Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Understanding the impact of COVID-19 risk perceptions on mitigation behaviors: A mixed methods approach using survey instruments and serious games

View ORCID ProfileScott C. Merrill, Sarah A. Nowak, Trisha R. Shrum, John P. Hanley, Eric M. Clark, Luke Fredrickson, View ORCID ProfileTung-Lin Liu, Robert M. Beattie, Aislinn O’Keefe, Asim Zia, Christopher J. Koliba
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.07.22278512
Scott C. Merrill
1Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405-0082, U.S.A.
2Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Scott C. Merrill
  • For correspondence: SCMerril@UVM.edu
Sarah A. Nowak
3Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Trisha R. Shrum
2Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, U.S.A.
4Department of Community Development and Applied Economics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John P. Hanley
3Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric M. Clark
1Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405-0082, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luke Fredrickson
5Department of Computer Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, 05405, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tung-Lin Liu
6Department of Food Systems. University of Vermont, 105 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tung-Lin Liu
Robert M. Beattie
5Department of Computer Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, 05405, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aislinn O’Keefe
7Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Asim Zia
2Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, U.S.A.
4Department of Community Development and Applied Economics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, U.S.A.
5Department of Computer Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, 05405, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher J. Koliba
2Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, U.S.A.
4Department of Community Development and Applied Economics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

COVID-19 risk mitigation behavior, including social distancing and mask wearing, was a principal factor influencing the spread of COVID-19. Yet this behavior, and its association with COVID-19 perceptions and beliefs, is poorly understood. Here we used a mixed methods approach combining serious game data with survey instruments to describe relationships between perceptions and behavior. Using a series of survey questions, participants were described along a spectrum denoting their perception of their susceptibility to COVID-19 associated with a list of activities. Afterwards, participants engaged with a serious game to examine behavioral responses to scenarios involving shopping at a grocery store and going to a park during simulated pandemic conditions. Messages describing the simulated infection risk were shown to drive many behavioral decisions. Another significant correlate, derived from survey results, was the participant’s perception of susceptibility associated with various activities for acquiring the COVID-19 infection. Individuals that perceived every day activities, such as grocery shopping, as unlikely to lead to a COVID-19 infection spent more time near others in the game-simulated grocery store environment compared to those that consider such activities as risky. Additionally, we found that participant behavior became increasingly risky as time progresses if they were lucky enough not to experience an infection. This reflects behavior observed in the United States and more broadly, possibly explains how people update their perception of the risk of activities. Overall, results show a link between perception and action with regards to COVID-19 and support the use of targeted risk messaging to influence behavior. Moreover, the link between reported real-world perceptions and game behavior suggest that serious games can be used as valuable tools to test policies, risk messaging and communication, with the goal of nudging individuals with varied and nuanced perceptions and belief sets towards behaviors that will reduce the impact of COVID-19.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

CJK, SCM, AZ, TS Internal grant from the University of Vermont's Gund Institute for Environment, Burlington, VT. USA (https://www.uvm.edu/gund). SAN, JPH Internal grant from the University of Vermont's Translational Global Infectious Diseases Research Center, Burlington, VT. USA (https://www.med.uvm.edu/tgircobre/home). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The University of Vermont’s Institutional Review Board approved this research Approval number# STUDY00001027. Titled: COVID-19 Outbreak Behavior Experimental Simulation Game and Survey. Consent was obtained using online using computer, and was considered a type of written consent.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data will be held in a public repository and available after acceptance.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 09, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Understanding the impact of COVID-19 risk perceptions on mitigation behaviors: A mixed methods approach using survey instruments and serious games
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Understanding the impact of COVID-19 risk perceptions on mitigation behaviors: A mixed methods approach using survey instruments and serious games
Scott C. Merrill, Sarah A. Nowak, Trisha R. Shrum, John P. Hanley, Eric M. Clark, Luke Fredrickson, Tung-Lin Liu, Robert M. Beattie, Aislinn O’Keefe, Asim Zia, Christopher J. Koliba
medRxiv 2022.08.07.22278512; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.07.22278512
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Understanding the impact of COVID-19 risk perceptions on mitigation behaviors: A mixed methods approach using survey instruments and serious games
Scott C. Merrill, Sarah A. Nowak, Trisha R. Shrum, John P. Hanley, Eric M. Clark, Luke Fredrickson, Tung-Lin Liu, Robert M. Beattie, Aislinn O’Keefe, Asim Zia, Christopher J. Koliba
medRxiv 2022.08.07.22278512; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.07.22278512

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (216)
  • Allergy and Immunology (495)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1101)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (196)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (274)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (502)
  • Epidemiology (9782)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (481)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2318)
  • Geriatric Medicine (223)
  • Health Economics (463)
  • Health Informatics (1563)
  • Health Policy (737)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (606)
  • Hematology (238)
  • HIV/AIDS (507)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11656)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (617)
  • Medical Education (239)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (258)
  • Neurology (2148)
  • Nursing (134)
  • Nutrition (338)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (427)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (518)
  • Oncology (1183)
  • Ophthalmology (366)
  • Orthopedics (129)
  • Otolaryngology (220)
  • Pain Medicine (148)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (313)
  • Pediatrics (698)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (302)
  • Primary Care Research (267)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2188)
  • Public and Global Health (4673)
  • Radiology and Imaging (781)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (457)
  • Respiratory Medicine (624)
  • Rheumatology (274)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (226)
  • Sports Medicine (210)
  • Surgery (252)
  • Toxicology (43)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)