Abstract
Background Adverse experiences can lead to severe mental health problems such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) throughout the lifespan. In individuals with PTSD, both global and local brain volume reductions have been reported—especially in the amygdala and hippocampus—while the literature on childhood maltreatment suggests strong dependency on the timing of adverse events. In the present study, we pooled data from two studies to contrast effects of reported trauma-exposure during neurodevelopmentally sensitive periods in early life with trauma-exposure during adulthood.
Methods A total of 155 women were allocated into one of six age-matched groups according to timing of traumatization (childhood vs adulthood) and psychopathology (PTSD vs trauma-exposed healthy vs trauma-naïve healthy). Volumes of amygdala and hippocampus were compared between these groups. Six additional exploratory regions of interest (ROI) were included based on a recent meta-analysis.
Results Amygdala volume was strongly dependent on timing of traumatization: Smaller amygdala volumes were observed in the childhood sample, while larger volumes were observed in the adulthood sample. Hippocampal volume comparisons revealed no statistically significant differences, although the descriptive pattern was similar to that found for the amygdala. The remaining exploratory ROIs showed significant group effects, but no timing effects.
Conclusions Timing of traumatization was associated with amygdala volumes throughout the lifespan, with opposite effects dependent on age at trauma occurrence. The relevance of potential confounders like trauma-type and multiplicity is discussed.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research under Grant No. 01KR1303A and by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB636/C1 to H.F).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Ethical Review Board of the Medical Faculty Mannheim (Heidelberg University) and the ethics committee of the Goethe University Frankfurt gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Author Note: All authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
↵* shared first authorship
Previous Presentation: Siehl, S. (2021). Structural and functional neuroplasticity in posttraumatic stress disorder: fear learning and context processing. [doctoral thesis, University of Mannheim]. https://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de
Data availability statement: We report how we determined our sample size, all data exclusions, all inclusion/exclusion criteria, whether inclusion/exclusion criteria were established prior to data analysis, all manipulations, and all measures in the study. Ethical restrictions to protect participant confidentiality prevent us from making study data publicly available. This also refers to the analysis/experimental code, and any other digital materials, where participant-related information (like sex or psychopathological status) are also included. Readers seeking access to the study data and materials should contact the corresponding author based on a formal collaboration agreement. This formal collaboration agreement indicates that data will be shared with other researchers who agree to work with the authors, and for the sole purpose of verifying the claims in the paper. The data and materials will be released to requestors after approval of this formal collaboration agreement by the local Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty Mannheim.
Data Availability
Ethical restrictions to protect participant confidentiality prevent us from making study data publicly available. This also refers to the analysis/experimental code, and any other digital materials, where participant-related information (like sex or psychopathological status) are also included. Readers seeking access to the study data and materials should contact the corresponding author based on a formal collaboration agreement. This formal collaboration agreement indicates that data will be shared with other researchers who agree to work with the authors, and for the sole purpose of verifying the claims in the paper. The data and materials will be released to requestors after approval of this formal collaboration agreement by the local Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty Mannheim.
https://osf.io/r65uz/?view_only=26f0e011f1d24b279991dff6c57e5fe3
