Limited induction of lung-resident memory T cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 by mRNA vaccination

MAIN

The COVID-19 pandemic continues, and many countries face multiple resurgences. While vaccines to limit SARS-CoV-2 infection rapidly emerged providing high protection from COVID-19, more insight into the mechanisms of protection induced by available vaccines is still needed. The level of vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies has been shown to correlate with protection from symptomatic infection; however, predicted antibody-mediated vaccine efficacy declines over time². Moreover, many viral variants of concern (VOC) can significantly evade humoral immunity, yet cellular responses induced by vaccines show strong cross-protection against these variants^{3, 4}, supporting the idea that cellular responses largely contribute to disease control⁵. In fact, preexisting cross-reactive memory T cells and early Nucleocapsid (N) responses against coronaviruses are associated with protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection^{6, 7}. Further, SARS-CoV-2 infection induces robust cellular immunity detectable beyond 10 months after infection in peripheral blood⁸, and as T_RM in the lung¹, and the number of SARS-CoV-2-specific T_RM in the lung correlates with clinical protection⁹. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 using BTN162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccines has been reported to induce CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell responses in peripheral blood^{10, 11}. Moreover, the IFNγ T-cell response to SARS-CoV-2 S-peptides, one of the main antiviral factors measured as a readout, further increased after boosting¹¹. However, current studies only address vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell responses in peripheral blood and whether mRNA vaccines also elicit SARS-CoV-2-specific long-term T_RM cells in the lung remains to be established.

To this end, we determined the presence of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells in 26 paired peripheral blood and lung cross-sectional samples from: I.) uninfected unvaccinated individuals (Ctrl, n=5), II.) unvaccinated long-term SARS-CoV-2 convalescent individuals (Inf, n=9, convalescent for a median of 304 days [183-320 IQR]), III.) uninfected and long-term two-dose vaccinated individuals (Vx2, n=7, a median of 206 days [184-234] after the second dose), and IV.) uninfected and short-term three-dose vaccinated individuals (Vx3, n=5, a median of 52 days [42-54] after the third dose or boost). Patient characteristics are summarized in Extended Table 1. In order to confirm the SARS-CoV-2 status of each patient, we analyzed total immunoglobulin (Ig) or IgG levels against N and Spike (S) proteins respectively, which discriminated Ctrl (negative for N and S), Inf patients (positive for N and S) and vaccinated groups (negative for N and positive for S; Extended Table 1). Furthermore, the viral neutralization titer was determined against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant using a pseudovirus neutralization assay and, as expected^{10, 11}, a positive correlation between neutralization and S-IgG titers was detected (Spearman r = 0.72, P = 0.0016; Extended Data Fig.1a). In addition to the absence of neutralization of the Omicron variant in plasma of the Ctrl group, 2 out of 7 patients (28%) in the Inf group and from 1 out of 6 patients (17%) in the Vx2 group failed to neutralize the virus, whereas all patients in the Vx3 group were able to neutralize this variant (Extended Table 1). The fact that we mostly studied elderly patients could certainly determine the overall response and, indeed there was a negative correlation between older age and neutralizing capacity for the Inf group (Spearman r = -0.88, P = 0.01; Extended Data Fig.1b) and the same trend was observed for the Vx2 group (Spearman r = -0.72, P = 0.10; Extended Data Fig.1c). This relationship was less evident between age and S-IgG titers (Extended Data Figs.1d, e), yet examples in larger cohorts exist¹⁰. Instead, S-IgG titers from all groups negatively correlated with sample timing (Spearman r = -0.61, P = 0.010; Extended Data Fig.1f), a correlation that was also observed for total Ig against N in the Inf group (Spearman r = -0.88, P = 0.009; Extended Data Fig.1g), which agrees with antibody titers decay^{10, 11, 12}.

