The Analgesic Efficacy of Different Techniques Surrounding Regional Anesthesia of the Lumbar Plexus and its Terminal Branches for Hip Fracture Surgeries

Abnoos Mosleh-Shirazi, Brian O’Donnell
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.22.22276758

ABSTRACT

Background Research is limited in comparing the analgesic efficacy of the various types of blocks with one another for hip fracture surgeries. Due to the rapid pace in the development of these new techniques in blocking the lumbar plexus and its terminal branches, uncertainty exists in literature and in practice regarding the definition and efficacy of one technique in comparison to another.

Objectives (1) To write a narrative description of regional anesthesia approaches to the lumbar plexus and associated terminal branches; (2) To do a systematic review and meta-analysis of published articles regarding the analgesic efficacy of regional anesthesia in the context of hip fracture and hip fracture surgery.

Questions (1) Does regional anesthesia of the lumbar plexus and its terminal branches enhance analgesic outcomes following hip fracture and hip fracture surgery? (2) Does the evidence point toward one techniques superiority over another? (3) Does evidence show a necessity for a nerve block over the use of opioid analgesics?

Search methods Six databases: EMBASE, PUBMED, SCOPUS, EBSCO (CINAHL and MEDLINE), WEB OF SCIENCE, COCHRANE LIBRARY were searched on October 12th, 2020.

Search criteria Studies were selected based on inclusion of: Study Design: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT), Population: Adults (18+ years) undergoing hip fracture surgery, Intervention: FNB, FICB, PCB and/or PENG block, Comparison: Another intervention of interest, Placebo, Non-intervention, Systemic analgesics (Opioids, NSAIDs, Paracetamol), Outcome: Analgesic efficacy (Pain scores measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) or Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)). Studies were excluded if: Unavailable in full-text, non-human studies, Not RCT, Surgery unrelated to hip fracture.

Data collection and analysis Two reviewers extracted all relevant data from the full text versions of eligible studies using a predefined data extraction form. Study characteristics included: author, publication year, study design, sample size, inclusion and exclusion criteria, type of intervention and control, statistical analysis, outcome data, and authors’ main conclusions.

Risk of bias in individual studies assessed by two reviewers based on criteria adapted from the Cochrane ‘Risk of Bias’ assessment tool. High-risk studies were excluded.

Main results 1. FICB vs Opioid: pain scores at rest at 24h were lower in the FICB group (-0.79 [-1.34, - 0.24], P= 0.005). Pain scores on movement at 12h were lower in the FICB group (-1.91 [-2.5, -1.3], P<0.00001). No difference between groups in other times. 2. FNB vs Opioid: Initial pain scores at rest were lower in FNB (-0.58 [-0.104, -0.12], P=0.01). 3. FICB vs FNB: No difference between groups at rest. Pain scores on movement: initial scores following block, and at 24 hours were lower in the FNB group (initial: 0.53 [0.21, 0.86], P=0.001, 24 h: 0.61 [0.29, 0.94], P=0.0002, results not estimable for 12h (not enough data)).

Authors’ conclusions Both femoral nerve block and fascia iliaca compartment block enhance analgesic outcomes following hip fracture and hip fracture surgery, superior to the use of systemic analgesics such as opioids. FNB may be more efficacious at reducing pain following hip fracture surgery when compared to FICB.

INTRODUCTION

Description of the condition

Hip fractures are a common occurrence in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and more. Consequently, elderly patients are usually on long-term medications, which result in hemodynamic instability that complicates the perioperative management of hip-fracture patients. Unfortunately, there is high morbidity and mortality among these patients, and they are often undertreated for pain. Due to physiological frailty, medical comorbidities and cognitive impairment interfering with pain assessment and treatment, pain management in the elderly is challenging,[1].

Description of the intervention

Opioids, along with other multimodal techniques, are commonly used to address pain. However due to altered pharmacodynamics and coexisting medical conditions, elderly patients are vulnerable to the side effects of opioids such as respiratory depression[2].

The use of peripheral nerve blockade for pain management may resolve some of the issues surrounding the use of opioid analgesics in the elderly. Targeted somatic nerve block via regional anesthesia provides rapid-onset, site specific analgesia while preventing dispensable sympathetic block even in CVS compromised patients[3].

In 1884, the first clinical locoregional anesthetic technique was introduced,[4] followed by the first central neuraxis block just 5 years later. After another 7 decades, the first proximal lower extremity peripheral nerve block was described in 1973 called the “3-in-1 block,”[4]. Since then, many techniques for regional anesthesia of the lumbar plexus and its terminal branches have evolved; including psoas compartment block (PCB) (posterior lumbar plexus block), Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB), 3-in-1 femoral nerve block (FNB) (anterior lumbar plexus block), PENG (pericapsular nerve group) block, etc. These techniques are frequently used for hip fracture patients due to the opioid-sparing effects,[5].

How the intervention might work

The lumbar plexus is formed by lumbar nerves L1-L4 and is the origin of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves, as well as the 4 major nerves that supply the lower limb: femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, obturator, and genitofemoral. The plexus is formed lateral to the intervertebral foramina and passes through psoas major. The nerves of the lumbar plexus pass in front of the hip joint and mainly support the anterior part of the thigh[7].

Regional anaesthesia provides analgesia by pharmacologic disruption of nociceptive transmission, neuroanatomy of the injury, anatomical target sites. Analgesia of large parts of the leg can be achieved by blocking the lumbar plexus and its associated terminal branches. Thus, it is principally used for post-operative analgesia for hip surgeries[8] and provide opioid-sparing effects[9].

A timeline and description of regional anaesthesia approaches to the lumbar plexus and associated terminal branches is provided in Appendix A.

