Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Triglyceride-glucose index and the risk of heart failure: evidence from two large cohorts and a Mendelian randomization analysis

Xintao Li, Jeffrey Shi Kai Chan, Bo Guan, Shi Peng, Xiaoyu Wu, Jiandong Zhou, Jeremy Man Ho Hui, Yan Hiu Athena Lee, Danish Iltaf Satti, Shek Long Tsang, Shouling Wu, Songwen Chen, Gary Tse, Shaowen Liu
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.28.22277033
Xintao Li
1Department of Cardiology, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
2Cardiovascular Analytics Group, Hong Kong – United Kingdom – China collaboration
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey Shi Kai Chan
2Cardiovascular Analytics Group, Hong Kong – United Kingdom – China collaboration
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bo Guan
3Geriatric Cardiology Department of the Second Medical Center and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shi Peng
1Department of Cardiology, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaoyu Wu
1Department of Cardiology, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiandong Zhou
2Cardiovascular Analytics Group, Hong Kong – United Kingdom – China collaboration
5Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremy Man Ho Hui
2Cardiovascular Analytics Group, Hong Kong – United Kingdom – China collaboration
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yan Hiu Athena Lee
2Cardiovascular Analytics Group, Hong Kong – United Kingdom – China collaboration
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Danish Iltaf Satti
2Cardiovascular Analytics Group, Hong Kong – United Kingdom – China collaboration
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shek Long Tsang
2Cardiovascular Analytics Group, Hong Kong – United Kingdom – China collaboration
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shouling Wu
4Department of Cardiology, Kailuan General Hospital, Tangshan 063000, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Songwen Chen
1Department of Cardiology, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shaowen.liu@hotmail.com garytse86@gmail.com chensongwen@hotmail.com
Gary Tse
2Cardiovascular Analytics Group, Hong Kong – United Kingdom – China collaboration
6Kent and Medway Medical School, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NT, United Kingdom
7Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shaowen.liu@hotmail.com garytse86@gmail.com chensongwen@hotmail.com
Shaowen Liu
1Department of Cardiology, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shaowen.liu@hotmail.com garytse86@gmail.com chensongwen@hotmail.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The relationship between triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, an emerging marker of insulin resistance, and the risk of incident heart failure (HF) was unclear. This study thus aimed to investigate this relationship.

Methods Subjects without prevalent cardiovascular diseases from the prospective Kailuan cohort (recruited during 2006-2007) and a retrospective cohort of family medicine patients from Hong Kong (recruited during 2000-2003) were followed up until December 31st, 2019 for the outcome of incident HF. Separate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) summarizing the relationship between TyG index and HF risk in the two cohorts were combined using a random-effect meta-analysis. Additionally, a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) of published genome-wide association study data was performed to assess the causality of observed associations.

Results In total, 95,996 and 19,345 subjects from the Kailuan and Hong Kong cohorts were analyzed, respectively, with 2,726 cases (2.8%) of incident HF in the former and 1,709 (7.0%) in the latter. Subjects in the highest quartile of TyG index had the highest risk of incident HF in both cohorts (Kailuan: aHR 1.23 (95% confidence interval: 1.09-1.39), PTrend <0.001; Hong Kong: aHR 1.21 (1.04-1.40), PTrend =0.007; both compared with the lowest quartile). Meta-analysis showed similar results (highest versus lowest quartile: HR 1.22(1.11-1.34), P<0.0001). Findings from MR analysis, which included 47,309 cases and 930,014 controls, supported a causal relationship between higher TyG index and increased risk of HF (odds ratio 1.27(1.15-1.40), P<0.001).

Conclusion A higher TyG index is an independent and causal risk factor for incident HF in the general population.

What is new?

  • In 115,341 subjects from two large cohorts in China, an elevated triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index was independently associated with an increased risk of incident heart failure (HF).

  • Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis based on published genome-wide association studies found significant association between genetically determined TyG index and the risk of HF.

  • Together, these findings suggest that a higher TyG index is an independent and causal risk factor of incident HF in the general population.

What are the clinical implications?

  • The TyG index may facilitate recognition of individuals at elevated risk of incident HF and allow early preventive interventions.

  • The demonstrated causal effect of TyG index on incident HF warrants further research to fully understand the underlying mechanisms.

Introduction

Heart failure (HF) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with contemporary five-year survival rates of less than 50%1. The prevalence of HF has been estimated to be 1-2% in developed countries and is projected to double by 20602, 3. Given the enormous public health and socioeconomic burden caused by HF, it is critically important to identify individuals at high risk of HF and to implement preventive interventions as early as possible4.

Recently, the role of metabolic disorders in the development of HF has been increasingly investigated5. Insulin resistance, a hallmark of type II diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome, has been observed to be associated with adverse cardiac remodeling and dysfunction6. Molecular studies have provided ample evidence for the etiological role of insulin resistance in the development of HF7, 8. However, the gold standard method for measuring insulin sensitivity, the hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp test, is time-consuming and invasive9, which has impeded its widespread use in clinical practice.

The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, a simple, dimensionless marker derived from fasting blood triglyceride and glucose levels as measured in routine biochemical tests, has been proposed and validated as a surrogate marker of insulin resistance10. Previous studies have found a positive association between TyG index and the risk of various metabolic and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases11, 12. However, few studies have been conducted to investigate the association between TyG index and the risk of incident HF, and whether the association is causal remains undetermined.

Mendelian randomization (MR) makes use of genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) to generate causal estimates of the long-term effects of risk factors on outcomes13. MR analysis can overcome the limitations of residual confounding and reverse causation in conventional observational studies13, 14. With the development of genome-wide association studies (GWAS), MR is highly suited and has been used for investigating the causal association between TyG index and HF15, 16.

As such, the present study aimed to assess the association between the TyG index and the risk of incident HF, as well as using a two-sample MR study to determine whether such associations were causal in nature.

Methods

Study design and population

Study subjects were identified from two Chinese studies, the Kailuan cohort in northern China and a territory-wide cohort in Hong Kong. The protocol for this study was in accordance with the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration and this study was approved by the Ethics Committee at the Kailuan General Hospital and the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong / Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster.

The Kailuan Study is a prospective cohort that based on a community in the Tangshan City. Details of the study has been published elsewhere17. In brief, a total of 101,510 subjects (aged 18 – 98 years; 81,110 males) were enrolled in the Kailuan Study at baseline (2006-2007), and received an interview of standardized questionnaires and clinical examinations at 11 hospitals responsible for health care of the community. The subjects were then followed up with repeat questionnaires, clinical and laboratory examinations every two years. All subjects gave informed consent to their enrolment in this study. Subjects with prevalent cancer and cardiovascular diseases, including HF, atrial fibrillation (AF), myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemic stroke were excluded, as well as those with missing baseline levels of triglyceride (TG) or fasting blood glucose (FBG).

Data for the Hong Kong cohort were extracted retrospectively from the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS), an administrative electronic medical records database that records the basic demographics, diagnoses, selected procedures, medication prescriptions, and selected laboratory measurements of all patients that attended public healthcare institutions in Hong Kong which serve an estimated 90% of the population18. Diagnoses in CDARS were recorded using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth revision (ICD-9) codes regardless of the time of data entry, as ICD-10 has not been implemented in CDARS to date. The ICD-9 codes used for identifying comorbid conditions and the outcome (HF) were summarized in Table S1. CDARS has been extensively used in prior studies and has been shown to have good diagnostic coding accuracy19, 20. As only retrospective, deidentified data were used, the requirement for individual patient consent has been waived. For this study, adult patients (18 years old or above) attending a family medicine clinic in Hong Kong during the years 2000-2003 with at least one set of paired FBG and fasting TG levels at baseline were included. Patients with a history of ischemic heart disease, stroke, HF, AF, or cancer were excluded, as well as those who were pregnant at the time of inclusion, and those with missing baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and total cholesterol levels.