To address cellular immune responses, we stimulated fresh peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and lung-derived cellular suspensions with overlapping Membrane (M), N and S peptide pools and determined the intracellular expression of IFNγ, interleukin (IL)-4, and IL-10, along with the degranulation marker CD107a in CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells (Extended Data Fig.2a), as previously described¹. We found detectable circulating IFNγ-secreting Ag-specific CD4⁺ T cells responding to all proteins in the blood of Inf patients, which was significantly higher compared to the Ctrl, Vx2, and Vx3 groups for M and N peptides (Fig. 1a, b). In contrast, for S peptides, the Inf group only showed higher frequencies of IFNγ⁺ CD4⁺ T cells compared to the Ctrl group, indicating an increase induced by vaccination in the blood of Vx2 and Vx3 groups. However, only two Vx2 patients showed detectable frequencies of S-specific CD4⁺ T cells in blood, while recently boosted Vx3 patients displayed an overall increase reaching statistical significance compared to the Ctrl group (Fig. 1b). In contrast to CD4⁺ T cells, the frequencies of IFNγ⁺ CD8⁺ T cells detected were minimal for each of the groups against any of the proteins, including for the Vx groups against S peptides (Fig. 1b). Expression of IL-4, IL-10, and CD107a by T cells showed, in general, high variability, limiting the detection of differences (Extended Data Fig. 3). Nonetheless, S-specific degranulating CD107a⁺ CD8⁺ T cells were overall more frequent in the Vx2 compared to the Ctrl group (P = 0.046; Extended Data Fig. 3). Together, these data indicate that M, N, and S-peptide specific IFNγ⁺ CD4⁺ T cell responses can be readily detected in blood months after resolving natural SARS-CoV-2 infection and that these responses require a recent mRNA vaccine booster-dose against SARS-CoV-2 to elicit similar frequencies against the S protein in vaccinated individuals.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 1. SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses in peripheral blood from convalescent and vaccinated patients.

(a) Representative flow-cytometry plots showing CD4⁺ T cells expressing CD107a and IFNγ after exposure of whole PBMCs to S-peptide pools or left unstimulated for each of the four groups included in this study (complete gating strategy is shown in Extended Data Fig. 2a). (b) Comparison of the net frequency (background subtracted) of IFNγ⁺ cells within CD4⁺ (upper) and CD8⁺ (lower) T-cell subsets after stimulation of PBMCs with any of the three viral peptide pools (membrane (M), nucleocapsid (N) and spike (S) peptides). Data are shown as median ± IQR, where each dot represents an individual patient for each group (Ctrl, control, n=5; Inf, convalescent infected, n=9; Vx2, vaccine 2 doses, n=7 and Vx3, vaccine 3 doses, n=5). Statistical significance was determined by Kruskal-Wallis test (with Dunn’s post-test).

As reported previously¹, we here found that mild or severe natural infection with SARS-CoV-2 induced robust IFNγ⁺ CD4⁺ T cells in the lung against M, N, and S peptides, detectable for up to 12 months after infection (Fig. 2a, b). Interestingly, whereas M and N-specific IFNγ⁺ CD4⁺ T-cell frequencies were significantly higher in the Inf group compared to Ctrl or Vx groups, these differences were not observed for S-specific responses (Figs. 2a, b). Vx2 and Vx3 groups showed presence of S-specific IFNγ⁺ CD4⁺ T cells in the lung in most patients and its frequency was comparable to levels detected in Inf patients, although statistical significance was no reached compared to the Ctrl group (Fig. 2b). In contrast to CD4⁺ T cells, CD8⁺ T cells producing IFNγ after stimulation with M, N, or S peptides was variable within each group and did not result in significant differences between the groups, indicating that natural infection nor vaccination elicit a robust IFNγ positive CD8⁺ T cell response in the human lung (Fig. 2b). Furthermore, induction of lung anti-SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses involving expression of IL-4, IL-10, and CD107a did not differ between groups (Extended Data Fig. 4a). Of note, in this tissue compartment, we detected negative correlations between patient’s age within the Inf group and the frequency of S-specific degranulating CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells (Spearman r = -0.76, P = 0.024 and Spearman r = -0.77, P = 0.020 respectively, Extended Data Fig. 4b).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 2. SARS-CoV-2-specific lung T-cell responses from convalescent and vaccinated patients and comparison between tissue compartments.

