Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Concurrent gliomas in patients with multiple sclerosis

Katharina Sahm, Tobias Kessler, View ORCID ProfilePhilipp Eisele, Miriam Ratliff, Elena Sperk, Laila König, Michael O. Breckwoldt, Corinna Seliger, Iris Mildenberger, Daniel Schrimpf, Christel Herold-Mende, View ORCID ProfilePia S. Zeiner, Ghazaleh Tabatabai, Sven G. Meuth, David Capper, Martin Bendszus, Andreas von Deimling, Wolfgang Wick, View ORCID ProfileFelix Sahm, View ORCID ProfileMichael Platten
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.01.22277047
Katharina Sahm
1Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
2Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: katharina.sahm{at}umm.de
Tobias Kessler
3Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
4Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philipp Eisele
1Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Philipp Eisele
Miriam Ratliff
5Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elena Sperk
6Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laila König
7Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael O. Breckwoldt
2Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
8Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Corinna Seliger
4Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
9Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit and Department of Neurology, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Iris Mildenberger
1Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
2Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Schrimpf
10Department of Neuropathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
11Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christel Herold-Mende
12Division of Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pia S. Zeiner
13Dr Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Pia S. Zeiner
Ghazaleh Tabatabai
14Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neurooncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhar Karls University Tübingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sven G. Meuth
15Department of Neurology, Institute of Translational Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Capper
16Department of Neuropathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
17German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Bendszus
8Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas von Deimling
10Department of Neuropathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
11Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang Wick
3Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
4Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Felix Sahm
10Department of Neuropathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
11Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Felix Sahm
Michael Platten
1Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
2Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael Platten
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Concurrent malignant brain tumors in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) constitute a rare but paradigmatic phenomenon for studying neuroimmunological mechanisms from both molecular and clinical perspectives.

Methods A multicenter cohort of 26 patients diagnosed with both primary brain tumors and multiple sclerosis was studied for disease localization, tumor treatment-related MS activity, and molecular characteristics specific for diffuse glioma in MS patients.

Results MS neither predisposes nor protects from the development of gliomas. Patients with glioblastoma WHO grade IV without IDH mutations had a longstanding history of MS, whereas patients diagnosed with IDH-mutant astrocytoma WHO grade II received multiple sclerosis diagnosis mostly at the same time or later. Concurrent MS was associated with a lesser extent of tumor resection and a worse prognosis in IDH-mutant glioma patients (PFS 32 vs. 64 months, p=0.0206). When assessing tumor-intrinsic differences no distinct subgroup-defining methylation pattern was identified in gliomas of MS patients compared to other glioma samples. However, differential methylation of immune-related genetic loci including human leukocyte antigen locus on 6p21 and interleukin locus on 5q31 was found in MS patients vs. matched non-MS patients. In line, inflammatory disease activity increased in 42% of multiple sclerosis patients after brain tumor radiotherapy suggesting a susceptibility of multiple sclerosis brain tissue to pro-inflammatory stimuli such as ionizing radiation.

Conclusions Concurrent low-grade gliomas should be considered in multiple sclerosis patients with slowly progressive, expansive T2/FLAIR lesions. Our findings of typically reduced extent of resection in MS patients and increased MS activity after radiation inform future treatment decisions.

Key points

  • – Disease history and sequence of diagnosis differ in MS patients with high-vs low-grade glioma

  • – Gliomas of MS patients harbor subtle methylation changes in immune-related genetic regions

  • – Brain tumor radiotherapy is followed by MS disease activity

Importance of the study Immune escape is a hallmark of diffuse glioma, while inflammation is the underlying mechanism of multiple sclerosis. These opposing mechanisms concur in patients that suffer in parallel from multiple sclerosis and glioma. This study is the first to investigate the tumor characteristics, tumor treatment responses and effect on multiple sclerosis activity of a cohort of patients with both diseases. The data warrant caution in the interpretation of suspicious lesions in imaging and suggests risk loci for the observed detrimental effects of radiation specific to MS patients.

Introduction

Gliomas have been reported in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) 1,2. As immune surveillance is critical in cancer development, a possible causal “immuno-genetic” relationship between neuroinflammatory diseases and malignant brain tumors has been repeatedly discussed 3. Proposed cancer-promoting mechanisms include a malignant transformation of multiple sclerosis plaques 4 and immunosuppression induced by immunomodulatory therapies 5,6,7. However, two population-based studies could not verify an altered risk for gliomas in patients with MS 8,9.

