Characteristics and costs of electric scooter injuries in Helsinki: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Electric scooters (e-scooters) have become a widespread means of transport globally, especially in large metropolitan cities. The arrival of shared e-scooter rental companies has contributed largely to the popularity of this emerging mode of transportation. (Haworth et al., 2021). Unfortunately, as a by-product, e-scooter-related accidents have increased drastically in numerous countries (Badeau et al., 2019; Coelho et al., 2021; Farley et al., 2020; Namiri et al., 2020; Shichman et al., 2022).

The incidence of e-scooter-related accidents has been reported as 60 injuries per 100 000 rides (Bekhit et al., 2020). In most countries, the overall incidence has increased rapidly after the introduction of shared e-scooter companies (Farley et al., 2020; Shichman et al., 2022). Compared to cycling, the risk for injuries is approximately 3.8 times higher (Cicchino et al., 2021). The most typical injuries consist of head injuries, fractures of the extremities, and superficial wounds. However, more severe injuries requiring intensive care or even fatality have been reported. (Moftakhar et al., 2021; Shichman et al., 2021, 2022; Siow et al., 2020; Trivedi et al., 2019)

There has been a rising number of publications on e-scooter injuries in recent years. However, most studies focus solely on a single category of injuries (Factor et al., 2021; Suominen et al., 2022) or cases from a single hospital (Shichman et al., 2021). To our knowledge, the incidence of accidents in proportion e-scooter usage has been estimated only by Bekhit et al. (Bekhit et al., 2020).

In the current literature, there are only a few cost estimates for e-scooter injuries, and they vary greatly depending on the country (Bekhit et al., 2020; Lavoie-Gagne, Siow, Harkin, Flores, Politzer, et al., 2021). However, these numbers focus solely on the cost of the hospital treatment. Economical impact on society from a broader perspective has not been studied.

The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of e-scooter injuries requiring hospital treatment and to describe the injury patterns and severity. In addition, we aimed to estimate the costs of e-scooter injuries to the healthcare system and society.

Patients and methods

Data inquiry

We performed an initial data inquiry to detect e-scooter-related injuries using a keyword search from the patient datapool. Four different e-scooter-related words, including their inflected forms, were used. Next, the authors HV and LT examined all the detected patient records. Consequently, only the cases where the e-scooter involvement was definite were included. All remaining patients over 16 years old were included in the study. Exclusive inclusion and exclusion criteria are presented in figure 1.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1:

Flow chart of the Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results

We identified 466 e-scooter-related injuries, of which 446 fulfilled our inclusion criteria (Figure 1). In 434 cases, the injured person was the rider, whereas in 12 cases, a pedestrian or a cyclist was injured. The median age of the patients was 26 years (IQR 22-33, range 16-92) for riders and 46 years (range 17-66 years) for non-riders. 260 (59 %) riders injured were male (Table 1). In 67 cases, the e-scooter involved in the accident was reported to be a shared e-scooter, in 17 cases the e-scooter was privately owned, and in 362 cases the information regarding e-scooter ownership was not available.

Injury characteristics

The most common injury mechanism was a fall (n= 374), followed by collision (n = 40). Furthermore, in 15 accidents there was two people reported on the same scooter. 13 scooter riders sustained a collision with a moving car. The non-riders were either pedestrians (n = 9) or bicyclists (n = 3) that got hit by or collided with an e-scooter rider (Table 2).

View this table:

• View inline
• View popup
• Download powerpoint

Table 2:

Injury mechanisms. In total, there were 446 persons injured in an e-scooter-related accident

According to abbreviated injury score 58 % (n = 257) of injuries were considered minor, whereas 35 % (n = 155) were moderate, and 8 % (n = 34) serious, or worse. Three patients had severe injuries, of which two were intracranial hemorrhages, and one was internal bleeding requiring angioembolization. One patient sustained a critical traumatic brain injury requiring an emergency craniectomy. The non-riders sustained only minor (n = 10) or moderate (n = 2) injuries. Distinct categorizations of the injury severity are presented in table 1.

The most common injury site was head and face with 220 (49 %) injured patients. Of these patients, 50 (11%) were diagnosed with a concussion, and 16 (3.6 %) sustained an intracranial hemorrhage. The upper and lower extremities were injured in 142 (32 %) and 113 (25 %) patients, respectively. Excluding minor injuries, the most common injuries were fractures of the hand (n=31) and distal forearm (n=13). Including all locations, 151 (34 %) patients sustained fractures. The injuries are presented in detail in figure 2.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2:

Anatomical locations of the injuries sustained in e-scooter accidents.