(a) Representative flow-cytometry plots showing CD4⁺ T cells expressing CD107a and IFNγ after exposure of single-cell suspensions of lung tissue to S-peptide pools or left unstimulated for each of the four groups included in this study (complete gating strategy is shown in Extended Data Fig. 2b). (b) Comparison of the net frequency (background subtracted) of IFNγ⁺ cells within CD4⁺ (upper) and CD8⁺ (lower) T-cell subsets after exposure of lung single-cell suspensions to any of the three viral peptide pools (membrane (M), nucleocapsid (N) and spike (S) peptides). (c) Comparison of the net frequency of IFNγ⁺ cells within CD4⁺ (left) and CD8⁺ (right) T-cell subsets in paired blood and lung samples of each group after exposure to S-peptide pools. Data in bar graphs are shown as median ± IQR, where each dot represents an individual patient for each group (Ctrl, control, n=5; Inf, convalescent infected, n=9; Vx2, vaccine 2 doses, n=7 and Vx3, vaccine 3 doses, n=5). Statistical significance was determined by (b) Kruskal-Wallis test (with Dunn’s post-test) or (c) Friedmann test (with Dunn’s post-test).

When we compared the magnitude of S-specific T cells in paired blood and lung samples, we found increased frequencies of IFNγ⁺ CD4⁺ T cells in the lungs of patients from the Inf group compared to blood (P =0.039, Fig. 2c). The same trend was observed for the Vx individuals, which was close to significant if both groups were pooled (P = 0.054). In contrast, the CD8⁺ T-cell compartment did not show clear differences between these two compartments (Fig. 2c), neither any of the T-cell subsets for any other function, which were highly variable (Extended Data Fig. 5). Together our data shows that S-specific CD4⁺ T-cell responses are detectable in the lung of uninfected vaccinated patients, indicating that mRNA vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 may elicit tissue-localized protective T-cell responses already after the second mRNA vaccine dose.

Considering the presence of T_RM in the respiratory tract might provide a better correlate of protection from disease in SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals^{1, 9}, we next analyzed expression of CD69 and CD103 by lung SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺T cells, which we classified as: CD69^- (non-T_RM), CD69⁺ (T_RM) and a subset within CD69⁺ cells expressing CD103⁺ (T_RM CD103⁺) (Fig. 3a, Extended Data Fig. 2b for gating strategy). Of note, CD69⁺T cells showed down-regulation of T-bet in all groups (Extended Data Fig. 2b), which has been associated to tissue residency¹. S-specific CD4⁺ T cells from the Inf group showed higher frequencies of IFNγ⁺ cells within the CD69⁺ and CD103⁺ T_RM phenotypes (Fig. 3a, b), with statistical significance reached for the overall CD69⁺ T_RM fraction compared to the non-T_RM fraction. Furthermore, while no significant differences were detected for CD103⁺ T_RM cells against S-peptides in any of the groups, a trend was observed for CD4⁺ T-cell responses to M peptides and statistical significance was reached for CD8⁺ T cells against N peptides compared to the non-T_RM fraction in the Inf group (Extended Data Fig. 6a, b). Of note, a negative correlation was observed between IFNγ-secreting S-specific CD8⁺ CD103⁺ T_RM cells and sample timing (Spearman r = -0.82, P = 0.019 Extended Data Fig. 6c). Similar to the Inf group, some patients in the Vx2 and Vx3 groups showed presence of S-specific T_RM with or without CD103 expression in their lungs (Figs. 3a, b). However, this response was highly heterogeneous and not statistically significant. These findings indicate that mRNA vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 can induce S-specific T_RM in some, but not all individuals and may also last long term after the second vaccination.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 3. Frequency of Spike-specific T_RM cells in the lung.

(a) Representative flow-cytometry plots showing three subsets of CD4⁺ T cells present in the lung: CD69^- non-T_RM, CD69⁺ T_RM, and CD69⁺CD103⁺ T_RM cells expressing CD107a and IFNγ after exposure of single-cell suspensions of lung tissue to S-peptide pools or left unstimulated for an Inf and a Vx2 patients. (b) Comparison of the net frequency of S-specific IFNγ⁺ cells within the three (non-) T_RM cell subsets present in the lung for each group. Data in bar graphs are shown as median ± IQR, where each dot represents an individual patient for each group (Ctrl, control, n=5; Inf, convalescent infected, n=8; Vx2, vaccine 2 doses, n=7 and Vx3, vaccine 3 doses, n=4). Statistical significance was determined by Friedmann test (with Dunn’s post-test) for the difference between the cellular subsets within each patient group.