From a clinical perspective, concurrent brain tumors may interfere with the diagnosis and course of MS and vice versa. MS lesions can mimic cerebral malignancies in conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 10, and misdiagnosing brain tumor symptoms as relapse in patients with known MS can delay appropriate tumor treatment 2. Moreover, due to the limited number of cases and lack of detailed analyses of clinical and imaging disease patterns, outcome, and molecular profiling, little is known about the effects of radio- and chemotherapy on MS disease activity and progression.

Discovering the role of epigenetic regulations such as histone modification or DNA methylation for susceptibility, progression, and treatment response of brain tumors has resulted in a fundamental shift in molecular classification and subtyping 11,12. In contrast to distinct brain tumor methylomes, epigenetic changes in non-neoplastic diseases are subtler. In MS, aberrant DNA methylation patterns affect disease development and pathogenesis by mediating inflammatory response and neurodegeneration 13. Interestingly, methylation differences are not only seen in pathologically altered tissue but can also be recapitulated in normal-appearing white matter or peripheral blood cells of MS patients and mainly occur in immune-related genes 14.

While the failure of immune surveillance is crucial for pathogenesis in both conditions, the complex interplay between the immune microenvironment, genetic alterations, and epigenetic regulation is only partly understood.

In this study, we analyzed clinical, imaging, and molecular data of a multicenter cohort of 26 patients with MS and concurrent glioma to determine if brain tumors in MS patients are molecularly distinct and if concurrent MS affects tumor prognosis and occurrence of treatment-associated adverse events.

Materials and Methods

Study population

In this multicenter, retrospective analysis, we collected 30 brain tumor tissue samples diagnosed between 01 January 2001 and 31 December 2017 and clinical and radiographical data of patients with reported multiple sclerosis from the Departments of Neuropathology, Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg; the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim of Heidelberg University; Dr Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University of Frankfurt, and the Department of Neurology, University of Tübingen (all located in Germany). Four cases were excluded due to tumor histology other than glioma or insufficient proof of multiple sclerosis diagnosis according to the revised McDonald criteria 15 resulting in a study population of 26 patients in the experimental cohort. Control cases with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant 1p19q-intact astrocytoma WHO grade II or IDH-wildtype glioblastoma WHO grade IV were collected from the Departments of Neuropathology, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg, and matched for tumor histology and the known prognostic markers IDH- and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT)-status, age at diagnosis, and Karnofsky-Index. Tissue sample collection and data collection and use were performed following local ethics regulations and approved by the local ethics committee (ethics votes 005/2003, 2013-832R-MA, 2018-614N-MA).

Clinical assessments

Progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from brain tumor surgery to the date of tumor progression, was assessed based on follow-up imaging performed under the response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria 16,17. The overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from surgery to the date of decease. Multiple sclerosis disease activity was assessed based on clinical attacks and MRI follow-up according to the revised McDonald criteria 15.

Methylation analysis

Bioinformatic analysis of Illumina 450k methylation array data was performed with customized scripts adapted from the R (www.r-project.org) based library “ChAMP” (version: 2.10.116) as described previously 18. At the Genomics and Proteomics Core Facility of the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) in Heidelberg, Germany, the Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip and kits (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) were used according to manufacturer’s instructions to obtain the DNA methylation status at >450,000 sites in paraffin-embedded tissue derived from glioma patients with MS and matched controls. Raw data was loaded using the load() function in “ChAMP”. For multi-hit sites, SNPs, and XY chromosome related CpGs data was filtered; next, data was normalized with a BMIQ based method and analyzed for batch effects with a singular value decomposition (SVD) algorithm. There was no significant batch to be corrected. Respective functions were used to assess differentially methylated regions (DMR). Principle component analysis was used for dimensionality reduction. Circos plots showing DMR distribution were constructed with the package “OmicCircos” (version: 1.26.0).

