Abstract
Background Debriefing is a team discussion in a constructive, supportive environment. Barriers exist to consistent, effective, operative team debriefing.
Aim To identify barriers to debriefing and their potential solutions as articulated by operating room personnel.
Design Qualitative study.
Methods Between December 2021 and February 2022 we interviewed operating room workers in a tertiary children’s hospital. We used purposive sampling to interview a variety of professions and specialties who work in the operating room environment. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded. The qualitative approach was reflexive thematic analysis with the theoretical framework was critical realism.
Results Interviews were analysed from 40 operating room staff: 14 nurses,7 anaesthetic technicians, 7 anaesthetists, and 12 surgeons; 25 (62%) were female. The five key themes were: 1) “commitment to learning” – healthcare workers are committed to teamwork, quality improvement, and teamwork; 2) “it’s a safe space” – psychological safety is a pre-requisite for, and is enhanced by, debriefing; “natural born leader” – the value of leadership and also the limitations caused by psychological constructs about what and who is a leader; 4) “space-time” – finding time to debrief after routine operations and after critical events; and 5) “doing the basics well” – debriefing needs structure without being over-complicated.
Conclusion Psychological safety is both a prerequisite for and a product of debriefing. Leadership, if viewed as a collective responsibility, could help break down power structures. Given the results of this study and evidence in the literature, it is likely that routine debriefing, if well done, will improve psychological safety, facilitate team learning, reduce errors, and improve patient safety.
Relevance to Clinical Practice Debriefing is challenging to perform, requires leadership and training, but is worth the effort. Nurses can take a leading role in promoting routine debriefing in healthcare.
What does this paper contribute to the wider global clinical community?
Debriefing, if done well, promotes teamwork, psychological safety in the workplace, quality and safety, and organisational learning.
Setting up an effective debriefing programme is challenging but worth the effort.
Debriefing requires collaboration and nurses are well placed to be leaders in debriefing policy design and to lead multidisciplinary debriefs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Starship Foundation, Aotearoa New Zealand.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was registered with the institutional research office and received ethical approval from the Auckland Health Research Ethics Committee (#3228).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Declarations Emma Skegg and Mercedes Mudgway were funded through a Starship Foundation® Grant (SF2142). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Mainly a rewriting of the Discussion section.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
