ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND The Omicron variant prevails the Delta variant after December 2021 in Thailand. Both variants of concern embody diverse epidemiological trends and immunogenicity, raising enormous public health concerns. We determined whether biological and clinical characteristics and immunogenicity of patients differ between Delta and Omicron during post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) stage.
METHODS A retrospective cohort study involved patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who were under a home isolation (HI) strategy. Clinical outcomes and laboratory data of 2704 and 2477 patients during the Delta and Omicron pandemics were analyzed, respectively. We evaluated anti-receptor binding domain immunoglobulin G (anti-RBD IgG) and surrogate viral neutralizing (sVNT) activity in a subset of 495 individuals post-COVID-19 infection during the Delta pandemic.
RESULTS Eighty-four percent of all patients received antiviral treatment. The peak cycle threshold (Ct) values, which inversely related to viral load, were lower in the Omicron (19 [IQR=17-22]) compared with the Delta (21 [IQR=18-26]; p<0.001), regardless of vaccination status. Upper respiratory tract symptoms were common signs during the Omicron compared with the Delta pandemic. At least two-dose vaccination reduced the chance of hospital readmissions by 10–30% and death by less than 1%. Furthermore, anti-RBD IgG and sVNT against the Delta variants tended to be higher among the older individuals after post-COVID 19 infections and expressed in the long interval after two-dose vaccination than in other groups.
CONCLUSIONS Mild-to-moderate Delta and Omicron breakthrough infection with prior full vaccination is limitedly immunogenic; thereby exerting reduced protection against reinfection and infection from novel variants. However, this may be only sufficient to prevent hospitalization and death, particularly in countries where vaccines are limited. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05328479.)
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* A complete list of the SPHERE investigators is provided in the Supplementary Appendix.
Funding: This work was supported by Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