To better gain insight into the overall S-specific response by each group, including all functions and considering lung-T_RM phenotypes, we represented S-specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell subsets as donut charts displaying the mean frequency of responses including all individuals (responders and non-responders, Fig. 4, b). This way, a dominance of IFNγ-secreting CD4⁺ T cells was particularly associated to the two T_RM phenotypes in the Inf and, to a lesser extent, in the Vx2 patients (Fig. 4a). Further, S-specific responses within non-T_RM and blood CD4⁺ T cells were functionally similar and in general dominated by IFNγ and IL-4 secretion (Fig. 4a). In contrast, degranulation characterized the majority of lung S-specific CD8⁺ T cells from Inf individuals (Fig. 4b), which correlated negatively with older age for the T_RM fractions (Spearman r = -0.88, P = 0.006 for both CD103 positive and negative, Extended Data Fig. 6d). Degranulation was also the major function in blood from the two Vx groups (Fig. 4b). Last, in general, CD8⁺ T-cell responses considering all functions were of higher magnitude in long-term Vx2 individuals, reaching statistical significance for blood responses in comparison to the Ctrl group, as shown in the adjoin graph on the right (Fig. 4b).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 4. Overall functional T-cell response of lung and blood compartments.

(a, b) Donut charts displaying the net contribution of each functional marker (IFNγ, CD107a, IL-4, and IL-10) to the overall S-specific CD4⁺ (a) and CD8⁺ (b) T-cell response within the lung resident and non-resident T-cell subsets and in peripheral blood for each of the individual patient groups. Data represent the mean value of the net frequency of each function within the patient group, including both responders and non-responders. The frequency shown inside each donut chart represents the accumulated mean response of all functions. Bar charts on the right show the mean of the total frequency considering all functions per group (mean ± SD). Statistical significance was determined by Kruskal-Wallis test (with Dunn’s post-test) for the difference between each group. * P < 0.05.

We previously detected a low but consistent polyfunctional IFNγ⁺CD107a⁺ T-cell response mostly associated to the T_RM fraction in convalescent infected patients¹. We therefore investigated whether mRNA vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 would also induce S-specific polyfunctional responses in both compartments (Figs. 5a, b). Indeed, increased frequencies of polyfunctional IFNγ⁺CD107a⁺ CD4⁺ T cells were detected in blood from the Inf group against N peptides compared to the Ctrl group, but not against M- and S-peptides. Interestingly, a trend towards higher frequencies of S-specific polyfunctional CD4⁺ T cells was observed for the Vx3 group (Fig. 5a). Likewise, circulating polyfunctional S-specific CD8⁺ T cells were enhanced in Vx2 individuals compared to Ctrl group (Fig. 5a). In fact, if Vx groups were pooled to increase sample size, then both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells reached significance compared to Ctrl samples (P = 0.037 for CD4⁺ and P = 0.024 for CD8⁺). In addition, the frequency of polyfunctional IFNγ⁺CD107a⁺ cells present in total CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells in the lung were only consistently increased in the Inf group against N peptides compared to the Ctrl and Vx3 groups (Fig. 5b). Nevertheless, while a high degree of variability was observed among vaccinated patients, polyfunctional S-specific T cells were detected in some individuals (Fig. 5b). Strikingly, S-specific CD4⁺ polyfunctional CD103⁺ T_RM cells were virtually absent in the Vx2 and Vx3 groups, while being frequently present in the lungs of patients from the Inf group (Extended data Fig. 7). Furthermore, the frequency of S-specific polyfunctional CD4⁺ T cells in the CD69⁺ T_RM cells was higher in the Inf group compared to the Ctrl and Vx2 groups (Extended data Fig. 7). Together, these data indicate that both short- and long-term vaccination do not induce S-specific IFNγ⁺CD107a⁺ CD103⁺ T_RM cells in the lung, which may contribute to antiviral activity.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 5. Polyfunctional CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell responses in blood and lung of convalescent and vaccinated patients.

