Abstract
Background Asylum-seekers and refugees (ASR) exhibit high prevalence rates of chronic and mental illness, but low utilization of ambulatory specialist healthcare. Forgoing timely healthcare when facing formal and informal access barriers may direct ASR toward emergency care. This paper addresses the interrelations of physical and mental health and the utilization of ambulatory and emergency care, and explicitly addresses the associations between the different types of care.
Methods A structural equation model was applied to a sample of n=136 ASR living in accommodation centers in Berlin, Germany. Patterns of emergency care utilization (outcome) and physical and mental ambulatory care utilization (endogenous predictors) were estimated, while controlling for age, sex, chronic conditions, bodily pain, depression, anxiety and length of stay in Germany (exogenous predictors) and self-rated health (endogenous predictor).
Results Significant associations were observed between ambulatory care utilization and poor self-rated health (0.207, 95%-CI: 0.05; 0.364), chronic illness (0.096, 95%-CI: 0.017; 0.175) and bodily pain (0.019, 95%-CI: 0.002; 0.036); between mental healthcare utilization and anxiety (0.202, 95%-CI: 0.051; 0.352); and between emergency care utilization and poor self-rated health (0.621, 95%-CI: 0.059; 1.183), chronic illness (0.287, 95%-CI: 0.012; 0.563), mental healthcare utilization (0.842, 95%-CI: 0.148; 1.535) and anxiety (0.790, 95%-CI: 0.141; 1.438). We found no associations between ambulatory care utilization and emergency care utilization.
Conclusions Our study generates mixed results concerning the associations between healthcare needs and ambulatory and emergency care utilization among ASR. We found no evidence that low utilization of ambulatory healthcare contributes to emergency care utilization among ASR; neither did we find any evidence that obtaining ambulatory treatment obviates the need to seek emergency care. Our results indicate that higher physical healthcare needs as well as anxiety are associated with more utilization of both ambulatory healthcare and emergency healthcare; whereas healthcare needs related to depression tend to remain unmet. Improving health services’ accessibility and responsiveness, including the expansion of support services, outreach, and the coverage of medical interpretation, may enable ASR to better meet their healthcare needs.
Implications for policy makers
We examined if low utilization of ambulatory healthcare among asylum-seekers and refugees (ASR) contributes to potentially avoidable and resource-intensive emergency room visits among this group.
We did not find evidence that low ambulatory care utilization determines high emergency care utilization among ASR; neither did we find evidence that getting ambulatory treatment obviates the need to seek emergency care.
Our study results show that some ASR patients use both ambulatory and emergency care, either moving back and forth between the two types of care (which suggests that neither one meets their need) or seeking either type of care “randomly” (which indicates problems navigating the health system). ASR with depression tend to not get any care for this problem.
Our findings signal the need to improve accessibility and responsiveness of health services, including understandable health information, help with navigating the health system, low-threshold and outreach services, medical interpretation, and sensitization of administrative and medical health staff.
Enabling ASR and other diverse groups to get specialized healthcare for their physical and mental health problems will contribute to better health system outcomes, including better health and less health inequalities, greater satisfaction among patients and staff, and more efficient healthcare provision, i.e. less preventable costs and burdens for the health system.
Implications for public Refugees often have difficulties in getting the healthcare they need. We tested if this makes them use more emergency care. This would be problematic for patients and healthcare providers; for example, because emergency services are already strained and costly. Indeed, our study suggests that refugees with anxiety go back and forth between ambulatory and emergency care, maybe because neither service resolves their problems. ASR with a chronic disease also use both ambulatory and emergency care. It is good if people with more health needs use more healthcare; it is even better, though, if we ensure they get specialized services for their particular problems. Refugees with depression tend to not get any help. More outreach, support with accessing the right healthcare provider, interpretation services and intercultural training for staff will help refugees get better care; and it will help healthcare providers offer treatment for refugees and other minorities effectively and efficiently.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The research leading to these results has received funding from the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under REA grant agreement no. 600209 (TU Berlin/IPODI).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Ethics Committee of Charite University Clinic Berlin gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.