Statistical analyses

Logistic regression analyses to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed to compare clinical characteristics in the experimental cohort and control cohort. Distribution of survival times was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared between groups with the log-rank test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Data availability

Source code can be made available on reasonable request.

Results

Clinical characteristics of patients with multiple sclerosis and concurrent glioma

A multicenter, retrospective cohort of 26 patients with both MS and diffuse glioma, meeting the predefined inclusion criteria was assembled from four centers (Figure 1, Supplementary Table 1). A survey of 2809 brain tumor patients (C71 ICD-10-GM), diagnosed between 01 January 2007 and 31 December 2015, revealed no evidence of increased MS prevalence compared to published cohorts with or without autoimmune diseases (Anssar et al., 2020) (Supplementary Table 2). All gliomas had an astrocytic morphology, with IDH-mutant astrocytomas WHO grade II being the most frequent brain tumors in MS patients (46%), followed by IDH-wildtype glioblastomas WHO grade IV (31%). Median age at tumor diagnosis was 32.5 years for IDH-mutant astrocytomas and 59 years for glioblastomas, both within the age range expected for these tumor types 19 (Figure 2 A, Supplementary Table 3, 4). The mean age at MS diagnosis was 31 years and 40 years, respectively (Figure 2 B, Supplementary Table 5). The MS symptom course was relapsing-remitting in 19/26 (73%) cases and secondary progressive in 4/26 (15%). All patients had radiologically proven cerebral inflammatory lesions, 6/26 (23%) had spinal lesions, and 7/26 (27%) had optic neuritis. 15/26 (58%) patients received immunomodulatory treatment (Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Figure 1 B).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1 Consort flow diagram of the multicenter study
Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2 Clinical and radiological characteristics of 19 patients with multiple sclerosis and concurrent glioma.

A+B Scatter dot plot of patients’ age at initial histologically proven diagnosis of glioma depending on the mutation status of isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH) in patients with concurrent multiple sclerosis (MS) or control patients without multiple sclerosis (ctl) (A), and patients’ age at initial multiple sclerosis diagnosis depending on tumoral IDH mutation status (B). Depicted are single and mean values with SEM.

C Chronology of multiple sclerosis and glioma diagnosis depending on tumor histology judged by IDH mutation status.

D Schematic representation of glioma location in patients with concurrent multiple sclerosis depending on tumoral IDH mutation status. Dots represent single patients.

E MRI with axial FLAIR and contrast-enhanced T1 images of a patient with multiple sclerosis and concurrent IDH-mutant astrocytoma WHO grade II (p02, upper row) and of a patient with multiple sclerosis and IDH-wildtype glioblastoma WHO grade IV (p08, lower row).

F Schematic representation of the spatial relation of multiple sclerosis lesions and IDH-mutant astrocytomas (red) or IDH-wildtype glioblastomas (blue) in patients with concurrent diseases.

While patients diagnosed with glioblastoma had a longstanding history of CNS inflammatory disease, patients diagnosed with IDH-mutant astrocytoma received MS diagnosis mostly at the same time or later. Subsequently, glioblastomas arose near existing inflammatory lesions, while IDH-mutant astrocytomas developed from radiologically normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) (Figure 2 D, E, F).

Concurrent multiple sclerosis diagnosis is associated with worse prognosis of IDH-mutant astrocytomas