(a, b) Comparison of the net frequency of polyfunctional CD107a⁺ IFNγ⁺ cells within CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell subsets for each of the four groups after exposure of PBMCs (a) or single-cell suspensions of lung tissue (b) to any of the three viral peptide pools (membrane (M), nucleocapsid (N) and spike (S) peptides). Data in bar graphs are shown as median ± IQR, where each dot represents an individual patient for each group (Ctrl, control, n=5; Inf, convalescent infected, n=9; Vx2, vaccine 2 doses, n=7 and Vx3, vaccine 3 doses, n=5). Statistical significance was determined by was determined using Kruskal-Wallis test (with Dunn’s post-test).

Last, considering the uniqueness of analyzing immune responses in paired blood and lung parenchyma samples and recent studies detailing changes in T cell responses in infected individuals already vaccinated and vice versa¹³, we highlight two patients that were discarded due to not fitting inclusion criteria, yet bring interesting data to the study. HL174 was a patient in their fifties who received the third mRNA-1273 vaccine boost and, five days after, tested positive by PCR. We analyzed paired tissue samples 30 days after the boost/infection event (Extended Data Fig. 8a). This patient had a neutralization titer of 1740 IU/mL against omicron, and had detectable IgG and Ig titers against S and N proteins (>800 AU/mL and 1.23 index, respectively). When comparing T-cell responses from blood and lung tissue, a much higher IFNγ-response was observed in the lung, in particular against the N protein, which already contained responding cells with a T_RM phenotype (Extended Data Fig. 8b, c). In contrast, in blood, degranulation was enhanced mostly against S but also M protein and some proportion of IL-10 secretion was detected against all proteins (Extended Data Fig. 8b).

On the other hand, patient HL162, who was in their early seventies, was first infected presenting a mild COVID-19 and, several months after, received three doses of the mRNA-1273 vaccine. In this case, we obtained samples 3.7 months after infection and another one 1.3 months after the third dose (due to a second intervention for a lung carcinoma), which corresponded to a year after initial infection, as shown (Extended Data Fig. 9a). Neither of these two time points showed neutralization titers against omicron and the titers of IgG, instead of increasing after triple vaccination, decreased from 156 to 0 index for the N protein and from 306.54 to 13.85 AU/mL for S protein. The comparison of the tissue compartments after infection and after triple vaccination evidenced a concomitant strong decrease in T-cell responses in blood and tissue (Extended Data Figs. 9b, c, and Extended Data Fig. 10a, b). However, IFNγ-secreting SARS-CoV-2 T cells against M and N proteins in the lung were better preserved from the original infection one year later than were responses against the S protein enhanced due to vaccination (Extended Data Fig. 9b, c, and Extended Data Fig. 10a, b). Thus, while the lower respiratory tract compartment more faithfully represented T_RM responses established already during the infection event one year earlier, responses in blood mostly vanished.

Comprehensive studies comparing the magnitude and duration of the T cell responses indicate similar magnitude after dual vaccination and after natural SARS-CoV-2 infection^{5, 11, 13}. However, these results may not hold if we consider that the magnitude, the functional profile and even the duration of these responses in blood may not faithfully reflect responses in the respiratory tract^{1, 7, 9, 14}. In fact, the individual comparison between these two compartments among the S-responding T cells from the different groups showed higher magnitude in the lung than in the blood, but also a different profile. A key difference, and the main driver of our study, was the establishment of long-term protection potentially mediated by T_RM after vaccination, since longevity of SARS-CoV-2 T cell responses remains a critical question⁷. In principle, T_RM are established by mucosal infection since Ag together with local signals promote the recruitment and establishment of this memory response. In this sense, intramuscular vaccination with an adenovector vaccine in mice did not induce SARS-CoV-2-specific T_RM in their lungs¹⁵. Thus, to induce potent resident immunity, vaccine strategies may need to either use live-attenuated Ag or employ mucosal routes. Consequently, the absence of vaccine induced S-specific T_RM could be expected in infection-naïve individuals. Still, recent data shows that a secretory IgA response was induced in ∼30% of participants after two doses of a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine which, in addition, may play an important role in protection against infection¹⁴. While we detected S-specific IFNγ⁺ CD4⁺ T cell responses in the lung of vaccinated individuals, the proportion of these cells in the T_RM phenotype was modest, in particular if considering CD103 expression. Further, the presence of polyfunctional IFNγ⁺CD107a⁺CD4⁺CD103⁺T_RM appeared to be restricted to the lungs of convalescent-infected patients only. Yet, lung S-specific CD8⁺ T_RM presented similar overall frequencies in vaccinated individuals when considering all functions. In fact, overall CD8⁺ T cell response, which was in general low and dominated by degranulation, appeared enhanced in some but not all vaccinated patients. Considering the putative protective role of CD8⁺ T cells observed in animal models¹⁶, our results for these vaccinated individuals are certainly encouraging.

