Abstract
Objectives In the Netherlands, during the first phase of the COVID-19 epidemic, the hotspot of COVID-19 overlapped with the country’s main livestock area, while in subsequent phases this distinct spatial pattern disappeared. Previous studies show that living near livestock farms influence human respiratory health and immunological responses. This study aimed to explore whether proximity to livestock was associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Methods The associations between residential (6-digit postal-code) distance to the nearest livestock farm and individuals’ SARS-CoV-2 status was studied in multilevel logistic regression models, comparing individuals notified with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test to the general population in the Netherlands. Data included all reported Dutch laboratory-confirmed patients with disease onset before 1 January 2022. Individuals living in strongly urbanised areas and border areas were excluded. Models were adjusted for individuals’ age categories, the social status of the postal code area, particulate matter (PM10)-and nitrogen dioxide (NO2)-concentrations. We analysed data for the entire period and population as well as separately for eight time periods (Jan-Mar, Apr-Jun, Jul-Sep and Oct-Dec in 2020 and 2021), four geographic areas of the Netherlands (north, east, west and south), and for five age categories (0-14, 15-24, 25-44, 45-64 and > 65 years).
Results Over the period 2020-2021, individuals’ SARS-CoV-2 status was associated with living closer to livestock farms. This association increased from an Odds Ratio (OR) of 1.01 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.01-1.02) for patients living at a distance of 751-1000 m to a farm to an OR of 1.04 (95% CI 1.04-1.04), 1.07 (95% CI 1.06-1.07) and 1.11 (95% CI 1.10-1.12) for patients living in the more proximate 501-750 m, 251-500m and 0-250 m zones around farms, all relative to patients living further than 1000 m around farms. This association was observed in three out of four quarters of the year in both 2020 and 2021, and in all studied geographic areas and age groups.
Conclusions In this exploratory study with individual SARS-CoV-2 notification data and high-resolution spatial data associations were found between living near livestock farms and individuals’ SARS-CoV-2 status in the Netherlands. Verification of the results in other countries is warranted, as well as investigations into possible underlying mechanisms.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded from the regular budget (project V/150207/20/RI), COVID-19 budget (projects D/111001/01/CO and V/190035/22/EB) and the Strategic Program (SPR) (project S/113002/01/IC) of the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), made available by the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport of the Netherlands The funding sources had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Centre for Clinical Expertise at the RIVM assessed the research proposal following the specific conditions as stated in the law for medical research involving human subjects (WMO). In their opinion the research does not fulfill one or both of these conditions and therefore conclude it is exempted for further approval by the ethical research committee. Pathogen surveillance is a legal task of the RIVM (artikel 3 Wet RIVM, article 3 Law RIVM) and is carried out under the responsibility of the Minister of Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS). Article 6c (artikel 6c) of the Public Health Act (Wet Publieke Gezondheid) provides that RIVM may receive pseudonymised data for this task without individual consent of each case.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. Restrictions apply to the availability of case-based data.
