CMV seropositivity in older adults changes T cell functionality, but does not prevent antibody or cellular SARS-CoV-2 vaccine responses

Jessica A. Breznik, Angela Huynh, Ali Zhang, Lucas Bilaver, Hina Bhakta, Hannah D. Stacey, Jann C. Ang, Jonathan L. Bramson, Ishac Nazy, Matthew S. Miller, Judah Denburg, Andrew P. Costa, Dawn M. E. Bowdish, other members of the COVID-in-LTC Investigator Group
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.27.22275673

Abstract

It has been previously reported that chronic infection with human cytomegalovirus (CMV) may contribute to poor vaccine responses against de novo antigens in older adults. We assessed effects of CMV serostatus on antibody quantity and quality, as well as cellular memory responses, after 2 and 3 SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine doses, in older adults in congregate living facilities. CMV serostatus did not affect anti-Spike and anti-RBD IgG antibody levels, nor neutralization capacity against wildtype or beta variants of SARS-CoV-2. CMV seropositivity altered T cell expression of senescence-associated markers and increased TEMRA cell numbers, as has been previously reported; however, this did not impact the Spike-specific CD4+ T cell memory responses. CMV seropositive individuals did not have a higher incidence of COVID-19, though prior infection influenced humoral immunity. Therefore, CMV seropositivity may alter T cell composition but does not impede humoral or cellular memory responses after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in older adults.

Introduction

Aging is associated with an increased frequency of viral respiratory infections and post-infection sequelae1, as well as reduced vaccine efficacy2. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, age was identified to be the most significant factor contributing to morbidity and mortality3, and it was unclear how effective vaccines against the de novo SARS-CoV-2 virus would be in older adults. Older adults often respond well to vaccines that target a memory response (e.g. Herpes zoster), but vaccines against de novo antigens or antigens that are antigenically distant from previous strains (e.g. some seasonal influenza vaccines) are often less immunogenic4, 5. Fortunately, SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines have been shown to be protective in older adults6, 7, 8, as they are effective at generating cellular and antibody-mediated immunity9, 10, 11, 12, though responses are generally more heterogeneous and wane faster than in younger adults9, 11.

In older adults, both immunosenescence and inflammation are thought to influence the immunogenicity and longevity of vaccine responses13, 14. Many studies have also implicated human cytomegalovirus (CMV) as a significant contributor to age-associated immune dysfunction. CMV is a common and persistent β-herpesvirus, found in ∼60-90% of adults worldwide, and seropositivity increases with age15, 16. CMV infection is typically asymptomatic in immunocompetent individuals, but its accompanying chronic immune activation fundamentally alters immune cell composition and function. There is a consensus that CMV seropositivity has a long-term impact on the maturation and composition of immune cells, including increased numbers and prevalence of CD8+ T cells, with expansion of virus-specific effector and memory cells at the expense of naïve T cells17, 18. Age-associated immunosenescence likewise contributes to similar changes within the T cell repertoire, reducing naïve T cells and increasing memory T cell populations, which have impaired proliferation, differentiation, and effector functions19, 20. A dysfunctional T cell repertoire may also have significant effects on B cell proliferation, differentiation, and maturation21. Accordingly, CMV seropositivity has been implicated as an exacerbating factor in age-associated immune remodelling and inter-individual immune diversity22, 23, 24, 25, as well as a modifying factor that may compromise infection outcomes and vaccination responses26.

Though there is little data to date, CMV reactivation in older adults has been suggested to contribute to more severe COVID-1927, 28, 29, 30, 31, as CMV seropositivity has been associated with impaired antibody and cellular immune responses to infections32, 33, 34. However, CMV seropositivity has also been reported to enhance cellular and antibody immune responses to unrelated bacteria or viruses, through diversification of CD8+ T cell receptors and augmentation of basal inflammation35, 36, 37, 38. CMV seropositivity has, in addition, been associated with a reduced humoral response to inactivated split influenza virus vaccines39, 40, 41, 42 and viral-vector-based Ebola vaccines43. Yet, a recent meta-analysis reported that there was insufficient evidence that CMV seropositive individuals have decreased antibody production after influenza vaccination44. Recent data also show that CMV seropositivity in young adults does not affect antibody or cellular responses after vaccination with the adenovirus-based vector vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-1945. These conflicting reports may suggest context and age-dependent effects of chronic CMV infection on immune function. SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines have been widely deployed in Canada, particularly in older adults. Whether CMV seropositivity impacts SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine efficacy is not yet known. Herein we investigated effects of CMV serostatus on humoral and cellular measures of vaccine responses after 2 and 3 doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in older adults. We found that CMV serostatus does not impede antibody or cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in older adults.

Methods

Participant Recruitment and Blood Collection

Blood was collected from 188 participants, 65 years of age and older, in assisted living facilities (3 retirement homes and 14 nursing homes), in Ontario, Canada, between March and December 2021. All protocols were approved by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board, and informed consent was obtained. Venous blood was drawn in anti-coagulant-free vacutainers for isolation of serum, as per standard protocols46. Venous blood was drawn in heparin-coated vacutainers for immunophenotyping and T cell activation assays. Blood was collected at least 7 days after 2nd and/or 3rd mRNA vaccine doses. Blood was drawn after 2nd and 3rd mRNA vaccine doses from 47 participants. Participant demographics are summarized in Table 1

View this table:
Table 1. Participant Demographics

Determination of CMV Serostatus

CMV seropositivity was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with the Human Anti-Cytomegalovirus IgG ELISA Kit (CMV) (Abcam ab108639) as per manufacturer’s instructions. Serum samples from a participant’s first blood draw were diluted 1:40 and assessed in duplicate. Samples with a CMV IgG Index above or equal to the positive standard were classified as CMV seropositive, whereas samples with a CMV IgG index less than the positive standard were classified as CMV seronegative.