Another difference in the comparison of the cellular immunity between SARS-CoV-2-infected convalescent and uninfected-vaccinated individuals is the broader and, potentially stronger, response induced by symptomatic infection. This is partially manifested by the fact that, when comparing the overall magnitude, responses against M and N peptides are frequently higher than S peptides^{1, 17, 18 19}. Of note, disease severity may impact both, the magnitude and function of the T cell response against the different proteins^{1, 20, 21}. In addition, among other factors, age also influences the magnitude and duration of immune responses in distinct tissue compartments, even the establishment of T_RM²², a factor that influenced the frequency of degranulation in the lung of our Inf patients, including within the T_RM fraction. Yet advanced age will also limit the immune response to vaccination²³. On the other hand, we have observed that different proteins induce different functional profiles during acute infection, which may influence disease control¹. Responses against the N protein seem to more consistently induce polyfunctional antiviral T cells and these responses may be more conserved among other coronaviruses^{1, 6, 24, 25}. Instead, S-specific immune responses may better support B cell and antibody generation via follicular helper T cells, instrumental for limiting infection^{1, 5}. Thus, another conclusion would be highlighting the interest of including other proteins beyond the spike such as N sequences, which has been suggested before^{1, 6, 19, 25, 26}. Last, in terms of duration, our study lacks longitudinal data to assess the dynamics in the different compartments, yet it is assumed that T_RM phenotypes will contribute to long-term persistence^{1, 7, 16}. In fact, the only patient for which we had longitudinal sampling after infection and after the third vaccine boost (extended Fig. 9) demonstrated that even if vaccination fails to induce a systemic antibody response, a low frequency SARS-CoV-2 T cell response directed to proteins from the original infection remains exclusively detectable in the lung as T_RM one year after.

We acknowledge that our study has several limitations, including the small sample size for the different groups. In addition, we addressed T cell immune responses in older and mostly oncologic patients, which may overall underestimate immune responses in all groups. Whereas the fact that the Inf group consisted of patients recovered from mild or severe disease, even if age and underlying conditions were similar to the other groups, may have skewed frequencies of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells towards the higher end. Still, considering their age and condition, any of these patients with a new infection would most likely develop a more serious COVID-19 event compared to the general population. In addition, the boosted Vx3 group was sampled short term comparing to the Vx2 group, but enhancement of T cell responses would be better detected 5-10 days after boosting^{10, 11} (which was a less likely time for scheduling surgery). Still it was enough to suggest that there was no major enhancement of long-term durable T cell response in the lung by a third boost. Further, we did not assess the contribution of T cells targeting mutation regions to the total spike since we aimed to compare the strength and function of vaccinated and naturally infected patients (these last group obtained during the first wave). However, the overall contribution of T cell responses to mutational regions/total spike responses has been reported to be low^{13, 27}. Last, low percentages of SARS-CoV-2 specific CD8⁺ T cells may be due to the use of 15-mer peptides, which are less optimal than 9/10-mer peptides for HLA class I binding⁴, although this is debatable²¹.

Overall, our results contribute to the understanding of disease protection mediated by current mRNA vaccines. While our data indicates a more robust and broader cellular response in convalescent patients, S-specific T cells can be detected in the lung of vaccinated individuals to similar overall levels 8 months after immunization, highlighting the durability of this immune arm. Further, while we detected increased levels of IFNγ⁺ T cell responses in blood after the third dose, limited benefit of boosting towards the enhancement of T cell responses in the lung was evidenced by our data. However, elderly people not responding to vaccination have been shown to benefit from a third dose²³ and there is an obvious benefit of boosting to provide a higher degree of antibody-mediated protection from infection in the context of high incidence of VOC². Still, if virus neutralization is unable to completely block infection, a more robust and wider T_RM response established in the lung of convalescent-infected individuals may have more chances of limiting disease. The inclusion of other protein fragments such as nucleocapsid peptides^{1, 6, 19, 25, 26} in combination with mucosal routes²⁸ will likely contribute to the establishment of optimal memory T cells in future vaccine strategies.