Affecting factors and temporal distribution

In total, 201 (45 %) patients were reported to be intoxicated by alcohol at the time of the injury. The effect of intoxication was emphasized during night-time as 75 % of the patients injured between 00.00 and 5.00 were reported to be intoxicated (Figure 3). Helmet use was reported in 14 (3 %) riders, although in 303 (70 %) cases, there was no definite information available on helmet use.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3:

Histogram of time of day of the accidents and proportion of alcohol intoxication. 5A) Accidents during weekdays (From Monday 00.00 to Friday 15.00) 5A) Accidents during weekends (From Friday 15.00 to Sunday 24.00)

Most of the accidents happened in July (n = 131), followed by June (n= 101) and August (n = 75), respectively (Figure 4). 51 % (n = 227) of the accidents happened before the speed restrictions on the inner-city, and 84 % (n = 375) before weekend night-time ban, respectively. In total, 55 % (n = 246) of the accidents happened during the weekend (Friday 15:00 to Sunday 24:00) (Figure 5). There was a major spike in accident incidence during weekend late evenings, and nights (Figure 3).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 4:

E-scooter accidents during the year reported by weekly accident incidence. The restrictions in operation are shown.

a. Speed restrictions of 15 km/h in certain the inner-city locations

b. Shared e-scooter services rental ban on Fridays and Saturdays between 00.00 and 05.00. In addition, the top speed on was set to 20 km/h during daytime and to 15 km/h between 00.00 and 05.00 (except on Fridays and Sundays)

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 5:

Histogram of accidents during the week and proportion of alcohol intoxication

Discussion

Although e-scooters are a convenient emerging mode of transport, the risk for injuries enhances the disadvantages. This study has demonstrated that while most e-scooter injuries are minor, 42 % of the injuries are moderate, severe, or worse. 13 % of the patients in our material required hospital admission, and 11 % required surgical interventions. Furthermore, the median cost of an injury was 1148 € with a total cost of 1,7 million €. This research provides insights for the decision-making on whether the price and loss in health are worth the usefulness of a new emerging travel mode.

Our findings on injury characteristics complement those of earlier publications. It is well established that people presenting themselves to the ED with an e-scooter injury are most often males (54-67 %) in their late twenties or early thirties (Bekhit et al., 2020; Bloom et al., 2021; Coelho et al., 2021; Farley et al., 2020; Lavoie-Gagne, Siow, Harkin, Flores, Girard, et al., 2021; Moftakhar et al., 2021; Namiri et al., 2020; Shichman et al., 2022; Siow et al., 2020; Trivedi et al., 2019). In 92-96 % of the cases, the injured are the riders themselves (Coelho et al., 2021; Ingstrup Nielsen et al., 2021; Shichman et al., 2022; Trivedi et al., 2019). As was also seen in our material, the most common site of injury is typically the head (27-47 % of the cases) (Farley et al., 2020; Ingstrup Nielsen et al., 2021; Moftakhar et al., 2021; Namiri et al., 2020; Trivedi et al., 2019; Uluk et al., 2022), although in some publications the extremities have been the predominant site (Bloom et al., 2021; Coelho et al., 2021). Nevertheless, a growing body of published work indicates that e-scooter injuries’ characteristics are well known.

A notable finding of our study was that a predominant number of accidents happened during weekends and night-time. Unfortunately, a greater portion of patients was also intoxicated during these times. Similar findings have also been reported in previous publications, although the correlation between alcohol usage and weekend night-time is not well established in these publications (Blomberg et al., 2019; Moftakhar et al., 2021; Suominen et al., 2022; Uluk et al., 2022). Although driving while intoxicated is forbidden by the law and the rules of shared e-scooter companies, effective surveillance is not possible. As a result, the city of Helsinki and the e-scooter rental companies banned the use of shared e-scooters during the night-time (00.00-05.00) in the beginning of September 2022. Anderson et al. examined the effect of a similar night-time ban on e-scooter rentals (9 p.m. to 4 a.m.) in city of Atlanta (USA), after which a decrease in e-scooter accidents was seen. However, the effect on ED time of arrival was not significant in their study (p = 0.16). (Anderson et al., 2021) When taking our results into consideration, the night-time ban appears to be justifiable. However, extensive conclusions cannot be drawn as the beginning of autumn, and the cooling of the weather also decreases the e-scooter usage drastically.

