Summary
Background Effectiveness of oral antivirals in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 patients is urgently needed. This retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate the clinical and virologic outcomes associated with molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use in COVID-19 patients during a pandemic wave dominated by the Omicron BA.2 subvariant.
Methods We analyzed data from a territory-wide retrospective cohort of hospitalized patients with confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection from 26th February 2022 to 26th April 2022 in Hong Kong. Oral antiviral users were matched with controls using propensity-score matching in a ratio of 1:1. Study outcomes were all-cause mortality, a composite outcome of disease progression (all-cause mortality, initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation [IMV], intensive care unit admission, or the need for oxygen therapy) and their individual outcomes, and time to achieving lower viral burden of cycle threshold (Ct) value ≥30 cycles. Hazard ratios (HR) of event outcomes were estimated using Cox regression models.
Results Among 40,776 hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection over a mean follow-up of 41.3 days with 925,713 person-days, this study included 1,856 molnupiravir users, 890 nirmatrelvir/ritonavir users and 2,746 control patients not initially requiring oxygen therapy at baseline after propensity-score matching. Oral antiviral use was associated with significantly lower risks of all-cause mortality (molnupiravir: HR=0.48, 95%CI=0.40-0.59, p<0.0001; nirmatrelvir/ritonavir: HR=0.34, 95%CI=0.23-0.50, p<0.0001), the composite outcome of disease progression (molnupiravir: HR=0.60, 95%CI=0.52-0.69, p<0.0001; nirmatrelvir/ritonavir: HR=0.57, 95%CI=0.45-0.72, p<0.0001), and the need for oxygen therapy (molnupiravir: HR=0.69, 95%CI=0.57-0.83, p=0.00011; nirmatrelvir/ritonavir: HR=0.73, 95%CI=0.54-0.97, p=0.032) than non-use. Time to achieving lower viral burden was significantly shorter among oral antiviral users than matched controls (molnupiravir: HR=1.38, 95%CI=1.15-1.64, p=0.0046; nirmatrelvir/ritonavir: HR=1.38, 95%CI=1.07-1.78, p=0.013).
Conclusions Against Omicron BA.2, initiation of novel oral antiviral treatment in hospitalized patients not requiring any oxygen therapy was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality and disease progression, in addition to achieving low viral burden faster. Our findings support the early use of oral antivirals in COVID-19 patients who do not require supplemental oxygen on admission.
Funding Health and Medical Research Fund, Food and Health Bureau, Government of the Hong Kong SAR
Evidence before this study The medical and research community are actively exploring the use of oral antivirals in COVID-19 patients to lower their risks of hospitalization and death, and to reduce the burden on healthcare systems. We searched Scopus and PubMed for studies until 13th May 2022 using the search terms “SARS-CoV-2 OR COVID-19” AND “molnupiravir OR Lagevrio OR EIDD-2801” OR “nirmatrelvir OR Paxlovid OR PF-07321332”. Major studies examining the safety and efficacy of molnupiravir include MOVe-IN and MOVe-OUT trials conducted in hospitalized and non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, respectively. Clinical evidence for the use of ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir came from the EPIC-HR trial conducted among non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19. While no clinical benefits have been observed with molnupiravir use in the inpatient setting among patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19, early initiation of molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir/ritonavir within 5 days of symptom onset in non-hospitalized patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 and risk factors for progression to severe disease has been associated with relative risk reduction of hospitalization or death by 30% and 88%, respectively. Notably, these clinical trials were conducted prior to the prevalence of Omicron variant, and the efficacy of oral antivirals against this current variant of concern can only be inferred from experimental evidence to date. Real-world evidence of oral antiviral use in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection of Omicron variant is lacking.
Added value of this study To the best of our knowledge, this is the first real-world study exploring the inpatient use of oral antivirals during a pandemic wave dominated by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. We conducted a territory-wide, retrospective cohort study to examine the effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in COVID-19 patients who did not require supplemental oxygen on admission in Hong Kong. Early initiation of oral antivirals within 2 days of admission was associated with significantly lower risks of all-cause mortality and disease progression, in addition to achieving low viral burden faster than their respective matched controls. Oral antiviral use was also associated with a reduced need for oxygen therapy than non-use.
Implications of all the available evidence Current guidelines are now prioritizing the distribution of oral antivirals to those who do not require supplemental oxygen, but who are at the highest risk of disease progression. Our study cohort reflected such prescription pattern in real-world clinical practice, consisting of mostly the elderly with multiple pre-existing comorbidities and who had not been fully vaccinated. The antiviral effect and mortality benefit observed in this patient cohort support the use of oral antivirals in COVID-19 patients who do not require supplemental oxygen on admission during a pandemic wave of Omicron variant. Ongoing research will inform the safety and effectiveness of oral antivirals in specific patient populations (by vaccination status and viral variants), drug combinations, and different healthcare settings.
Competing Interest Statement
BJC reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, Fosun Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Moderna, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi Pasteur. BJC has provided scientific advice to Pfizer and AstraZeneca on issues related to disease burden and vaccine effectiveness. He has not provided scientific advice to either company related to COVID antiviral effectiveness, and he has not received any funding from Pfizer or AstraZeneca for any research on antiviral effectiveness including the current work. The authors report no other potential conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the Health and Medical Research Fund (reference number: COVID190210), Food and Health Bureau of the Hong Kong Government.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Institutional review board of the University of Hong Kong / Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (reference no. UW 20-493) gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Full professors
In this version, we have updated the manuscript by excluding hospitalized COVID-19 patients with drug contraindications to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, severe renal or liver impairment to further mitigate confounding by indication as much as possible, and restrict the sample to those who were as equally eligible to receive either molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment as possible. Furthermore, we have added subgroup and sensitivity analyses which generated results that were broadly consistent with our primary analysis, and reassured the validity of our data presented for the real-world effectiveness of oral antiviral drugs. The head-to-head comparison between molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was removed.
Data Availability
The clinical outcome data were extracted from the Hospital Authority database in Hong Kong and vaccination records were extracted from the eSARS data provided by the Centre for Health Protection. The data custodians (the Hospital Authority and the Department of Health of Hong Kong SAR government) provided the underlying individual patient data to the University of Hong Kong for the purpose of performing scientific research for the study. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Authors must not transmit or release the Data, in whole or in part and in whatever form or media, or any other parties or place outside Hong Kong; and fully comply with the duties under the law relating to the protection of personal data including those under the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance and its principles in all aspects.