Whole Blood Immunophenotyping

Circulating immune cell populations were quantitated in whole blood using fluorophore-conjugated monoclonal antibodies by multicolour flow cytometry with a CytoFLEX LX (4 laser, Beckman Coulter), as per standard protocols46, 47, 48. Count-Bright™ absolute counting beads (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were used to determine absolute cell counts. Data was gated with FlowJo V10.8.1 (TreeStar, Inc.) as previously published47. Five main subsets of human CD8+ and CD4+ T cells (Naïve (N), Central Memory (CM), Effector Memory (EM), Effector Memory re-expressing CD45RA (EMRA), and terminally differentiated (TD)) were identified by their expression of CD45RA, CCR7, CD28 and/or CD57. CD8N and CD4N were classified as CD45RA+CCR7+; CD8CM and CD4CM as CD45RA-CCR7+; CD8EM and CD4EM as CD45RA-CCR7-, CD8EMRA and CD4EMRA as CD45RA+CCR7-; and CD8TD and CD4TD as CD45RA+CCR7-CD28-CD57+, as per standard protocols68.

Assessment of T Cell Activation Induced Markers (AIMs) for SARS-CoV-2 Peptides

Antigen-specific T cell recall responses were assessed as per established protocols47 using a Spike (S) glycoprotein SARS-CoV-2 peptide pool containing overlapping peptides of the complete immunodominant sequence domain (#130-126-701; Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Negative control (unstimulated wells) and positive control (polyclonal stimulation with CytoStim™ (0.5 µL/well, #130-092-173; Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) conditions were included with each sample, as was stimulation with influenza hemagglutinin (HA) antigens (4 µL; AgriFlu, Alfuria® Tetra Inactivated Influenza Vaccine 2020-2021 season, Seqirus, UK). 100 µL of heparinized venous blood was incubated with an equal volume of Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium, GlutaMAX™ Supplement (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 1 μg/mL S-antigen for 44 h in 96-well flat bottom plates at 37 °C. Samples were stained with fluorophore-conjugated monoclonal antibodies and assessed with a CytoFLEX LX (4 laser, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) as previously described47. Data was analyzed with FlowJo V10.1 (TreeStar, Inc.) as previously published47. Antigen-specific T cells (AIM-positive) were identified by co-expression of CD25 and CD134 (OX40) on CD4+ T cells49, 50, and co-expression of CD69 and CD137 (4-1BB) on CD8+ T cells51. Samples with a T cell frequency of at least 20 events and ≥ 2-fold above an unstimulated sample (negative control; i.e. stimulation index ≥ 2), were defined as AIM-positive. Expression of CXCR3, CCR4 and/or CCR6 was used to identify CD4+ Th1 (CXCR3+CCR6-CCR4-), Th2 (CXCR3-CCR4+CCR6-), and Th17 (CXCR3-CCR4+CCR6+) CD4+ T cell subsets.

Measurements of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies and Neutralizing Capacity

Serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein and receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG, IgA and IgM antibodies were measured by a validated ELISA as previously described47, 52, with assay cut-off 3 standard deviations above the mean of a pre-COVID-19 population from the same geographic region. Data are reported as a ratio of observed optical density (OD) to the determined assay cut-off OD. Antibody neutralization capacity was assessed by cell culture assays with Vero E6 (ATCC CRL-1586) cells and live SARS-CoV-2, with data reported as geometric microneutralization titers at 50% (MNT50), which ranged from below detection (MNT50 = 5; 1:10 dilution) to MNT50 = 128052. Antibody neutralization was measured against the ancestral strain of SARS-CoV-2 and the beta variant of concern (B.1.351). The beta variant was obtained through BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH: SARS-Related Coronavirus 2, Isolate hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020, NR-54009, contributed by Alex Sigal and Tulio de Oliveira.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism version 9 (San Diego, CA, USA). Two-group comparisons of dose and CMV seropositivity or prior COVID-19 and CMV seropositivity were assessed by two-way ANOVA. Differences between CMV seropositive and seronegative group antibody levels, antibody neutralization capacity, T cell immune cell composition, T cell surface expression, and memory T cell responses, were assessed by Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction or Mann-Whitney U-test, according to data normality. P values are reported as two-tailed and p values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Participant demographics

Serum anti-CMV IgG antibodies were measured by ELISA to determine CMV seropositivity. 69.7% (n = 131/188) of participants were CMV seropositive. There was no difference in age or sex distribution between seropositive (median 85±6.8 years, 67.6% female) and seronegative participants (median 86±7.7 years, 69.8% female) (Table 1). Blood samples were collected at a median of 179.8 days (CMV seronegative) and 175.4 days (CMV seronegative) after 2 doses of Moderna Spikevax 100 µg (mRNA-1273) or Pfizer Cominarty 30 µg (BNT162b2) administered as per manufacturer-recommended schedules. In Ontario, Canada, 3rd dose vaccinations were recommended for older adults in congregate living beginning in August 2021, if they were more than 6 months post-2nd vaccinations53. Participants received 3rd doses in August-September 2021, and blood samples were collected at a median of 82.0 days (CMV seronegative) or 83.7 days (CMV seropositive) after 3rd doses. Participants were classified as having had a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection if they had a documented positive PCR test or were seropositive for IgG or IgA nucleocapsid antibodies. 37.8% of CMV seronegative participants and 34.4% of CMV seropositive participants had a positive nasopharyngeal PCR test since March 2020 and/or serum anti-nucleocapsid IgG or IgA antibodies.

