Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

How do local-level authorities engage in epidemic and pandemic preparedness activities and coordinate with higher levels of government? Survey results from 33 cities

View ORCID ProfileMatthew R Boyce, Melissa Cordoba Asprilla, Breanna van Loenen, Amanda McClelland, Ariella Rojhani
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.25.22275614
Matthew R Boyce
1Center for Global Health Science & Security, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matthew R Boyce
  • For correspondence: matt.boyce@georgetown.edu
Melissa Cordoba Asprilla
2Vital Strategies, New York City, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Breanna van Loenen
3Resolve to Save Lives, New York City, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda McClelland
3Resolve to Save Lives, New York City, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ariella Rojhani
2Vital Strategies, New York City, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic suggests that there are opportunities to improve preparedness for infectious disease outbreaks. While much attention has been given to understanding national-level preparedness, relatively little attention has been given to understanding preparedness at the local-level. We, therefore, aim to describe (1) how local governments were engaged in epidemic preparedness efforts before the COVID-19 pandemic and (2) how they were coordinating with authorities at higher levels of governance before COVID-19. We developed an online survey and distributed it to 50 cities around the world involved in the Partnership for Healthy Cities. The survey included several question formats including free-response, matrices, and multiple-choice questions. RACI matrices, a project management tool that helps explain coordination structures, were used to understand the level of government responsible, accountable, consulted, and informed regarding select preparedness activities. We used descriptive statistics to summarize local-level engagement in epidemic preparedness. Local health authorities from 33 cities completed the survey. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 20 of the cities had completed infectious disease risk assessments, 10 completed all-hazards risk assessments, 11 completed simulation exercises, 10 completed after-action reviews, 19 developed preparedness and response plans, three reported involvement in their country’s Joint External Evaluation of the International Health Regulations, and eight cities reported involvement in the development of their countries’ National Action Plan for Health Security. RACI matrices revealed various models of epidemic preparedness, with responsibility often shared across levels, and national governments accountable for the most activities, compared to other governance levels. In conclusion, national governments maintain the largest role in epidemic and pandemic preparedness but the role of subnational and local governments is not negligible. Local-level actors engage in a variety of preparedness activities and future efforts should strive to better include these actors in preparedness as a means of bolstering local, national, and global health security.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

All study materials were submitted to the Georgetown University Institutional Review Board for ethical review. The Institutional Review Board granted an exemption to the study (STUDY00003948) in June 2021 after determining that the research posed no more than minimal risk to those who would be participating.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data used and/or analyzed during the current study are included in this published article and supporting information.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 26, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How do local-level authorities engage in epidemic and pandemic preparedness activities and coordinate with higher levels of government? Survey results from 33 cities
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
How do local-level authorities engage in epidemic and pandemic preparedness activities and coordinate with higher levels of government? Survey results from 33 cities
Matthew R Boyce, Melissa Cordoba Asprilla, Breanna van Loenen, Amanda McClelland, Ariella Rojhani
medRxiv 2022.05.25.22275614; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.25.22275614
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
How do local-level authorities engage in epidemic and pandemic preparedness activities and coordinate with higher levels of government? Survey results from 33 cities
Matthew R Boyce, Melissa Cordoba Asprilla, Breanna van Loenen, Amanda McClelland, Ariella Rojhani
medRxiv 2022.05.25.22275614; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.25.22275614

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (239)
  • Allergy and Immunology (521)
  • Anesthesia (124)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1418)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (217)
  • Dermatology (158)
  • Emergency Medicine (291)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (582)
  • Epidemiology (10288)
  • Forensic Medicine (6)
  • Gastroenterology (527)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2625)
  • Geriatric Medicine (254)
  • Health Economics (496)
  • Health Informatics (1729)
  • Health Policy (789)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (671)
  • Hematology (266)
  • HIV/AIDS (564)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12083)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (648)
  • Medical Education (273)
  • Medical Ethics (83)
  • Nephrology (288)
  • Neurology (2456)
  • Nursing (144)
  • Nutrition (377)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (491)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (566)
  • Oncology (1319)
  • Ophthalmology (400)
  • Orthopedics (146)
  • Otolaryngology (235)
  • Pain Medicine (168)
  • Palliative Medicine (51)
  • Pathology (342)
  • Pediatrics (778)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (329)
  • Primary Care Research (296)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2394)
  • Public and Global Health (4999)
  • Radiology and Imaging (893)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (525)
  • Respiratory Medicine (681)
  • Rheumatology (309)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (255)
  • Sports Medicine (244)
  • Surgery (297)
  • Toxicology (45)
  • Transplantation (140)
  • Urology (108)