DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPLEX INTERVENTION PACKAGE FOR DENGUE PREVENTION

Introduction

Dengue is a major health problem affecting mainly the tropical countries. Many strategies have been employed to tackle the outbreaks, but the key components of outbreak response are household and community level behavioural and social interventions. Moreover, leadership and planning for sustainable community participation, transfer of technical knowledge and skills in planning, and measures to ensure sustainability at each level are identified as key issues in dengue prevention. However, behavioural change is important in effective implementation of control activities to prevent and control dengue. Many community-based dengue control programmes focus only to improve knowledge and to increase awareness assuming that changing behaviours,[1].

Complex interventions are widely used in public health practices. Main three stages can be identified in the development of complex intervention, [2-4]. Moreover, systematically used theory to develop the intervention, fully description of the intervention will help to implement properly for the purposes of the evaluation. Importantly, the developed intervention needs to be replicated by others. The behavioural interventions would be focused on identifying key risk reduction actions at the household and community level to minimize negative health consequences. Moreover, application of multiple approaches is essential to be included to achieve the success to ensure community-located outbreak prevention through achieving specific behavioural results,[5]. A systematic review revealed that community mobilization programmes are effective interventions in reducing Aedes aegypti entomological indices,[6]. Notably, multi-stakeholder partnership leads to achieve successful outcomes of the interventions. Furthermore, the importance of incorporating health education and capacity building for the development of the programmes to prevent communicable disease is highlighted,[7]. Therefore, there is a need to empower the community through multi-stakeholder participation to achieve sustainable solution for dengue prevention and all steps to be taken to minimize the dengue burden by changing behaviour of the community members. Importantly, systematic development of a complex intervention with minimum risk of bias is currently needed and it needs to be culturally and geographically suited.

Communication for Behavioural Impact (COMBI) is defined as a methodological process which blends strategically blends a variety of communication interventions intended to engage individuals and families in adopting and maintaining healthy behaviours and maintaining those behaviours. It uses a managerial view to plan social mobilization and communication for behavioural impact on public health. The importance of social mobilization for prevention and control of dengue has gathered pace internationally in recent years. Further, COMBI planning offers a comprehensive and innovative managerial insight to planning social mobilization and communication for behavioural impact which is intended for programme managers in integrating interventions to effectively manage dengue. Moreover, to ensure sustainable dengue prevention, the COMBI plans should address the various at-risk populations and it needs to be adopted culturally,[8].

There is a lack paucity of studies with scientifically developed intervention packages for dengue prevention. In this backdrop, to prevent the occurrence of dengue outbreaks, the behaviour of the community needs to be changed. Thus, the development of an intervention for the prevention of dengue based on evidence is a timely need. Importantly, the results of this study would enable responsible authorities to strengthen control strategies to improve dengue prevention activities and it will generate a greater interest to develop capacities for dengue management and would enable them to take action to minimize the impact due to disease burden. The aim was to develop a complex intervention package to change the behaviour of the householders for dengue prevention in Kurunegala district, Sri Lanka.

Methods

A complex intervention process was formulated according to 2008 guide and modified with the revised framework of ‘Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidence’,[2-4]. This framework provides a guideline for using a stepped approach which separates different elements and using the probable active component in developing the intervention. The development of the intervention package was formulated according to the two phases including ‘Theoretical phase’ and ‘Modelling phase’.