METHODS

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization, M.G.; Patient Recruitment and Sample Collection, J.R., V.F.; Methodology, DKJ.P., SG.K., A.G.R., J.R-C, C.M., J.E.; Investigation, DKJ.P., SG.K., A.G.R., J.E.; Formal Analysis, DKJ.P., A.G.R., M.J.B. and M.G.; Writing-Original Draft, DKJ.P. and M.G; Writing-Review & Editing, all authors; Funding Acquisition, M.G.; Supervision, M.G.

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no competing interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files.

EXTENDED DATA LEGENDS

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Extended Data Fig. 1. Correlation between SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies, neutralizing capacity, age, and sampling time.

Graphs show the relationship between: (a) S-specific IgG antibodies (AU/mL) in plasma and SARS-CoV-2 neutralization titer for each group (Inf, convalescent infected, n=7; Vx2, vaccine 2 doses, n=6 and Vx3, vaccine 3 doses, n=4); (b, c) SARS-CoV-2 neutralization titer and age of Inf patients (b) and Vx2 patients (c); (d, e) S-specific IgG antibodies (AU/mL) and age of Inf patients (d) and Vx2 patients (e); (f) S-specific IgG antibodies (AU/mL) in all groups and day of sampling after infection or vaccination; and (e) N-specific Ig antibodies (index) in Inf patients and day of sampling after infection. Correlations (r and P values) were assessed by Spearman test.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Extended Data Fig. 2. Gating strategy for the analysis of T cells present in peripheral blood and lung tissue.

(a, b) Representative flow-cytometry plots showing the gating strategy towards the identification of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells within PMBC (a) and lung tissue (b) samples. CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell subsets in PBMCs were identified by gating of time (to exclude disturbances in flow measurements), followed by gating of total lymphocytes, single cells, and live cells. CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell subsets in lung tissue were identified by gating of time, live CD45⁺ cells, single cells, and lymphocytes.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Extended Data Fig. 3. Spike-specific T-cell responses (CD107a, IL-4, IL-10) in peripheral blood from convalescent and vaccinated patients.

Comparison of the net frequency of CD107a⁺ (left), IL-4⁺ (middle), and IL-10⁺ (right) cells within CD4⁺ (upper) and CD8⁺ (lower) T-cell subsets for each of the four groups after exposure of PBMCs to S-peptide pools. Data in bar graphs are shown as median ± IQR, where each dot represents an individual patient for each group (Ctrl, control, n=5; Inf, convalescent infected, n=9; Vx2, vaccine 2 doses, n=7 and Vx3, vaccine 3 doses, n=5). Statistical significance was determined by Kruskal-Wallis test (with Dunn’s post-test).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Extended Data Fig. 4. SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses (CD107a, IL-4, IL-10) in the lung from convalescent and vaccinated patients.

(a) Comparison of the net frequency of CD107a⁺ (left), IL-4⁺ (middle), and IL-10⁺ (right) cells within CD4⁺ (upper) and CD8⁺ (lower) T-cell subsets for each of the four groups after exposure of single-cell suspensions of lung tissue to S-peptide pools. Data in bar graphs are shown as median ± IQR, where each dot represents an individual patient for each group (Ctrl, control, n=5; Inf, convalescent infected, n=9; Vx2, vaccine 2 doses, n=7 and Vx3, vaccine 3 doses, n=5). Statistical significance was determined by Kruskal-Wallis test (with Dunn’s post-test). (b) Correlation between the net frequency of S-specific CD107a⁺ cells of CD4⁺ (left) and CD8⁺ (right) T cells in the lung and age (Inf group). Correlations (r and P values) were assessed by Spearman test.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Extended Data Fig. 5. Comparison of the frequency of S-peptide specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells between lung and blood.

