Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Mental health of healthcare workers in England during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal cohort study

View ORCID ProfileDanielle Lamb, Rafael Gafoor, Hannah Scott, Ewan Carr, View ORCID ProfileSharon A.M Stevelink, View ORCID ProfileRosalind Raine, View ORCID ProfileMatthew Hotopf, View ORCID ProfileNeil Greenberg, View ORCID ProfileSiobhan Hegarty, View ORCID ProfileIra Madan, Paul Moran, Richard Morriss, Dominic Murphy, Anne Marie Rafferty, Scott Weich, Sarah Dorrington, View ORCID ProfileSimon Wessely
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.16.22276479
Danielle Lamb
1UCL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Danielle Lamb
  • For correspondence: d.lamb{at}ucl.ac.uk
Rafael Gafoor
2University College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hannah Scott
3King's College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ewan Carr
3King's College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sharon A.M Stevelink
3King's College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sharon A.M Stevelink
Rosalind Raine
2University College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rosalind Raine
Matthew Hotopf
3King's College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matthew Hotopf
Neil Greenberg
3King's College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Neil Greenberg
Siobhan Hegarty
3King's College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Siobhan Hegarty
Ira Madan
4Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ira Madan
Paul Moran
5University of Bristol
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Morriss
6University of Nottingham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dominic Murphy
7Combat Stress
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Marie Rafferty
3King's College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott Weich
8University of Sheffield
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Dorrington
3King's College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon Wessely
3King's College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Simon Wessely
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective To examine variations in impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of all types of healthcare workers (HCWs) in England over the first 17 months of the pandemic.

Method We undertook a prospective cohort study of 22,501 HCWs from 18 English acute and mental health NHS Trusts, collecting online survey data on common mental disorders (CMDs), depression, anxiety, alcohol use, and PTSD, from April 2020 to August 2021. We analysed these data cross-sectionally by time period (corresponding to periods the NHS was under most pressure), and longitudinally. Data were weighted to better represent Trust population demographics.

Results The proportion of those with probable CMDs was greater during periods when the NHS was under most pressure (measured by average monthly deaths). For example, 55% (95%CI 53%, 58%) of participants reported symptoms of CMDs in April-June 2020 versus 47% (95%CI 46%, 48%) July-October 2020. Contrary to expectation, there were no major differences between professional groups (i.e. clinical and non-clinical staff). Younger, female, lower paid staff, who felt poorly supported by colleagues/managers, and who experienced potentially morally injurious events were most at risk of negative mental health outcomes.

Conclusion Among HCWs, the prevalence of probable CMDs increased during periods of escalating pressure on the NHS, suggesting staff support should be increased at such points in the future, and staff should be better prepared for such situations via training. All staff, regardless of role, experienced poorer mental health during these periods, suggesting that support should be provided for all staff groups.

What is already known on this topic Existing evidence about the mental health of healthcare workers (HCWs) through the COVID-19 pandemic comes mainly from cross-sectional studies using unrepresentative convenience samples, typically focussing on clinical staff rather than all HCWs. Such studies show high prevalence of symptoms of mental disorders, but the strength of this evidence is uncertain.

What this study adds Using a defined sampling frame, with longitudinal, weighted data, we show that during periods of greater pressure on the NHS (as indicated by average monthly national COVID-19 death rates), prevalence of mental disorder symptoms increased, and, importantly, that this effect was seen in non-clinical as well as clinical staff.

How this study might affect research, practice or policy These findings indicate that provision of support for HCWs should not only focus on those providing clinical care, but also on non-clinical staff such as porters, cleaners, and administrative staff, and additional support should be provided during higher pressure periods. Better preparation of staff for such situations is also suggested.

