Abstract
Objectives Debriefing has been pivotal in medical simulation training but its application to the real-world operating room environment has been challenging. We aimed to review the literature on routine surgical debriefing with specific reference to its implementation, barriers, and effectiveness.
Methods Inclusion criteria were studies pertaining to debriefing in routine practice in the operating room. Excluded were studies on simulation and training. We searched the databases Google Scholar, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, PsychINFO, Medline, Embase, and ProQuest Theses & Dissertations Global. The last search was performed in March 2022. Quality was assessed on a 21-point checklist adapted from a standard reporting guideline. Synthesis was descriptive.
Results The search identified 19 papers. Publication date ranged from 2007 – 2022. Five studies involved a specific intervention. Methodology of studies included surveys, interviews, and analysis of administrative data. Quality scores ranged from 12 – 19 out of 21. On synthesis we identified four topics: explanations of how debriefing had been implemented; the learning dimensions of debriefing, both team learning and quality improvement at the organisational level; the effect of debriefing on patient safety or the organisation’s culture; and the barriers to debriefing.
Conclusion Debriefing is valuable for team learning, efficiency, patient safety, and psychological safety. Successful implementation programs were characterised by strong commitment from management and support by frontline workers. Integration with administrative quality and safety processes, and information feedback to frontline workers, are fundamental to successful debriefing programs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the University of Auckland (Summer Studentship grants for two authors) and a Starhip Foundation Grant.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript and supplementary material