Abstract
Measurement of the adverse outcomes of repeated head trauma in contact sport athletes is often achieved using tests where the comparator is the ‘score’ or the ‘accuracy’ obtained. While it is expected that ex-athletes would perform worse than controls, previous studies have shown inconsistent results. Here we have attempted to address these inconsistencies from a different perspective by quantifying not only accuracy, but also the time of motor responses (response time). We tested age-matched control subjects who have never experienced head trauma (n=20; 41.8 ± 14.4 years), and two cohorts of retired contact sport athletes with a history of head trauma and concussions; one with self-reported concerns (n=36; 45.4 ± 12.6 years), and another with no ongoing concerns (n=19; 43.1 ± 13.5 years). Participants performed cognitive (Cogstate) and somatosensory (Cortical Metrics) testing and both accuracy and response time were recorded. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was undertaken to investigate corticospinal conduction and excitability. Results showed that in both test batteries there was little difference between groups when considering only accuracy scores. By contrast, response times in all but one test revealed that ex-athletes with self-reported concerns were significantly slower compared to no concern ex-athlete or control groups (p ranges 0.031 to <0.001). TMS latency showed significantly increased conduction time (p=0.008) in the group with ongoing concerns. These findings suggest that incorporating response times in cognitive and somatosensory testing is more informative than considering accuracy scores alone when assessing cognitive processing ability in retired contact sport athletes with ongoing brain health concerns.
Competing Interest Statement
This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. AJP currently receives partial research salary funding from Erasmus+ strategic partnerships program (2019-1-IE01-KA202-051555). AJP has previously received partial research funding from the Sports Health Check Charity (Australia), Australian Football League, Impact Technologies Inc., and Samsung Corporation, and is remunerated for expert advice to medico-legal practices. The development and manufacture of the Cortical Metrics device used in this study has received partial funding from the Office of Naval Research (USA). MT is a director of Cortical Metrics LLC who has a license from the University of North Carolina to distribute the Brain Gauge device used in this study. No other author has any declaration of interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
La Trobe university Human Research Ethics Committee granted approval for all methods in the study (HEC18005)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors approved by the requester's research institution.
