Impact of Differential Vaccine Effectiveness on COVID-19 Hospitalization Cases: Projections for 10 Developed Countries where Booster Vaccines were Recommended

Michael Maschio, Kelly Fust, Amy Lee, Nicolas Van de Velde, Philip O. Buck, Michele A. Kohli
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.26.22280377

ABSTRACT

Background & Objectives In a previous analysis, a decision-analytic model was used to analyze the clinical and economic impact of the differences in effectiveness between the two licensed mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccines, mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2, in 2022 for adults aged 18 years and older in the United States (US). In this analysis, the same model was used to estimate the impact that administering first booster doses with mRNA-1273 could have had on COVID-related hospitalizations and costs over a 6-month period in 10 developed countries (Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Spain, United Kingdom [UK], and US), considering updated effectiveness data.

Methods The model was used to estimate number of hospitalizations and related costs using the actual vaccine distribution for the first COVID-19 booster from each country. These estimates were compared to a scenario where 100% of doses for that 6-month period was assumed to be mRNA-1273. The effectiveness of mRNA-1273 compared to BNT162b2 was estimated from real world data from the UK.

Results The total number of doses switched to the mRNA-1273 booster would range from 4.3 million in Spain to 39.4 million in Japan. The number of hospitalizations and associated hospitalization costs would be expected to fall in all countries, with the proportional decrease ranging from 1.1% (16,800 fewer) in Germany to 8.8% (25,100 fewer) in Australia.

Conclusions Real-world effectiveness data suggest that a booster dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine may be more effective compared to other vaccines used for booster doses. Given this difference in effectiveness, results of this analysis demonstrate that switching to 100% mRNA-1273 boosters would have reduced the number of hospitalizations and associated costs in each country during the first 6 months of the omicron period.

INTRODUCTION

There are currently multiple vaccines used globally for active immunization to prevent coronavirus disease (COVID-19), including 2-dose messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines BNT162b2 (COMIRNATY®; Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA; BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH, Mainz, Germany) and mRNA-1273 (SPIKEVAX®; Moderna Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA). Other available vaccines include two viral vector-based vaccines, (single dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine [Jcovden®; Johnson & Johnson, Beerse, Belgium] and 2-dose ChAdOx1-S vaccine [Vaxzevria®; AstraZeneca, Cambridge, England]), and the recently authorized 2-dose NVX-CoV2373 (Nuvaxovid® and Covovax®; COVID-19 Vaccine; Novavax Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA), a protein subunit vaccine. Booster doses are now recommended in many countries. Although the guidelines and recommendations for use of each vaccine vary by country, many countries specify a preference for mRNA vaccines for booster doses, citing effectiveness and safety data.1,2

In a previously conducted analysis, Maschio et al.3 examined the clinical and economic impact of the differences in effectiveness between mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 booster vaccinations over one year (2022) in United States (US) adults aged 18 years and older. At the time that the original analysis was completed, there were data for vaccine effectiveness (VE) against Delta but very few data on VE against Omicron. Therefore, Maschio et al. relied on estimates of VE from studies of neutralizing antibody titers or from small studies using one vaccine only. To utilize real world data, relative VE ratios between Omicron and Delta variants for BNT162b2 were applied to all other vaccines. In the current analysis, the most recent evidence for VE is used to estimate the impact of COVID-19 boosters on Omicron infections.

Real world evidence of the VE against Omicron are now available from studies with large sample sizes and meta-analyses.4,5,6,7 Butt et al.5 used a retrospective cohort matched study design to assess the VE of an mRNA-based booster dose compared to the primary series among members of the Veteran’s Affairs healthcare system (median age 72 years), who are at high risk of infection and adverse outcomes from COVID-19. Ono et al.7 conducted a study of comparative effectiveness between Japanese residents aged ≥16 years who received the BNT162b2 primary series and either a mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 booster dose; due to data availability, they were unable to adjust for known risk factors for COVID-19. EPI-PHARE6 conducted a cohort study in adults ≥18 years to assess first booster dose efficacy (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) against risk of hospitalization for COVID-19 in France. Hulme et al.4 conducted a matched database analysis to compare the effectiveness of boosting adults aged ≥18 years in England with either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. As this study includes a large sample of the general adult population and directly compares the effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 against COVID-19 hospitalization and death while controlling for potential differences in vaccine recipients, it provided the data required to update the previous analysis.

