Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Exploring Unique Device Identifier Implementation and Use for Real-World Evidence: A Mixed-Methods Study with NESTcc Health System Network Collaborators

View ORCID ProfileSanket S. Dhruva, Jennifer L. Ridgeway, Joseph S. Ross, Joseph P. Drozda Jr., Natalia A. Wilson
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.21.22279992
Sanket S. Dhruva
1University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 4150 Clement St, 111C, San Francisco, CA, USA 94121
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sanket S. Dhruva
  • For correspondence: sanket.dhruva@ucsf.edu
Jennifer L. Ridgeway
2Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, and the Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph S. Ross
3Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, and the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph P. Drozda Jr.
4Mercy Research (retired as of 02/28/2022), Mercy, Chesterfield, MO, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natalia A. Wilson
5Center for Healthcare Delivery and Policy, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives To examine the current state of Unique Device Identifier (UDI) implementation, including barriers and facilitators, among eight health systems participating in a research network committed to real-world evidence (RWE) generation for medical devices.

Design Mixed methods, including a structured survey and semi-structured interviews.

Setting Eight health systems participating in the National Evaluation System for health Technology research network within the United States.

Participants Individuals identified as being involved in or knowledgeable about UDI implementation or medical device identification from supply chain, information technology, and high-volume procedural area(s) in their health system.

Main Outcomes Measures Interview topics were related to UDI implementation, including barriers and facilitators; UDI use; benefits of UDI adoption; and vision for UDI implementation. Data were analyzed using directed content analysis, drawing on prior conceptual models of UDI implementation and the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework. A brief survey of health system characteristics and scope of UDI implementation was also conducted.

Results Thirty-five individuals completed interviews. Three of eight health systems reported having implemented UDI. Themes identified about barriers and facilitators to UDI implementation included knowledge of the UDI and its benefits among decision makers; organizational systems, culture, and networks that support technology and workflow changes; and external factors such as policy mandates and technology. A final theme focused on the availability of UDIs for RWE; lack of availability significantly hindered RWE studies on medical devices.

Conclusions UDI adoption within health systems requires knowledge of and impetus to achieve operational and clinical benefits. These are necessary to support UDI availability for medical device safety and effectiveness studies and RWE generation.

What is already known on this topic

  • Recent legislation and policy have placed increased emphasis on tracking medical device safety and effectiveness using real-world evidence (RWE).

  • The unique device identifier (UDI), available on labels of most moderate- and high-risk medical devices, ensures accurate and reliable medical device identification and tracking.

What this study adds

  • Even among health systems committed to RWE generation, UDIs are often not available within their data sources to enable effective medical device identification for RWE studies.

  • Knowledge by health system leaders about UDI benefits and buy-in about its operational and clinical benefits are necessary for UDI implementation and availability for RWE generation.

How this study might affect research, practice or policy

  • Results demonstrate the need to increase awareness and provide guidance about the value of UDI use to health system leadership.

  • Policy mandates are necessary to drive greater UDI adoption in health systems and support real-world evidence generation.

Competing Interest Statement

Dr. Dhruva receives research support from the Medical Device Innovation Consortium (MDIC) as part of the National Evaluation System for health Technology Coordinating Center (NESTcc), Greenwall Foundation, National Institute for Health Care Management, Arnold Ventures, and Department of Veterans Affairs. Dr. Ross currently receives research support through Yale University from Johnson and Johnson to develop methods of clinical trial data sharing, from the MDIC as part of the NESTcc, from the Food and Drug Administration for the Yale-Mayo Clinic Center for Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (CERSI) program (U01FD005938), from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HS022882), from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R01HS025164, R01HL144644), and from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation to establish the Good Pharma Scorecard at Bioethics International; in addition, Dr. Ross is an expert witness at the request of Relator's attorneys, the Greene Law Firm, in a qui tam suit alleging violations of the False Claims Act and Anti-Kickback Statute against Biogen Inc. Dr. Drozda has received research support from Medtronic and Johnson & Johnson. His non-dependent son is an employee of Boston Scientific. Natalia Wilson has received research support from the MDIC as part of the NESTcc, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Johnson & Johnson, and Medtronic; serves on advisory committees for the AIM North America UDI Advisory Committee, Association for Health Care Resource & Materials Management Learning UDI Community Steering Committee; reports consulting for Arizona State University's Center for Healthcare Delivery and Policy, Mass General Brigham; and had purchased stock options in Vitreos Health. The remaining author has nothing to disclose.

Funding Statement

This project was supported by a research grant from the Medical Device Innovation Consortium (MDIC) as part of the National Evaluation System for health Technology (NEST), an initiative funded by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) through grant 1U01FD006292-01. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views nor the endorsements of the Department of Health and Human Services or the FDA. While MDIC provided feedback on project conception and design, the organization played no role in collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data The research team, not the funder, made the decision to submit the manuscript for publication Views expressed in written materials or publications and by speakers and moderators do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the Department of Health and Human Services; nor does any mention of trade names, commercial practices, or organization imply endorsement by the United States Government.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Mayo Clinic Francisco Institutional Review Board gave ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data are not available given confidentiality provisions as part of informed consent.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 23, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Exploring Unique Device Identifier Implementation and Use for Real-World Evidence: A Mixed-Methods Study with NESTcc Health System Network Collaborators
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Exploring Unique Device Identifier Implementation and Use for Real-World Evidence: A Mixed-Methods Study with NESTcc Health System Network Collaborators
Sanket S. Dhruva, Jennifer L. Ridgeway, Joseph S. Ross, Joseph P. Drozda Jr., Natalia A. Wilson
medRxiv 2022.09.21.22279992; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.21.22279992
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Exploring Unique Device Identifier Implementation and Use for Real-World Evidence: A Mixed-Methods Study with NESTcc Health System Network Collaborators
Sanket S. Dhruva, Jennifer L. Ridgeway, Joseph S. Ross, Joseph P. Drozda Jr., Natalia A. Wilson
medRxiv 2022.09.21.22279992; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.21.22279992

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (216)
  • Allergy and Immunology (495)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1101)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (196)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (274)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (502)
  • Epidemiology (9782)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (481)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2318)
  • Geriatric Medicine (223)
  • Health Economics (463)
  • Health Informatics (1563)
  • Health Policy (737)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (606)
  • Hematology (238)
  • HIV/AIDS (507)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11656)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (617)
  • Medical Education (239)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (258)
  • Neurology (2148)
  • Nursing (134)
  • Nutrition (338)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (427)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (518)
  • Oncology (1183)
  • Ophthalmology (366)
  • Orthopedics (129)
  • Otolaryngology (220)
  • Pain Medicine (148)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (313)
  • Pediatrics (698)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (302)
  • Primary Care Research (267)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2188)
  • Public and Global Health (4673)
  • Radiology and Imaging (781)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (457)
  • Respiratory Medicine (624)
  • Rheumatology (274)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (226)
  • Sports Medicine (210)
  • Surgery (252)
  • Toxicology (43)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)