Abstract
Background Fear of movement is thought to interfere with the recovery from low back pain (LBP). To date, the relationship between fear of movement and postural balance has not been adequately elucidated. Recent findings suggest that more specific fears need to be assessed and put in relation to a specific movement task. We propose that the fear to bend the trunk in a certain direction is distinctly related to the amount of postural sway in different directions. Therefore, our aim was to investigate whether fear of movement in general and fear of bending the trunk in a certain plane is related to postural sway.
Methods Data was collected from participants with LBP during two assessments approximately three weeks apart. Postural sway was measured with a force-platform during quiet standing with the eyes closed. Fear of movement was assessed with an abbreviated version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) and custom items referring to fear of bending the trunk in the sagittal and the frontal plane.
Results Based on data from 25 participants, fear of bending the trunk in the frontal plane was positively related to displacement in the sagittal and frontal plane and to velocity in the frontal plane (X2 =4.35, P=.04; X2 =8.15, P=.004; X2 =9.79, P=.002). Fear of bending the trunk in the sagittal plane was not associated with any direction specific measure of sway. A positive relation of the TSK-11 with velocity of the frontal plane (X2 =7.14, P=.008) was found, but no association with undirected measures of sway.
Discussion Fear of bending the trunk in the frontal plane may be especially relevant to postural sway under the investigated stance conditions. It is possible that fear of bending the trunk in the frontal plane could interfere with balance control at the hip, shifting the weight from side to side to control balance.
Conclusion For the first time the directional relationship of fear of movement and postural sway was studied. Fear of bending the trunk in the frontal plane was positively associated with several measures of postural sway.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
http://wwww.doi.org/10.2196/26982
Funding Statement
This project was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) as a part of the National Research Program 'Big Data' (NRP 75, Grant Nr: 167302).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was received from the Cantonal Ethics Committee Zurich, Switzerland (BASEC-2018-02132).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Introduction expanded, clarification of methods, better language, discussion clearer and organized, expanded table 2, removal of statistics in figures.
Data Availability
Raw data that support the findings of this study cannot be made publicly available to protect participants' rights according to Swiss human research law. The deidentified individual participant data that underly the results of this paper can be accessed by investigators who (1) submit a methodological sound proposal describing the intended analysis and as reviewed by the authors of this publication, (2) provide proof of relevant ethical approval for the intended analysis, and (3) fulfill data protection measures according to Swiss legal requirements.