The current modelled analysis expands on the Maschio et al. study3 by adapting the previously developed decision analytic model to 9 additional countries for the period in which Omicron was the dominant variant of concern. The objective of this study was to estimate the impact that administering all first booster doses with mRNA-1273 could have had on COVID-related hospitalizations and costs over the 6-month Omicron period in the following countries that preferentially recommend the use of mRNA vaccines for boosters: Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Spain, United Kingdom (UK), and US.

METHODS

A previously described decision analytic model3 was used to compare two mRNA COVID-19 booster scenarios and estimate the potential number of hospitalizations and associated costs for each scenario by country. The target population for all countries was adults aged 18 years or older, with the exception of France, where policy limits mRNA-1273 to adults aged 30 years or older.8 The months of the analytic time frame were selected for consistency with when Omicron became the dominant variant of concern in each country. The time horizon for all analyses in the present study was the 6 month period from January to June 2022, with the exception of the UK and US, which were analyzed over the 6 month period from December 2021 to May 2022.

To construct the two scenarios for each country, the booster coverage rate and the proportion of different booster doses delivered were determined. The current scenario reflects the actual historical data on types of doses given as shown in Table 1. As mRNA vaccines are preferentially recommended in these countries, only a small portion of people (1.5% in the US; <1% in other countries) received another type of vaccine (ChAdOx1-S, Ad26.COV2.S, or NVX-CoV2373). In the second mRNA-1273 scenario, the booster coverage rates are identical to the current scenario, but all individuals received the mRNA-1273 booster.

View this table:
Table 1. Model inputs: Proportions of different vaccine types delivered for the first booster for each country

In the model, the baseline risk of infection in the unvaccinated varies by month. Amongst those who received the primary series only or the primary series plus booster, the incidence of infection is reduced according to VE, and is recalculated each month to account for waning based on time since vaccination. The coverage and mix of primary series vaccines delivered is the same for the current scenario and the all mRNA-1273 scenario. For those who received the primary series in 2021, we made the simplifying assumption that their series was completed in the month displayed in Appendix Table 7, as this marked the month at which 50% cumulative coverage in the population was achieved in each country. This month, which varies by country, was therefore our anchor month to calculate time since primary series completion for the VE calculations for each month. The primary series VE was estimated as an average of the waning adjusted VE weighted by the proportion of the cohort receiving each primary series. For anyone who had received a booster prior to the start of the analytical time horizon, we made the simplifying assumption that the booster was received in the month prior. As people continued to receive boosters in 2022, the booster VE was estimated as a weighted average of the waning adjusted VE (time since receiving their booster) and the proportion of the cohort receiving each booster.

Model Inputs: Primary Series Vaccine Effectiveness

Primary series VE is summarized in Table 2. Primary series VE for all vaccines against infection and monthly waning for mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 were obtained from a meta-analysis conducted by Pratama et al., 2022.15 Pratama identified studies available by April 6, 2022, including 12 from the US, 4 from Europe, 2 from South Africa, 2 from Qatar and 1 from Canada. Monthly waning for Ad26.COV2.S and ChAdOX1-S were calculated from a large study by Adams et al., 2022 in the US,16 and the UK Health Security Agency (HSA) COVID-19 report, respectively.17

View this table:
Table 2. Model Inputs: Primary Series and First Booster Effectiveness15,16,17,4

Primary series hospitalization VE from BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S, as well as monthly waning for BNT162b2, were obtained from Pratama et al., 2022.15 Data for mRNA-1273 and ChAdOx1-S were not available from Pratama, and therefore VE against hospitalization and waning were calculated from the UK HSA COVID-19 report.17 Waning data for Ad26.COV2.S were unavailable and assumed to be the same as waning against infection.