CMV seropositivity does not impede anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody production or neutralization in older adults

To assess effects of CMV serostatus on antibody responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike and RBD IgG, IgA, and IgM antibody levels were measured by ELISA (Figure 1; Table 2). The number of responders (i.e. individuals with antibodies above the threshold limit of detection) significantly increased between post-2nd and post-3rd doses for anti-Spike IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies, as well as anti-RBD IgG antibodies, but not anti-RBD IgA or IgM antibodies (Table 2). For example, 5-7 months after second dose vaccinations, anti-Spike IgG antibody responses were detected in 88.7% of participants, and anti-RBD IgG antibody responses were detected in 63.5% of participants. Approximately 3 months after the third dose, 97.3% and 94.6% of participants had detectable anti-Spike IgG and anti-RBD IgG, respectively. CMV seropositivity did not impact the frequency of responders for anti-Spike and anti-RBD IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies. Accordingly, two-group analyses showed a main effect of vaccine dose, but not CMV serostatus, on serum anti-Spike IgG (Figure 1A) and anti-RBD (Figure 1D) antibodies, as well as anti-Spike IgA (Figure 1B) and anti-Spike IgM (Figure 1C) antibodies. There were no significant main effects of vaccine dose or CMV serostatus on anti-RBD IgM (Figure 1F) antibodies. Main effects of dose and CMV serostatus were observed for serum anti-RBD IgA levels (Figure 1E), though post-hoc assessments by CMV serostatus were not significant. Therefore, CMV seropositivity does not impede antiviral antibody responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Antibodies and neutralization capacity by CMV serostatus after two and three COVID-19 vaccines in older adults.

Serum SARS-CoV-2 anti-Spike and anti-RBD antibodies were detected by ELISA, and antibody neutralization capacity was assessed by MNT50 with live SARS-CoV-2 virus. Anti-Spike antibodies: IgG (A), IgA (B) and IgM (C). Anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibodies: IgG (D), IgA (E), and IgM (F). Antibody neutralization capacity was assessed against ancestral (G) and beta variant (H) SARS-CoV-2. Dotted lines indicate the threshold of detection. Each data point indicates an individual participant, and the center line indicates the median. Associations between CMV serostatus and vaccine dose were assessed by two-way ANOVA, with Tukey’s test post-hoc analysis. ***p<0.001, *p<0.0001.

View this table:
Table 2. Responders and non-responders to vaccination by CMV serostatus – antibodies

To examine potential effects of CMV serostatus on antibody function, serum antibody neutralization capacity was assessed by MNT50 assays against live ancestral (wildtype) and beta variant SARS-CoV-2 (Figure 1G-H; Table 3). Vaccines were designed against the wildtype virus, whereas the beta variant contains mutations that confer increased transmissibility and immune evasion54. Neutralization of ancestral and beta variant SARS-CoV-2 ranged from below the detection limit to MNT50=1280, though mean neutralization was consistently higher against the ancestral virus after 2 and 3 vaccine doses. Neutralization capacity was similar between CMV seropositive and seronegative individuals against both ancestral and beta variant SARS-CoV-2, though there was a main effect of dose on neutralization capacity. In particular, significant increases in neutralization were observed after 3rd dose vaccination against the beta variant. Anti-Spike and anti-RBD IgG levels moderately correlated with antibody neutralization capacity, irrespective of CMV serostatus (Table 3). As well, modest correlations were observed between neutralization capacity and anti-Spike and anti-RBD IgA antibodies in both CMV seropositive and CMV seronegative participants. Therefore, CMV seropositivity does not compromise vaccine-elicited antibody neutralization of SARS-CoV-2.

View this table:
Table 3. Associations of antibody and neutralization responses after vaccination by CMV serostatus

As serum was collected from some participants after both 2nd and 3rd vaccine doses, these paired data were also assessed independently (Supplementary Figure 1). Consistent with our pooled participant data, there were main effects of dose but not CMV serostatus on anti-Spike and anti-RBD IgG and IgA serum antibody levels. We did observe an interaction between CMV serostatus and dose on anti-RBD IgM measurements by intra-individual analysis, but most participants had antibody levels below the threshold. Intra-individual analyses also showed that the number of vaccine doses, but not CMV serostatus, had a significant effect on antibody neutralization capacity against wildtype and beta variant virus. Therefore, CMV seropositivity does not significantly impact intra-individual changes in antibody levels or neutralization capacity between 2 and 3 doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines.

We next considered post-dose 2 and post-dose 3 antibody measurements in context of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (Supplementary Figure 2). As summarized in Table 1, incidence of COVID-19 was similar between CMV seronegative and seropositive participants. We observed a main effect of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection on anti-Spike and anti-RBD IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies after 2 doses of mRNA vaccines, as well as anti-Spike and anti-RBD IgG and IgA, but not IgM, serum antibodies after 3 vaccine doses. We observed an interaction between prior COVID-19 and CMV serostatus for anti-Spike and anti-RBD IgA antibodies post-dose 2 and post-dose 3, and IgM antibodies post-dose 2. There was a main effect of CMV serostatus on anti-Spike IgM antibodies, but as observed above, most individuals had levels below the detection threshold. We in addition observed main effects of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, but not CMV serostatus, on antibody neutralization of ancestral SARs-CoV-2 after 2 and 3 vaccine doses and the beta variant after 2, but not 3, vaccine doses (Supplementary Figure 3). Collectively, these data indicate that CMV serostatus does not appear to have a major impact on anti-Spike or anti-RBD IgG antibody production, or total serum antibody neutralization capacity. Moreover, CMV seropositivity in the older adult cohort did not impair IgG antibody production or neutralization in response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

CMV serostatus influences peripheral CD4+ and CD8+ T cell immunophenotype

To examine the impact of CMV seropositivity on the T cell repertoire, whole blood CD4+ and CD8+ T cell composition was quantitated, and their surface expression of CD28 and CD57 was measured, by flow cytometry (Figure 2; Supplementary Figure 4). Chronic T cell activation is a characteristic of CMV seropositivity18, 36, 55. Accordingly, CMV seropositive individuals had significant changes to their peripheral T cell repertoire (Figure 2; Supplementary Figure 4). We found no changes in numbers of circulating total leukocytes, total CD4+ T cells, or CD4N, CD4EM, CD8N, or CD8EM T cell populations by CMV serostatus. However, CMV seropositivity increased numbers of total CD8+ T cells, as well as CD4EMRA, CD4TD, CD8EMRA, and CD8TD T cells, and decreased numbers of CD4CM and CD8CM T cells (Figure 2).