Why it is important to do this review

Early surgery within 48 hours of the hip fracture has shown to decrease complication and mortality rates[6]. This gives an opportunity for anesthesiologists to offer regional analgesia for effective pain control. However, due to the rapid pace in the development of these new techniques in blocking the lumbar plexus and its terminal branches, confusion exists in literature and in practice regarding the definition and efficacy of one technique in comparison to another.

Objectives

(1) To write a narrative description of regional anesthesia approaches to the lumbar plexus and associated terminal branches; (2) To do a systematic review and meta-analysis of published articles regarding the analgesic efficacy of regional anesthesia in the context of hip fracture and hip fracture surgery, to answer the following questions: (1) Does regional anesthesia of the lumbar plexus and its terminal branches enhance analgesic outcomes following hip fracture and hip fracture surgery? (2) Does the evidence point toward one techniques superiority over another? (3) Does evidence show a necessity for a nerve block over the use of opioid analgesics?

METHODS

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

Only prospective RCTs were included in this study, including no blinding, single-blinded and double-blinded studies.

Types of participants

Adults (18+ years) undergoing hip fracture surgery.

Outcome: Analgesic efficacy (Pain scores measured by Visual analogue scale (VAS) or Numerical rating scale (NRS)). Studies were excluded if: Unavailable in full-text, non-human studies, Not RCT, Surgery unrelated to hip fracture.

Types of interventions

FNB, FICB, PCB and/or PENG block compared to another intervention of interest, placebo, non-intervention, or systemic analgesics (opioids, NSAIDs, paracetamol). Any dose or form of local anesthetic to accompany technique (including continuous catheter infusion or single dose) were included.

Types of outcome measures

Primary outcomes

Analgesic efficacy of the intervention using VAS or NRS scales.

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes were accounted for but not included in the meta-analysis, such as: pre-operative and/or post-operative need for analgesia, time to first request for additional analgesia, adverse effects, allergic reactions, length of hospital stay, mortality.

Search methods for identification of studies

Electronic searches

Both electronic and hand-searching techniques were used to identify studies. Six databases: EMBASE, PUBMED, SCOPUS, EBSCO (CINAHL and MEDLINE), WEB OF SCIENCE, COCHRANE LIBRARY were searched on October 12th, 2020.

Searches were limited based on inclusion criteria:

Type of block: Femoral nerve block, Fascia iliaca compartment block, Psoas compartment block, Lumbar plexus block, Pericapsular nerve group PENG block

Type of study: Randomized controlled trial, Human study, Available in English

Age: Adult (18+)

Search words for each database are summarized in Appendix B.

Searching other resources

Manual searches were then conducted for all eligible articles via their reference list and related articles suggested by PubMed.

Data collection and analysis

Two reviewers extracted all relevant data from the full text versions of eligible studies using a predefined data extraction form. Study characteristics included: author, publication year, study design, sample size, inclusion and exclusion criteria, type of intervention and control, statistical analysis, outcome data, and authors’ main conclusions.

Selection of studies

The abstract of each study was reviewed for eligibility by one reviewer (A.M.S). Potential studies underwent full text review by the same author. Studies were excluded if they did not meet the inclusion criteria. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are outlined in Appendix C.

Assessment of risk of bias in included studies

Risk of bias in individual studies assessed by two reviewers based on criteria adapted from the Cochrane ‘Risk of Bias’ assessment tool (RoB 2). A study was rated overall as Low risk, Some concerns, or High risk for bias based on five domains: (1) Randomisation process, (2) Deviations from intended interventions, (3) Missing outcome data, (4) Measurement of the outcome, (5) Selection of the reported result. High risk of bias determined by important imbalances at baseline, improper randomisation, failure of blinding of outcome assessors and significant (>15%) loss to follow-up. High-risk studies were excluded.

Unit of analysis issues

The Hozo equation (Hozo) was used to derive mean and standard deviation from median and inter-quantile ranges. For sample sizes greater than 25, the sample’s median was set to equal to mean as recommended by Hozo et al. Also, for sample sizes of 15 through 70, range was divided by 4 as the best estimate of the sample’s standard deviation as recommended by Hozo et al. The 11-point NRS, and 100-mm VAS scores divided by 10 were considered equal to the 10-cm VAS scale. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of individual included studies and results were shown via forest plots. Data analyses abided by the guidelines set out by the Cochrane Collaboration regarding statistical methods. two-tailed P-values <0.05 were considered significant in all instances. Relative risks and the standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous outcomes were also calculated.

Dealing with missing data

Authors of included studies were individually contacted for missing data.

Assessment of heterogeneity

Chi-squared statistic was used to assess heterogeneity, where values >50% are consistent with large heterogeneity, and using heterogeneity P-value, where values <10% are consistent with large heterogeneity.

Assessment of reporting biases

Funnel plots were conducted to detect publication bias.

Subgroup analysis and investigation of heterogeneity

Since heterogeneity was expected across studies, an inverse variance random-effects model was used to evaluate outcomes. Heterogeneous control interventions and data collection points were investigated via subgroup analyses. Intervention types were pooled into the following subgroups; (1) Fascia-iliaca compartment block vs. intra-articular hip injection (2) Fascia-iliaca compartment block vs. Placebo (sham block) (3) Fascia iliaca compartment block vs. Femoral nerve block (4) Fascia iliaca compartment block vs. opioid or other analgesic (5) Femoral nerve block vs. Placebo (sham block) (6) Femoral nerve block vs. opioid or other analgesic.

Sensitivity analysis

All analyses were conducted using Review Manager (RevMan; version 5.4).

A flow chart demonstrating an overview of the research protocol and study selection process can be found in Appendix D.

RESULTS

Description of the studies

Results of the search

The database search yielded 439 studies. A total of 316 abstracts were screened after removal of duplicates. After screening, 70 full text articles were assessed for eligibility.

