ABSTRACT
Background Nephrotic syndrome is associated with an acquired hypercoagulopathy thought to drive its predisposition for venous thromboembolism. Previous studies have suggested that urinary antithrombin loss leading to acquired antithrombin deficiency is the primary mechanism underlying this hypercoagulopathy, but this hypothesis has not been directly tested. The objectives of this study were to test the influence of antithrombin levels on hypercoagulopathy in nephrotic syndrome patient samples and perform meta-analyses to evaluate the likelihood of antithrombin deficiency in nephrotic syndrome patients.
Design Samples from 3 independent nephrotic syndrome cohorts were analyzed. Antithrombin antigen and activity assays were performed using ELISA and amidolytic assays, respectively. Plasma thrombin generation, albumin, and urine protein-to-creatinine ratios were determined using established methods. Meta-analyses were performed by combining these new data with previously published data.
Results Antithrombin levels were not consistently related to either plasma albumin or proteinuria. Antithrombin was quantitatively related to hypercoagulopathy in adult nephrotic syndrome. Whereas antithrombin activity was inconsistently associated with hypercoagulopathy in childhood nephrotic syndrome. Notably, hypercoagulopathy did not differ between patients with normal antithrombin levels and those with levels below the threshold used to define clinical antithrombin deficiency (<70%). Moreover, ex vivo antithrombin supplementation did not significantly alter hypercoagulopathy in antithrombin deficient plasma samples. Moreover, the meta-analyses demonstrated that antithrombin deficiency is not a uniform feature of nephrotic syndrome but may be more common in children than adults.
Conclusions These data suggest that antithrombin deficiency plays only a limited role in the mechanisms underlying the acquired hypercoagulopathy of nephrotic syndrome. Moreover, antithrombin deficiency is not present in all nephrotic syndrome patients and is more likely in children than adults despite the higher risk for venous thromboembolism in adults than children. Future studies should focus on identifying antithrombin-independent mechanisms that better explain the pathophysiology of hypercoagulopathy in nephrotic syndrome.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
BAK was supported by grants U54DK083912-05S1, U54DK083912-07S1, K08DK103982, R03DK118315, and R01DK124549 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE) is part of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN), which is funded by the NIH and led by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) through its Division of Rare Diseases Research Innovation (DRDRI). NEPTUNE is funded under grant number U54DK083912 as a collaboration between NCATS and the NIDDK. Additional funding and/or programmatic support is provided by the University of Michigan, NephCure Kidney International and the Halpin Foundation. RDCRN consortia are supported by the RDCRN Data Management and Coordinating Center (DMCC), funded by NCATS and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) under U2CTR002818.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The IRBs of Nationwide Children's Hospital and the University of Michigan gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