Next, clinical data from glioma patients with concurrent MS were compared with data from control patients without MS and matched for tumor histology and the known prognostic markers IDH- and MGMT-status, age at diagnosis, and Karnofsky-Index (Supplementary Table 3, 4). The glioblastoma-related neurological symptoms and distinct radiological morphology led to prompt radiological tumor suspicion and subsequent histological diagnosis independent of MS comorbidity. In contrast, radiological findings in most MS patients with IDH-mutant astrocytoma WHO grade II occurred incidentally, with a median time of 21 months (0 – 68) between initial MRI suspicion and histological diagnosis (Figure 3 A, B). However, glioma size at the time of histological diagnosis was comparable between MS and control groups for both tumor types (Figure 3 C). For non-contrast enhancing lesions, results from non-invasive MRI spectroscopy could support tumor suspicion in one patient (Supplementary Figure 2). Glioma diagnosis was confirmed by biopsy in 14/26 (54%) cases, and 12/26 (46%) received partial or complete tumor resection. Remarkably, the proportion of patients receiving tumor biopsy was higher in MS patients than controls independent of tumor histology (29% vs. 14% for IDH-wildtype; 50% vs. 25% for IDH-mutant) (Figure 3 D). While all glioblastoma patients received standard tumor-specific treatment, except one non-MS patient receiving best supportive care, the majority of patients with IDH-mutant astrocytomas were primarily treated with a watchful waiting approach according to the current standard of care independent of MS diagnosis (Figure 3 E). As expected 20, patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastomas showed a significantly shorter PFS compared to patients with IDH-mutant astrocytomas independent of concurrent MS. Of note, multiple sclerosis was associated with a worse prognosis in IDH-mutant tumors only (PFS 32 vs. 64 months, p=0.0206) (Figure 3 F, Supplementary Figure 1 D). The limited sample size did not allow to firmly establish the impact of immunomodulatory treatments on brain tumor progression (Supplementary Figure 1 E).

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 3 Clinical course of brain tumor disease in patients with glioma and concurrent multiple sclerosis

A Percentage of patients with or without glioma-caused neurological symptoms leading to initial tumor diagnosis in patients with concurrent multiple sclerosis (MS) or matched controls (ctl) depending on tumoral IDH mutation status.

B Time between radiological tumor suspicion and subsequent histological diagnosis.

C Tumor size as detected by MRI at the time of histological diagnosis in patients with concurrent multiple sclerosis or matched controls depending on tumoral IDH mutation status. Displayed are the products of the two largest perpendicular diameters (cm2) in axial FLAIR or contrast-enhanced T1 images for IDH-mutant astrocytomas WHO grade II and IDH-wildtype glioblastomas, respectively.

D Percentage of patients receiving tumor biopsy, partial, or complete resection.

E Type of adjuvant tumor therapy depending on concurrent multiple sclerosis diagnosis and IDH mutation status.

F Kaplan–Meier analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) after primary tumor treatment depending on IDH status and concurrent multiple sclerosis diagnosis

Glioma radiotherapy as a possible risk factor for multiple sclerosis disease activity

The majority of patients were treated with radiotherapy (RT) alone or in combination with chemotherapy at one time during the course of brain tumor disease (83% in the IDH-mutant and 71% in the IDH-wildtype cohort) (Figure 4 A, Supplementary Figure 1 C). While none of the IDH-mutant astrocytoma patients showed clinical or radiological signs of multiple sclerosis disease activity according to NEDA-3 criteria within the 12 months prior to starting RT, 5/12 patients (42%) with multiple sclerosis and IDH-mutant astrocytoma showed disease activity within 12 months after RT, with an average of 1.4 clinical relapses. Remarkably, 89% of clinical episodes occurred within the first six months after RT and were associated with new contrast-enhancing lesions within or adjacent to the radiation field (Figure 4, Supplementary Figure 1 F). In 3/5 patients, radiation-associated neuroinflammation occurred despite immunomodulatory treatment, and in 2/5 patients, multiple sclerosis was initially diagnosed within six months after RT. Interestingly, one patient with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma experienced long-term survival with no evidence of tumor recurrence for eight years following radiation-induced pseudo-progression. The radiographical increase in disease activity was accompanied by neurological deterioration, leading to the initial diagnosis of a chronic progressive multiple sclerosis course eight months after completion of radiotherapy (Figure 5).

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 4 Association between radiotherapy and multiple sclerosis disease activity

A Percentage of patients with or without radiotherapy (RT) treatment during the course of brain tumor disease depending on concurrent multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis and tumoral IDH mutation status.

B Percentage of patients with or without clinical or radiological multiple sclerosis disease activity in the 12 months preceding (left bar) and after RT (right bar).

C Scatter dot plot of the number of clinical episodes per patient for six multiple sclerosis patients in the 12 months preceding and after RT. Depicted are single and mean values with SEM.

D Time course of cumulative clinical multiple sclerosis episodes for five multiple sclerosis patients experiencing disease activity in the 12 months after RT.

E MRI with axial FLAIR images of two patients showing new demyelinating lesions (arrows) after RT within the 50% isodose line (p02 photon irradiation 60/2Gy; p47 proton irradiation 54/1.8Gy).