The average VE was calculated by country as a weighted average using the proportion of doses delivered shown in Table 3 as weights. In all countries, the most common primary series received was a mRNA vaccine. The UK provided the highest proportion of ChAdOX1-S. Overall, the proportion of people receiving Ad26.COV2.S was low. As NVX-CoV2373 was only recently approved, there are no VE data available for the Omicron variant. As less than 0.1% of patients received it in only a few of the countries of interest, it was not included in the analysis.

Model Inputs: Booster Vaccines Effectiveness

Booster VEs against infection for BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1-S were obtained from Pratama et al., 2022.15 As the current analysis focuses on the difference in booster VE of the two mRNA vaccines, it was important to capture the true relative difference between the two. In order to leverage the real-world evidence data published by Hulme et al., 2022, the hazard ratio (HR) comparing the VE of mRNA-1273 to BNT162b2 was applied to the VE of BNT162b2 to obtain the VE of mRNA-1273. Given the small proportion of doses of Ad26.COV2.S delivered globally as a booster, data were unavailable, and were approximated by calculating the ratio between Ad26.COV2.S primary series infection to hospitalization VEs and applying it to Ad26.COV2.S booster hospitalization VE.

Booster VE against hospitalization for BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S were obtained from Pratama et al., 2022.15 Similar to booster VE against infection, the HR from Hulme et al., 20224 for hospitalizations was applied the BNT162b2 booster hospitalization VE to obtain the VE of mRNA-1273. Data for ChAdOx1-S were unavailable from the Pratama meta-analysis. In the US, only 1.5% of boosters delivered were not an mRNA vaccine and for the other countries, this proportion was less than 0.5% (See Table 1). Data on the performance of these boosters, especially ChAdOx1-S are sparse, and we therefore assigned them all the infection and hospitalization effectiveness associated with Ad26.COV2.S which represented the largest proportion of the non-mRNA vaccines (Table 2).

Booster waning rates for infection and hospitalization were assumed to be the same as primary series for all vaccines except for mRNA-1273. As the purpose of the analysis was to estimate the impact of the difference in VE noted by Hulme et al., 2022, the booster waning rates for mRNA-1273 were adjusted to maintain the HRs from this study for the entire 6-month duration.4 Sensitivity analyses on the effectiveness of mRNA-1273 were performed by varying the HRs estimated by Hulme et al. using the 95% confidence intervals (CI). Using the lower bound yields estimates of VE against infection and hospitalization of 71.6% (waning 5.4%) and 93.6% (waning 1.58%), respectively. Using the upper bound yields estimates of VE against infection and hospitalization of 71.3% (waning 5.4%) and 91.5% (waning 2.12%), respectively.

Other Model Inputs

Model inputs were estimated for each country from publicly available data and other published sources as available. Estimates of the total population size in each country were based on United Nations data19 (Appendix Table 6). Primary series44-53 and first booster coverage rates44-53 were also estimated for each country, by age group as available (Appendix Table 7 and Figure 3 to Figure 12). Hospitalization rates, by age group as available, and costs were estimated based on local data for each country (Table 4).22 -43 Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying hospitalization rates ±25%. Hospitalization costs represent the average cost per hospital stay for COVID-19 infection. Similarly to the previously published analysis,3 infection incidence estimates amongst the unvaccinated in each country over the 6-month time horizon were based on modeling from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) (Figure 1), although the incidence rates used (updated July 19, 2022) do differ from the past projections for this period.20,21

View this table:
Table 3. Model Inputs: Primary Series Vaccine Distribution
View this table:
Table 4. Model Inputs: Hospitalization Rates in Unvaccinated Individuals and Hospitalization Costs
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Model Inputs: Country-Specific Incidence of COVID-19 Rates in the Unvaccinated Population During the 6-Month Analytic Time Horizon20,21

