Abstract
Objective To explore and synthesize critical factors for the scale-up of comprehensive rehabilitation care for people with non-communicable disease in low-resourced settings.
Methods A core set of 81 articles were selected from two published scoping reviews. Using the principles of thematic analysis, the core set was analysed for factors that may directly or indirectly affect the feasibility or scale-up of rehabilitation. Categories and themes were formulated via an iterative team approach using the core set (n=81). Subsequently, we triangulated the thematic analysis against our findings from a feasibility study conducted in a low-resourced, urban, setting in South Africa. Next, a validation article set (n=63) was identified by updating the searches for the respective published reviews, and a purposeful sample of articles drawn from the validation set (n=13; 20%) was used to validate the factors identified in the primary analysis based on the principles of data saturation.
Findings A total of 40 different themes (i.e., critical factors) were derived from 169 categories. Subsequently the identified factors could be packaged into nine system elements principal for the scale-up of rehabilitation for people with NCDs in terms of increasing population coverage, increasing comprehensiveness, and integration within existing health structures.
Conclusion A multitude of factors which affect the feasibility and scale-up of rehabilitation for NCDs in low resource settings were identified. These factors are multi-dimensional and multi-directional. Researchers and policy makers should consider these factors and their interconnectedness when planning to address the rehabilitation needs through implementation and scale-up initiatives.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
PACTR201807847711940
Clinical Protocols
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30975678/
Funding Statement
Parts of this study were funded by the AXA Research Fund (S005949)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was obtained from the Stellenbosch University Health Research and Ethics council (HREC2-2018-0913), and Western Cape Health Research Committee (WC-201806-027).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Declarations of interest: none
Data Availability
All data produced from published literature are contained in the manuscript or supplementary files. Primary data is available upon reasonable request to the authors.