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Effect of CMV serostatus on the circulating T cell repertoire in older adults.

T cell populations in whole blood were assessed by flow cytometry. (A) Relative prevalence of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets by CMV serostatus (also see Supplementary Figure 4). Absolute cell counts of: (B) total leukocytes; (C) total CD4+ T cells; (D) CD8+ T cells. Absolute cell counts of CD4+ T cells: (E) naïve; (F) central memory; (G) effector memory; (H) EMRA; (I) terminally differentiated. Absolute cell counts of CD8+ T cells: (J) naive; (K) central memory; (L) effector memory; (M) EMRA; (N) terminally differentiated. (O) Surface geometric mean expression of CD57 and CD28 on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells by CMV serostatus. Each data point in B-N indicates an individual participant, and data are presented as box and whisker plots, minimum to maximum, where the center line indicates the median. The surface marker expression in O was visualized by concatenating uncompensated events in FlowJo for each participant and indicated T cell population grouped according to CMV serostatus, and then geometric mean fluorescence intensity expression data of each CMV group was overlaid onto the same histogram plot. Associations between T cell subsets and CMV serostatus were assessed by Student’s t test with Welch’s correction or Mann-Whitney U test, according to normality. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ***p<0.0001.

CD28 is a co-stimulatory molecule that contributes to TCR-antigen-mediated activation of T cells, while CD57 is a marker of terminally differentiated T cells as well as an indicator of immune senescence56. Repeated T cell activation is associated with upregulation of CD57 and a reduction in CD28 expression57, 58, 59. Consistent with these prior data, comparisons of CD28 and CD57 expression on T cell populations by CMV serostatus in our cohort of older adults (Figure 2O) revealed increased CD57 expression and reduced CD28 expression on total CD4+ and CD8+ T cell populations, as well as more specifically CD4CM, CD4EM, CD4EMRA, CD8N, and CD8EMRA T cells. Expression of CD28 was also decreased on CD8CM and CD8EM cells of CMV seropositive individuals, though expression of CD57 was not influenced by CMV serostatus. CMV serostatus did not affect CD57 or CD28 expression on CD4N T cells.

As even mild COVD-19 can have lasting effects on immune cell composition47, we also considered combined effects of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and CMV serostatus on T cell composition (Supplementary Figures 5-6). Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with lower leukocyte counts, but otherwise had no significant main effects on absolute cell numbers nor prevalence of the assessed CD4+ or CD8+ T cell populations.

In summary, there are significant changes to the relative composition and functional phenotype of peripheral blood CD8+ T cell and CD4+ T cell subsets between CMV seronegative and seropositive individuals, irrespective of prior COVID-19. The observed expansion of EMRA and terminally differentiated T cells, as well as reduced surface expression of the costimulatory molecule CD28 on CD8N T cells in particular, may influence T cell vaccine responses.

CMV serostatus influences CD4+ and CD8+ SARS-CoV-2 antigen-induced recall responses

An activation-induced marker (AIM) assay was used to examine T cell memory responses after second and third dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations (Figure 3; Table 4). SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are unusual in that healthy adults generate strong CD4+ T cell memory recall responses, but weaker CD8+ T cell memory responses60. We also made similar observations in older adults. Most study participants had CD4+ T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 Spike (post-dose 2: 93.1%; post-dose 3: 95.9%), but only 19.5% of participants had Spike-elicited CD8+ memory T cell responses after 2 vaccine doses, though this increased to 29.7% of participants after 3 vaccine doses. CMV serostatus did not influence the number of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 Spike-activated CD4+ T cells or CD8+ T cells after 2nd or 3rd dose vaccinations. Grouped analyses revealed a significant main effect of CMV serostatus on the frequency of S-CD8+ T cells. However, despite greater variance of data in seropositive individuals, post-hoc analyses by CMV serostatus were not significant post-dose 2 or post-dose 3. Intra-individual paired analyses also showed no main effects of vaccine dose nor CMV serostatus on S-CD8+ T cell population activation (Supplementary Figure 7). Prior COVID-19 did not influence the prevalence of S-CD8+ T cells after 2 or 3 vaccine doses, though CMV seropositivity contributed to increased S-CD8+ T cell activation post-dose 2 (Supplementary Figure 8). The prevalence of S-activated CD4+ T cells was likewise not different by CMV serostatus (Figure 3B), nor prior COVID-19 (Supplementary Figure 8), though grouped analyses on a population and intra-individual basis showed a main effect of vaccine dose (Supplementary Figure 7). Therefore, CMV serostatus contributes to increased CD8+ T cell, but not CD4+ T cell, memory responses to SARS-CoV-2 Spike antigen.

Figure 3.
Figure 3. CD4+ and CD8+ T cell activation induced memory responses to SARS-CoV-2 Spike peptide pools in older adults.

AIM assays were performed by flow cytometry analysis after whole blood stimulation. (A) Spike SARs-CoV-2-specific AIM+CD8+ T cells (expressing CD69 and CD137) were measured as a proportion of total CD8+ T cells. (B) Spike SARs-CoV-2-specific AIM+CD4+ T cells (expressing CD25 and OX40L) were measured as a proportion of total CD4+ T cells. Spike SARs-CoV-2-specific AIM+CD4+ T cell functional Th1 (C), Th2 (D), and Th17 (E) subsets. Each data point indicates an individual participant. For A-B data from all individuals is graphed irrespective of whether they meet cut-off requirements for a ‘positive’ result. For C-E, only data from individuals with ‘positive’ S-CD4+ T cell memory responses were graphed. Data are presented as box and whisker plots, minimum to maximum, where the center line indicates the median. Associations between CMV serostatus and vaccine dose were assessed by two-way ANOVA, with Tukey’s test post-hoc analysis. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

View this table:
Table 4. Responders and non-responders to vaccination by CMV serostatus – cellular responses

CD4+ memory T cells are comprised of a number of different functional subsets, including T helper 1 (Th1), T helper 2 (Th2), and T helper 17 (Th17) cells61, which were further characterized. There was a significant effect of CMV serostatus on the frequency of Th1 S-CD4+ T cells, with post-hoc analyses showing an increase in CMV seropositive individuals after 2 but not 3 vaccine doses (Figure 3C). Th2 and Th17 S-CD4+ T cell frequencies were not influenced by CMV serostatus (Figure 3D-E), though paired analyses by dose and CMV serostatus suggested a significant increase in Th17 responses in CMV seropositive individuals after 3rd vaccine doses (Supplementary Figure 7). Interestingly, when we considered these data in context of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, CMV serostatus had a main effect on the prevalence of S-CD4+ Th1 and Th17 T cells, which increased and decreased, respectively, with CMV seropositivity, though only post-dose 2 (Supplementary Figure 8).