Data collection and definitions

The data collected and definitions used in this study were detailed in Supplementary Methods17, 21, 22. The TyG index was calculated as ln [fasting TG (mg/dl)×FBG (mg/dl) / 2]23.

Outcomes and follow-up

In the Kailuan cohort, all subjects were followed from the baseline examination until the date of onset of HF, date of death, or end of follow-up (December 31st, 2019), whichever came first. HF was diagnosed by experienced cardiologists in accordance with the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology24. Incident HF cases were derived from the Municipal Social Insurance Institutions, hospital discharge register, and death certificates.

In the Hong Kong cohort, all patients were followed up from inclusion until the first recorded diagnosis of HF, death, or the end of follow-up (December 31st, 2019), whichever came first. HF was identified using ICD-9 codes as summarized in Table S1.

Two-sample MR analysis

Mendelian randomization is built upon three main assumptions25. First, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) selected as instrumental variables should be robustly associated with the risk factor. Second, no association should exist between genetic variants and confounders. Third, genetic variants should affect outcome only through the risk factor.

TyG index-associated variants that reached genome-wide significance (P < 5 × 10-8) were retrieved from a previous GWAS16. In brief, the identified GWAS included 273,368 subjects from the United Kingdom Biobank, who were aged 40-69 and free from diabetes mellitus and lipid metabolism disorders16. These SNPs were further pruned by linkage disequilibrium with R2 < 0.01 and those that were significantly associated with TG or glucose were also excluded. In total, 192 IVs were selected for TyG index initially. Summary statistics data for the associations of TyG index-associated SNPs with HF were extracted from the published GWAS performed by the Heart Failure Molecular Epidemiology for Therapeutic Targets (HERMES) Consortium on 47,309 cases and 930,014 controls of European ancestry26. HF cases from 26 cohorts of the HERMES Consortium were identified based on the clinical diagnosis of HF of any etiology with no specific criteria for left ventricular ejection fraction. Details of subject selection were published elsewhere26.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median with interquartile range (IQR) depending on their distribution. Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages.

Kaplan-Meier curves were used to visualize the cumulative incidence of HF across quartiles of the TyG index. The association between baseline TyG index and the risk of incident HF was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model, with hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) as the summary statistics. The Cox regression was performed with a staged approach, as detailed in Supplementary Methods. The association between the risks of HF and the observed spectrum of TyG index was also modelled and visualized using fractional polynomial curves with full multivariable adjustments. Furthermore, competing risk regression using the Fine and Gray sub-distribution model was performed to address the potentially confounding issue of competing risk, with death from any cause as the competing event. Sub-hazard ratios (SHR) with 95% CI were used as the summary statistics. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by excluding subjects with less than two-year follow-up time, and, separately, those with medications at baseline.

A priori subgroup analyses were performed for age (<65 vs ≥65), gender (male vs female), diabetes (yes vs no), hypertension (yes vs no), dyslipidemia (yes vs no) for both cohorts, and, for the Kailuan cohort, for obesity (yes vs no), and hs-CRP level (<1 mg/dl vs ≥1 mg/dl).

To combine the results from the two cohorts, we extracted hazard ratios from the fully adjusted model and performed a meta-analysis using the inverse variance method with random effects to estimate the association between TyG index, both as categorical and continuous variables, and the risk of incident HF.

In the MR analysis, the summary exposure and outcome data were first harmonized, and SNPs significantly associated with incident HF were excluded. Causal effects of TyG index on HF were estimated by the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method. Weighted median, MR-Egger, and pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) methods were used for supplementary analyses. Directional pleiotropy was assessed by MR-Egger intercepts and heterogeneity among genetic variants was evaluated by Cochran’s Q test.

To test the validity of causal effects estimates, multivariable MR (MVMR) using the IVW method was conducted to further investigate the direct causal effect of TyG index on HF after adjusting for confounders including BMI27, SBP28, DBP28, LDL-c29, and HDL-c29. An additional sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding any SNP significantly associated with those confounders.

All statistical analyses for the Kailuan and Hong Kong cohorts were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC), Stata 16.1 software (StataCorp, College Station, TX), and/or RevMan (Version 5.1; Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). The MR analyses were performed by the TwoSampleMR, MR-PRESSO and MVMR packages with R version 4.0.2. All p values were two-sided, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

Of the 101,510 subjects who took part in the Kailuan study, 95,996 subjects were analyzed after applying the exclusion criteria (Figure S1). For the Hong Kong cohort, 24,338 patients were identified for inclusion, and 19,345 patients were analyzed after applying the exclusion criteria (Figure S2). Table 1 and Table 2 shows the baseline characteristics of subjects according to the baseline TyG index quartiles of two cohorts.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1. The baseline characteristics of subjects in the Kailuan Cohort.
View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2. The baseline characteristics of subjects in the cohort from Hong Kong.

In the Kailuan cohort, there were 2,726 cases (2.8%) of incident HF over a mean follow-up of 12.3±2.2 years, with an overall incidence rate of 2.3 (95% CI 2.2-2.4) cases per 1000 person years. In the Hong Kong cohort, there were 1,709 cases (7.0%) of incident HF over a mean follow-up of 16.2±4.3 years, with an overall incidence rate of 5.5 (95% CI 5.3-5.8) cases per 1000 person years. Over the study duration, 10,825 subjects (11.3%) in the Kailuan cohort died (9,985 (10.1%) without developing HF), while 6,372 patients (32.9%) in the Hong Kong cohort died (4,996 (25.8%) without developing HF).

Associations between the TyG index and the risk of incident HF

Table 3 and Table 4 show the associations between the TyG index, assessed both as a categorial and continuous variable, with the respective risks of incident HF in the Kailuan and Hong Kong cohorts. The cumulative incidence of incident HF for the Kailuan and the Hong Kong cohort is shown in Figures 1A and 1B, respectively. After fully adjusting for potential confounders, patients in the highest quartile of the TyG index had significantly higher risks of incident HF than those in the lowest quartile in both the Kailuan (HR 1.23 (95% CI 1.09-1.39), P <0.001) and Hong Kong (HR 1.21 (95% CI 1.04-1.40), P =0.007) cohorts. Similarly, every unit increment in the TyG index was associated with a 17% and a 13% increase in the risk of HF in the Kailuan (HR 1.17 (95% CI 1.10-1.24), P <0.001) and Hong Kong (HR 1.13 (95% CI 1.05-1.22), P<0.001) cohorts, respectively. Fractional polynomial curves with full multivariable adjustment (Figure S3) showed a possible threshold effect in the prognostic value of the TyG index, with a lower TyG index showing no significant association with the risk of incident HF, and a higher TyG index showing a grossly linear relationship with the said risk. This was consistent with the multivariable Cox regression analysis as shown in Tables 3 and 4 with TyG index analyzed as quartiles. Competing risk regression using the Fine and Gray sub-distribution model with death from any cause as the competing event also showed positive associations between a higher TyG index and a high risk of incident HF (Tables 3 and 4). Sensitivity analyses produced consistent and similar results (Tables 3 and 4).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meier curve of the cumulative incidence of incident heart failure for the (A) Kailuan cohort and (B) Hong Kong cohort, stratifying by quartiles of the triglyceride-glucose index.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3. Association between baseline TyG and incident heart failure in the Kailuan cohort.
View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4. Association between baseline TyG index and incident heart failure in the cohort from Hong Kong.