(a-c) Graphs show the individual patient net frequency of CD107a⁺ (a), IL-4⁺ (b), and IL-10⁺ (c) cells within CD4⁺ (left) and CD8⁺ (right) T-cell subsets of paired blood and lung samples that were exposed to S-peptide pools. Statistical significance was determined using Friedmann test (with Dunn’s post-test) for the difference between blood and lung samples within each patient group.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Extended Data Fig. 6. The response of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ (non-) T_RM cells against M and N peptide pools.

(a, b) Comparison of the net frequency of IFNγ⁺ cells within three T_RM-cell subsets of CD4⁺ (left) and CD8⁺ (right) T cells present in the lung: CD69^- non-T_RM, CD69⁺ T_RM, and CD69⁺CD103⁺ T_RM cells for each group after exposure to (a) M- and (b) N-peptide pools. Data in bar graphs are shown as median ± IQR, where each dot represents an individual patient for each group (Ctrl, control, n=5; Inf, convalescent infected, n=8; Vx2, vaccine 2 doses, n=7 and Vx3, vaccine 3 doses, n=4). Statistical significance was determined using Friedmann test (with Dunn’s post-test) for the difference between the cellular subsets within each patient group. (c) Correlation between the net frequency of lung S-specific IFNγ⁺ cells within the CD8⁺ CD69⁺ CD103⁺ T_RM subset and days since confirmed infection and sampling (Inf group). (d) Correlation between the net frequency of S-specific CD107a⁺ CD8⁺ CD69⁺ CD103⁺ T_RM cells or CD8⁺ CD69⁺ T_RM cells and age (Inf group). Correlations (r and P values) were assessed by Spearman test.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Extended Data Fig. 7. Frequency of polyfunctional T-cell responses against spike with a tissue-resident phenotype in the lung.

Comparison of the net frequency of S-specific polyfunctional CD107a⁺ IFNγ⁺ cells within lung CD4⁺ (upper) and CD8⁺ (lower) (non-) tissue-resident cell subsets (CD69^- non-T_RM, CD69⁺ T_RM, and CD69⁺CD103⁺ T_RM cells) for each of the four patient groups after exposure of single-cell lung suspensions to S-peptide pools. Data in bar graphs are shown as median ± IQR, where each dot represents an individual patient for each group (Ctrl, control, n=5; Inf, convalescent infected, n=8; Vx2, vaccine 2 doses, n=7 and Vx3, vaccine 3 doses, n=4). Statistical significance was determined by Kruskal-Wallis test (with Dunn’s post-test) for the difference between the groups.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Extended Data Fig. 8. T-cell responses for patient #174.

(a) Timeline for patient 174, indicating vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, infection with SARS-CoV-2, and acquisition of blood and lung samples. (b) Donut charts displaying the net contribution of each functional marker (IFNγ, CD107a, IL-4, IL-10, or no response) to the M-, N-, and S-specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell response within the lung resident and non-resident T-cell subsets and in peripheral blood for patient 174. The frequency shown inside each donut chart represents the accumulated mean response of all functions. (c) Flow-cytometry plots of patient 174 showing CD4⁺ (upper) and CD8⁺ (lower) T cells expressing CD107a and IFNγ after exposure of lung single-cell suspensions (left) and PBMCs (right) to M-, N- and S-peptide pools or left unstimulated.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Extended Data Fig. 9. T-cell responses for patient #162, longitudinal samples.

(a) Timeline for patient 162 who was longitudinally sampled, first ∼4 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection and then ∼1 month after third dose mRNA-vaccination. (b, c) Donut charts displaying the net contribution of each functional marker (IFNγ, CD107a, IL-4, IL-10, or no response) to the M-, N-, and S-specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell response within the lung resident and non-resident T-cell subsets and in peripheral blood for patient 162 in the first sample (b) and second sample (c). The frequency shown inside the donut chart represents the accumulated mean response of all functions.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Extended Data Fig. 10. Longitudinal patterns of SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses in lung and blood for patient #162.

(a, b) Flow-cytometry plots showing longitudinal data (left, after infection, sample 1; right, after third-dose vaccination, sample 2) of patient 162 showing CD4⁺ (top) and CD8⁺ (bottom) T cells expressing CD107a and IFNγ after exposure of PBMCs (a) and lung cell suspension (b) to M-, N-, and S-peptide pools or left unstimulated (vehicle).