RESULTS

The total number of hospitalizations and hospitalization costs for each first booster scenario are presented in Table 5, along with the total number of doses that hypothetically would be switched if mRNA-1273 was used exclusively for the booster dose. Based on the actual historical vaccine use for the booster doses, the model predicts the total numbers of hospitalizations for each country, ranging from 175,900 in Canada to 2,562,900 in the US. If 100% of boosted individuals had received the mRNA-1273 booster the total number of doses switched to the mRNA-1273 booster would range from 4.3 million in Spain to 39.4 million in Japan (Table 5). Given the higher overall effectiveness of mRNA-1273 relative to the BNT162b2 booster, the number of hospitalizations would be expected to fall in each country in the 100% mRNA-1273 scenario, with the proportional decrease in hospitalizations ranging from 1.1% (16,800 fewer) in Germany to 8.8% (25,100 fewer) in Australia. Given the observed reductions in the numbers of hospitalizations predicted by the model, hospitalization costs also fell in each country, paralleling the observed percentage reductions in the number of hospitalizations (Table 5). In sensitivity analyses varying hospitalization rates, the absolute number of hospitalizations increased or decreased but the percentage change in the number of hospitalizations for the mRNA-1273 scenario did not alter from the base-case because all parameters in the model are linearly related and therefore change proportionally. Results of the effectiveness sensitivity analysis (Figure 2) demonstrate that the impact of variation on the percentage change in hospitalizations is proportional to the percentage change observed in the base case. For example, in those countries with a higher percentage change in the number of hospitalizations between the current and mRNA-1273 scenarios, the impact of the variation in effectiveness was greater. In all sensitivity analyses, there was still a decrease in hospitalization for all scenarios where 100% of the population was switched to mRNA-1273.

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Impact of Effectiveness Sensitivity Analysis on the Percent Change in Hospitalizations
View this table:
Table 5. Base-Case Results

DISCUSSION

This study found that, when compared to the current use of multiple COVD-19 vaccines for booster doses in the 10 countries assessed, shifting to 100% mRNA-1273 boosters would have decreased the expected number of hospitalizations, which in turn would have reduced COVID-19 related hospitalization costs. In the current scenario, a portion of people received non-mRNA vaccines as boosters but as this is only 1.5% in the US and less than 1% in other countries, these have minimal impact on results. Results of the effectiveness sensitivity analysis demonstrate that the impact of variation on the percentage change in hospitalizations depends on the observed percentage change in the base-case analysis. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses varying hospitalization rates resulted in changes to the absolute number of hospitalizations but did not alter the percentage change in the number of hospitalizations for the mRNA-1273 scenario. In all scenarios, switching to 100% mRNA-1273 was predicted to decrease hospitalization. These findings are subject to several limitations discussed below, some of which have been previously described in Maschio et al.3

There is high uncertainty regarding VE against emerging variants. This study aimed to build upon Maschio et al. by using historical data from the Omicron period, as well as incorporating recently published data into effectiveness estimates. Although the effectiveness data represent a mixture of the Delta and Omicron variants, Hulme et al.4 is one of the few publications that presents a controlled comparison of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 in the general population during the Omicron wave. Results from Hulme et al. are consistent with other studies published during the Delta and Omicron periods.5,6,7 However, these alternative studies do not control for bias in the same manner or have smaller sample sizes. Additionally, the incidence data utilized in this analysis represent the rapid rise and subsequent decline in cases amid the Omicron wave. A lack of COVID-19 testing during the Omicron wave may have led to an underestimation of true infection rates, although IHME numbers include corrections to account for this issue. A sharp increase in incidence occurred across all countries during the time horizon of the analysis and this may not be observed again in the future. Conversely, it is unknown whether a future variant of concern may be more virulent than Omicron. As such, it is difficult to use the findings from the present analysis to inform predictions about the ability of mRNA-1273 to reduce the hospitalization burden in the future; rather, the findings from this study should be viewed through a historical lens.

Although the present analysis is focused on the Omicron period, in the real-world, first booster doses were delivered prior to the start of the analytic time frame. In the model, first booster doses delivered prior to the start of the analyses (December 2021 or January 2022) were not eligible for switching to mRNA-1273. As such, the historical impact of switching first booster doses to mRNA-1273 may be underestimated. Finally, the quality of input data vary by country. For example, age-specific coverage rates and hospitalization data were not available for all settings. Age is a known driver of COVID-19 vaccination uptake and hospitalization risk; as such, a lack of age-specific data may lead to an over-or underestimation of the impact of mRNA-1273 in these countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world effectiveness data suggest that a booster dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine may be more effective compared to other vaccines used for booster doses. Given this difference in effectiveness, results of this analysis demonstrate that switching to 100% mRNA-1273 boosters would have reduced the number of hospitalizations and associated costs in each country during the first 6 months of the omicron period.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.