To determine if the observed contributions of CMV serostatus to increased CD8+ T cell and CD4+ Th1 T cell memory responses are consistent across different stimuli, we also examined T cell AIM responses after TCR-independent polyclonal stimulation with CytoStim, and stimulation with influenza hemagglutinin antigens (Figure 4). As we observed for Spike-activated T cells, both CytoStim and HA stimulation resulted in increased proportions of AIM+CD8+ T cells in CMV seropositive individuals (Figure 4A, 4F), though AIM+CD4+ T cell frequency was not affected by CMV serostatus (Figure 4B, 4G). These data show that effects of CMV seropositivity on total AIM+CD8+ and AIM+CD4+ T cell frequencies are consistent across different stimuli. CytoStim-stimulated CD4+ T cells, like Spike-stimulated CD4+ T cells, also showed distinct Th1 skewed responses, though this was not observed after HA stimulation. These data collectively suggest that CMV serostatus alters the functional composition of memory T cells, with antigen-specific effects, though CMV serostatus but does not alter the ability of older adults to generate CD4+ or CD8+ T cell memory, nor the incidence of activation after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Figure 4.
Figure 4. CD4+ and CD8+ T cell activation induced memory responses to CytoStim and influenza HA peptide pools in older adults.

AIM assays were performed by flow cytometry analysis after whole blood stimulation. CytoStim-induced responses: (A) AIM+CD8+ T cells (expressing CD69 and CD137) as a proportion of total CD8+ T cells; (B) AIM+CD4+ T cells (expressing CD25 and OX40L) as a proportion of total CD4+ T cells; AIM+CD4+ T cell functional Th1 (C), Th2 (D), and Th17 (E) subsets. Influenza HA-induced responses: (F) AIM+CD8+ T cells (expressing CD69 and CD137) as a proportion of total CD8+ T cells; (G) AIM+CD4+ T cells (expressing CD25 and OX40L) as a proportion of total CD4+ T cells; AIM+CD4+ T cell functional Th1 (H), Th2 (I), and Th17 (J) subsets. Each data point indicates an individual participant. Data is pooled from all blood collections, and for participants with two different collection time points, data are only included from post-dose 2 collections. Data are presented as box and whisker plots, minimum to maximum, where the center line indicates the median. Associations between T cell responses CMV serostatus were assessed by Student’s t test with Welch’s correction or Mann-Whitney U test, according to normality. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ***p<0.0001.

Discussion

Our data suggest that despite being a significant modifier of peripheral blood T cell composition and phenotype, CMV seropositivity does not have a negative impact on vaccine immunogenicity in older adults. Yet, we found that there were subtle changes in antibody and cellular responses in CMV seropositive individuals between vaccine doses and in individuals with prior COVID-19. Our study cohort included participants from multiple assisted living facilities, and it did not exclude individuals with particular health conditions (e.g. cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, autoimmune disorders) or prescribed medications (e.g. immune modulating drugs). Thus, any observed effects of CMV needed to be sufficiently robust to overcome potential effects of those other factors.

Our observations of changes in the peripheral T cell repertoire in CMV seropositive individuals, and CD4+ and CD8+ T cell expression of CD28 and CD57, are consistent with prior publications that reported expansion of exhausted CD4EMRA and CD8EMRA memory T cells in CMV seropositive healthy community-dwelling adults39, 41. There are conflicting reports as to whether the CMV seropositivity is associated with a reduction in naïve CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. In this investigation, we observed similar numbers of CD4N and CD8N T cells in seropositive and seronegative individuals, and in particular similar expression of CD57 and CD28 on CD4N T cells. Our data therefore suggest that CMV seropositivity does not influence the availability nor capacity of circulating naïve T cells to respond and generate memory responses to de novo antigens in older adults.

CMV seropositivity in older adults has been associated with lower frequencies of memory T cells in response to seasonal influenza, though acute infection T cell responses were unchanged62, and there is conflicting data as to whether CMV seropositivity enhances or impairs influenza virus-specific T cell responses31, 39, 63, 64. We found that T cell memory recall responses were similar in CMV seropositive and seronegative individuals. Our findings are concordant with observations from a previous study that found CMV serostatus did not alter the ability of older adults to generate memory responses to the newly emergent (at the time) West Nile virus46. We observed in our cohort of older adults that T cell memory responses were not different by CMV serostatus. Furthermore, it has been reported that T cell memory responses to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein are boosted in convalescent younger adults after vaccination65, 66. We identified an increase in Spike-specific CD4+ T cell memory responses between 2 and 3 mRNA vaccine doses in our older adult cohort, but we did not observe increased CD8+ or CD4+ T cell memory responses in convalescent older adults after vaccination. This may in part be because our analysis of effects of prior COVID-19 were not restricted to a particular time frame post-SARS-CoV-2 infection. Irrespective, these findings suggest that while combined effects of infection and subsequent vaccination may differ by age, older adults can elicit functional memory T cell responses to infection and vaccination against de novo viruses.