Figure 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 5 Long-term response after radiation-induced pseudoprogression

Representation of isodoses (Gy) and longitudinal MRIs with axial FLAIR images (left column) and contrast-enhanced axial T1 images (right column) of a patient (p08) with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma WHO grade IV. Transient contrast enhancement within the tumor area corresponding to radiation-induced pseudoprogression with a maximum of 8 months after completion of radiotherapy (60/2Gy) is associated with an increase in subcortical multiple sclerosis lesions (arrows) and the initial diagnosis of a chronic progressive multiple sclerosis course. Long term follow-up shows a moderate generalized brain atrophy (stars) without evidence of glioblastoma recurrence up to 8 years after initial tumor therapy.

Genome-wide methylation analysis of glioma samples identified DMRs associated with neuroinflammation

Genome-wide methylation patterns of glioma tissue from 12 multiple sclerosis patients and the matched control cohort without multiple sclerosis were compared to address the question if chronic neuroinflammation may predispose susceptibility to the exacerbation of focal disease activity on a molecular level in multiple sclerosis patients after radiotherapy (Supplementary Table 3, 4). While principal component analysis and unsupervised clustering revealed no distinct subgroup-defining methylation pattern depending on multiple sclerosis diagnosis, analysis of DMRs identified 117 DMRs in IDH-mutant astrocytomas and 103 DMRs in IDH-wildtype glioblastomas, with 11 common DMRs possibly associated with multiple sclerosis (Figure 6 A, Supplementary Figure 3). Interestingly, DMRs build a hotspot on the short arm of chromosome 6 (p21.32) within the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region (Figure 6 B). The HLA system plays a critical role in immune regulation by presenting epitopes to leukocytes and thereby releasing antigen-specific immune responses 21. For multiple sclerosis, the HLA system has been shown to comprise major susceptibility loci (Gourraud et al., 2012), and the aberrant methylation patterns of specific HLA genes in NAWM of multiple sclerosis patients are thought to be relevant for multiple sclerosis etiology (Huynh et al., 2014). Moreover, most known multiple sclerosis risk genes belong to the immune system, and genetic regions related to innate immunity are thought to constitute glioma risk factors (Plantone et al., 2015). In line, additional DMRs are located on chromosome 5q31 within the interleukin (IL) region and include genes associated with myelinization and immune function (Supplementary Table 6). These data suggest that epigenetic changes in inflammatory genes in NAWM predispose to exacerbation of neuroinflammation by focal irradiation.

Figure 6
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 6 Genome-wide DNA methylation changes between gliomas of patients with concurrent multiple sclerosis and controls

A Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of methylation profiles from 850k methylation array data of 12 glioma tissue in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and matched controls.

B Circos plot showing DMR between patients with and without multiple sclerosis separately for IDHmut (inner two circles) and IDHwt tumors (outer two circles) on each of the human chromosomes with a zoom in on chromosome 6. The inner cirle of the respective comparisons show the average methylation, the outer circle the area of the DMR.

Discussion

Multiple sclerosis with concurrent glioma is a rare phenomenon, with only a few cases reported 9,22-24. From an immunological perspective, both diseases comprise opposed paradigmatic conditions within the central nervous system (CNS), with excessive immune reactions causing multiple sclerosis and profound immunosuppression enabling glioma progression, respectively 25,26,27. The role of underlying onco-immunological mechanisms for disease susceptibility and etiology has been repeatedly discussed without answering the question of an incidental co-existence or causal relationship 22,28,3. In this context, epigenetic mechanisms could play an essential role. While region-specific changes in DNA methylation occur in multiple sclerosis brains 14, the methylome is known as a diagnostic and predictive factor in primary brain tumors 3,12. By comparative analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation patterns of gliomas occurring in patients with and without concurrent multiple sclerosis, we could identify DMRs involving immune-relevant genes such as HLA and interleukin regions (Figure 6). Although the pathophysiological relevance remains unproven, these results support previous findings of subtle but widespread and persistent epigenetic changes in the CNS tissue of multiple sclerosis patients 14 and could reflect underlying (subclinical) neuroinflammation.