Included studies

In total, twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria[12, 14, 16, 20, 23, 27, 28, 33, 34, 38, 47, 51, 59, 60, 62, 65, 57, 66, 74, 77, 80, 82, 83, 85, 86]. Included studies date from 2007 to 2019.

Five articles were removed due to high risk of bias[27, 33, 51, 74, 80], leaving twenty studies for the meta-analysis. The twenty studies yielded 1871 patients in total, with 937 total patients in the intervention groups, and 934 total patients in the control groups.

Excluded studies

Eight studies were removed because the research was not yet complete[17, 18, 53-58], 20 studies were removed because they were irrelevant to hip fracture[10, 13, 15, 22, 24, 26, 29-32, 39, 41, 43, 45, 63, 68, 69-71, 73], six studies were removed because their outcomes did not focus on analgesic efficacy[11, 40, 52, 64, 78, 79], two studies were unavailable in full text (19, 75), and lastly, 9 articles were removed due to inappropriate study design[25, 35, 36, 42, 44, 49, 50, 67, 84]. The reference lists of all articles examined by full text and similar reviews were hand searched, but yielded no additional articles.

Study characteristics

Table 1 presents highlighted study features. All twenty studies were randomised controlled trials. Seven studies compared FICB with opioids[28, 47, 60, 62, 82, 83, 85]. Seven studies compared FNB with opioids[14, 16, 34, 38, 66, 72, 77]. Five studies compared FNB with FICB [20, 23, 59, 65, 86]. One study compared FICB with intra-articular hip injection[12]. See Table 1.

View this table:
Table 1

Study characteristics for all included studies in this review. (FICB, fascia iliaca compartment block; FNB, femoral nerve block; NRS, numeric rating scale; VAS, visual analogue scale; RCT, randomized controlled trial; US, ultrasound).

Risk of bias in included studies

Based on criteria adapted from the Cochrane ‘Risk of Bias’ assessment tool, nine of the included randomised controlled trials[12, 16, 38, 47, 62, 65, 82, 85, 86] were rated with overall low risk of bias, eleven studies had some concerns according to RoB 2[14, 20, 23, 28, 34, 59, 60, 66, 72, 77, 83], and five studies were rated as high risk of bias[27, 33, 51, 74, 80]. These findings are summarized in Table 2. Of the papers with some concern for risk of bias, five had issues with the randomisation process[14, 20, 23, 28, 77], two had deviations from the intended interventions[14, 57], eight had issues with measurement of the outcome[23, 34, 59, 60, 66, 72, 77, 83]. Of the papers with high risk of bias, three had issues with; the (i) randomization process, had (ii) deviations from the intended interventions, and had issues with the (iii) outcome measurement[27, 74, 80], one had issues with the randomization process and measurement of the outcome[33], and one had deviations from the intended interventions as well as issues with the measurement of outcome[51]. None of the papers had missing outcome data, loss to follow-up >15%. or issues with selection of the reported result. The five papers with high risk of bias according to the RoB 2 tool were excluded from the meta-analysis. Thus, twenty articles were included in the meta-analysis.

View this table:
Table 2

Risk of bias within studies based on criteria adapted from the Cochrane ’Risk of Bias’ assessment tool.

Results of individual studies

In the meta-analysis of the seven studies comparing the analgesic efficacy of FICB compared with Opioids, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups at rest at 24 hours and on movement at 12 hours as shown in Table 3. Data for pain scores at rest at 24 hours in this group were derived from three studies out of the seven as shown in Figure 1. Compared with opioids at rest at 24 hours, FICB had a greater analgesic effect with an SMD (standardized mean difference) of -0.79 (95% CI; -1.34, -0.24) (P = 0.005) (Z = 2.83) (heterogeneity: tau2 = 0.09, Chi2 = 3.23, df = 2, P = 0.20, I2 = 38%). Data for pain scores on movement at 12 hours in this group were derived from two studies out of the seven as shown in Figure 2. Compared with opioids on movement at 12 hours, FICB had a greater analgesic effect with an SMD (standardized mean difference) of -1.91 (95% CI; -2.52, -1.30) (P < 0.00001) (Z = 6.18) (heterogeneity: tau2 = 0.00, Chi2 = 1.00, df = 1, P = 0.32, I2 = 0%).

Figure 1
Figure 1

Forest plot of comparison: FICB vs. Opioids. Outcome: pain scores at rest at 24 hours.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Forest plot of comparison: FICB vs. Opioids. Outcome: pain scores on movement at 12 hours.

View this table:
Table 3

Fascia iliaca compartment block vs. Opioids

In the meta-analysis of the seven studies comparing the analgesic efficacy of FNB compared with Opioids, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups initially at rest following the block as shown in Table 4. Data for pain scores at rest following the block in this group were derived from five studies out of the seven as shown in Figure 3. Compared with opioids at rest following the block, FICB had a greater analgesic effect with an SMD (standardized mean difference) of -0.58 (95% CI; -1.04, -0.12) (P = 0.01) (Z = 2.49) (heterogeneity: tau2 = 0.19, Chi2 = 16.46, df = 4, P = 0.002, I2 = 76%).

Figure 3
Figure 3

Forest plot comparison: FNB vs. Opioids. Outcome: initial pain scores at rest following block.

View this table:
Table 4

Femoral nerve block vs. Opioids

In the meta-analysis of the five studies comparing the analgesic efficacy of FICB compared with FNB, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups on movement initially following the block and on movement at 24 hours as shown in Table 5. Data for pain scores on movement initially following the block in this group were derived from one study out of the five as shown in Figure 4. Compared with FICB on movement initially following the block, FNB had a greater analgesic effect with an SMD (standardized mean difference) of 0.53 (95% CI; 0.21, 0.86) (P = 0.001) (Z = 3.26) (heterogeneity: not applicable). Data for pain scores on movement at 24 hours in this group were derived from one study out of the five as shown in Figure 5. Compared with FICB on movement at 24 hours, FNB had a greater analgesic effect with an SMD (standardized mean difference) of 0.61 (95% CI; 0.29, 0.94) (P < 0.002) (Z = 3.71) (heterogeneity: not applicable).

