Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Uncertainty Quantification in COVID-19 Detection Using Evidential Deep Learning

Bardia Khosravi, Shahriar Faghani, Amir Ashraf-Ganjouei
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.29.22275732
Bardia Khosravi
1Department of Radiology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shahriar Faghani
1Department of Radiology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Interdisciplinary Neuroscience Research Program (INRP), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amir Ashraf-Ganjouei
2Interdisciplinary Neuroscience Research Program (INRP), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: a.ganjuee@gmail.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Considering the immense pace of developments in deep learning (DL), its applications in medicine are relatively limited. One main issue that hinders the utilization of DL in the medical practice workflow is its reliability. A radiologist interpreting an image can easily say “I don’t know”, while a DL model is forced to output a result. Evidential deep learning (EDL) is one of the methods for uncertainty quantification (UQ). In this work, we aimed to use EDL to express model uncertainty in detecting COVID-19. We used SIIM-FISABIO-RSNA COVID-19 chest x-ray dataset and trained a model to diagnose typical COVID-19 pneumonia. When applied to a separate test set, it yielded an accuracy of 88% with median uncertainty scores of 0.25 and 0.07 for normal and typical COVID-19 images, respectively. Moreover, the model labeled unseen indeterminate and atypical COVID-19 x-rays with median uncertainties of 0.32 and 0.35, respectively. Our model’s performance was superior to the exact model trained with conventional approach of DL (i.e., using the cross-entropy loss), which is not able to express the uncertainty level. Overall, this study demonstrates applicability of UQ in disease detection that could facilitate the use of DL in practice by increasing its reliability.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study used (or will use) ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at: https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/siim-covid19-detection/overview

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced are available online at: https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/siim-covid19-detection/data

https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/siim-covid19-detection/data

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 29, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Uncertainty Quantification in COVID-19 Detection Using Evidential Deep Learning
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Uncertainty Quantification in COVID-19 Detection Using Evidential Deep Learning
Bardia Khosravi, Shahriar Faghani, Amir Ashraf-Ganjouei
medRxiv 2022.05.29.22275732; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.29.22275732
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Uncertainty Quantification in COVID-19 Detection Using Evidential Deep Learning
Bardia Khosravi, Shahriar Faghani, Amir Ashraf-Ganjouei
medRxiv 2022.05.29.22275732; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.29.22275732

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Radiology and Imaging
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (215)
  • Allergy and Immunology (495)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1095)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (196)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (274)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (500)
  • Epidemiology (9766)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (480)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2308)
  • Geriatric Medicine (222)
  • Health Economics (462)
  • Health Informatics (1557)
  • Health Policy (734)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (603)
  • Hematology (236)
  • HIV/AIDS (503)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11639)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (617)
  • Medical Education (237)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (257)
  • Neurology (2142)
  • Nursing (134)
  • Nutrition (336)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (426)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (517)
  • Oncology (1175)
  • Ophthalmology (364)
  • Orthopedics (128)
  • Otolaryngology (220)
  • Pain Medicine (146)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (311)
  • Pediatrics (695)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (300)
  • Primary Care Research (267)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2180)
  • Public and Global Health (4654)
  • Radiology and Imaging (776)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (457)
  • Respiratory Medicine (623)
  • Rheumatology (274)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (225)
  • Sports Medicine (210)
  • Surgery (251)
  • Toxicology (43)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)