Abstract
Background The major aims of the three Predictors Studies have been to further our understanding of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) progression sufficient to predict the length of time from disease onset to major disease outcomes in individual patients with AD.
Objectives To validate a longitudinal Grade of Membership (L-GoM) prediction algorithm developed using clinic-based, mainly white patients from the Predictors 2 Study in a statistically representative community-based sample of Hispanic (N=211) and non-Hispanic (N=62) older adults (with 60 males and 213 females) from the Predictors 3 Study and extend the algorithm to mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
Methods The L-GoM model was applied to data collected at the initial Predictors 3 visit for 150 subjects with AD and 123 with MCI. Participants were followed annually for up to seven years. Observed rates of survival and need for full-time care (FTC) were compared to those predicted by the algorithm.
Results Initial MCI/AD severity in Predictors 3 was substantially higher than among clinic-based AD patients enrolled at the specialized Alzheimer’s centers in Predictors 2. The observed survival and need for FTC followed the L-GoM model trajectories in individuals with MCI or AD, except for N=32 subjects who were initially diagnosed with AD but reverted to a non-AD diagnosis on follow-up.
Conclusions These findings indicate that the L-GoM model is applicable to community-dwelling, multiethnic older adults with AD. They extend the use of the model to the prediction of outcomes for MCI. They also justify release of our L-GoM calculator at this time.
Competing Interest Statement
Dr. Stern consults for Eisai, Lilly, and Arcadia. Columbia University licenses the Dependence Scale, and in accordance with university policy, Dr. Stern is entitled to royalties through this license. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01AG007370. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The present study was conducted as part of IRB protocol 7258R and approved by the New York State Psychiatric Institute Institutional Review Board.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Updated Supplement
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