APPENTIX

View this table:
Table 6. Population Size, by Country and Age Group
View this table:
Table 7. Primary Series Coverage, by Country and Age Group
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Australia First Booster Coverage46
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Canada First Booster Coverage45
Figure 5.
Figure 5. France First Booster Coverage48
Figure 6.
Figure 6. Germany First Booster Coverage51
Figure 7.
Figure 7. Italy First Booster Coverage47
Figure 8.
Figure 8. Japan First Booster Coverage49,50
Figure 9.
Figure 9. South Korea First Booster Coverage44
Figure 10.
Figure 10. Spain First Booster Coverage47
Figure 11.
Figure 11. United Kingdom First Booster Coverage52
Figure 12.
Figure 12. United States First Booster Coverage53

All of the above figures show vaccine coverage calculated as the percent of vaccines delivered to the number of people in the age group.

Footnotes

  • michael.maschio{at}quadrantHE.com, kelly.fust{at}quadrantHE.com, amy.lee{at}quadrantHE.com, Nicolas.VandeVelde{at}modernatx.com, Philip.Buck{at}modernatx.com

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Johnson and Johnson’s Janssen COVID-19 vaccine overview and safety. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/differentvaccines/janssen.html Updated: December 28, 2021. Accessed: January 28, 2022.
  2. ↵
    Oliver SE, Wallace M, See I, et al. Use of the Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 Vaccine: Updated Interim Recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - United States, December 2021. MMWR 2022; 71(3): 90–5.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    Maschio M, Fust K, Lee A, et al. Clinical and Economic Impact of Differential COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness in the United States. medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.31.22272957.
  4. ↵
    Hulme WJ, Horne EMF, Parker EPK, et al. Comparative effectiveness of BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 boosting in England: a cohort study in OpenSAFELY-TPP. medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.29.22278186.
  5. ↵
    Butt AA, Talisa VB, Shaikh OS, et al. Relative Vaccine Effectiveness of a Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Messenger RNA Vaccine Booster Dose Against the Omicron Variant. Clin Infect Dis 2022. doi : https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac328
  6. ↵
    EPI-PHARE. Efficacité de la dose de rappel contre les hospitalisation pour COVID-19. Updated on July 7, 2022. https://www.epi-phare.fr/rapports-detudes-et-publications/rappel-vaccination-covid-19/ Accessed: August 25, 2022.
  7. ↵
    Ono S, Michihata N, Yamana H, et al. Comparative effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 booster dose after BNT162b2 primary vaccination against the Omicron variants: A retrospective cohort study using large-scale population-based registries in Japan. Clin Infect Dis 2022. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac763
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    Ministère De La Santé Et De La Prévention. La stratégie vaccinale et la liste des public prioritaires. Available at: Liste des publics éligibles à la vaccination (solidarites-sante.gouv.fr). Accessed: August 24, 2022.
  9. AusVax Safety. Moderna COVID-19 vaccine safety data - All participants. Available at: https://ausvaxsafety.org.au/moderna-covid-19-vaccine/moderna-covid-19-vaccine-safety-data-all-participants. Accessed: September 2, 2022.
  10. Market Share Data on file at Moderna.
  11. GIV COVID-19. Gestión Integral de la Vacinación. Available at: Informe ejecutivo vacunaciónCOVID19 (sanidad.gob.es). Accessed: September 2, 2022.
  12. Research and analysis: Coronavirus vaccine – summary of Yellow Card reporting. Updated August 4, 2022. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting. Accessed: August 11, 2022.
  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID Data Tracker. Available at: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccination-demographic. Accessed: February 10, 2022.
  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID Data Tracker. Available at: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccination-demographi. Accessed: December 9, 2021.
  15. ↵
    Pratama NR, Wafa IA, Budi DS, et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (B.1.1.529): A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.29.22274454.
  16. ↵
    Adams K, Rhoads JP, Surie D, et al. Vaccine Effectiveness of Primary Series and Booster Doses against Omicron Variant COVID-19-Associated Hospitalization in the United States. medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.09.22276228.