One major clinical challenge is the accurate detection of brain malignancies in patients with known multiple sclerosis, where especially early non-enhancing gliomas could be misdiagnosed as multiple sclerosis lesions. On the other hand, tumefactive multiple sclerosis lesions can mimic brain tumors when viewed with conventional MRI techniques 2. In our cohort, the vast majority of IDH-mutant astrocytomas in patients suffering from multiple sclerosis were incidentally detected during routine radiological follow-up. Although an average of almost two years passed until histological validation was realized, MRI tumor size at the time of surgery was comparable to that of the control group in which further diagnostic procedures were triggered by neurological symptoms. Remarkably, a relevant proportion of multiple sclerosis patients received tumor biopsy only without further resection, which might have contributed to an unfavorable prognosis (Figure 3). Although the small sample sizes constitute a major limitation, our data suggest the importance of an additional diagnostic work-up, the early biopsy of atypical or suspicious lesions, and in case of a brain tumor diagnosis a second surgery to allow for (partial) resection as a known prognostic marker.

So far, little is known about the disease course of multiple sclerosis patients with concurrent brain tumors. While at the early stages of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, clinical episodes associated with inflammatory lesions largely recover, incomplete recovery causes secondary disease progression over time 29. Although some case series suggest a positive impact of brain tumors on multiple sclerosis disease course 30, conclusive data including the role of brain cancer treatments and multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies are lacking. Our data support the concept of radiation-induced inflammation in multiple sclerosis, with close to half the patients presenting with clinical or radiological signs of disease activity after glioma radiotherapy, while showing no evident disease activity before radiotherapy (Figure 4). One patient experienced a complete long-term response after radiation-induced pseudo-progression (Figure 5). The role of secondary immune effects including release of tumor antigens for the response to radiotherapy is well known 31, and a combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy has shown synergistic effects also in brain tumors 32. Thus, based on this paradigmatic concurrence of immunologically opposed CNS diseases, our data could support the concept of combined radioimmunotherapy to treat brain cancer.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Supplementary Figure 1 Clinical and radiological characteristics of 19 patients with multiple sclerosis and concurrent glioma.

A Gender distribution of patient and control cohorts.

B Percentage of patients with and without disease-modifying treatment during the course of MS depending on tumoral IDH mutation status.

C Percentage of patients with and without chemotherapy (CT) treatment during the course of brain tumor disease depending on concurrent MS diagnosis and tumoral IDH mutation status.

D Kaplan–Meier analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with IDH mutant astrocytoma and concurrent multiple sclerosis after primary tumor treatment depending on immunomodulatory therapy.

E Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival (OS) after primary tumor treatment depending on IDH status and concurrent multiple sclerosis diagnosis.

F MRI with axial FLAIR images of patient p47 showing the tumoral lesion before and after RT with stable disease according to RANO criteria.

Supplementary Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Supplementary Figure 2 MRI spectroscopy

MRI scan of multiple sclerosis patient p28 with axial FLAIR images and spectroscopy demonstrating choline-increase and N-acetyl-aspartate decrease in an IDH-mutant astrocytoma WHO grade II.

Supplementary Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Supplementary Figure 3 Genome-wide DNA methylation changes of gliomas in patients with concurrent multiple sclerosis

A Principal component analysis.

B Schematic representation of numbers of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in gliomas compared between patients with concurrent multiple sclerosis and control patients without multiple sclerosis depending on tumoral IDH mutation status.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Supplementary Table 1 Patient characteristics (n=26)
View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Supplementary Table 2 Glioma risk in patients with multiple sclerosis
View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Supplementary Table 3 Characteristics of patients with IDH1-wildtype glioblastoma WHO grade IV
View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Supplementary Table 4 Characteristics of patients with IDH1-mutant astrocytoma WHO grade II
View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Supplementary Table 5: Multiple sclerosis course
View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Supplementary Table 6 Common differentially methylated regions (DMR)

Footnotes

  • Funding: This work was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) within CRC1366 “Vascular Control of Organ Function”, project number 39404578, to KS and MP (project C1) and the Hertie Foundation (P1200013) to KS. MOB acknowledges funding by the Else Kröner-Fresenius Stiftung (2019_EKMS.23).

  • Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

  • Authorship: Conception and design: KS, MP. Acquisition of data: all. Analysis of data: KS, TK, DS, FS, MP. Interpretation of data: all. Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: all.

Abbreviations

CI
confidence interval
DMP
differentially methylated position
DMR
differentially methylated region
HLA
human leukocyte antigen
IDH
isocitrate dehydrogenase
IL
interleukin
MGMT
O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase
NAWM
normal appearing white matter
OR
odds ratio
OS
overall survival
PFS
progression-free survival
RANO
response assessment in neuro-oncology
RT
radiotherapy
SVD
singular value decomposition

References

  1. 1.↵
    Sinclair G, Al-Saffar Y, Johnstone P, Hatiboglu MA, Shamikh A. A challenging case of concurrent multiple sclerosis and anaplastic astrocytoma. Surgical neurology international. 2019; 10:166–166.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    Preziosa P, Sangalli F, Esposito F, et al. Clinical deterioration due to co-occurrence of multiple sclerosis and glioblastoma: report of two cases. Neurol Sci. 2017; 38(2):361–364.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    Plantone D, Renna R, Sbardella E, Koudriavtseva T. Concurrence of multiple sclerosis and brain tumors. Front Neurol. 2015; 6:40.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    Acqui M, Caroli E, Di Stefano D, Ferrante L. Cerebral ependymoma in a patient with multiple sclerosis case report and critical review of the literature. Surg Neurol. 2008; 70(4):414–420.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Sierra Morales F, Wright RB, Novo JE, Arvanitis LD, Stefoski D, Koralnik IJ. Glioblastoma in natalizumab-treated multiple sclerosis patients. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2017; 4(7):512–516.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    Sharim J, Tashjian R, Golzy N, Pouratian N. Glioblastoma following treatment with fingolimod for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Clin Neurosci. 2016; 30:166–168.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    Mantero V, Balgera R, Bianchi G, et al. Brainstem glioblastoma in a patient with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Neurol Sci. 2015; 36(9):1733–1735.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    Anssar TM, Leitzmann MF, Linker RA, et al. Autoimmune diseases and immunosuppressive therapy in relation to the risk of glioma. Cancer Med. 2020; 9(3):1263–1275.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    Hemminki K, Liu X, Försti A, Ji J, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. Subsequent brain tumors in patients with autoimmune disease. Neuro Oncol. 2013; 15(9):1142–1150.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Kebir S, Gaertner FC, Mueller M, et al. F-fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography for the differential diagnosis of tumefactive multiple sclerosis versus glioma: A case report. Oncol Lett. 2016; 11(3):2195–2198.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    Sahm F, Schrimpf D, Stichel D, et al. DNA methylation-based classification and grading system for meningioma: a multicentre, retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18(5):682–694.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Capper D, Jones DTW, Sill M, et al. DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours. Nature. 2018; 555(7697):469–474.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Celarain N, Tomas-Roig J. Aberrant DNA methylation profile exacerbates inflammation and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis patients. J Neuroinflammation. 2020; 17(1):21.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    Huynh JL, Garg P, Thin TH, et al. Epigenome-wide differences in pathology-free regions of multiple sclerosis-affected brains. Nat Neurosci. 2014; 17(1):121–130.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2018; 17(2):162–173.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, et al. Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(11):1963–1972.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    van den Bent MJ, Wefel JS, Schiff D, et al. Response assessment in neuro-oncology (a report of the RANO group): assessment of outcome in trials of diffuse low-grade gliomas. Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12(6):583–593.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Kessler T, Sahm F, Sadik A, et al. Molecular differences in IDH wildtype glioblastoma according to MGMT promoter methylation. Neuro Oncol. 2018; 20(3):367–379.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Wick W, Roth P, Hartmann C, et al. Long-term analysis of the NOA-04 randomized phase III trial of sequential radiochemotherapy of anaplastic glioma with PCV or temozolomide. Neuro Oncol. 2016; 18(11):1529–1537.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Van Den Bent MJ, Erridge S, Vogelbaum MA, et al. Second interim and first molecular analysis of the EORTC randomized phase III intergroup CATNON trial on concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide in anaplastic glioma without 1p/19q codeletion2019. Located at: Journal of Clinical Oncology.
  21. 21.↵