Figure 4
Figure 4

Forest plot comparison: FICB vs. FNB. Outcome: initial pain scores on movement following block.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: FICB vs. FNB. Outcome: pain scores on movement at 24 hours.

View this table:
Table 5

Fascia iliaca compartment block vs. Femoral nerve block

Forest plots for the studies with statistically significant findings can be found in Figures 6-9.

Figure 6
Figure 6

Funnel plot of comparison: FICB vs. Opioids. Outcome: pain scores at rest at 24 hours.

Figure 7
Figure 7

Funnel plot of comparison: FICB vs. Opioids. Outcome: pain scores on movement at 12 hours.

Figure 8
Figure 8

Funnel plot of comparison: FNB vs. Opioids. Outcome: initial pain scores at rest following block.

Figure 9
Figure 9

Funnel plot comparison: FICB vs. FNB. Outcome: initial pain scores on movement following block.

Figure 10
Figure 10

Funnel plot of comparison: FICB vs. FNB Outcome: pain scores on movement at 24 hours

DISCUSSION

Summary of main results

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that FNB had a superior analgesic effect compared with FICB, and both FNB and FICB had superior analgesic effect compared with opioids.

Of the twenty studies included in the meta-analysis, 7 studies compared FICB with opioids. Pain scores at rest at 24 hours (-0.79 [-1.34, -0.24], P= 0.005), and on movement at 12 hours post hip-fracture surgery (-1.91 [-2.5, -1.3], P< 0.00001) were lower in the FICB group compared with the opioid group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the use of FICB versus opioids in analgesic efficacy measured by pain (VAS, NRS) scores after hip fracture surgery in patients initially at rest following the block, at rest at 12 hours, initial pain scores on movement following the block, or on movement at 24 hours.

An additional seven studies compared FNB with opioids. The initial pain scores at rest were lower in the FNB group (-0.58 [-0.104, -0.12], P= 0.01). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the use of FNB versus opioids in analgesic efficacy after hip fracture surgery in patients at rest at 12 hours, 24 hours, or when comparing initial pain scores on movement following the block. There was insufficient data for pain scores on movement at 12 hours, and 24 hours.

Finally, five studies compared FNB with FICB. Pain scores on movement initially following the block, and at 24 hours were lower in the FNB group when compared with FICB (initial: 0.53 [0.21, 0.86], P= 0.001, 24 h: 0.61 [0.29, 0.94], P= 0.0002). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups for pain scores at rest. There was insufficient data for pain scores at rest at 12 hours, and pain scores on movement at 12 hours.

The remaining study compared the analgesic efficacy of FICB with intra-articular hip injection (IAHI) as control[12]. The primary outcome was pain relief measured using the NRS at 20 minutes, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours after the regional anaesthesia, both at rest and on movement. Pain was significantly lower in the IAHI group during movement of the fractured limb at 20 min (p < 0.05), 12h (p<0.05), 24h (p<0.05) and 48h (p<0.05). the findings of this study suggest that IAHI provides better pre-operative pain management in elder patients with intracapsular hip fractures compared to FICB.

Strengths and Limitations

The strengths of this study are that two independent reviewers decided the eligibility of the full-text articles and conducted the risk of bias assessment, and high risk of bias papers were not included in the meta-analysis. In addition, a full manual search was conducted to ensure no missing articles, and authors of the included papers were contacted for missing data. However, the limitations of this study were that filters were applied during the search, which set limits for the type of study, age, language, etc. Due to subgrouping, there were not enough studies to conduct funnel plots and rule out publication bias. The funnel plot might appear symmetrical, but the interpretation is unsure, with only five to seven studies per subgroup. In addition, the statistically significant results for the FICB vs. FNB subgroup were based on data from 1 paper.

AUTHORS’ CONCLUSIONS

Implications for practice

Both femoral nerve block and fascia iliaca compartment block enhance analgesic outcomes following hip fracture and hip fracture surgery, superior to the use of systemic analgesics such as opioids. FNB may be more efficacious at reducing pain following hip fracture surgery when compared to FICB.

Implications for research

This paper was designed to include all forms of regional anaesthesia for the lumbar plexus and its terminal branches. In the end, there was only enough high quality randomized-controlled trials to answer the research questions for Femoral nerve block and Fascia Iliaca Compartment block. More research should be conducted on the analgesic efficacy of PCB and PENG block for hip fracture surgeries. That way, future systematic reviews and meta-analyses can effectively compare all the block types. Future studies should further focus on comparing the analgesic efficacy of FNB vs FICB with respect to hip fracture surgeries to see if evidence supports the superiority of FNB compared to FICB.

CONTRIBUTIONS OF AUTHORS

Conducted literature search and study selection: A.M.S.

Supervised literature search and study selection: B.O.D.

Performed data extraction and assessment of risk of bias: both authors.

Conducted meta-analysis: A.M.S.

Supervised meta-analysis: B.O.D.

Wrote manuscript: A.M.S.

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

The authors have no competing interest to declare.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PROTOCOL AND REVIEW

There were no differences between the protocol and review.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript

APPENDIX

Appendix A
Appendix A

Timeline and description of regional anaesthesia approaches to the lumbar plexus and associated terminal branches.

View this table:
Appendix B

Database search words and results.

View this table:
Appendix C

Inclusion and exclusion criteria used to select articles.