Mandatory helmet use has been brought up in many publications (Blomberg et al., 2019; Coelho et al., 2021; Crowe & Elkbuli, 2021; Moftakhar et al., 2021). In our material, nearly half of the patients sustained a head injury. These varied from mild contusions to life threatening intracranial bleeding. Similar to our material, the reported helmet usage has been typically 2-4 % in the injured (Blomberg et al., 2019; Bloom et al., 2021; Coelho et al., 2021; English et al., 2020; Siow et al., 2020; Trivedi et al., 2019). In countries where helmet use is mandatory, helmets have been reported in 20-45 % of the injured (Coelho et al., 2021; Mitchell et al., 2019). On the other hand, compulsory helmet use seems to decrease the usage of e-scooters (Lo et al., 2020). From the standpoint of injury prevention, this would be desirable, although this would limit the users’ freedom. Moreover, the effectiveness of helmet usage is not well studied on e-scooters. Mitchell et al. found in their small-scale study (n = 54) that helmet usage reduced the presence of head injuries with OR of 0,18 (95 % CI 0,04-0,83) (Mitchell et al., 2019). In comparison, the preventive effectiveness of helmet usage is well established in cycling, where it is estimated to provide a 63 to 88 % reduction in head injuries (Thompson et al., 1999). Thus, we believe helmets should be strongly couraged on e-scooters to prevent severe head injuries.

The estimates for costs for e-scooter injuries vary depending on the country. For example, Bekhit et al. estimated in New Zealand, that the cost of a single e-scooter injury was approximately 1 000 € (1693 NZD) (Bekhit et al., 2020) whereas in the United States average cost is estimated to be between 1100 € (1213 USD, median) and 90 000 € (95 710 $, mean)(Bloom et al., 2021; Lavoie-Gagne, Siow, Harkin, Flores, Politzer, et al., 2021). Furthermore, in Australia, the average cost was determined as 364 € (Mitchell et al., 2019). Unquestionably, the methods for cost estimations vary, but undoubtedly, e-scooter usage comes with a cost.

While the present study was made in precision, there are also several weaknesses. First, as we did not have an exact ICD-code for e-scooter injuries, we had to inquire the patients via a keyword search. As a result, some e-scooter injuries might have gone unnoticed. Nonetheless, the number of patients was large, and the loss of patients can be considered random. Thus, a selection bias can be regarded as minimal, and the injury proportions are accurate. Second, due to the retrospective nature of the data, the distinction between vehicles could not be made completely accurately. There is a possibility that the ED personnel might have miscategorized some vehicles. Furthermore, the distinction between privately owned and shared e-scooters was not possible. As there are no distinct protocols, the amount of helmet usage and alcohol intoxication might be underreported. Third, some milder injuries are also treated in private hospitals. Thus, the reported incidence underestimates the actual hospital requiring e-scooter injury rate. However, the hospitals in the study treat the vast majority of ED requiring accidents in our city, and therefore the reported incidences are solid estimates of the actual incidence.

The main strength of the study is that while many studies focus on a restricted pool of patients (e.g., patients of a single hospital, craniofacial injuries, or injuries requiring surgical care), we report all emergency care requiring e-scooter injuries from the whole city – varying from mild trauma to life-threatening accidents. In addition, we performed a comprehensive estimation of the economic impacts of the e-scooters. While there are studies with a greater quantity of patients, the studies exploit national registries with a larger number of inaccuracies. (Farley et al., 2020). All things considered, the present study adds considerably to the current knowledge of e-scooter-related injuries.

Conclusions

While most e-scooter injuries are minor, a considerable proportion of the injuries are moderate, severe, or worse, including patients requiring intensive care and operative treatment. Comprehensive preventive measures must be conducted to decrease the incidence of e-scooter injuries. The night-time bans and speed-limits on rental e-scooters during weekends appear to be justifiable means to decrease the disadvantages - both in individual and social perspective.

Declarations

Not applicable

Ethics approval and consent to participate

An organizational approval was sought to access the data from all participating hospitals (HUS/44/2021). Ethical committee was not consulted as the study was retrospective and did not require any interaction with the patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are not publicly available due potential other publications utilizing the data but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Funding

The authors received no external funding for the purposes of the study.

Authors’ contributions

HV conceptualized and planned the core study design. VH, KV, MC, and AK reviewed and proposed improvements for the study design. HV and LT performed the data enquiry. HV analyzed the data, performed the statistical analysis, and wrote the core manuscript. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data and manuscript revision and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

HV: Junior ED doctor, PhD student

LT: Bachelor of Medicine

VH: Consultant in Emergency Medicine, Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Head Physician of Emergency Medicine and Service, PhD, the title of docent

KV: Consultant in Orthopaedics and Traumatology, PhD

MC: Consultant in Anesthesiology and Emergency medicine, Director of Emergency Medicine and Services, Professor of Emergency Medicine, PhD, the title of docent

AK: Specialist in General Practice, Head of the department in basic level Emergency services