We observed a distinct Th1 bias after polyclonal T cell activation, and in response to the immunodominant regions of the Spike antigen after 2 doses, but not 3 doses, of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. Th1 skewing of the immune response after influenza virus vaccination has been previously noted in CMV seropositive infants and young adults and mice64, 67, as well as in older adults68. Strong Th1 CD4+ T cell responses have been associated with lower disease severity in unvaccinated COVID-19 patients69, and SARS-CoV-2 Spike-elicited CD4+ T cell memory responses in unvaccinated convalescent individuals have also been identified to be primarily Th1-differentiated65, 66. However, we did not identify a main effect of prior COVID-19, nor an interaction of CMV serostatus and prior COVID-19, on the prevalence of CD4+ T cell Th1 responses in vaccinated older adults. These data indicate that in older adults CMV seropositivity is associated with Th1-biased CD4+ T cell responses, which are not further modified by any prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our observations also suggest that Spike-specific memory T cell functional responses change between 2 and 3 vaccine doses in older adults, congruent with observations of changes in memory T cell phenotype between vaccine doses in younger adults65.

Our data also show that CMV seropositivity does not prevent production of anti-Spike or anti-RBD IgG, IgA, or IgM antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA, though we did observe an interaction between CMV seropositivity and prior COVID-19 both post-dose 2 and post-dose 3. These effects may be reflective of our limited sample size, or differences in time since infection between CMV seropositive and CMV seronegative individuals. CMV seropositive individuals have been reported to have increased B cell proliferation and mutations within the immunoglobulin heavy chain sequences of IgM and IgG, but not IgA, isotypes70. CMV serostatus could also have a larger effect on maturation of the antibody response via isotype switching, and thus isotype composition after vaccination, which may contribute to our observations, but to our knowledge this has not been extensively explored.

Early in the pandemic, CMV seropositivity was associated with increased risk of hospitalization in COVID-19 patients71, and CMV reactivation was later reported to have a higher incidence in patients in intensive care72. More recently it was reported that unvaccinated individuals with latent CMV, irrespective of anti-CMV antibody levels, age, and sex, are at higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization73. In particular, the exhausted T cells present in CMV seropositive individuals have also been predicted to contribute to more severe COVID-19 pathophysiology74. Our data does not preclude the possibility that CMV-associated remodelling of innate and adaptive immunity in older adults may contribute to the pathogenesis and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection. CMV serostatus may in addition impact humoral or cellular responses to breakthrough infections with current or emerging variants of concern.

In conclusion, our data shows that CMV serostatus alters the T cell repertoire but does not blunt cellular nor humoral responses after 2 and 3 doses SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in older adults in congregate care facilities. Further research is necessary to disentangle the more subtle effects of CMV serostatus on immunogenicity and durability of immune responses after vaccination, as well as to assess its role in risk of breakthrough infections.

Data Availability

Data are not available without prior approval from the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (HiREB).

Footnotes

  • Conflict of Interest Disclosures: The authors have no financial relationship with any organization that may have an interest and have no other relationships or activities that could post a conflict of interest.