Appendix D
Appendix D

Overview of research protocol and study selection process.

View this table:
Appendix E

completed checklist for the reporting guideline appropriate to study: PRISMA 2020 Checklist from www.equator-network.org

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

I would like to thank Dr. Brian O’Donnell for his contributions and guidance throughout this project.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest [or state specific conflicts].

  • Funding: The authors have no sources of funding to declare for this manuscript [or declare funding].

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Amiri H, Zamani M, Safari S. Lumbar Plexus Block for Management of Hip Surgeries. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. 2014;4(3).
  2. 2.↵
    Scurrah A, Shiner C, Stevens J, Faux S. Regional nerve blockade for early analgesic management of elderly patients with hip fracture -a narrative review. Anaesthesia. 2017;73(6):769–783.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    Dangle J, Kukreja P, Kalagara H. Review of Current Practices of Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Hip Fracture and Surgery. Current Anesthesiology Reports. 2020;10(3):259–266.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    Doroshenko M, Turkot O, Horn DB. Sympathetic Nerve Block. [Updated 2021 Feb 8]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557637/
  5. 5.↵
    Leeuw MAD, Zuurmond WWA, Perez RSGM. The Psoas Compartment Block for Hip Surgery: The Past, Present, and Future. Anesthesiology Research and Practice. 2011;2011:1– 6.
  6. 6.↵
    Girón-Arango L, Peng PW, Chin KJ, Brull R, Perlas A. Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Hip Fracture. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2018:1.
  7. 7.↵
    Schunke Michael, Schulte E, Schumacher U, Voll MM, Wesker K. Thieme atlas of anatomy. General anatomy and musculoskeletal system. 2014.
  8. 8.↵
    Touray S, Leeuw MD, Zuurmond W, Perez RM. Psoas compartment block for lower extremity surgery: a meta-analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2008;101(6):750–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Girón-Arango L, Peng PW, Chin KJ, Brull R, Perlas A. Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Hip Fracture. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2018:1.
  10. 10.↵
    Abdelmawgoud A, Rashwan S. The analgesic efficacy of continuous fascia iliaca block vs. continuous psoas compartment block after hip surgery: A comparative study. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2012;28(3):183–7.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    Altermatt FR, Echevarría GC, de la Fuente RF, Baeza R, Ferrada M, de la Cuadra JC, et al. Perioperative lumbar plexus block and cardiac ischemia in patients with hip fracture: randomized clinical trial. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2018;68(5):484–91.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    Aprato A, Audisio A, Santoro A, Grosso E, Devivo S, Berardino M, et al. Fascia-iliaca compartment block vs intra-articular hip injection for preoperative pain management in intracapsular hip fractures: A blind, randomized, controlled trial. Injury. 2018;49(12):2203–8.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    Badiola I, Liu J, Huang S, Kelly JD, Elkassabany N. A comparison of the fascia iliaca block to the lumbar plexus block in providing analgesia following arthroscopic hip surgery: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2018;49:26–9.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    Beaudoin FL, Haran JP, Liebmann O. A comparison of ultrasound-guided three-in-one femoral nerve block versus parenteral opioids alone for analgesia in emergency department patients with hip fractures: A randomized controlled trial. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2013;20(6):584–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Bober K, Kadado A, Charters M, Ayoola A, North T. Pain Control After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial Determining Efficacy of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Blocks in the Immediate Postoperative Period. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2020;35(6):S241–S5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Chaudet A, Bouhours G, Rineau E, Hamel JF, Leblanc D, Steiger V, et al. Impact of preoperative continuous femoral blockades on morphine consumption and morphine side effects in hip-fracture patients: A randomized, placebo-controlled study. Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine. 2016;35(1):37–43.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    Chi CI. A randomized controlled trial of comparing two methods of nerve block in combination with laryngeal mask anesthesia effect for hip fracture on post-operative quality of recovery in elderly patients. http://wwwwhoint/trialsearch/Trial2aspx?TrialID=ChiCTR-IOR-15007353. 2015.
  18. 18.↵
    Chi CI. Nerve block anesthesia and general anesthesia influnce postoperative on cognitive dysfunction after hip athroplasty of aged fracture of neck of femur patients: randomized controlled trial. http://wwwwhoint/trialsearch/Trial2aspx?TrialID=ChiCTR-INC-16009960. 2016.
  19. 19.
    Coad NR. Post-operative analgesia following femoral-neck surgery--a comparison between 3 in 1 femoral nerve block and lateral cutaneous nerve block. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1991;8(4):287–90.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Cooper AL, Nagree Y, Goudie A, Watson PR, Arendts G. Ultrasound[guided femoral nerve blocks are not superior to ultrasound[guided fascia iliaca blocks for fractured neck of femur. Emergency Medicine Australasia. 2019;31(3):393–8.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.
    Cuvillon, P., Ripart, J., Debureaux, S., Boisson, C., Veyrat, E., & Mahamat, A. et al. (2007). Analgésie postopératoire par cathéter fémoral après fracture du col du fémur chez la personne âgée: étude prospective randomisée. Annales Françaises D’anesthésie Et De Réanimation, 26(1), 2–9. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2006.06.025
