Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

The Citation of Retracted COVID-19 Papers is Common and Rarely Critical

View ORCID ProfileGideon Meyerowitz-Katz, Praba Sekhar, View ORCID ProfileLonni Besançon, View ORCID ProfileTari Turner, View ORCID ProfileSteve McDonald
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.30.22277084
Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz
1School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong
2Western Sydney Local Health District
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz
  • For correspondence: gideon.meyerowitzkatz@health.nsw.gov.au
Praba Sekhar
3School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lonni Besançon
4Media and Information Technology, Linköping University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lonni Besançon
Tari Turner
3School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tari Turner
Steve McDonald
3School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Steve McDonald
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Retraction is the final safeguard against research error/misconduct. In principle, retraction exists to prevent serious issues identified in published research through post-publication review. Our study investigated the citing of clinical research papers retracted during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods We used the Retraction Watch database extracted as of 27/01/2022 to identify retracted COVID-19 papers and the Google Scholar citation function to gather a dataset of citations of retracted clinical research. We reviewed key aspects of the citing research.

Results In total, the Retraction Watch database included 212 entries for retracted COVID-19 papers. Of these, 53 papers were clinical. There were a total of 1,141 citations of retracted papers, with 105 errors, leaving 1,036 citations to analyze. The majority (86%) of citations were not critical. The majority (80%) of papers citing retracted research were published after the retraction date.

Conclusions The citation of retracted and withdrawn COVID-19 clinical studies is common, and rarely critical. Most researchers who cite retracted research do not identify that the paper is retracted, even when submitting long after the paper has been withdrawn. This has serious implications for the reliability of published research and the academic literature, which need to be addressed.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This research was not funded.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data on retractions is available on request from Retraction Watch. Citations data is available on request from the corresponding author once retraction data has been shared by RW.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 30, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Citation of Retracted COVID-19 Papers is Common and Rarely Critical
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The Citation of Retracted COVID-19 Papers is Common and Rarely Critical
Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, Praba Sekhar, Lonni Besançon, Tari Turner, Steve McDonald
medRxiv 2022.06.30.22277084; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.30.22277084
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The Citation of Retracted COVID-19 Papers is Common and Rarely Critical
Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, Praba Sekhar, Lonni Besançon, Tari Turner, Steve McDonald
medRxiv 2022.06.30.22277084; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.30.22277084

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (243)
  • Allergy and Immunology (525)
  • Anesthesia (125)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1435)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (220)
  • Dermatology (158)
  • Emergency Medicine (293)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (589)
  • Epidemiology (10335)
  • Forensic Medicine (6)
  • Gastroenterology (533)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2656)
  • Geriatric Medicine (255)
  • Health Economics (499)
  • Health Informatics (1744)
  • Health Policy (791)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (682)
  • Hematology (269)
  • HIV/AIDS (571)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12119)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (650)
  • Medical Education (276)
  • Medical Ethics (83)
  • Nephrology (291)
  • Neurology (2484)
  • Nursing (145)
  • Nutrition (381)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (497)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (569)
  • Oncology (1335)
  • Ophthalmology (403)
  • Orthopedics (153)
  • Otolaryngology (239)
  • Pain Medicine (172)
  • Palliative Medicine (51)
  • Pathology (345)
  • Pediatrics (786)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (334)
  • Primary Care Research (297)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2422)
  • Public and Global Health (5032)
  • Radiology and Imaging (902)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (536)
  • Respiratory Medicine (688)
  • Rheumatology (309)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (257)
  • Sports Medicine (246)
  • Surgery (300)
  • Toxicology (45)
  • Transplantation (141)
  • Urology (108)