Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Acceptability of a behavioural intervention to mitigate the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions in older people with long-term conditions: a qualitative study

View ORCID ProfileL Shearsmith, PA Coventry, C Sloan, A Henry, E Newbronner, E Littlewood, D Bailey, S. Gascoyne, View ORCID ProfileL. Burke, E. Ryde, R Woodhouse, D McMillan, D Ekers, S Gilbody, CA Chew-Graham
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.10.22274892
L Shearsmith
1University of Leeds
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for L Shearsmith
  • For correspondence: l.shearsmith@leeds.ac.uk
PA Coventry
2University of York Department of Health Sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C Sloan
2University of York Department of Health Sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A Henry
3University of York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E Newbronner
3University of York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E Littlewood
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D Bailey
2University of York Department of Health Sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Gascoyne
2University of York Department of Health Sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Burke
2University of York Department of Health Sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for L. Burke
E. Ryde
2University of York Department of Health Sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R Woodhouse
2University of York Department of Health Sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D McMillan
2University of York Department of Health Sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D Ekers
2University of York Department of Health Sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S Gilbody
4Mental Health and Addictions Research Group
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CA Chew-Graham
5Keele University School of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives The COVID-19 pandemic has heightened the need to address loneliness and social isolation (and associated incidence of depression) amongst older adults. Between June and October 2020, the Behavioural Activation in Social IsoLation (BASIL) pilot study investigated the acceptability and feasibility of a remotely delivered brief psychological intervention (Behavioural Activation, BA) to prevent and reduce loneliness and depression in older people with long term conditions (LTCs) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Design An embedded qualitative study was conducted with semi-structured interviews to generate data that was first analysed inductively using thematic analysis and then deductively using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA).

Setting National Health Service and third sector organisations in England.

Participants Sixteen older adults and 9 Support Workers (BSWs) participating in the BASIL pilot trial.

Results Older adults and BSWs described a positive affective attitude towards the intervention linked to altruism, however the activity planning aspect of the intervention was limited due to COVID-19 restrictions. The intervention was understood by older adults & BSWs, although less understanding in older adults without low mood. A manageable burden was involved with delivering and participating in the intervention. For ethicality, older adults valued social contact and making changes, BSWs valued being able to observe those changes. Opportunity cost was low for BSWs & older adults. BA was perceived to be useful in the pandemic and likely to achieve its aims, (Perceived Effectiveness) especially if tailored to people with both low mood and LTCs. Self-efficacy developed over time and with experience for both BSWs and older adults.

Conclusions Overall, the BASIL pilot study processes and BA intervention were found to be acceptable. Use of the TFA provided valuable insights into how the intervention was experienced and how the acceptability of study processes and the BA intervention could be enhanced ahead of the larger definitive trial (BASIL+).

Strengths & Limitations

  1. The use of TFA in both informing the topic guide and conducting the analysis, demonstrating a systematic enquiry into acceptability, and contributing to the wider field as well as the topic area.

  2. The length of the interviews facilitated an in-depth exploration of older adults and BASIL Support Workers’ experiences.

  3. Conducting the interviews by telephone whilst discussing feasibility of telephone delivery may have enabled contextual cues to be discussed that may have been missed in a face-to-face interview set up, however may have led to a self-selecting sample of people who were comfortable with the telephone.

  4. A limitation is that the short timescale for the study meant that participants had to be interviewed as they completed 3m outcome measures, rather than using strategic sampling.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Funded by National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research (PGfAR) RP-PG-0217-20006

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical approval was provided by Yorkshire and The Humber - Leeds West Research Ethics Committee ref: 18/YH/0380 (approved as substantial amendment 02 under existing NIHR IRAS249030 research programme). The protocol for the BASIL pilot study was preregistered (ISRCTN94091479) on June 9, 2020.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 14, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Acceptability of a behavioural intervention to mitigate the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions in older people with long-term conditions: a qualitative study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Acceptability of a behavioural intervention to mitigate the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions in older people with long-term conditions: a qualitative study
L Shearsmith, PA Coventry, C Sloan, A Henry, E Newbronner, E Littlewood, D Bailey, S. Gascoyne, L. Burke, E. Ryde, R Woodhouse, D McMillan, D Ekers, S Gilbody, CA Chew-Graham
medRxiv 2022.05.10.22274892; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.10.22274892
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Acceptability of a behavioural intervention to mitigate the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions in older people with long-term conditions: a qualitative study
L Shearsmith, PA Coventry, C Sloan, A Henry, E Newbronner, E Littlewood, D Bailey, S. Gascoyne, L. Burke, E. Ryde, R Woodhouse, D McMillan, D Ekers, S Gilbody, CA Chew-Graham
medRxiv 2022.05.10.22274892; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.10.22274892

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (269)
  • Allergy and Immunology (549)
  • Anesthesia (134)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1746)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
  • Dermatology (172)
  • Emergency Medicine (310)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (651)
  • Epidemiology (10770)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (582)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2930)
  • Geriatric Medicine (286)
  • Health Economics (531)
  • Health Informatics (1917)
  • Health Policy (832)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (741)
  • Hematology (290)
  • HIV/AIDS (627)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12495)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (684)
  • Medical Education (299)
  • Medical Ethics (86)
  • Nephrology (319)
  • Neurology (2778)
  • Nursing (150)
  • Nutrition (431)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (553)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (596)
  • Oncology (1451)
  • Ophthalmology (440)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (254)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (378)
  • Pediatrics (863)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (361)
  • Primary Care Research (333)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2626)
  • Public and Global Health (5336)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1001)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (592)
  • Respiratory Medicine (721)
  • Rheumatology (329)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (288)
  • Sports Medicine (278)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (47)
  • Transplantation (149)
  • Urology (124)