Results of subgroup analyses are shown in Figure 2A and Figure 2B for the Kailuan and Hong Kong cohorts, respectively. Generally, the TyG index, analyzed as a continuous variable, was positively associated with the risk of HF across various subgroups. There was significant interaction between gender and the TyG index in the Kailuan cohort (P for interaction = 0.02), but not in the Hong Kong cohort (P for interaction = 0.11). The association between TyG index and the risk of incident HF was more prominent in female subjects than in male subjects in both cohorts [HR 1.21 (95% CI 1.02 -1.47) for female vs. 1.15 (95% CI 1.08 - 1.23) for male in the Kailuan cohort, and 1.22 (95% CI 1.10 -1.64) vs. 1.05 (95% CI 0.94 - 1.17) in the Hong Kong cohort].

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2.

Subgroup analysis of the association between TyG index and incident HF for the (A) Kailuan cohort and (B) Hong Kong cohort. HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval.

A random-effect meta-analysis combining the results from the two cohorts showed that the risk of incident HF of subjects in the highest quartile of the TyG index was 22% higher (95% CI 11% - 34%, P<0.0001; Figure 3A) than those in the lowest quartile, with every unit increment of the TyG index being associated with a 15% increase in the risk of incident HF (95% CI 10% - 21%, P<0.00001; Figure 3B). Similarly, subjects in the highest quartile of the TyG index had a 25% (95% CI 13% - 37%) increase in the sub-hazard of incident HF.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 3.

Forest plots for the meta-analysis of the association between TyG index with HF risk. (A) TyG index analyzed as a categorical variable. (B) TyG index analyzed as a continuous variable.

Two-Sample MR analysis

The associations between genetically determined TyG index and the risk of incident HF as estimated by two-sample MR are presented in Figure 4. Analysis using the IVW method demonstrated that genetic predisposition to increased TyG index was significantly associated with an increased risk of incident HF (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.15 - 1.40, P<0.001). The Cochran’s Q statistic indicated significant heterogeneity across SNPs, while no indication of directional pleiotropy was found by MR-Egger intercept (Table S3). The association remained consistent when using complementary methods for analysis, including weighted median, MR-Egger and MRPRESSO (Figure 4).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 4.

Mendelian randomization (MR) association between genetically determined TyG index and HF. Sensitivity analysis 1: multivariable MR through IVW method after adjusting for cofounders including BMI, SBP, DBP, LDL-c, and HDL-c. Sensitivity analysis 2: MR analysis through IVW after excluding any SNPs significantly associated with those confounders, including BMI, SBP, DBP, LDL-c, and HDL-c. SNPs: single-nucleotide polymorphisms; OR: odds ratio; IVW: inverse-variance weighted.

To verify the causal effect of TyG index on HF, we performed multivariable MR analysis by adjusting for HF risk factors, including BMI, blood pressure, and lipids. The association remained stable after adjusting for single risk factors (Table S4) and in a fully adjusted model (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02-1.41, P=0.03; Figure 4). Furthermore, results of the sensitivity analysis, in which 32 SNPs with potential pleiotropy were excluded, confirmed the positive association between genetically determined TyG index and HF risk (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.35, P=0.01).

Discussion

Utilizing observational data from two large Chinese cohorts and a two-sample MR analysis based on a public GWAS dataset, this study demonstrated that a high TyG index was an independent and causal risk factor for incident HF in the general population.

Previous studies have found independent associations between TyG index and risks of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases, including myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke23, 30. In a recent analysis of data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, Huang et al. also reported an association between higher TyG index and higher risk of incident HF in an American population, with every standard deviation’s increase in TyG index (corresponding to a TyG index of 0.6) associated with a 15% increase in risk31. Our study confirmed these findings in two larger cohorts from distinct geographical regions in China. Unlike the ARIC study which was restricted to subjects between the ages of 45-64 years old, our study included adult patients across the full age range. As such, our study more closely reflects real-life practice, and our findings are thus more directly generalizable.

Importantly, utilizing MR of GWAS data, we demonstrated that the association between TyG and HF was causal by nature. Although the exact underlying mechanism for the association between TyG index and HF remains to be confirmed by further molecular studies, the well-established relationship between TyG index and insulin resistance suggests that insulin resistance may at least be an important driver of such association10. This was further reinforced by the results from the Kailuan cohort showing that the association between TyG index and HF was independent of chronic inflammation, as well as previous studies observing associations between insulin resistance and higher risks of incident HF independent of myocardial ischaemia32–34. Insulin resistance may lead to excessive circulating free fatty acids and triglycerides, which induces cardiac lipotoxicity by generating toxic lipid intermediates, and decreases cardiac efficiency by increasing fatty acid oxidation35, 36. Insulin resistance is also associated with disturbances of the systemic metabolic and inflammatory milieu, including increased concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines, adipokines, and catecholamines, which may trigger low-grade inflammation and chronic hypercatecholaminemia that result in detrimental effects on cardiac function37. Furthermore, insulin resistance is involved in the maladaptive activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, with chronic hyperinsulinaemia inducing increased release of angiotensinogen from adipose tissue and upregulation of angiotensin II receptor expression, eventually resulting in adverse cardiac remodeling and dysfunction38. Nonetheless, the mechanisms between insulin resistance and HF are incompletely understood to date, and remain an important area of further research.

Another major finding of the present study is that the association between TyG index and the risk of HF was stronger in females than in males. Between-gender differences are common in cardiovascular medicine. Previous studies have shown that women with disorders of glucose metabolism have a greater risk of coronary heart disease than men30, 39. HF caused by obesity, diabetes, or metabolic syndrome was also found to be more common in women40. These suggest that between-gender differences in molecular mechanisms, particularly those in hormonal axes, may not only influence glucose and lipid metabolism, but also energy metabolism in the heart and, thereby, cardiac function.

Females are known to be less likely than males to develop insulin resistance41 but are at higher risk of diabetic cardiomyopathy42, implying that females may be more susceptible to cardiac damage induced by insulin resistance. Gender differences in nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity and signaling, which are critical in metabolic regulation and in modulating responses to insulin resistance, are thought to be central to these observations43. The higher baseline levels of NOS in females predisposes to higher levels of uncoupled NOS on exposure to oxidative stress, which exacerbates the effects of insulin resistance, such as myocardial fibrosis and hypertrophy43. Additionally, considering that the mean age of subjects in this study implied that the female subjects were mostly postmenopausal, the postmenopausal decline in the protective effects of estrogen may contribute to gender differences in the susceptibility to insulin resistance-induced cardiac damage40. Notwithstanding the existing evidence as discussed above, further studies exploring the gender differences in susceptibility to insulin resistance-induced cardiac damage should provide important insights and better understanding of diabetic cardiomyopathy.