  • Funding: This work was funded by a grant from Canadian COVID-19 Immunity Task Force and Public Health Agency of Canada awarded to Costa and Bowdish. APC is the Schlegel Chair in Clinical Epidemiology and Aging. DMEB is the Canada Research Chair in Aging & Immunity. Funding support for this work was provided by grants from the Ontario Research Foundation, COVID-19 Rapid Research Fund, and by the Canadian COVID-19 Immunity Task Force awarded to IN. MSM is supported, in part, by an Ontario Early Researcher Award and a Canada Research Chair in Viral Pandemics.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Kline, K.A. & Bowdish, D.M. Infection in an aging population. Current opinion in microbiology 29, 63–67 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    Goodwin, K., Viboud, C. & Simonsen, L. Antibody response to influenza vaccination in the elderly: a quantitative review. Vaccine 24, 1159–1169 (2006).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Banerjee, A. et al. Estimating excess 1-year mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic according to underlying conditions and age: a population-based cohort study. Lancet 395, 1715–1725 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Cunningham, A.L. et al. Efficacy of the herpes zoster subunit vaccine in adults 70 years of age or older. New England Journal of Medicine 375, 1019–1032 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Lal, H. et al. Efficacy of an adjuvanted herpes zoster subunit vaccine in older adults. The New England journal of medicine 372, 2087–2096 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Brown, K., Stall, NM., Vanniyasingam T., et al. Early impact of Ontario’s COVID-19 vaccine rollout on long-term care home residents and health care workers. Science Briefs of the Ontario COVID-19 Science Advisory Table; 2021.
  7. 7.↵
    Salcher-Konrad, M., Smith, S. & Comas-Herrera, A. Emerging Evidence on Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines Among Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 22, 1602–1603 (2021).
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    Chung, H. et al. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccines against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe covid-19 outcomes in Ontario, Canada: test negative design study. BMJ 374, 1943 (2021).
  9. 9.↵
    Breznik, J.A. et al. Antibody Responses 3-5 Months Post-Vaccination with mRNA-1273 or BNT163b2 in Nursing Home Residents. medRxiv, 2021.2008.2017.21262152 (2021).
  10. 10.↵
    Zhang, A. et al. Antibody Responses to 3rd Dose mRNA Vaccines in Nursing Home and Assisted Living Residents. medRxiv, 2021.2012.2017.21267996 (2021).
  11. 11.↵
    Brockman, M.A. et al. Reduced magnitude and durability of humoral immune responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines among older adults. J Infect Dis (2021).
  12. 12.↵
    Weng, N.-p. & Pawelec, G. Validation of the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in older adults in “real-world” settings. Immunity & Ageing 18, 36 (2021).
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    Fulop, T. et al. Immunosenescence and Inflamm-Aging As Two Sides of the Same Coin: Friends or Foes? Front Immunol 8, 1960–1960 (2018).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Fulop, T., Pawelec, G., Castle, S. & Loeb, M. Immunosenescence and vaccination in nursing home residents. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 48, 443–448 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Zuhair, M. et al. Estimation of the worldwide seroprevalence of cytomegalovirus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reviews in medical virology 29, e2034 (2019).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Pawelec, G., McElhaney, J.E., Aiello, A.E. & Derhovanessian, E. The impact of CMV infection on survival in older humans. Curr Opin Immunol 24, 507–511 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Sylwester, A.W. et al. Broadly targeted human cytomegalovirus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells dominate the memory compartments of exposed subjects. Journal of Experimental Medicine 202, 673–685 (2005).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Chidrawar, S. et al. Cytomegalovirus-seropositivity has a profound influence on the magnitude of major lymphoid subsets within healthy individuals. Clinical and experimental immunology 155, 423–432 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Sansoni, P. et al. The immune system in extreme longevity. Experimental gerontology 43, 61–65 (2008).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    Goronzy, J.J. & Weyand, C.M. Successful and Maladaptive T Cell Aging. Immunity 46, 364–378 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Dörner, T. & Radbruch, A. Antibodies and B Cell Memory in Viral Immunity. Immunity 27, 384–392 (2007).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Yan, Z. et al. Aging and CMV discordance are associated with increased immune diversity between monozygotic twins. Immunity & ageing : I & A 18, 5 (2021).
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    Brodin, P. et al. Variation in the human immune system is largely driven by non-heritable influences. Cell 160, 37–47 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    Mekker, A. et al. Immune senescence: relative contributions of age and cytomegalovirus infection. PLoS pathogens 8, e1002850 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Olsson, J. et al. Age-related change in peripheral blood T-lymphocyte subpopulations and cytomegalovirus infection in the very old: the Swedish longitudinal OCTO immune study. Mechanisms of ageing and development 121, 187–201 (2000).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    Crooke, S.N., Ovsyannikova, I.G., Poland, G.A. & Kennedy, R.B. Immunosenescence and human vaccine immune responses. Immunity & Ageing 16, 25 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    Kadambari, S., Klenerman, P. & Pollard, A.J. Why the elderly appear to be more severely affected by COVID-19: The potential role of immunosenescence and CMV. Reviews in medical virology 30, e2144 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Moss, P. “The ancient and the new”: is there an interaction between cytomegalovirus and SARS-CoV-2 infection? Immunity & ageing : I & A 17, 14–14 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    Söderberg-Nauclér, C. Does reactivation of cytomegalovirus contribute to severe COVID-19 disease? Immunity & ageing : I & A 18, 12–12 (2021).
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    Chen, Y. et al. Aging in COVID-19: Vulnerability, immunity and intervention. Ageing research reviews 65, 101205 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    Merani, S., Pawelec, G., Kuchel, G.A. & McElhaney, J.E. Impact of Aging and Cytomegalovirus on Immunological Response to Influenza Vaccination and Infection. Front Immunol 8, 784 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    Cicin-Sain, L. et al. Cytomegalovirus infection impairs immune responses and accentuates T-cell pool changes observed in mice with aging. PLoS pathogens 8, e1002849 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    Smithey, M.J., Li, G., Venturi, V., Davenport, M.P. & Nikolich-Žugich, J. Lifelong persistent viral infection alters the naive T cell pool, impairing CD8 T cell immunity in late life. J Immunol 189, 5356–5366 (2012).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    Khan, N. et al. Herpesvirus-specific CD8 T cell immunity in old age: cytomegalovirus impairs the response to a coresident EBV infection. J Immunol 173, 7481–7489 (2004).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    Barton, E.S. et al. Herpesvirus latency confers symbiotic protection from bacterial infection. Nature 447, 326–329 (2007).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    Terrazzini, N. et al. Cytomegalovirus infection modulates the phenotype and functional profile of the T-cell immune response to mycobacterial antigens in older life. Experimental gerontology 54, 94–100 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    Pera, A. et al. CMV latent infection improves CD8+ T response to SEB due to expansion of polyfunctional CD57+ cells in young individuals. PloS one 9, e88538 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    Smithey, M.J. et al. Lifelong CMV infection improves immune defense in old mice by broadening the mobilized TCR repertoire against third-party infection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115, E6817–e6825 (2018).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    Derhovanessian, E. et al. Cytomegalovirus-associated accumulation of late-differentiated CD4 T-cells correlates with poor humoral response to influenza vaccination. Vaccine 31, 685–690 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    Saurwein-Teissl, M. et al. Lack of antibody production following immunization in old age: association with CD8+ CD28− T cell clonal expansions and an imbalance in the production of Th1 and Th2 cytokines. The Journal of Immunology 168, 5893–5899 (2002).
