ABSTRACT
Importance Data on real-world effectiveness of casirivimab and imdevimab (CAS+IMD) for treatment of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) are limited, especially with regard to variants of concern such as Delta.
Objective To assess effectiveness of CAS+IMD versus no COVID-19 antibody treatment among patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in the ambulatory setting overall and among subgroups, including patients diagnosed during the Delta-dominant period prior to Omicron emergence.
Design Retrospective cohort study.
Setting Komodo Health closed claims database.
Participants Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in ambulatory settings from December 2020 through September 2021 treated with CAS+IMD or untreated but treatment-eligible under the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). Each treated patient was exact- and propensity score-matched without replacement to up to 5 untreated EUA-eligible patients.
Exposure CAS+IMD treatment.
Main Outcomes and Measures Composite endpoint of 30-day all-cause mortality or COVID-19-related hospitalization. Kaplan-Meier estimators were used to calculate risk of outcome overall and across subgroups defined by age groups, COVID-19 vaccination status, immunocompromised, and timing of COVID-19 diagnosis (December 2020 to June 2021, and July 2021 to September 2021). Cox proportional-hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
Results Among 75 159 patients treated with CAS+IMD and 1 670 338 EUA-eligible untreated patients, 73 759 treated patients were matched to 310 688 untreated patients; matched patients had an average age ∼50 years, approximately 60% were women and were generally well-balanced across risk factors. The 30-day risk of the composite outcome was 2.1% and 5.2% in the CAS+IMD -treated and untreated patients, respectively; CAS+IMD treatment was associated with a 60% lower risk of the outcome (aHR 0.40; 95% CI, 0.38-0.42). The effect of CAS+IMD treatment was consistent across subgroups, including those who received a COVID-19 vaccine (aHR 0.48, 95% CI, 0.41-0.56), and those diagnosed during the Delta-dominant period (aHR 0.40, 95% CI, 0.38-0.42).
Conclusions and Relevance The real-world effectiveness of CAS+IMD is consistent with the efficacy for reducing all-cause mortality or COVID-19-related hospitalization reported in clinical trials. Effectiveness is maintained across patient subgroups, including those who may be prone to breakthrough infections, and was effective against susceptible variants including Delta.□
Competing Interest Statement
All authors are employees and stockholders of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The authors conducted secondary research using de-identified data licensed from a third party, Komodo, in compliance with 45 CFR 164.514(a)-(c). The data had identifying patient information removed and were coded in such a way that the data could not be linked back to subjects from whom they were originally collected prior to the authors gaining access to it. This research, which used the de-identified licensed data described above, does not require IRB or ethics review, as analyses with these data do not meet the definition of 'research involving human subjects' as defined within 45 CFR 46.102(f) which stipulates human subjects as living individuals about whom an investigator obtains identifiable private information for research purposes.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Qualified researchers may request access to study documents (including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, and statistical analysis plan) that support the methods and findings reported in this manuscript.