Having derived consistent findings from two geographically distinct regions in China, our results suggest that the TyG index, as a surrogate marker of insulin resistance, may be widely applicable and prognostically useful regardless of geographical region and ethnicity. As subjects with prevalent major cardiovascular diseases were excluded from the present study, the analyzed cohorts had relatively low cardiovascular risks. Our results supported the TyG index as a potentially viable and effective tool for cardiovascular risk stratification in the general population. Of note, insulin resistance in many previous studies was measured by the Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) which requires measurements of fasting insulin and glucose32, 33. However, measuring insulin levels is expensive, and the HOMA-IR has been mostly confined to research uses with low clinical utilization. In contrast, the TyG index is simple to measure, has been validated against the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp test which is considered the gold standard for measuring insulin resistance10, and may outperform the HOMA-IR in identifying insulin resistance44. It has also been shown to be excellent at detecting insulin resistance in non-diabetic patients45, which is important as insulin resistance and its associated cardiovascular damage precedes overt type II diabetes mellitus46. The TyG index may therefore facilitate recognition of patients at elevated risk of incident HF, for which efficacious measures for primary prevention exist4.

Strengths and limitations

The strengths of our study included the large sample size, long follow-up time, and having demonstrated reproducible results across two independent observational cohorts and MR analysis. Our findings were further strengthened by multiple subgroup and sensitivity analyses yielding largely consistent results. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this was one of the first studies demonstrating causality between higher TyG index and higher risk of incident HF. Nonetheless, some limitations must be noted. First, we were unable to compare the predictive power of different methods for assessing insulin resistance in our observational study, since fasting insulin levels were unavailable for most subjects. Second, inherent to all observational studies, there may be residual or unmeasured confounders that we were not able to address. Nonetheless, we have included multiple important risk factors for incident HF in the multivariable regression models, and the numerous sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results which reinforced the validity of our findings. Third, the MR analysis was restricted to patients of European descent to reduce bias from population stratification, which may limit extrapolation of our MR results to other populations. Nevertheless, given that associations between TyG index and the risk of incident HF observed in a recent report in an American cohort (the ARIC study) were comparable to our findings as observed in Chinese cohorts, the causality established by our MR analysis is likely true in Chinese patients as well. Fourth, no information was available about the subtype of incident HF. Given the different metabolic mechanisms contributing to the pathogenesis of different types of HF47, further research in this regard is warranted. Fifth, diagnoses of the Hong Kong cohort were identified using ICD-9 codes and could not be individually adjudicated due to the retrospective, deidentified nature of the database, as well as the large sample size. Regardless, all diagnostic codes were entered by treating clinicians, who were completely independent of the authors. CDARS has also been shown to have good coding accuracy, specifically for cardiovascular outcomes20.

Conclusion

As observed from two large, geographically distinct Chinese cohorts, a higher TyG index was independently associated with higher risk of incident HF. MR analysis demonstrated that the association was likely causal in nature. Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings and fully elucidate the underlying biological mechanisms.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Author contributions

Xintao Li and Jeffrey Shi Kai Chan designed this study, conducted the main analysis, visualized the results, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Bo Guan, Shi Peng, Xiaoyu Wu, Yan Hiu Athena Lee, Jeremy Man Ho Hui, Danish Iltaf Satti, Shek Long Tsang, Shouling Wu, Jiandong Zhou, Songwen Chen, Gary Tse, and Shaowen Liu reviewed and edited the article. All authors contributed to the article significantly and approved the submitted version.

Funding Sources

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81970273).

Disclosures

None.