  17. ↵
    UK Health Security Agency. COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report Week 31 (4 August 2022). Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1096327/Vaccine_surveillance_report_week_31_2022.pdf. Accessed: September 2, 2022.
  18. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Data on COVID-19 vaccination in the EU/EEA. Open Data file downloaded on September 2, 2022.
  19. ↵
    United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2022). World Population Prospects 2022, Online Edition. Population by Single Age – BothSexes. Available at: https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/. Accessed: August 24, 2022.
  20. ↵
    Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). COVID-19 estimate downloads. Projections updated July 19, 2022. Available at: https://www.healthdata.org/covid/data-downloads. Accessed: August 26, 2022.
  21. ↵
    Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). COVID-19 Projections (March 31, 2022). United States of America. Used with permission. All rights reserved.
  22. ↵
    COVID-19 in Australia. Severity of COVID-19 cases: Hospitalisations, ICU and ventilators. Available at: https://www.covid19data.com.au/hospitalisations-icu. Accessed: September 2, 2022.
  23. Cook DC, Fraser RW, McKirdy SJ. A benefit-cost analysis of different response scenarios to COVID-19: A case study. Health Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 4;4(2):e286.
    OpenUrl
  24. Government of Canada. COVID-19 epidemiology update. Available at: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/. Accessed: August 30, 2022.
  25. Canadian Institute for Health Information. COVID-19 hospitalization and emergency department statistics. Available at: https://www.cihi.ca/en/covid-19-hospitalization-and-emergency-department-statistics. Accessed: August 30, 2022.
  26. DREES. La dose de rappel protège fortement contre les formes symptomatiques et sévères du COVID-19. January 7, 2022. Available at: https://data.drees.solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/pages/accueil/. Accessed: August 25, 2022
  27. Gallien S, Guilment C, Hurles A, et al. Couts des hospitalisations et des soins de suite et de réadaptation liés au COVID-19 en France en 2020. Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses Formation 2022: S51. DOI: 10.1016/j.mmifmc.2022.03.110.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. Robert Koch Institut. Incidence due to COVID-19 hospitalized cases by age group and vaccination status. Available at: https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Daten/Inzidenz_Impfstatus.html;jsessionid=3F3FB5657BEE5EA338842D3A3A8C5C3D.internet052?nn=13490888RKI%20Wochen%20bericht. Accessed: September 2, 2022.
  29. Schilling, J., Tolksdorf, K., Marquis, A. et al. The different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: A descriptive analysis from January 2020 to February 2021. Bundesgesundheitsbl 2021; 64:1093–1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-021-03394-x.
    OpenUrl
  30. Barmer Ersatzkasse. DRG Intensivemedizinische Komplexbehandlung; AOK Pressemitteilung. Available at: https://www.praxisvita.de/covid-19-behandlung-kosten-pro-patient-krankenkassen-veroeffentlichen-zahlen-19253.html. Accessed: September 2, 2022.
  31. Zamagni G, Armocida B, Abbafati C, et al. COVID-19 vaccination coverage in Italy: how many hospitalisations and related costs could have been saved if we were all vaccinated? Frontiers in Public Health 2020; 10 March. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.825416
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. Japan Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare. Visualizing the data: information on COVID-19 infections. Available at: https://covid19.mhlw.go.jp/en/. Accessed: September 2, 2022.
  33. Hase R, Kubota Y, Niiyama Y, et al. The profile of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 under the Quarantine Act in a designated hospital near an international airport in Japan. Glob Health Med. 2021 Jun 30;3(3):180–183. doi: 10.35772/ghm.2021.01058.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. Yi S, Choe YJ, Lim DS, et al. Impact of national COVID-19 vaccination campaign, South Korea. Vaccine 2022; 40(26):3670–3675. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.05.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. Seo WJ, Kang J, Kang HK, et al. Impact of prior vaccination on clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2022 Dec;11(1):1316–1324.
    OpenUrl