Theoretical phase is to identify evidence base and appropriate theory to gather relevant information to find out the effective intervention packages for dengue prevention. Thus, the facts for the theoretical phase were identified from various sources, including existing evidence, expert opinion, and community need assessment. The modelling phase consists of modelling process and outcomes assessment. The model of the present study was the COMBI theory to empower the community to change the behaviour and ensure sustainable dengue control. The World Health Organization (WHO) 10 key steps in planning COMBI strategies were followed in order to develop the present intervention package,[1,9,10]. Accordingly, a Situational Market Analysis for Communication Keys (SMACK) was conducted in highest dengue endemic area in Kurunegala district (Kurunegala MOH area) to identify the Specific Behavioural Objectives (SBOO) for the plan. The SBOO were finalized using the results of the SMACK which was conducted using mixed methodological approach. Thereafter, the intervention package was finalized by modified Delphi method with expert opinion from specialists in public health from the National Dengue Control Unit (NDCU), Health Promotion Bureau (HPB), Provincial level, general medicine and consensus of the grass-root level experts and an advisor of the international COMBI institute. The developed plan was presented to the panel of expert and finalized the SBOO, strategies, activities for implementation of the intervention and monitoring of the intervention. The management team prepared the scheduling, budget plan with the guidance of an economist, mobilization for resources and activity planning for the implementation of the developed intervention.

Results

Discussion

The complex intervention was formulated according to the revised framework of complex intervention development. The rationale for a complex intervention is to develop a theoretical understanding of the likely process of change, by drawing on existing evidence and theory, supplemented, if necessary, by new primary research, qualitative approach with the stakeholders or the targeted population,[4]. In addition, there may be lots of competing or partly overlapping theories,[20]. However, the research team need expertise opinion on relevant disciplines to find the most appropriate theory and as the complex interventions have several dimensions of complexity, it may be to do with the range of possible outcomes, or their variability in the target population, rather than with the number of elements in the intervention package itself. It follows that there is no sharp boundary between simple and complex interventions, [4]. The interventions have been developed according to different models and planning processes. The planning of the intervention package was formulated using WHO’s 10 steps of COMBI planning method. The COMBI approach is successfully demonstrated that correct problem identification synergized with community engagement can potentially reduce Aedes proliferation and dengue morbidity in Malaysia and Sri Lanka,[21,22]. Out of the COMBI based interventions, Malaysia used integrated marketing communication techniques to inoculate this behavioral change to target group. Therefore, the COMBI approach is successful with correct problem identification and community engagement,[21]. The use of the Delphi technique instead of face-to-face consultative meetings had the advantage of not requiring the experts to take time off their schedules to contribute to the study. It allow the experts to respond at any time convenient to them and to contact any source of information if needed. Further, this process facilitated the independence of forming opinion and perspectives as it prevented the manipulation of opinion by influential individuals, which could happen in a face-to-face consultative meeting,[23]. In the process of development of the intervention plan, there was a quantitative study to finalize the SBOs. For that, validated tools were used to assess the current situation marketing analysis as a major step in the COMBI planning process. The generalizability of an intervention package depends on the effectiveness and validity of models, theories, methods use for development process. In the present study, after considering the effectiveness of the already conducted studies, planning abilities, implementation, and feasibility issues with the consensus of the expert panel, COMBI planning was identified for the development of the interventional package. Importantly, the COMBI theory was used to plan the process of community empowerment program, because it is a proven effective method for behavior changes for dengue control and widely utilizing planning process in different countries,[19]. Moreover, the process of assessing current situation market analysis also performed by mixed methodology with representative samples. Therefore, the generalizability of the intervention to high endemic areas could be done with adaptation to setting. Notably, incorporation of similar programs for prevention of dengue through behavioural change to the public health system of Sri Lanka seems feasible and cost effective,[22]. Moreover, a community-based dengue prevention and control process enables key stakeholders in the community to actively prevent and control their dengue problem, [18]. Importantly, the studies in the Dominican Republic,[24], Colombia,[25], Hulu Langat,[21] and Thailand,[18] revealed that the interpersonal communication was an effective way to achieve greater success of a community-based programme. Therefore, the present intervention package aimed to empower the community by developing a sustainable dengue control process at the grass root level with the involvement of multi-stakeholders. Importantly, the dengue problem can be solved by conducting the community-based dengue prevention process with active participation of key stakeholders in the community. Moreover, sustainability of a community-based dengue prevention and control comprise activities depends on the degree of eliminate larval breeding sources, control adult mosquitoes, apply personal protection, introduce dengue symptom detection, and outbreak prevention, [26]. In Sri Lanka also there is a clear need to address above areas especially waste management and vector control,[22]. Importantly, the specificity of the intervention messages of the present study was waste management according to 3R concept aiming source reduction from both outdoor and indoor vector breeding places. Formalization of waste management would empower the community members to identify breeding sites and removing them. It would not that difficult or not labour intensive or less costly than managing dengue cases or mass cleaning campaings. Such specific messages have been used to achieve successful behavioural outcomes in the interventions in other countries, [21,22,25,27,28]. Solid waste management is a growing challenge to many countries. Improper waste management serve as the breeding places for many vectors resulting in proliferation of vector-borne diseases,[29]. Moreover, the presence of solid waste around households, such as cans, car parts, bottles, old and used tyres, plastic materials, broken clay, glass vessels and coconut shells, created outdoor breeding sites for Aedes mosquitoes and represented in our ecosystem the most productive container types. Maintaining solid waste for a long time often more than seven days supports the breeding of Aedes aegypti,[30] and increases the transmission of dengue. Moreover, Wijesundara planned the intervention according to COMBI with two SBOs including 30 minutes’ inspection on Sunday and improve the proper waste management practices and Rozhan and others have identified the SBOs as management of water containers twice weekly and scrub any containers found to contain larvae. Furthermore, a study was carried out in Malaysia revealed that the knowledge, attitudes and practices were influenced by the interventional programme during its implementation weeks. However, the outcome evaluations at the end of the study revealed that COMBI programme failed to achieve the desired behavioral impact of the programme. The multi-stakeholder collaboration is one of the suggested solutions to overcome the problems of the programme, because there was lack of human resources and funding. Furthermore, they suggested to improve the health sector participation for the awareness of the community to prevent dengue,[31]. Therefore, for the development of the present intervention package, the multi-stakeholder participation was ensured. Similar to the present study, community empowerment programs were conducted in Cuba,[32,33] and Myanmar,[28]. Moreover, Behaviour change intervention package was developed to manage household water container in Philippine, 2012. Further, this study revealed that other factors such as social and political environment are needed to explain community responses to new dengue vector control interventions,[27]. Therefore, the present study was developed using new communication strategy with multi-stakeholder participation. Another study conducted in Cuba revealed that the importance of the community-based strategies such as organizational management, entomological risk surveillance, capacity building and community work for vector control. The community empowerment strategy increased community involvement and added effectiveness to routine A. aegypti control,[33]. The efficacy of community-controlled partnership-driven interventions was found to be superior to the vertical approach in terms of sustainability and community empowerment. Moreover, a study in Sri Lanka, revealed that the vector control interventions had a significant impact on vector densities (BI) and on dengue incidence. It revealed that rigorous vector control programs lead to reduce the disease and economic burden of dengue in endemic settings,[34] al, 2019). When considering the intervention packages in the studies, there was a lack of scientific evidence in the development process. Therefore, to develop the present intervention package, the evidence from most of the effective intervention packages were utilized. Not only that, but the identified gaps of the failed interventions were also considered to have better outcomes of interest. Therefore, the present intervention package can be considered as a scientifically developed intervention for sustainable dengue prevention.

Conclusion and Recommendations

Developing a COMBI plan for an area after the identification of specific behavioural objectives would make it feasible for implementation in order to empower the community to prevent dengue in the area and to improve community health services. Scientifically developed COMBI based planning process can be used to bring about satisfactory control of dengue with the participation of the community in high endemic areas to achieve sustainable dengue prevention. This type of intervention can be applied to any locality after conducting the situation marketing analysis of the relevant area and developing area specific COMBI plan with the support of the preventive sector healthcare institutions in any country. Moreover, future research can be conducted using the COMBI planning process in the other endemic areas in preventing dengue outbreaks in the region or globally.

Author contributions

Conceptualization and methodology: RMNUR, CA, AB; Technical advisors: NP, AA; Writing and Original draft preparation: RMNUR; Review, editing and supervision: CA, AB, NP, AA, SM.

Footnote