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Cornell C. Multimodal approach to pain management following bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: i’m a believer!: commentary on an article by Hyun Kang, MD, et al.: effectiveness of multimodal pain management after bipolar hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture. a randomized, controlled study. Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 2013;95(4):e211□e2.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    Deniz S, Atım A, Kürklü M, Çaycı T, Kurt E. Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block versus 3 in 1 block in hip prosthesis surgery. Agri : Agri (Algoloji) Dernegi’nin Yayin organidir = The journal of the Turkish Society of Algology. 2014;26(4):151–7.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    Desmet M, Vermeylen K, Van Herreweghe I, Carlier L, Soetens F, Lambrecht S, et al. A Longitudinal Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Reduces Morphine Consumption After Total Hip Arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42(3):327–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Dickman E, Pushkar I, Likourezos A, Todd K, Hwang U, Akhter S, et al. Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks for intracapsular and extracapsular hip fractures. American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2016;34(3):586–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Fahs AM, Koueiter DM, Kurdziel MD, Huynh KA, Perry CR, Verner JJ. Psoas Compartment Block vs Periarticular Local Anesthetic Infiltration for Pain Management After Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Study. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2018;33(7):2192–6.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    Fletcher AK, Rigby AS, Heyes FLP. Three-in-one femoral nerve block as analgesia for fractured neck of femur in the emergency department: A randomized, controlled trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2003;41(2):227–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Foss NB, Kristensen BB, Bundgaard M, Bak M, Heiring C, Virkelyst C, et al. Fascia iliaca compartment blockade for acute pain control in hip fracture patients - A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2007;106(4):773–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    Fournier R, Van Gessel E, Gaggero G, Boccovi S, Forster A, Gamulin Z. Postoperative analgesia with “3-in-1” femoral nerve block after prosthetic hip surgery. Can J Anaesth. 1998;45(1):34–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.
    Frassanito L, Rodolà F, Concina G, Messina A, Chierichini A, Vergari A. The efficacy of the psoas compartment block versus the intrathecal combination of morphine, fentanyl and bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia after primary hip arthroplasty: A randomized single-blinded study. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. 2008;12(2):117–22.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. 31.
    Garner M, Alsheemeri Z, Sardesai A, Khanduja V. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Versus Local Anesthetic Infiltration After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery. Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery. 2017;33(1):125–32.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    Gasanova I, Alexander JC, Estrera K, Wells J, Sunna M, Minhajuddin A, et al. Ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block versus periarticular infiltration for pain management after total hip arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2019;44(2):206–11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    Gille J, Gille M, Gahr R, Wiedemann B. Acute pain management in proximal femoral fractures. Femoral nerve block (catheter technique) vs. systemic pain therapy using a clinic internal organisation model. Anaesthesist. 2006;55(4):414-+.
    OpenUrl
  34. 34.↵
    Graham CA, Baird K, McGuffie AC. A pilot randomised clinical trial of 3-in-1 femoral nerve block and intravenous morphine as primary analgesia for patients presenting to the emergency department with fractured hip. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2008;15(4):205–11.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    Helso I, Jantzen C, Lauritzen JB, Jorgensen HL. Opioid Usage During Admission in Hip Fracture Patients-The Effect of the Continuous Femoral Nerve Block. Geriatric orthopaedic surgery and rehabilitation. 2016;7(4):197□201.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    Hong H-K, Ma Y. The efficacy of fascia iliaca compartment block for pain control after hip fracture: A meta-analysis. Medicine. 2019;98(28):e16157.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. 37.
    Haddad FS, Williams RL. Femoral nerve block in extracapsular femoral neck fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995;77:922–3.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    Hwang U, Todd K, Dickman E, Akhtar S, Morrison S. Emergency department femoral nerve blocks for acute hip fracture pain: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the american geriatrics society. 2015;63:S103.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.↵
    Ilfeld BM, Mariano ER, Madison SJ, Loland VJ, Sandhu NS, Suresh PJ, et al. Continuous femoral versus posterior lumbar plexus nerve blocks for analgesia after hip arthroplasty: A randomized, controlled study. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2011;113(4):897–903.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    Jang JS, Lee YH, Kandahar HK, Shrestha SK, Lee JS, Lee JK, et al. Changes in the tumor necrosis factor-α level after an ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block in elderly patients with a hip fracture. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2018;68(6):558–63.
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.↵
    Johnson RL, Amundson AW, Abdel MP, Sviggum HP, Mabry TM, Mantilla CB, et al. Continuous Posterior Lumbar Plexus Nerve Block Versus Periarticular Injection with Ropivacaine or Liposomal Bupivacaine for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Three-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume. 2017;99(21):1836–45.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.↵
    Jones JK, Evans BA, Fegan G, Ford S, Guy K, Jones S, et al. Rapid Analgesia for Prehospital hip Disruption (RAPID): Findings from a randomised feasibility study. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 2019;5(1).
  43. 43.↵
    Kratz T, Dette F, Schmitt J, Wiesmann T, Wulf H, Zoremba M. Impact of regional femoral nerve block during general anesthesia for hip arthoplasty on blood pressure, heart rate and pain control: A randomized controlled study. Technology and Health Care. 2015;23(3):313–22.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    Lee JS, Bhandari T, Emond M, Perry JJ, Woo M, Chenkin J. Ultrasound guided regional anesthesia in older hip fractures patients: uptake of regional anesthesia in randomly selected emergency physicians. Canadian journal of emergency medicine. 2015;17:S47–S8.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.↵