  36. Centro de Coordinación de Alertas y Emergencias Sanitarias. Actualización nº 524. Enfermedad por el coronavirus (COVID-19). 16.12.2021. Available at: https://www.sanidad.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/ccayes/alertasActual/nCov/documentos/Actualizacion_524_COVID-19.pdf. Accessed: September 2, 2022.
  37. González D. El coste hospitalario del paciente ingresado por COVID-19 alcanza los 18.692,33 euros en Granada. February 9, 2021. Available at: https://gacetamedica.com/politica/el-coste-hospitalario-del-paciente-ingresado-por-covid-19-alcanza-los-18-69233-euros-en-granada/
  38. National Health Service. National Schedule of NHS Costs Year: 2020-21 - All NHS trusts and NHS foundation trusts - HRG Data. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2022/07/2_National_schedule_of_NHS_costs_FY20-21.xlsx. Accessed: September 1, 2022.
  39. Ferguson N, Laydon D, Nedjati Gilani G, et al. Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand. 2020. Available at: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gidafellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf. Accessed: August 31, 2022.
  40. Ferguson N, Ghani A, Hinsley W, Volz E. Report 50: Hospitalisation risk for Omicron cases in England. Available at: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/mrc-global-infectious-disease-analysis/covid-19/report-50-severity-omicron/. Accessed: August 31, 2022.
  41. Reese H, Iuliano AD, Patel NN, et al. Estimated incidence of COVID-19 illness and hospitalization - United States, February - September, 2020. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 15;72(12):e1010–e101.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. Wang L, Berger NA, Kaelber DC, et al. COVID infection rates, clinical outcomes, and racial/ethnic and gender disparities before and after Omicron emerged in the US. medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.21.22271300
  43. ↵
    Di Fusco M, Shea KM, Lin J, et al. (2021). Health outcomes and economic burden of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the United States. J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):308–317.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. ↵
    Korean Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Data on daily vaccination status. Available at: https://ncv.kdca.go.kr/vaccineStatus.es?mid=a11710000000 Accessed: August 31, 2022.
  45. ↵
    Government of Canada. COVID-19 vaccination in Canada. Available at: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccination-coverage/#a3. Accessed: September 2, 2022.
  46. ↵
    Australian Government. Department of Health and Aged Care. Available at: https://www.health.gov.au/resources/collections/covid-19-vaccination-vaccination-data. Accessed: September 2, 2022.
  47. ↵
    European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. COVID-19 Vaccine Tracker. Available at: https://vaccinetracker.ecdc.europa.eu/public/extensions/COVID-19/vaccine-tracker.html#age-group-tab. Accessed: September 2, 2022.
  48. ↵
    L’Assurance Maladie. COVID-19 Vaccination Data. Available at: https://datavaccin-covid.ameli.fr/pages/type-vaccins/. Accessed: September 2, 2022.
  49. ↵
    Digital Agency. Daily Vaccination Coverage. Available at: https://info.vrs.digital.go.jp/dashboard/ Accessed: August 9, 2022.
  50. ↵
    Prime Minister Office. Breakdown of Total Number of Vaccinations. Available at: https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/headline/kansensho/vaccine.html. Accessed: August 9, 2022.
  51. ↵
    Robert Koch-Institut (2021): COVID-19-Impfungen in Deutschland, Berlin: Zenodo. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.5126652.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  52. ↵
    UK Health Security Agency. Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the UK. Vaccinations in England. Available at: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/vaccinations?areaType=nation&areaName=England. Accessed: August 11, 2022.
  53. ↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID Data Tracker. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2022. Available at: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker. Accessed: June 15, 2022.
Back to top
Posted September 27, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Impact of Differential Vaccine Effectiveness on COVID-19 Hospitalization Cases: Projections for 10 Developed Countries where Booster Vaccines were Recommended
Michael Maschio, Kelly Fust, Amy Lee, Nicolas Van de Velde, Philip O. Buck, Michele A. Kohli
medRxiv 2022.09.26.22280377; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.26.22280377
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area