Abstract
Marburg virus disease is an acute haemorrhagic fever caused by Marburg virus. Marburg virus is zoonotic, maintained in nature in Egyptian fruit bats, with occasional spillover infections into humans and nonhuman primates. Although rare, sporadic cases and outbreaks occur in Africa, usually associated with exposure to bats in mines or caves, and sometimes with secondary human-to-human transmission. Outbreaks outside of Africa have also occurred due to importation of infected monkeys. Although all previous Marburg virus disease outbreaks have been brought under control without vaccination, there is nevertheless the potential for large outbreaks when implementation of public health measures is not possible or breaks down. Vaccines could thus be an important additional tool and development of several candidate vaccines is under way. We developed a branching process model of Marburg virus transmission and investigated the potential effects of several prophylactic and reactive vaccination strategies in settings driven primarily by multiple spillover events as well as human-to-human transmission. Our results show a low basic reproduction number of 0.81 (95% CI: 0·08–1·83) despite a high case fatality ratio, reported elsewhere. Of six vaccination strategies explored, a combination of ring and targeted vaccination of high-risk groups was generally most effective, with a probability of controlling potential outbreaks of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85 - 0.91) compared with 0.65 (0.60 - 0.69) for no vaccination, especially if the outbreak is driven by zoonotic spillovers and the vaccination campaign initiated as soon as possible after onset of the first case.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Department of Health and Social Care using UK Aid funding and is managed by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (VEEPED: PR-OD-1017-20002). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Health and Social Care.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval for the study was granted by the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Ethics Committee (Reference Number 26566).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Some adjustments made to text for clarity; added a link to Github repository with R files to run the branching process model.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