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.↵
    Frasca, D., Diaz, A., Romero, M., Landin, A.M. & Blomberg, B.B. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) seropositivity decreases B cell responses to the influenza vaccine. Vaccine 33, 1433–1439 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    Trzonkowski, P. et al. Association between cytomegalovirus infection, enhanced proinflammatory response and low level of anti-hemagglutinins during the anti-influenza vaccination--an impact of immunosenescence. Vaccine 21, 3826–3836 (2003).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    Bowyer, G. et al. Reduced Ebola vaccine responses in CMV+ young adults is associated with expansion of CD57+KLRG1+ T cells. J Exp Med 217, e20200004 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    van den Berg, S.P.H., Warmink, K., Borghans, J.A.M., Knol, M.J. & van Baarle, D. Effect of latent cytomegalovirus infection on the antibody response to influenza vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical microbiology and immunology 208, 305–321 (2019).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. 45.↵
    Sharpe, H.R. et al. CMV-associated T cell and NK cell terminal differentiation does not affect immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 vaccination. JCI Insight 7 (2022).
  46. 46.↵
    Verschoor, C.P., Kohli, V. & Balion, C. A comprehensive assessment of immunophenotyping performed in cryopreserved peripheral whole blood. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 94, 662–670 (2018).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    Kennedy, A.E. et al. Lasting Changes to Circulating Leukocytes in People with Mild SARS-CoV-2 Infections. Viruses 13, 2239 (2021).
    OpenUrl
  48. 48.↵
    Loukov, D., Karampatos, S., Maly, M.R. & Bowdish, D.M.E. Monocyte activation is elevated in women with knee-osteoarthritis and associated with inflammation, BMI and pain. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 26, 255–263 (2018).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    Zaunders, J.J. et al. High levels of human antigen-specific CD4+ T cells in peripheral blood revealed by stimulated coexpression of CD25 and CD134 (OX40). J Immunol 183, 2827–2836 (2009).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    Seddiki, N. et al. Human antigen-specific CD4(+) CD25(+) CD134(+) CD39(+) T cells are enriched for regulatory T cells and comprise a substantial proportion of recall responses. Eur J Immunol 44, 1644–1661 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    Wolfl, M. et al. Activation-induced expression of CD137 permits detection, isolation, and expansion of the full repertoire of CD8+ T cells responding to antigen without requiring knowledge of epitope specificities. Blood 110, 201–210 (2007).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    Huynh, A. et al. Characteristics of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Recovered COVID-19 Subjects. Viruses 13, 697 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. 53.↵
    Immunization, N.A.C.o. Guidance on booster COVID-19 vaccine doses in Canada - Update December 3, 2021: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2021.
  54. 54.↵
    Hirabara, S.M. et al. SARS-COV-2 Variants: Differences and Potential of Immune Evasion. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology 11, 781429 (2021).
    OpenUrl
  55. 55.↵
    Klenerman, P. & Oxenius, A. T cell responses to cytomegalovirus. Nature reviews. Immunology 16, 367–377 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    Strioga, M., Pasukoniene, V. & Characiejus, D. CD8+ CD28− and CD8+ CD57+ T cells and their role in health and disease. Immunology 134, 17–32 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    Fletcher, J.M. et al. Cytomegalovirus-specific CD4+ T cells in healthy carriers are continuously driven to replicative exhaustion. The Journal of Immunology 175, 8218–8225 (2005).
    OpenUrl
  58. 58.↵
    Henson, S.M., Riddell, N.E. & Akbar, A.N. Properties of end-stage human T cells defined by CD45RA re-expression. Curr Opin Immunol 24, 476–481 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    Brenchley, J.M. et al. Expression of CD57 defines replicative senescence and antigen-induced apoptotic death of CD8+ T cells. Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology 101, 2711–2720 (2003).
    OpenUrl
  60. 60.↵
    Neidleman, J. et al. mRNA vaccine-induced T cells respond identically to SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern but differ in longevity and homing properties depending on prior infection status. eLife 10, e72619 (2021).
    OpenUrl
  61. 61.↵
    Crotty, S. A brief history of T cell help to B cells. Nature reviews. Immunology 15, 185–189 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. 62.↵
    van den Berg, S.P.H. et al. Latent CMV Infection Is Associated With Lower Influenza Virus-Specific Memory T-Cell Frequencies, but Not With an Impaired T-Cell Response to Acute Influenza Virus Infection. Front Immunol 12 (2021).
  63. 63.↵
    Theeten, H. et al. Cellular Interferon Gamma and Granzyme B Responses to Cytomegalovirus-pp65 and Influenza N1 Are Positively Associated in Elderly. Viral immunology 29, 169–175 (2016).
    OpenUrl
  64. 64.↵
    Furman, D. et al. Cytomegalovirus infection enhances the immune response to influenza. Science translational medicine 7, 281ra243 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  65. 65.↵
    Neidleman, J. et al. SARS-CoV-2-Specific T Cells Exhibit Phenotypic Features of Helper Function, Lack of Terminal Differentiation, and High Proliferation Potential. Cell Rep Med 1, 100081–100081 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  66. 66.↵
    Grifoni, A. et al. Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals. Cell 181, 1489-1501.e1415 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. 67.↵
    Miles, D.J. et al. Cytomegalovirus infection in Gambian infants leads to profound CD8 T-cell differentiation. J Virol 81, 5766–5776 (2007).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. 68.↵
    Felismino, E.S. et al. Better Response to Influenza Virus Vaccination in Physically Trained Older Adults Is Associated With Reductions of Cytomegalovirus-Specific Immunoglobulins as Well as Improvements in the Inflammatory and CD8+ T-Cell Profiles. Front Immunol 12 (2021).
  69. 69.↵
    Rydyznski Moderbacher, C. et al. Antigen-Specific Adaptive Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in Acute COVID-19 and Associations with Age and Disease Severity. Cell 183, 996-1012.e1019 (2020).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  70. 70.↵
    Wang, C. et al. Effects of aging, cytomegalovirus infection, and EBV infection on human B cell repertoires. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) 192, 603–611 (2014).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. 71.↵
    Shrock, E. et al. Viral epitope profiling of COVID-19 patients reveals cross-reactivity and correlates of severity. Science 370 (2020).
  72. 72.↵
    Simonnet, A. et al. High incidence of Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, and human-herpes virus-6 reactivations in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Infect Dis Now 51, 296–299 (2021).
    OpenUrl
  73. 73.↵
    Alanio, C. et al. Cytomegalovirus latent infection is associated with an increased risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization. J Infect Dis (2022).
  74. 74.↵
    Del Valle, D.M. et al. An inflammatory cytokine signature predicts COVID-19 severity and survival. Nature Medicine 26, 1636–1643 (2020).
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top
Posted May 28, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
CMV seropositivity in older adults changes T cell functionality, but does not prevent antibody or cellular SARS-CoV-2 vaccine responses
Jessica A. Breznik, Angela Huynh, Ali Zhang, Lucas Bilaver, Hina Bhakta, Hannah D. Stacey, Jann C. Ang, Jonathan L. Bramson, Ishac Nazy, Matthew S. Miller, Judah Denburg, Andrew P. Costa, Dawn M. E. Bowdish, other members of the COVID-in-LTC Investigator Group
medRxiv 2022.05.27.22275673; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.27.22275673
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area