Abstract
Purposes To select the summary cognitive index that is best predicted from spatio-temporal gait features (STGF) extracted from gait patterns.
Methods 125 participants were recruited, including 40 young and 85 elderly adults. Their performances in different cognitive domains were evaluated through 12 cognitive measures obtained from five neuropsychological tests. Four summary cognitive indexes were calculated in each case: 1) the z-score of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) from a population norm (MMSE z-score); 2) the sum of the absolute z-scores of the patient’s neuropsychological measures from a population norm (ZSum); 3) the patient’s scores for the first principal component (PC) of the set of neuropsychological test scores (PCCog); and 4) the Mahalanobis distance of each patient’s score from a population norm (MDCog). The gait patterns were recorded while they executed four walking tasks (normal, fast, easy- and hard-dual tasks). Sixteen STGF were measured using a body-fixed Inertial Measurement Unit. Dual-task costs were computed. The proportion of variances (R2) that PCA-STGF scores accounted for the four summary cognitive indexes and for the 12 cognitive variables across individuals were measured in multiple linear regressions. The confidence intervals for each R2 were estimated by bootstrapping the regression 1000 times.
Results The mean values of R2 for the summary cognitive indexes were: 0.0831 for MMSE z-score, 0.0624 for ZSum, 0.0614 for PCCog, and 0.4751 for MDCog. The mean values of R2 for the 12 cognitive values ranged between 0.0566 and 0.1211. The multivariate linear regression was only statistically significant for MDCog, with the highest value of the R2 estimation.
Conclusions Individual cognitive variables and most of the summary cognitive indices showed a weak association with gait parameters. However, the MDCog index showed a stronger association, explaining about 50 % of the variance. This suggests that this index can be used to study the relationship between gait patterns and cognition.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Flemish Interuniversity Council (VLIR-UOS) through the CU2017TEA436A103 project, awarded to Ghent University, Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Cuban Center for Neuroscience. Also, it was supported by the PN305LH13-050 project funded by the Oficina de Gestión de Fondos y Proyectos Internacionales, CITMA, Cuba.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics Committee of Cuban Center for Neuroscience
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors