Abstract
Background Administrative medical and claims records are increasingly used to study prevalence of and outcomes for children exposed to child maltreatment. However, suspicion of child maltreatment is often under-documented in medical records using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Although researchers have developed strategies to more broadly capture the injuries, illnesses, and circumstances that are suggestive of maltreatment, there is no consensus on which codes to use for this purpose.
Objective To systematically examine the types of research being conducted with ICD codes related to suspected maltreatment, summarize the methods used to identify the codes, and propose future direction.
Methods We searched five electronic databases for studies that reported ICD codes suggestive of child maltreatment in any medical setting, included participants aged 0-18 years, and published in a peer-reviewed journal in English. Two reviewers independently screened the titles, abstracts, and the full texts. Data were synthesized in a qualitative manner.
Results Thirty-seven studies met inclusion criteria. Most studies focused on determining the incidence or trends of maltreatment-related injuries or illnesses. Studies varied greatly in the codes used to identify suspected maltreatment. Only four articles reported on the validation of selected codes. ICD codes for transport accidents were the most frequently excluded co-occurring codes. Studies frequently relied on two seminal studies and two national-level guidelines.
Conclusions Substantial heterogeneity existed in the ICD codes and methods used to identify suspected maltreatment. The age range for codes, excluded co-occurring codes, and validation of codes are areas future research should address. This review may reduce costs for future researchers so that they could choose optimal measures of suspected maltreatment from our summarized list of codes without reinventing the wheel. Our review provides a basis for the development of recommended guidelines in establishing uniform codes for suspected maltreatment that could promote public health surveillance and allow for more efficient and uniform policy or program evaluation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Duke Endowment, ABC Thrive Bass Connections, and the Translating Duke Health Children's Health and Discovery Initiative.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Declarations of interest: None.
Funding/Support: This study was supported by the Duke Endowment, ABC Thrive Bass Connections, and the Translating Duke Health Children’s Health and Discovery Initiative.
Role of Funder/Sponsor: None of the funders had any role in the design or conduct of this study.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
