Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Acceptability, willingness to use and preferred distribution models of oral-based HIV self-testing kits among key and priority populations enrolled in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis clinics in central Uganda. A mixed-methods cross-sectional study

John Bosco Junior Matovu, Roy William Mayega, View ORCID ProfileSylivia Nalubega, Jayne Byakika-Tusiime
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.27.22278119
John Bosco Junior Matovu
1School of Public Health, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mtvbosco@gmail.com
Roy William Mayega
2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sylivia Nalubega
3Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Soroti University, Soroti, Uganda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sylivia Nalubega
Jayne Byakika-Tusiime
4Department of Public Health, School of Health Sciences, Soroti University, Soroti, Uganda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Key Populations (KPs) and Priority Populations (PPs) taking Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention require routine HIV testing every after three months. HIV self-testing could be an alternative testing approach for these population categories. We assessed the acceptability of oral-based HIV Self-Testing (HIVST) among Key and priority Populations taking PrEP in central Uganda. A mixed methods cross-sectional study was conducted on 367 key and priority populations attending Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis clinics in central Uganda, from May to August 2018. KPs and PPs were introduced to the Oraquick HIV self-testing kit as an option for HIV testing during their routine visit to the PrEP clinic. A demonstration of how to perform HIV self-testing was conducted using an Oraquick demonstration video and leaflet inserts after which, respondents were asked to choose between HIVST and the conventional facility blood-based HIV testing. Those willing to use the oral kit were asked to voluntarily consent, were provided with an Oraquick HIVST kit and were assisted to perform the test. Quantitative data were presented as proportions for each outcome variable. Thematic analysis was performed to explore factors that promote and inhibit HIVST. HIV self-testing acceptability; defined as the proportion of those who performed an HIVST test among those approached was 99.5% (365/367). Using an oral fluid-based kit “Oraquick” was reported to be free of pain, convenient, easy to use and time saving hence preferred over other HIV testing modalities. A multimodal approach to distributing HIV self-testing kits was suggested by respondents. Oral-based HIV self-testing is highly acceptable among key and priority populations taking Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and can be adopted as an alternative to the conventional routine three monthly facility-based provider dependent HIV screening. Kits’ distribution may employ several models. Majority of key populations would afford the kits at a cost of not more than 1.4USD if not provided free of charge.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The research was fully funded by the principal investigator and no external support was received from any organization for this study

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study was protocol was reviewed and approved by the Busitema University Faculty of Health Sciences Higher Degrees and Research Committee and the Mbale Regional Referral Hospital Research and Ethics Committee (Ref No. MRRH-REC-IN-COM 024/2018). All respondents provided written informed consent and were free to opt out of the study at any stage of the study. Two emancipated minors aged 17 years belonging to the adolescent girls and young women category were considered for the study and written informed consent was obtained from each of their guardians before they were enrolled to participate in the study

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Deidentified data will be made available by contacting the study PI, mtvbosco@gmail.com but is also available at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XLBZXD

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XLBZXD

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 29, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Acceptability, willingness to use and preferred distribution models of oral-based HIV self-testing kits among key and priority populations enrolled in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis clinics in central Uganda. A mixed-methods cross-sectional study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Acceptability, willingness to use and preferred distribution models of oral-based HIV self-testing kits among key and priority populations enrolled in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis clinics in central Uganda. A mixed-methods cross-sectional study
John Bosco Junior Matovu, Roy William Mayega, Sylivia Nalubega, Jayne Byakika-Tusiime
medRxiv 2022.07.27.22278119; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.27.22278119
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Acceptability, willingness to use and preferred distribution models of oral-based HIV self-testing kits among key and priority populations enrolled in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis clinics in central Uganda. A mixed-methods cross-sectional study
John Bosco Junior Matovu, Roy William Mayega, Sylivia Nalubega, Jayne Byakika-Tusiime
medRxiv 2022.07.27.22278119; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.27.22278119

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • HIV/AIDS
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (227)
  • Allergy and Immunology (500)
  • Anesthesia (110)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1226)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (205)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (282)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (526)
  • Epidemiology (9990)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (496)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2430)
  • Geriatric Medicine (236)
  • Health Economics (479)
  • Health Informatics (1632)
  • Health Policy (750)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (632)
  • Hematology (247)
  • HIV/AIDS (528)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11840)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (623)
  • Medical Education (250)
  • Medical Ethics (73)
  • Nephrology (267)
  • Neurology (2266)
  • Nursing (139)
  • Nutrition (348)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (449)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (532)
  • Oncology (1241)
  • Ophthalmology (375)
  • Orthopedics (133)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (154)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (324)
  • Pediatrics (727)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (311)
  • Primary Care Research (280)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2272)
  • Public and Global Health (4814)
  • Radiology and Imaging (832)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (486)
  • Respiratory Medicine (649)
  • Rheumatology (283)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (237)
  • Sports Medicine (224)
  • Surgery (266)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (123)
  • Urology (99)