    Liu X, Hu X, Li R, Zhang Y. Combination of post-fascia iliaca compartment block and dexmedetomidine in pain and inflammation control after total hip arthroplasty for elder patients: a randomized control study. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research. 2020;15(1):42.
    OpenUrl
  46. 46.
    Ma Yanhui, Wu Jie, Jia Bin, et al. The effect of continuous iliac fascial space block combined with oral analgesics for preoperative analgesia in elderly patients with hip fracture[J]. Chinese Medical Journal, 2018,98 (10): 723–727. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.10.002
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  47. 47.↵
    Ma Y, Wu J, Xue J, Lan F, Wang T. Ultrasound-guided continuous fascia iliaca compartment block for pre-operative pain control in very elderly patients with hip fracture: A randomized controlled trial. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2018;16(3):1944–52.
    OpenUrl
  48. 48.
    Monzón, D., Vazquez, J., Jauregui, J., & Iserson, K. (2010). Pain treatment in post-traumatic hip fracture in the elderly: regional block vs. systemic non-steroidal analgesics. International Journal Of Emergency Medicine, 3(4), 321–325. doi: 10.1007/s12245-010-0234-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    Martin B, Ali B. Regional nerve block in fractured neck of femur. Emergency medicine journal. 2002;19(2):144–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    Morrison RS, Dickman E, Hwang U, Akhtar S, Ferguson T, Huang J, et al. Regional Nerve Blocks Improve Pain and Functional Outcomes in Hip Fracture: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2016;64(12):2433–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    Mostafa SF, Eid GM, Elkalla RS. Patient-controlled fascia iliaca compartment block versus fentanyl patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in patients undergoing femur fracture surgery. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2018;34(1):9–13.
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.↵
    Mouzopoulos G, Vasiliadis G, Lasanianos N, Nikolaras G, Morakis E, Kaminaris M. Fascia iliaca block prophylaxis for hip fracture patients at risk for delirium: A randomized placebo-controlled study. Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 2009;10(3):127–33.
    OpenUrl
  53. 53.↵
    Nct. USFIB at the Inguinal Ligament for Total Hip Arthroplasty. https://clinicaltrialsgov/show/NCT01911949. 2013.
  54. 54.
    Nct. Shamrock Versus Lumbar Ultrasound Trident - Ultrasound Guided Block of the Lumbar Plexus. https://clinicaltrialsgov/show/NCT02255591. 2014.
  55. 55.
    Nct. Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve Block. https://clinicaltrialsgov/show/NCT02381717. 2015.
  56. 56.
    Nct. Pre-op Femoral Nerve Block for Hip Fracture. https://clinicaltrialsgov/show/NCT02450045. 2015.
  57. 57.↵
    Nct. Nurse Led Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve Block in the Emergency Department. https://clinicaltrialsgov/show/NCT04145752. 2019.
  58. 58.↵
    Nct. Postop Pain Control in Hip Fracture Surgeyr: fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Versus Fracture Block. https://clinicaltrialsgov/show/NCT04335461. 2020.
  59. 59.↵
    Newman B, McCarthy L, Thomas PW, May P, Layzell M, Horn K. A comparison of pre-operative nerve stimulator-guided femoral nerve block and fascia iliaca compartment block in patients with a femoral neck fracture. Anaesthesia. 2013;68(9):899–903.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    H Nie, Y-X Yang, Y Wang, Y Liu, B Zhao, B Luan. Effects of continuous fascia iliaca compartment blocks for postoperative analgesia in patients with hip fracture. Pain Res Manag 2015;20(4):210–212.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  61. 61.
    Nie H, Yang YX, Wang Y, Liu Y, Zhao B, Luan B. Effects of continuous fascia iliaca compartment blocks for postoperative analgesia in patients with hip fracture. Pain Res Manag. 2015;20(4):210–2.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  62. 62.↵
    Pasquier M, Taffé P, Hugli O, Borens O, Kirkham KR, Albrecht E. Fascia iliaca block in the emergency department for hip fracture: A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. BMC Geriatrics. 2019;19(1).
  63. 63.↵
    Perry CR, Fahs AM, Kurdziel MD, Koueiter DM, Fayne RJ, Verner JJ. Intraoperative Psoas Compartment Block vs Preoperative Fascia Iliaca Block for Pain Control After Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2018;33(6):1770–4.
    OpenUrl
  64. 64.↵
    Polischuk MD, Kattar N, Rajesh A, Gergis T, King K, Sriselvakumar S, et al. Emergency Department Femoral Nerve Blocks and 1-Year Mortality in Fragility Hip Fractures. Geriatric orthopaedic surgery and rehabilitation. 2019;10.
  65. 65.↵
    Reavley P, Montgomery AA, Smith JE, Binks S, Edwards J, Elder G, et al. Randomised trial of the fascia iliaca block versus the ’3-in-1’ block for femoral neck fractures in the emergency department. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2015;32(9):685–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. 66.↵
    Rowlands M, Van De Walt G, Bradley J, Mannings A, Armstrong S, Bedforth N, et al. Femoral Nerve Block Intervention in Neck of Femur Fracture (FINOF): A randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2018;8(4).
  67. 67.↵
    Sahota O, Rowlands M, Bradley J, de Walt GV, Bedforth N, Armstrong S, et al. Femoral nerve block Intervention in Neck of Femur fracture (FINOF): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15.
  68. 68.↵
    Shariat AN, Hadzic A, Xu DQ, Shastri U, Kwofie K, Gandhi K, et al. Fascia lliaca Block for Analgesia After Hip Arthroplasty A Randomized Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2013;38(3):201–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. 69.↵
    Souron V, Delaunay L, Schifrine P. Intrathecal morphine provides better postoperative analgesia than psoas compartment block after primary hip arthroplasty. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2003;50(6):574–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  70. 70.
    Stevens M, Harrison G, McGrail M. A modified fascia iliaca compartment block has significant morphine-sparing effect after total hip arthroplasty. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 2007;35(6):949–52.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  71. 71.↵
