Abstract
Introduction The relationship between the spatial availability of alcohol and alcohol-related harm is well established; however the specific components of availability which drive this relationship and how availability may best be measured remains unclear. This study applies a range of alternative measures of availability to selected areas in Great Britain to establish to what extent they are related to each other.
Methods Using a database giving low-level geographic location (full postcode) and type e.g. (bar, supermarket) of every licensed outlet selling alcohol across 4 times points (2003, 07, 10, 14) we calculated low-level measures of alcohol availability for three Local Authorities covering a spectrum of population density and deprivation. Measures were calculated based proximity, outlet density, outlet clustering and so-called ‘gravity’ measures. The relationships between measures are explored descriptively and through correlation and factor analysis.
Results The availability of alcohol is high in the selected Local Authorities, with an average of 45 outlets within 1km of any individual postcode and a mean distance of 400m to an on-trade and 900m to an off-trade outlet. Different measures display different temporal trends with the density and gravity measures having close agreement with each other while proximity measures suggest different trends. Socioeconomic patterning varies both between Local Authorities and measures chosen, with similar agreement between density and gravity measures and different patterns displayed for proximity measures.
Conclusions These findings highlight that different measures applied to different geographies may give fundamentally different characterisations of availability. The choice of availability measure used in any study does, therefore, matter and should not be made without appropriate regard to theoretical considerations
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Declaration of interest: None to declare
Data Availability
The underlying availability data is commercially sensitive and cannot be shared.
