Abstract
In this work, we examined healthcare seeking behavior (HSB) of patients visiting public healthcare facilities in an urban context. We conducted a cross-sectional survey across twenty-two primary and secondary public healthcare facilities in the South-west Delhi district in India. The survey was designed to ascertain from patients at these facilities their HSB - i.e., on what basis patients decide the type of healthcare facility to visit, or which type of medical practitioner to consult. From each facility visited, we also collected operational information, such as the average number of patients visiting per day, and the medical services provided at each facility. Based on participant responses, we observed that factors such as wait time, prior experience with care providers, distance from the facility, and also socioeconomic and demographic factors such as annual income, educational qualification, and gender significantly influenced preferences of patients in choosing healthcare facilities. We used binomial and multinomial logistic regression to determine associations between HSB and socioeconomic and demographic attributes of patients at a 0.05 level of significance. Our statistical analyses revealed that patients in the lower income group preferred to seek treatment from public healthcare facilities (OR = 3.51, 95% CI = (1.65, 7.46)) irrespective of the perceived severity of their illness, while patients in the higher income group favored directly consulting specialized doctors (OR = 2.71, 95% CI = (1.34, 5.51)). Other factors such as having more than two children increased probability of seeking care from public facilities. This work contributes to the literature by providing quantitative evidence regarding overall patient HSB, especially at primary and secondary public healthcare facilities, regardless of their presenting illness, and operational information regarding healthcare delivery at these facilities. This work can inform policy designed to improve accessibility and quality of care at public primary and secondary healthcare facilities in India.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Najiya Fatma is funded by the Prime Minister's Research Fellowship programme funded by the Government of India.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board at the Indian Institute of Technology New Delhi approved the study protocol with approval number IITD-IEC-ID-P064 on November 25, 2019.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Her email address is mez188287{at}mech.iitd.ac.in.
He holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering from Purdue University, Indiana, USA. His email address is varunr{at}mech.iitd.ac.in.
Data Availability
Survey data can be shared upon request.
