ABSTRACT
Objectives Accessing the Internet has increased the gap in patient health literacy (HL), impacting patient-doctor trust. We examined how trust in physicians is affected by functional HL (the ability to read and write) and by broader concepts of HL, including communicative HL (the ability to extract information from communication to use) and critical HL (the ability to analyze and use information) among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
Methods This cross-sectional study enrolled 362 SLE patients at five academic centers between June 2020 and August 2021. The 14-item Functional Communicative Critical Health Literacy Scale assessed the three dimensions of HL (range: 1-4 points). Outcomes were trust in one’s physician and physicians generally using the 5-item Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale (range: 0-100 points). General linear models adjusted for age, sex, education, income, disease activity, disease duration, depression, and time using the Internet.
Results Trust in one’s physician increased with higher functional and communicative HL (per 1-pt increase, 3.21 [95%CI 0.61, 5.81], 5.8 [95%CI 1.96, 9.63]). Trust in physicians in general increased with higher communicative HL and decreased with higher critical HL (per 1-pt increase, 7.01 [95%CI 2.27, 11.76], -6.83 [95%CI -11.67, -1.99]). Longer Internet use was associated with both higher communicative and critical HL.
Conclusions Our findings suggest that rheumatologists can help patients build trust by encouraging dialogue about their health issues with their doctors and family members, rather than trying to improve their ability to discern health information.
Key messages
What is already known on this topic
Factors affecting trust in one’s physician among chronic diseases including SLE are economic status, misdiagnosis experience, and the duration of the physician-patient relationship.
In the general population, higher trust in physicians generally was associated with functional HL as patients’ external factors.
What this study adds
This is the first study to reveal an association between trust in one’s own physician and HL among patients with SLE. In addition, we were able to expand the correlates of HL by measuring broader concepts of HL dimensions, such as communicative and critical HL.
How this study may affect research, practice, or policy
This study suggests the importance of rheumatologists’ encouragement of patients to communicate, share their concerns, and resolve their misunderstandings to develop a trusting relationship. This study recommends that communictive HL (ability to obtain useful health information) should be the focus and not critical HL (ability to discern health information).
Competing Interest Statement
NK is a member of, Committee on Clinical research, Japan College of Rheumatology and has received grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline K.K., and payment for speaking and educational events from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Sanofi K.K., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Japan College of Rheumatology. KS has received a research grant from Pfizer Inc. and, payment for speaking and educational events from GlaxoSmithKline K.K. Other authors declare no competing interests.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number: JP 19KT0021). The funder had no role in the study design, analyses, or interpretation of the data; writing of the manuscript; or the decision to submit it for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of Showa University (number 22-002-A)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.