Abstract
The article has explored the preferential publication bias of Nepal’s medical journals. To this end, it has reviewed the frequency and proportion of preferential publishing and editorial involvement in endogenous publication practices in six national medical journals registered in the Scopus database system. For the analysis of the data, social network analysis application – VOSviewer for graphical visualisation has been used. Editorial engagement in self-publishing and preferential publishing is found to be common in all journals. The study suggests that as long as the trend of preferential and sequestered publication continues, the integrity and validity generated and disseminated by the journals risks losing trust by the community concerned and the chances of these non-mainstream journals contributing to mainstream journals being slim. And, by way of recommendatory conclusions, it offers the following four questions and areas for further investigation to arrive at the clarity and understanding of some of the issues that have been flagged in the findings and discussions: (a) Why do editors engage in excess self-promotion using the outlet they are supposed to objectively and transparently manage? (b) What is the motivating factor for authors to rely on a particular journal to get published despite having multiple outlets to pick and choose from? (c) Why should the editors and reviewers of scientific contributions maintain the networking silo to include a few in the loop and exclude others from it?
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
NO
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
DP Pant (dpant{at}pri.gov.np), B Acharya (B. Acharya bacharya{at}pri.gov.np), MR Kattel (mrkattel{at}pri.gov.np)|
Data Availability
All article information used in this study is available in Scopus database. Editorial information were collected from their respective journal websites. The procedure to collect article information from the Scopus has been clearly mentioned in the manuscript