Competing Interest Statement

MH, RR, and SW are senior NIHR Investigators. SW has received speaker fees from Swiss Re for two webinars on the epidemiological impact of COVID 19 pandemic on mental health. RR reports grants from DHSC/UKRI/ESRC COVID-19 Rapid Response Call, grants from Rosetrees Trust, grants from King's Together rapid response call, grants from UCL (Wellcome Trust) rapid response call, during the conduct of the study; & grants from NIHR outside the submitted work. MH reports grants from DHSC/UKRI/ESRC COVID-19 Rapid Response Call, grants from Rosetrees Trust, grants from King's Together rapid response call, grants from UCL Partners rapid response call, during the conduct of the study; grants from Innovative Medicines Initiative and EFPIA, RADAR-CNS consortium , grants from MRC, grants from NIHR, outside the submitted work. SS reports grants from UKRI/ESRC/DHSC, grants from UCL, grants from UKRI/MRC/DHSC, grants from Rosetrees Trust, grants from King's Together Fund, and an NIHR Advanced Fellowship [ref: NIHR 300592] during the conduct of the study. NG reports a potential COI with NHSEI, during the conduct of the study; and I am the managing director of March on Stress Ltd which has provided training for a number of NHS organisations although I am not clear if the company has delivered training to any of the participating trusts or not as I do not get directly involved in commissioning specific pieces of work. DL is funded by the NIHR ARC North Thames. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care. Other authors report no competing interests.

Funding Statement

Funding for NHS CHECK has been received from the following sources: Medical Research Council (MR/V034405/1); UCL/Wellcome (ISSF3/ H17RCO/C3); Rosetrees (M952); NHS England and Improvement; Economic and Social Research Council (ES/V009931/1); as well as seed funding from National Institute for Health Research Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, King's College London, National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response at King's College London.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical approval for the study was granted by the Health Research Authority (reference: 20/HRA/210, IRAS: 282686) and local Trust Research and Development approval. The study was approved as having Urgent Public Health Status in August 2020.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data is available on reasonable request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 16, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mental health of healthcare workers in England during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal cohort study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Mental health of healthcare workers in England during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal cohort study
Danielle Lamb, Rafael Gafoor, Hannah Scott, Ewan Carr, Sharon A.M Stevelink, Rosalind Raine, Matthew Hotopf, Neil Greenberg, Siobhan Hegarty, Ira Madan, Paul Moran, Richard Morriss, Dominic Murphy, Anne Marie Rafferty, Scott Weich, Sarah Dorrington, Simon Wessely
medRxiv 2022.06.16.22276479; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.16.22276479
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Mental health of healthcare workers in England during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal cohort study
Danielle Lamb, Rafael Gafoor, Hannah Scott, Ewan Carr, Sharon A.M Stevelink, Rosalind Raine, Matthew Hotopf, Neil Greenberg, Siobhan Hegarty, Ira Madan, Paul Moran, Richard Morriss, Dominic Murphy, Anne Marie Rafferty, Scott Weich, Sarah Dorrington, Simon Wessely
medRxiv 2022.06.16.22276479; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.16.22276479

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (434)
  • Allergy and Immunology (760)
  • Anesthesia (222)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3316)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (366)
  • Dermatology (282)
  • Emergency Medicine (480)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1175)
  • Epidemiology (13403)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (900)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5182)
  • Geriatric Medicine (483)
  • Health Economics (786)
  • Health Informatics (3286)
  • Health Policy (1146)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1199)
  • Hematology (432)
  • HIV/AIDS (1024)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14657)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (917)
  • Medical Education (478)
  • Medical Ethics (128)
  • Nephrology (526)
  • Neurology (4957)
  • Nursing (263)
  • Nutrition (735)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (889)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (797)
  • Oncology (2531)
  • Ophthalmology (730)
  • Orthopedics (284)
  • Otolaryngology (348)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (547)
  • Pediatrics (1308)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (552)
  • Primary Care Research (559)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4225)
  • Public and Global Health (7526)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1717)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1022)
  • Respiratory Medicine (982)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (500)
  • Sports Medicine (425)
  • Surgery (551)
  • Toxicology (73)
  • Transplantation (237)
  • Urology (206)