Abstract
The geographical area around a health facility characterizing the population that utilizes some or all of its services – a health facility catchment area (HFCA)-, forms the fundamental basis of estimating reliable population denominator for disease mapping and routine healthcare planning. Consequently, the approaches used to delineate the catchment area have a direct impact on the health of a population. To date, there is no systematic literature review documenting different approaches that have been used to define HFCAs while elucidating the implications on derived population denominators. To fill this gap, we systematically reviewed literature and documented approaches that have been used to define HFCA in sub–Saharan Africa (SSA). Simple to complex approaches have been used to define catchment areas in SSA with varying degrees of complexity and limitations in the last four decades. These approaches are mainly driven by lack of geocoded data on the residential address of care seekers and their care-seeking behaviour. To generate closer-to-reality HFCA, for robust disease mapping and healthcare planning, additional data and innovative approaches balancing between model complexity and routine programmatic use are required.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
PMM is supported by the Royal Society Newton International Fellowship (number NIF/R1/201418). JNO is supported by the Global Research Institute Fellowship at the College of William and Mary. EM is supported by funds from Professor Robert Snow Wellcome Trust Principal Fellowship (number 212176). EAO is supported as a Wellcome Trust Intermediate Fellow (number 201866). PMM, EM, AM and EAO are grateful for the support of the Wellcome Trust to the Kenya Major Overseas Programme (number 203077).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