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate all the subjects involved in this study, their families, and the members of the survey team from the Kailuan community.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Ziaeian B and Fonarow GC. Epidemiology and aetiology of heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016;13:368–78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, Burri H, Butler J, Čelutkienė J, Chioncel O, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Crespo-Leiro MG, Farmakis D, Gilard M, Heymans S, Hoes AW, Jaarsma T, Jankowska EA, Lainscak M, Lam CSP, Lyon AR, McMurray JJV, Mebazaa A, Mindham R, Muneretto C, Francesco Piepoli M, Price S, Rosano GMC, Ruschitzka F and Kathrine Skibelund A. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:3599–3726.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    de Boer RA, Nayor M, deFilippi CR, Enserro D, Bhambhani V, Kizer JR, Blaha MJ, Brouwers FP, Cushman M, Lima JAC, Bahrami H, van der Harst P, Wang TJ, Gansevoort RT, Fox CS, Gaggin HK, Kop WJ, Liu K, Vasan RS, Psaty BM, Lee DS, Hillege HL, Bartz TM, Benjamin EJ, Chan C, Allison M, Gardin JM, Januzzi JL, Jr.., Shah SJ, Levy D, Herrington DM, Larson MG, van Gilst WH, Gottdiener JS, Bertoni AG and Ho JE. Association of Cardiovascular Biomarkers With Incident Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3:215–224.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    Greene SJ and Butler J. Primary Prevention of Heart Failure in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Circulation. 2019;139:152–154.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    Ho KL, Karwi QG, Connolly D, Pherwani S, Ketema EB, Ussher JR and Lopaschuk GD. Metabolic, structural and biochemical changes in diabetes and the development of heart failure. Diabetologia. 2022;65:411–423.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    Kishi S, Gidding SS, Reis JP, Colangelo LA, Venkatesh BA, Armstrong AC, Isogawa A, Lewis CE, Wu C, Jacobs DR, Jr.., Liu K and Lima JA. Association of Insulin Resistance and Glycemic Metabolic Abnormalities With LV Structure and Function in Middle Age: The CARDIA Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:105–114.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Riehle C and Abel ED. Insulin Signaling and Heart Failure. Circ Res. 2016;118:1151–69.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Velez M, Kohli S and Sabbah HN. Animal models of insulin resistance and heart failure. Heart Fail Rev. 2014;19:1–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Antuna-Puente B, Disse E, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Laville M, Capeau J and Bastard JP. How can we measure insulin sensitivity/resistance? Diabetes Metab. 2011;37:179–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Guerrero-Romero F, Simental-Mendía LE, González-Ortiz M, Martínez-Abundis E, Ramos-Zavala MG, Hernández-González SO, Jacques-Camarena O and Rodríguez-Morán M. The product of triglycerides and glucose, a simple measure of insulin sensitivity. Comparison with the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:3347–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Ding X, Wang X, Wu J, Zhang M and Cui M. Triglyceride-glucose index and the incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20:76.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    Zou S, Yang C, Shen R, Wei X, Gong J, Pan Y, Lv Y and Xu Y. Association Between the Triglyceride-Glucose Index and the Incidence of Diabetes in People With Different Phenotypes of Obesity: A Retrospective Study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:784616.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    Smith GD and Ebrahim S. ’Mendelian randomization’: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32:1–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Larsson SC, Burgess S and Michaëlsson K. Association of Genetic Variants Related to Serum Calcium Levels With Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Infarction. Jama. 2017;318:371–380.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Li X, Peng S, Guan B, Chen S, Zhou G, Wei Y, Gong C, Xu J, Lu X, Zhang X and Liu S. Genetically Determined Inflammatory Biomarkers and the Risk of Heart Failure: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:734400.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    Si S, Li J, Li Y, Li W, Chen X, Yuan T, Liu C, Li H, Hou L, Wang B and Xue F. Causal Effect of the Triglyceride-Glucose Index and the Joint Exposure of Higher Glucose and Triglyceride With Extensive Cardio-Cerebrovascular Metabolic Outcomes in the UK Biobank: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020;7:583473.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    Wu S, Huang Z, Yang X, Zhou Y, Wang A, Chen L, Zhao H, Ruan C, Wu Y, Xin A, Li K, Jin C and Cai J. Prevalence of ideal cardiovascular health and its relationship with the 4-year cardiovascular events in a northern Chinese industrial city. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5:487–93.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Kong X, Yang Y, Gao J, Guan J, Liu Y, Wang R, Xing B, Li Y and Ma W. Overview of the health care system in Hong Kong and its referential significance to mainland China. J Chin Med Assoc. 2015;78:569–73.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    Chan JSK, Satti DI, Lee YHA, Hui JMH, Lee TTL, Chou OHI, Wai AKC, Ciobanu A, Liu Y, Liu T, Roever L, Biondi-Zoccai G, Zhang Q, Cheung BMY, Zhou J and Tse G. High visit-to-visit cholesterol variability predicts heart failure and adverse cardiovascular events: a population-based cohort study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022.
  20. 20.↵
    Wong AY, Root A, Douglas IJ, Chui CS, Chan EW, Ghebremichael-Weldeselassie Y, Siu CW, Smeeth L and Wong IC. Cardiovascular outcomes associated with use of clarithromycin: population based study. Bmj. 2016;352:h6926.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Inker LA, Astor BC, Fox CH, Isakova T, Lash JP, Peralta CA, Kurella Tamura M and Feldman HI. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63:713–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Inker LA, Eneanya ND, Coresh J, Tighiouart H, Wang D, Sang Y, Crews DC, Doria A, Estrella MM, Froissart M, Grams ME, Greene T, Grubb A, Gudnason V, Gutiérrez OM, Kalil R, Karger AB, Mauer M, Navis G, Nelson RG, Poggio ED, Rodby R, Rossing P, Rule AD, Selvin E, Seegmiller JC, Shlipak MG, Torres VE, Yang W, Ballew SH, Couture SJ, Powe NR and Levey AS. New Creatinine- and Cystatin C-Based Equations to Estimate GFR without Race. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1737–1749.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    Wang A, Wang G, Liu Q, Zuo Y, Chen S, Tao B, Tian X, Wang P, Meng X, Wu S, Wang Y and Wang Y. Triglyceride-glucose index and the risk of stroke and its subtypes in the general population: an 11-year follow-up. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20:46.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    Swedberg K, Cleland J, Dargie H, Drexler H, Follath F, Komajda M, Tavazzi L, Smiseth OA, Gavazzi A, Haverich A, Hoes A, Jaarsma T, Korewicki J, Lévy S, Linde C, Lopez-Sendon JL, Nieminen MS, Piérard L and Remme WJ. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: executive summary (update 2005): The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1115–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    Burgess S, Scott RA, Timpson NJ, Davey Smith G and Thompson SG. Using published data in Mendelian randomization: a blueprint for efficient identification of causal risk factors. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;30:543–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Shah S, Henry A, Roselli C, Lin H, Sveinbjörnsson G, Fatemifar G, Hedman Å K, Wilk JB, Morley MP, Chaffin MD, Helgadottir A, Verweij N, Dehghan A, Almgren P, Andersson C, Aragam KG, Ärnlöv J, Backman JD, Biggs ML, Bloom HL, Brandimarto J, Brown MR, Buckbinder L, Carey DJ, Chasman DI, Chen X, Chen X, Chung J, Chutkow W, Cook JP, Delgado GE, Denaxas S, Doney AS, Dörr M, Dudley SC, Dunn ME, Engström G, Esko T, Felix SB, Finan C, Ford I, Ghanbari M, Ghasemi S, Giedraitis V, Giulianini F, Gottdiener JS, Gross S, Guðbjartsson DF, Gutmann R, Haggerty CM, van der Harst P, Hyde CL, Ingelsson E, Jukema JW, Kavousi M, Khaw KT, Kleber ME, Køber L, Koekemoer A, Langenberg C, Lind L, Lindgren CM, London B, Lotta LA, Lovering RC, Luan J, Magnusson P, Mahajan A, Margulies KB, März W, Melander O, Mordi IR, Morgan T, Morris AD, Morris AP, Morrison AC, Nagle MW, Nelson CP, Niessner A, Niiranen T, O’Donoghue ML, Owens AT, Palmer CNA, Parry HM, Perola M, Portilla-Fernandez E, Psaty BM, Rice KM, Ridker PM, Romaine SPR, Rotter JI, Salo P, Salomaa V, van Setten J, Shalaby AA, Smelser DT, Smith NL, Stender S, Stott DJ, Svensson P, Tammesoo ML, Taylor KD, Teder-Laving M, Teumer A, Thorgeirsson G, Thorsteinsdottir U, Torp-Pedersen C, Trompet S, Tyl B, Uitterlinden AG, Veluchamy A, Völker U, Voors AA, Wang X, Wareham NJ, Waterworth D, Weeke PE, Weiss R, Wiggins KL, Xing H, Yerges-Armstrong LM, Yu B, Zannad F, Zhao JH, Hemingway H, Samani NJ, McMurray JJV, Yang J, Visscher PM, Newton-Cheh C, Malarstig A, Holm H, Lubitz SA, Sattar N, Holmes MV, Cappola TP, Asselbergs FW, Hingorani AD, Kuchenbaecker K, Ellinor PT, Lang CC, Stefansson K, Smith JG, Vasan RS, Swerdlow DI and Lumbers RT. Genome-wide association and Mendelian randomisation analysis provide insights into the pathogenesis of heart failure. Nature communications. 2020;11:163.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    Locke AE, Kahali B, Berndt SI, Justice AE, Pers TH, Day FR, Powell C, Vedantam S, Buchkovich ML, Yang J, Croteau-Chonka DC, Esko T, Fall T, Ferreira T, Gustafsson S, Kutalik Z, Luan J, Mägi R, Randall JC, Winkler TW, Wood AR, Workalemahu T, Faul JD, Smith JA, Zhao JH, Zhao W, Chen J, Fehrmann R, Hedman Å K, Karjalainen J, Schmidt EM, Absher D, Amin N, Anderson D, Beekman M, Bolton JL, Bragg-Gresham JL, Buyske S, Demirkan A, Deng G, Ehret GB, Feenstra B, Feitosa MF, Fischer K, Goel A, Gong J, Jackson AU, Kanoni S, Kleber ME, Kristiansson K, Lim U, Lotay V, Mangino M, Leach IM, Medina-Gomez C, Medland SE, Nalls MA, Palmer CD, Pasko D, Pechlivanis S, Peters MJ, Prokopenko I, Shungin D, Stančáková A, Strawbridge RJ, Sung YJ, Tanaka T, Teumer A, Trompet S, van der Laan SW, van Setten J, Van Vliet-Ostaptchouk JV, Wang Z, Yengo L, Zhang W, Isaacs A, Albrecht E, Ärnlöv J, Arscott GM, Attwood AP, Bandinelli S, Barrett A, Bas IN, Bellis C, Bennett AJ, Berne C, Blagieva R, Blüher M, Böhringer S, Bonnycastle LL, Böttcher Y, Boyd HA, Bruinenberg M, Caspersen IH, Chen YI, Clarke R, Daw EW, de Craen AJM, Delgado G, Dimitriou M, Doney ASF, Eklund N, Estrada K, Eury E, Folkersen L, Fraser RM, Garcia ME, Geller F, Giedraitis V, Gigante B, Go AS, Golay A, Goodall AH, Gordon SD, Gorski M, Grabe HJ, Grallert H, Grammer TB, Gräßler J, Grönberg H, Groves CJ, Gusto G, Haessler J, Hall P, Haller T, Hallmans G, Hartman CA, Hassinen M, Hayward C, Heard-Costa NL, Helmer Q, Hengstenberg C, Holmen O, Hottenga JJ, James AL, Jeff JM, Johansson Å, Jolley J, Juliusdottir T, Kinnunen L, Koenig W, Koskenvuo M, Kratzer W, Laitinen J, Lamina C, Leander K, Lee NR, Lichtner P, Lind L, Lindström J, Lo KS, Lobbens S, Lorbeer R, Lu Y, Mach F, Magnusson PKE, Mahajan A, McArdle WL, McLachlan S, Menni C, Merger S, Mihailov E, Milani L, Moayyeri A, Monda KL, Morken MA, Mulas A, Müller G, Müller-Nurasyid M, Musk AW, Nagaraja R, Nöthen MM, Nolte IM, Pilz S, Rayner NW, Renstrom F, Rettig R, Ried JS, Ripke S, Robertson NR, Rose LM, Sanna S, Scharnagl H, Scholtens S, Schumacher FR, Scott WR, Seufferlein T, Shi J, Smith AV, Smolonska J, Stanton AV, Steinthorsdottir V, Stirrups K, Stringham HM, Sundström J, Swertz MA, Swift AJ, Syvänen AC, Tan ST, Tayo BO, Thorand B, Thorleifsson G, Tyrer JP, Uh HW, Vandenput L, Verhulst FC, Vermeulen SH, Verweij N, Vonk JM, Waite LL, Warren HR, Waterworth D, Weedon MN, Wilkens LR, Willenborg C, Wilsgaard T, Wojczynski MK, Wong A, Wright AF, Zhang Q, Brennan EP, Choi M, Dastani Z, Drong AW, Eriksson P, Franco-Cereceda A, Gådin JR, Gharavi AG, Goddard ME, Handsaker RE, Huang J, Karpe F, Kathiresan S, Keildson S, Kiryluk K, Kubo M, Lee JY, Liang L, Lifton RP, Ma B, McCarroll SA, McKnight AJ, Min JL, Moffatt MF, Montgomery GW, Murabito JM, Nicholson G, Nyholt DR, Okada Y, Perry JRB, Dorajoo R, Reinmaa E, Salem RM, Sandholm N, Scott RA, Stolk L, Takahashi A, Tanaka T, van ’t Hooft FM, Vinkhuyzen AAE, Westra HJ, Zheng W, Zondervan KT, Heath AC, Arveiler D, Bakker SJL, Beilby J, Bergman RN, Blangero J, Bovet P, Campbell H, Caulfield MJ, Cesana G, Chakravarti A, Chasman DI, Chines PS, Collins FS, Crawford DC, Cupples LA, Cusi D, Danesh J, de Faire U, den Ruijter HM, Dominiczak AF, Erbel R, Erdmann J, Eriksson JG, Farrall M, Felix SB, Ferrannini E, Ferrières J, Ford I, Forouhi NG, Forrester T, Franco OH, Gansevoort RT, Gejman PV, Gieger C, Gottesman O, Gudnason V, Gyllensten U, Hall AS, Harris TB, Hattersley AT, Hicks AA, Hindorff LA, Hingorani AD, Hofman A, Homuth G, Hovingh GK, Humphries SE, Hunt SC, Hyppönen E, Illig T, Jacobs KB, Jarvelin MR, Jöckel KH, Johansen B, Jousilahti P, Jukema JW, Jula AM, Kaprio J, Kastelein JJP, Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi SM, Kiemeney LA, Knekt P, Kooner JS, Kooperberg C, Kovacs P, Kraja AT, Kumari M, Kuusisto J, Lakka TA, Langenberg C, Marchand LL, Lehtimäki T, Lyssenko V, Männistö S, Marette A, Matise TC, McKenzie CA, McKnight B, Moll FL, Morris AD, Morris AP, Murray JC, Nelis M, Ohlsson C, Oldehinkel AJ, Ong KK, Madden PAF, Pasterkamp G, Peden JF, Peters A, Postma DS, Pramstaller PP, Price JF, Qi L, Raitakari OT, Rankinen T, Rao DC, Rice TK, Ridker PM, Rioux JD, Ritchie MD, Rudan I, Salomaa V, Samani NJ, Saramies J, Sarzynski MA, Schunkert H, Schwarz PEH, Sever P, Shuldiner AR, Sinisalo J, Stolk RP, Strauch K, Tönjes A, Trégouët DA, Tremblay A, Tremoli E, Virtamo J, Vohl MC, Völker U, Waeber G, Willemsen G, Witteman JC, Zillikens MC, Adair LS, Amouyel P, Asselbergs FW, Assimes TL, Bochud M, Boehm BO, Boerwinkle E, Bornstein SR, Bottinger EP, Bouchard C, Cauchi S, Chambers JC, Chanock SJ, Cooper RS, de Bakker PIW, Dedoussis G, Ferrucci L, Franks PW, Froguel P, Groop LC, Haiman CA, Hamsten A, Hui J, Hunter DJ, Hveem K, Kaplan RC, Kivimaki M, Kuh D, Laakso M, Liu Y, Martin NG, März W, Melbye M, Metspalu A, Moebus S, Munroe PB, Njølstad I, Oostra BA, Palmer CNA, Pedersen NL, Perola M, Pérusse L, Peters U, Power C, Quertermous T, Rauramaa R, Rivadeneira F, Saaristo TE, Saleheen D, Sattar N, Schadt EE, Schlessinger D, Slagboom PE, Snieder H, Spector TD, Thorsteinsdottir U, Stumvoll M, Tuomilehto J, Uitterlinden AG, Uusitupa M, van der Harst P, Walker M, Wallaschofski H, Wareham NJ, Watkins H, Weir DR, Wichmann HE, Wilson JF, Zanen P, Borecki IB, Deloukas P, Fox CS, Heid IM, O’Connell JR, Strachan DP, Stefansson K, van Duijn CM, Abecasis GR, Franke L, Frayling TM, McCarthy MI, Visscher PM, Scherag A, Willer CJ, Boehnke M, Mohlke KL, Lindgren CM, Beckmann JS, Barroso I, North KE, Ingelsson E, Hirschhorn JN, Loos RJF and Speliotes EK. Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology. Nature. 2015;518:197–206.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Evangelou E, Warren HR, Mosen-Ansorena D, Mifsud B, Pazoki R, Gao H, Ntritsos G, Dimou N, Cabrera CP, Karaman I, Ng FL, Evangelou M, Witkowska K, Tzanis E, Hellwege JN, Giri A, Velez Edwards DR, Sun YV, Cho K, Gaziano JM, Wilson PWF, Tsao PS, Kovesdy CP, Esko T, Mägi R, Milani L, Almgren P, Boutin T, Debette S, Ding J, Giulianini F, Holliday EG, Jackson AU, Li-Gao R, Lin WY, Luan J, Mangino M, Oldmeadow C, Prins BP, Qian Y, Sargurupremraj M, Shah N, Surendran P, Thériault S, Verweij N, Willems SM, Zhao JH, Amouyel P, Connell J, de Mutsert R, Doney ASF, Farrall M, Menni C, Morris AD, Noordam R, Paré G, Poulter NR, Shields DC, Stanton A, Thom S, Abecasis G, Amin N, Arking DE, Ayers KL, Barbieri CM, Batini C, Bis JC, Blake T, Bochud M, Boehnke M, Boerwinkle E, Boomsma DI, Bottinger EP, Braund PS, Brumat M, Campbell A, Campbell H, Chakravarti A, Chambers JC, Chauhan G, Ciullo M, Cocca M, Collins F, Cordell HJ, Davies G, de Borst MH, de Geus EJ, Deary IJ, Deelen J, Del Greco MF, Demirkale CY, Dörr M, Ehret GB, Elosua R, Enroth S, Erzurumluoglu AM, Ferreira T, Frånberg M, Franco OH, Gandin I, Gasparini P, Giedraitis V, Gieger C, Girotto G, Goel A, Gow AJ, Gudnason V, Guo X, Gyllensten U, Hamsten A, Harris TB, Harris SE, Hartman CA, Havulinna AS, Hicks AA, Hofer E, Hofman A, Hottenga JJ, Huffman JE, Hwang SJ, Ingelsson E, James A, Jansen R, Jarvelin MR, Joehanes R, Johansson Å, Johnson AD, Joshi PK, Jousilahti P, Jukema JW, Jula A, Kähönen M, Kathiresan S, Keavney BD, Khaw KT, Knekt P, Knight J, Kolcic I, Kooner JS, Koskinen S, Kristiansson K, Kutalik Z, Laan M, Larson M, Launer LJ, Lehne B, Lehtimäki T, Liewald DCM, Lin L, Lind L, Lindgren CM, Liu Y, Loos RJF, Lopez LM, Lu Y, Lyytikäinen LP, Mahajan A, Mamasoula C, Marrugat J, Marten J, Milaneschi Y, Morgan A, Morris AP, Morrison AC, Munson PJ, Nalls MA, Nandakumar P, Nelson CP, Niiranen T, Nolte IM, Nutile T, Oldehinkel AJ, Oostra BA, O’Reilly PF, Org E, Padmanabhan S, Palmas W, Palotie A, Pattie A, Penninx B, Perola M, Peters A, Polasek O, Pramstaller PP, Nguyen QT, Raitakari OT, Ren M, Rettig R, Rice K, Ridker PM, Ried JS, Riese H, Ripatti S, Robino A, Rose LM, Rotter JI, Rudan I, Ruggiero D, Saba Y, Sala CF, Salomaa V, Samani NJ, Sarin AP, Schmidt R, Schmidt H, Shrine N, Siscovick D, Smith AV, Snieder H, Sõber S, Sorice R, Starr JM, Stott DJ, Strachan DP, Strawbridge RJ, Sundström J, Swertz MA, Taylor KD, Teumer A, Tobin MD, Tomaszewski M, Toniolo D, Traglia M, Trompet S, Tuomilehto J, Tzourio C, Uitterlinden AG, Vaez A, van der Most PJ, van Duijn CM, Vergnaud AC, Verwoert GC, Vitart V, Völker U, Vollenweider P, Vuckovic D, Watkins H, Wild SH, Willemsen G, Wilson JF, Wright AF, Yao J, Zemunik T, Zhang W, Attia JR, Butterworth AS, Chasman DI, Conen D, Cucca F, Danesh J, Hayward C, Howson JMM, Laakso M, Lakatta EG, Langenberg C, Melander O, Mook-Kanamori DO, Palmer CNA, Risch L, Scott RA, Scott RJ, Sever P, Spector TD, van der Harst P, Wareham NJ, Zeggini E, Levy D, Munroe PB, Newton-Cheh C, Brown MJ, Metspalu A, Hung AM, O’Donnell CJ, Edwards TL, Psaty BM, Tzoulaki I, Barnes MR, Wain LV, Elliott P and Caulfield MJ. Genetic analysis of over 1 million people identifies 535 new loci associated with blood pressure traits. Nat Genet. 2018;50:1412–1425.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Willer CJ, Schmidt EM, Sengupta S, Peloso GM, Gustafsson S, Kanoni S, Ganna A, Chen J, Buchkovich ML, Mora S, Beckmann JS, Bragg-Gresham JL, Chang HY, Demirkan A, Den Hertog HM, Do R, Donnelly LA, Ehret GB, Esko T, Feitosa MF, Ferreira T, Fischer K, Fontanillas P, Fraser RM, Freitag DF, Gurdasani D, Heikkilä K, Hyppönen E, Isaacs A, Jackson AU, Johansson Å, Johnson T, Kaakinen M, Kettunen J, Kleber ME, Li X, Luan J, Lyytikäinen LP, Magnusson PKE, Mangino M, Mihailov E, Montasser ME, Müller-Nurasyid M, Nolte IM, O’Connell JR, Palmer CD, Perola M, Petersen AK, Sanna S, Saxena R, Service SK, Shah S, Shungin D, Sidore C, Song C, Strawbridge RJ, Surakka I, Tanaka T, Teslovich TM, Thorleifsson G, Van den Herik EG, Voight BF, Volcik KA, Waite LL, Wong A, Wu Y, Zhang W, Absher D, Asiki G, Barroso I, Been LF, Bolton JL, Bonnycastle LL, Brambilla P, Burnett MS, Cesana G, Dimitriou M, Doney ASF, Döring A, Elliott P, Epstein SE, Ingi Eyjolfsson G, Gigante B, Goodarzi MO, Grallert H, Gravito ML, Groves CJ, Hallmans G, Hartikainen AL, Hayward C, Hernandez D, Hicks AA, Holm H, Hung YJ, Illig T, Jones MR, Kaleebu P, Kastelein JJP, Khaw KT, Kim E, Klopp N, Komulainen P, Kumari M, Langenberg C, Lehtimäki T, Lin SY, Lindström J, Loos RJF, Mach F, McArdle WL, Meisinger C, Mitchell BD, Müller G, Nagaraja R, Narisu N, Nieminen TVM, Nsubuga RN, Olafsson I, Ong KK, Palotie A, Papamarkou T, Pomilla C, Pouta A, Rader DJ, Reilly MP, Ridker PM, Rivadeneira F, Rudan I, Ruokonen A, Samani N, Scharnagl H, Seeley J, Silander K, Stančáková A, Stirrups K, Swift AJ, Tiret L, Uitterlinden AG, van Pelt LJ, Vedantam S, Wainwright N, Wijmenga C, Wild SH, Willemsen G, Wilsgaard T, Wilson JF, Young EH, Zhao JH, Adair LS, Arveiler D, Assimes TL, Bandinelli S, Bennett F, Bochud M, Boehm BO, Boomsma DI, Borecki IB, Bornstein SR, Bovet P, Burnier M, Campbell H, Chakravarti A, Chambers JC, Chen YI, Collins FS, Cooper RS, Danesh J, Dedoussis G, de Faire U, Feranil AB, Ferrières J, Ferrucci L, Freimer NB, Gieger C, Groop LC, Gudnason V, Gyllensten U, Hamsten A, Harris TB, Hingorani A, Hirschhorn JN, Hofman A, Hovingh GK, Hsiung CA, Humphries SE, Hunt SC, Hveem K, Iribarren C, Järvelin MR, Jula A, Kähönen M, Kaprio J, Kesäniemi A, Kivimaki M, Kooner JS, Koudstaal PJ, Krauss RM, Kuh D, Kuusisto J, Kyvik KO, Laakso M, Lakka TA, Lind L, Lindgren CM, Martin NG, März W, McCarthy MI, McKenzie CA, Meneton P, Metspalu A, Moilanen L, Morris AD, Munroe PB, Njølstad I, Pedersen NL, Power C, Pramstaller PP, Price JF, Psaty BM, Quertermous T, Rauramaa R, Saleheen D, Salomaa V, Sanghera DK, Saramies J, Schwarz PEH, Sheu WH, Shuldiner AR, Siegbahn A, Spector TD, Stefansson K, Strachan DP, Tayo BO, Tremoli E, Tuomilehto J, Uusitupa M, van Duijn CM, Vollenweider P, Wallentin L, Wareham NJ, Whitfield JB, Wolffenbuttel BHR, Ordovas JM, Boerwinkle E, Palmer CNA, Thorsteinsdottir U, Chasman DI, Rotter JI, Franks PW, Ripatti S, Cupples LA, Sandhu MS, Rich SS, Boehnke M, Deloukas P, Kathiresan S, Mohlke KL, Ingelsson E and Abecasis GR. Discovery and refinement of loci associated with lipid levels. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1274–1283.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Tian X, Zuo Y, Chen S, Liu Q, Tao B, Wu S and Wang A. Triglyceride-glucose index is associated with the risk of myocardial infarction: an 11-year prospective study in the Kailuan cohort. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20:19.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    Huang R, Lin Y, Ye X, Zhong X, Xie P, Li M, Zhuang X and Liao X. Triglyceride-glucose index in the development of heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction: analysis of the ARIC study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022.
