Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Auditory grouping ability predicts speech-in-noise performance in cochlear implants

Inyong Choi, Phillip E. Gander, View ORCID ProfileJoel I. Berger, Jean Hong, Sarah Colby, Bob McMurray, View ORCID ProfileTimothy D. Griffiths
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.30.22275790
Inyong Choi
1Dept. Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
2Dept. Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: inyong-choi@uiowa.edu
Phillip E. Gander
3Dept. Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joel I. Berger
3Dept. Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joel I. Berger
Jean Hong
2Dept. Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Colby
4Dept. Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bob McMurray
1Dept. Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
2Dept. Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
4Dept. Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy D. Griffiths
5Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Timothy D. Griffiths
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives Cochlear implant (CI) users exhibit a large variance in understanding speech in noise (SiN). Past works in CI users found that spectral and temporal resolutions correlate with the SiN ability, but a large portion of variance has been remaining unexplained. Our group’s recent work on normal-hearing listeners showed that the ability of grouping temporally coherent tones in a complex auditory scene predicts SiN ability, highlighting a central mechanism of auditory scene analysis that contributes to SiN. The current study examined whether the auditory grouping ability contributes to SiN understanding in CI users as well.

Design 47 post-lingually deafened CI users performed multiple tasks including sentence-in-noise understanding, spectral ripple discrimination, temporal modulation detection, and stochastic figure-ground task in which listeners detect temporally coherent tone pips in the cloud of many tone pips that rise at random times at random frequencies. Accuracies from the latter three tasks were used as predictor variables while the sentence-in-noise performance was used as the dependent variable in a multiple linear regression analysis.

Results No co-linearity was found between any predictor variables. All the three predictors exhibited significant contribution in the multiple linear regression model, indicating that the ability to detect temporal coherence in a complex auditory scene explains a further amount of variance in CI users’ SiN performance that was not explained by spectral and temporal resolution.

Conclusions This result indicates that the across-frequency comparison builds an important auditory cognitive mechanism in CI users’ SiN understanding. Clinically, this result proposes a novel paradigm to reveal a source of SiN difficulty in CI users and a potential rehabilitative strategy.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by NIDCD P50 (DC000242 31) awarded to Gantz, Griffiths, and McMurray, Department of Defense Hearing Restoration and Rehabilitation Program grant awarded to Choi (W81XWH1910637), and DC008089 awarded to McMurray.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

IRB of the Unversity of Iowa gave ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 31, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Auditory grouping ability predicts speech-in-noise performance in cochlear implants
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Auditory grouping ability predicts speech-in-noise performance in cochlear implants
Inyong Choi, Phillip E. Gander, Joel I. Berger, Jean Hong, Sarah Colby, Bob McMurray, Timothy D. Griffiths
medRxiv 2022.05.30.22275790; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.30.22275790
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Auditory grouping ability predicts speech-in-noise performance in cochlear implants
Inyong Choi, Phillip E. Gander, Joel I. Berger, Jean Hong, Sarah Colby, Bob McMurray, Timothy D. Griffiths
medRxiv 2022.05.30.22275790; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.30.22275790

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Otolaryngology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (228)
  • Allergy and Immunology (506)
  • Anesthesia (110)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1245)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (206)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (282)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (534)
  • Epidemiology (10032)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (500)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2464)
  • Geriatric Medicine (238)
  • Health Economics (480)
  • Health Informatics (1647)
  • Health Policy (754)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (637)
  • Hematology (250)
  • HIV/AIDS (536)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11872)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
  • Medical Education (253)
  • Medical Ethics (75)
  • Nephrology (268)
  • Neurology (2290)
  • Nursing (139)
  • Nutrition (352)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (454)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (537)
  • Oncology (1249)
  • Ophthalmology (377)
  • Orthopedics (134)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (158)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (325)
  • Pediatrics (734)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (315)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2281)
  • Public and Global Health (4843)
  • Radiology and Imaging (843)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (492)
  • Respiratory Medicine (652)
  • Rheumatology (286)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (241)
  • Sports Medicine (227)
  • Surgery (269)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (125)
  • Urology (99)