    Klein J, Sato A. The HLA system. First of two parts. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343(10):702–709.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Aarli JA, Mørk SJ, Myrseth E, Larsen JL. Glioblastoma associated with multiple sclerosis: coincidence or induction? Eur Neurol. 1989; 29(6):312–316.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.
    Currie S, Urich H. Concurrence of multiple sclerosis and glioma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1974; 37(5):598–605.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Frisullo G, Patanella AK, Nociti V, et al. Glioblastoma in multiple sclerosis: a case report. J Neurooncol. 2009; 94(1):141–144.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Bunse L, Pusch S, Bunse T, et al. Suppression of antitumor T cell immunity by the oncometabolite (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate. Nat Med. 2018; 24(8):1192–1203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Mildenberger I, Bunse L, Ochs K, Platten M. The promises of immunotherapy in gliomas. Curr Opin Neurol. 2017; 30(6):650–658.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    Platten M, Bunse L, Riehl D, Bunse T, Ochs K, Wick W. Vaccine Strategies in Gliomas. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2018; 20(5):11.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    Hinnell C, Almekhlafi M, Joseph JT, Bell R, Sharma P, Furtado S. Concurrence of high-grade brainstem glioma and multiple sclerosis. Can J Neurol Sci. 2010; 37(4):512–514.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Dobson R, Giovannoni G. Multiple sclerosis - a review. Eur J Neurol. 2019; 26(1):27–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Green AJ, Bollen AW, Berger MS, Oksenberg JR, Hauser SL. Multiple sclerosis and oligodendroglioma. Mult Scler. 2001; 7(4):269–273.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    Tabatabaei P, Visse E, Bergström P, Brännström T, Siesjö P, Bergenheim AT. Radiotherapy induces an immediate inflammatory reaction in malignant glioma: a clinical microdialysis study. J Neurooncol. 2017; 131(1):83–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    Reznik E, Smith AW, Taube S, et al. Radiation and Immunotherapy in High-grade Gliomas: Where Do We Stand? Am J Clin Oncol. 2018; 41(2):197–212.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 04, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Concurrent gliomas in patients with multiple sclerosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Concurrent gliomas in patients with multiple sclerosis
Katharina Sahm, Tobias Kessler, Philipp Eisele, Miriam Ratliff, Elena Sperk, Laila König, Michael O. Breckwoldt, Corinna Seliger, Iris Mildenberger, Daniel Schrimpf, Christel Herold-Mende, Pia S. Zeiner, Ghazaleh Tabatabai, Sven G. Meuth, David Capper, Martin Bendszus, Andreas von Deimling, Wolfgang Wick, Felix Sahm, Michael Platten
medRxiv 2022.07.01.22277047; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.01.22277047
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Concurrent gliomas in patients with multiple sclerosis
Katharina Sahm, Tobias Kessler, Philipp Eisele, Miriam Ratliff, Elena Sperk, Laila König, Michael O. Breckwoldt, Corinna Seliger, Iris Mildenberger, Daniel Schrimpf, Christel Herold-Mende, Pia S. Zeiner, Ghazaleh Tabatabai, Sven G. Meuth, David Capper, Martin Bendszus, Andreas von Deimling, Wolfgang Wick, Felix Sahm, Michael Platten
medRxiv 2022.07.01.22277047; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.01.22277047

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neurology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (430)
  • Allergy and Immunology (756)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3294)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (364)
  • Dermatology (279)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1171)
  • Epidemiology (13376)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (899)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5153)
  • Geriatric Medicine (482)
  • Health Economics (783)
  • Health Informatics (3269)
  • Health Policy (1140)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1190)
  • Hematology (431)
  • HIV/AIDS (1017)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14629)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
  • Medical Education (477)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (523)
  • Neurology (4925)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (730)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (883)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2524)
  • Ophthalmology (724)
  • Orthopedics (281)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (543)
  • Pediatrics (1302)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (550)
  • Primary Care Research (557)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4212)
  • Public and Global Health (7504)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1706)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1013)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (497)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (548)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (236)
  • Urology (205)