062010001), and received additional funding for setting up the data collection tool by the Royal Dutch Society for Physiotherapy, the Association for Quality in Physical Therapy, the Nivel Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Stichting Revalidatie en Wetenschap, and Maastricht University.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the medical ethics committee of Radboud university medical centre (Registration #2020-7278).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
According to international standards, data will be stored for 15 years. The data in this manuscript are anonymised and documented, and stored to be reusable after anonymisation. After publication of all studies of the ParaCOV consortium, the data can be reused upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.