  32. 32.↵
    Banerjee D, Biggs ML, Mercer L, Mukamal K, Kaplan R, Barzilay J, Kuller L, Kizer JR, Djousse L, Tracy R, Zieman S, Lloyd-Jones D, Siscovick D and Carnethon M. Insulin resistance and risk of incident heart failure: Cardiovascular Health Study. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6:364–70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    Vardeny O, Gupta DK, Claggett B, Burke S, Shah A, Loehr L, Rasmussen-Torvik L, Selvin E, Chang PP, Aguilar D and Solomon SD. Insulin resistance and incident heart failure the ARIC study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities). JACC Heart Fail. 2013;1:531–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    Wamil M, Coleman RL, Adler AI, McMurray JJV and Holman RR. Increased Risk of Incident Heart Failure and Death Is Associated With Insulin Resistance in People With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: UKPDS 89. Diabetes Care. 2021;44:1877–1884.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    Kolwicz SC, Jr.., Purohit S and Tian R. Cardiac metabolism and its interactions with contraction, growth, and survival of cardiomyocytes. Circ Res. 2013;113:603–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    Yazıcı D and Sezer H. Insulin Resistance, Obesity and Lipotoxicity. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;960:277–304.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    Nishida K and Otsu K. Inflammation and metabolic cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Res. 2017;113:389–398.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    Samuelsson AM, Bollano E, Mobini R, Larsson BM, Omerovic E, Fu M, Waagstein F and Holmäng A. Hyperinsulinemia: effect on cardiac mass/function, angiotensin II receptor expression, and insulin signaling pathways. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;291:H787–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    Peters SA, Huxley RR and Woodward M. Diabetes as risk factor for incident coronary heart disease in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 64 cohorts including 858,507 individuals and 28,203 coronary events. Diabetologia. 2014;57:1542–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    Gerdts E and Regitz-Zagrosek V. Sex differences in cardiometabolic disorders. Nat Med. 2019;25:1657–1666.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. 41.↵
    Tramunt B, Smati S, Grandgeorge N, Lenfant F, Arnal JF, Montagner A and Gourdy P. Sex differences in metabolic regulation and diabetes susceptibility. Diabetologia. 2020;63:453–461.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    Toedebusch R, Belenchia A and Pulakat L. Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: Impact of Biological Sex on Disease Development and Molecular Signatures. Front Physiol. 2018;9:453.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    Murphy E, Amanakis G, Fillmore N, Parks RJ and Sun J. Sex Differences in Metabolic Cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Res. 2017;113:370–377.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    Vasques AC, Novaes FS, de Oliveira Mda S, Souza JR, Yamanaka A, Pareja JC, Tambascia MA, Saad MJ and Geloneze B. TyG index performs better than HOMA in a Brazilian population: a hyperglycemic clamp validated study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;93:e98–e100.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    Toro-Huamanchumo CJ, Urrunaga-Pastor D, Guarnizo-Poma M, Lazaro-Alcantara H, Paico-Palacios S, Pantoja-Torres B, Ranilla-Seguin VDC and Benites-Zapata VA. Triglycerides and glucose index as an insulin resistance marker in a sample of healthy adults. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019;13:272–277.
    OpenUrl
  46. 46.↵
    Ormazabal V, Nair S, Elfeky O, Aguayo C, Salomon C and Zuñiga FA. Association between insulin resistance and the development of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17:122.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    Lakhani I, Leung KSK, Tse G and Lee APW. Novel Mechanisms in Heart Failure With Preserved, Midrange, and Reduced Ejection Fraction. Front Physiol. 2019;10:874.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 29, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Triglyceride-glucose index and the risk of heart failure: evidence from two large cohorts and a Mendelian randomization analysis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Triglyceride-glucose index and the risk of heart failure: evidence from two large cohorts and a Mendelian randomization analysis
Xintao Li, Jeffrey Shi Kai Chan, Bo Guan, Shi Peng, Xiaoyu Wu, Jiandong Zhou, Jeremy Man Ho Hui, Yan Hiu Athena Lee, Danish Iltaf Satti, Shek Long Tsang, Shouling Wu, Songwen Chen, Gary Tse, Shaowen Liu
medRxiv 2022.06.28.22277033; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.28.22277033
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Triglyceride-glucose index and the risk of heart failure: evidence from two large cohorts and a Mendelian randomization analysis
Xintao Li, Jeffrey Shi Kai Chan, Bo Guan, Shi Peng, Xiaoyu Wu, Jiandong Zhou, Jeremy Man Ho Hui, Yan Hiu Athena Lee, Danish Iltaf Satti, Shek Long Tsang, Shouling Wu, Songwen Chen, Gary Tse, Shaowen Liu
medRxiv 2022.06.28.22277033; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.28.22277033

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (230)
  • Allergy and Immunology (507)
  • Anesthesia (111)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1256)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (207)
  • Dermatology (148)
  • Emergency Medicine (283)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (537)
  • Epidemiology (10047)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (500)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2482)
  • Geriatric Medicine (239)
  • Health Economics (482)
  • Health Informatics (1652)
  • Health Policy (756)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (638)
  • Hematology (250)
  • HIV/AIDS (536)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11888)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
  • Medical Education (255)
  • Medical Ethics (75)
  • Nephrology (269)
  • Neurology (2301)
  • Nursing (140)
  • Nutrition (354)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (458)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (537)
  • Oncology (1257)
  • Ophthalmology (377)
  • Orthopedics (134)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (158)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (326)
  • Pediatrics (737)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (315)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2294)
  • Public and Global Health (4850)
  • Radiology and Imaging (846)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (493)
  • Respiratory Medicine (654)
  • Rheumatology (288)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (241)
  • Sports Medicine (228)
  • Surgery (271)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (130)
  • Urology (100)