    Strid JMC, Sauter AR, Ullensvang K, Andersen MN, Daugaard M, Bendtsen MAF, et al. Ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block in volunteers; a randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2017;118(3):430–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  72. 72.↵
    Szucs S, Iohom G. Functional recovery following operative fixation of fractured neck of femur in the elderly. Regional anesthesia and pain medicine. 2010;35(5):E181.
    OpenUrl
  73. 73.↵
    Tctr. The efficacy of ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for postoperative pain control in hip surgery : a double-blind randomised controlled trial. http://wwwwhoint/trialsearch/Trial2aspx?TrialID=TCTR20190721001. 2019.
  74. 74.↵
    Temelkovska-Stevanovska M, Durnev V, Jovanovski-Srceva M, Mojsova-Mijovska M, Trpeski S. Continuous femoral nerve block versus fascia iliaca compartment block as postoperative analgesia in patients with hip fracture. Prilozi (Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite Oddelenie za medicinski nauki). 2014;35(2):85–93.
    OpenUrl
  75. 75.
    Thompson J, Long M, Rogers E, Pesso R, Galos D, Dengenis RC, et al. Fascia Iliaca Block Decreases Hip Fracture Postoperative Opioid Consumption: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2020;34(1):49–54.
    OpenUrl
  76. 76.
    Todd K, Dickman E, Hwang U, Akhtar S, Morrison R. Emergency department femoral nerve blocks for acute hip fracture pain: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of pain. 2015;16(4):S68□.
    OpenUrl
  77. 77.↵
    Unneby A, Svensson O, Gustafson Y, Olofsson B. Femoral nerve block in a representative sample of elderly people with hip fracture: A randomised controlled trial. Injury. 2017;48(7):1542–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  78. 78.↵
    Unneby A, Svensson O, Lindgren BM, Bergstrom U, Gustafson Y. Delirium and other complications during hospital stay related to femoral nerve block vs conventional pain management among patients with hip fracture: a randomised controlled trial. European geriatric medicine. 2018;9:S30□.
    OpenUrl
  79. 79.↵
    Unneby A, Svensson PO, Gustafson PY, Lindgren A, Bergstrom U, Olofsson PB. Complications with focus on delirium during hospital stay related to femoral nerve block compared to conventional pain management among patients with hip fracture - A randomised controlled trial. Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured. 2020;51(7):1634–41.
    OpenUrl
  80. 80.↵
    Uysal Aİ, Altıparmak B, Yaşar E, Turan M, Canbek U, Yılmaz N, et al. The effects of early femoral nerve block intervention on preoperative pain management and incidence of postoperative delirium geriatric patients undergoing trochanteric femur fracture surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2020;26(1):109–14.
    OpenUrl
  81. 81.
    Wennberg P, Möller M, Herlitz J, Kenne Sarenmalm E. Fascia iliaca compartment block as a preoperative analgesic in elderly patients with hip fractures - effects on cognition. BMC geriatrics. 2019;19(1):252.
    OpenUrl
  82. 82.↵
    Wennberg P, Norlin R, Herlitz J, Sarenmalm EK, Möller M. Pre-operative pain management with nerve block in patients with hip fractures: a randomized, controlled trial. International journal of orthopaedic and trauma nursing. 2019;33:35–43.
    OpenUrl
  83. 83.↵
    Yamamoto N, Sakura S, Noda T, Nishiyama A, Dan’ura T, Matsui Y, et al. Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacies of intravenous acetaminophen and fascia iliaca compartment block in hip fracture surgery: A randomised controlled trial. Injury. 2019;50(10):1689–93.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  84. 84.↵
    Yu B, He M, Cai GY, Zou TX, Zhang N. Ultrasound-guided continuous femoral nerve block vs continuous fascia iliaca compartment block for hip replacement in the elderly: A randomized controlled clinical trial (CONSORT). Medicine (United States). 2016;95(42).
  85. 85.↵
    Yun, M., Kim, Y., Han, M., Kim, J., Hwang, J., & Do, S. (2009). Analgesia before a spinal block for femoral neck fracture: fascia iliaca compartment block. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 53(10), 1282–1287. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02052.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  86. 86.↵
    Zhou Y, Zhang WC, Chong H, Xi Y, Zheng SQ, Wang G, Wu XB. A Prospective Study to Compare Analgesia from Femoral Obturator Nerve Block with Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Acute Preoperative Pain in Elderly Patients with Hip Fracture. Med Sci Monit. 2019 Nov 13;25:8562–8570. doi: 10.12659/MSM.915289. PMID: 31721757; PMCID: PMC6873637.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  87. 87.
    Winnie AP, Ramamurthy S, Durrani Z. The Inguinal Paravascular Technic of Lumbar Plexus Anesthesia. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1973;52(6).
  88. 88.
    Femoral Nerve Block - Landmarks and Nerve Stimulator Technique [Internet]. NYSORA. 2019 [cited 2020Jan15]. Available from: https://www.nysora.com/techniques/lower-extremity/femoral/femoral-nerve-block/
  89. 89.
    Capdevila X, Macaire P, Dadure C, Choquet O, Biboulet P, Ryckwaert Y, d’Athis F. Continuous psoas compartment block for postoperative analgesia after total hip arthroplasty: new landmarks, technical guidelines, and clinical evaluation. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 1606–13
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  90. 90.
    Waldman SD. Pain review. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier; 2009.
  91. 91.
    Dalens B, Vanneuville G, Tanguy A. Comparison of the fascia iliaca compartment block with the 3-in-1 block in children. Anesth Analg. 1989;69(6):705–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  92. 92.
    Davies, D. (2016). Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block: Landmark Approach. Guidelines used in the emergency department. Ver 1.0 pub 10.06.16. Hentet 01.04.17
  93. 93.
    Girón-Arango L, Peng PW, Chin KJ, Brull R, Perlas A. Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Hip Fracture. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2018;:1.
  94. 94.
    Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block [Internet]. Nerve Blocks. 2019 [cited 2020Jan15]. Available from: https://nerveblock.co.uk/peng-block/
Back to top
Posted June 23, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
The Analgesic Efficacy of Different Techniques Surrounding Regional Anesthesia of the Lumbar Plexus and its Terminal Branches for Hip Fracture Surgeries
Abnoos Mosleh-Shirazi, Brian O’Donnell
medRxiv 2022.06.22.22276758; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.22.22276758
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area