Effectiveness of influenza vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers in Qatar

Elias Tayar, Sami Abdeen, Muna Abed Alah, Hiam Chemaitelly, Iheb Bougmiza, Houssein H. Ayoub, Anvar Hassan Kaleeckal, Ali Nizar Latif, Riyazuddin Mohammad Shaik, Hamad Eid Al-Romaihi, Mohamed H. Al-Thani, Roberto Bertollini, Laith J. Abu-Raddad, Abdullatif Al-Khal
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.09.22274802

Abstract

A number of studies reported that influenza vaccination is associated with lower risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and/or coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) morbidity and mortality. We conducted a matched, test-negative, case-control study to estimate effectiveness of influenza vaccination, using Abbott’s quadrivalent Influvac Tetra vaccine, against SARS-CoV-2 infection and against severe COVID-19. The study was implemented on a population of 30,774 healthcare workers (HCWs) in Qatar during the 2020 annual influenza vaccination campaign, between September 17, 2020 and December 31, 2020, before introduction of COVID-19 vaccination. The median age in the matched samples was 36 years (interquartile range (IQR), 32-44) for cases and 35 years (IQR, 32-42) for controls. The median duration between influenza vaccination and the PCR test was 43 days (IQR, 29-62). The estimated effectiveness of influenza vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection >14 days after receiving the vaccine was 29.7% (95% CI: 5.5-47.7%). The estimated effectiveness of influenza vaccination against any severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 was 88.9% (95% CI: 4.1-98.7%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed main analysis results. Recent influenza vaccination is associated with an appreciable reduction in the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity.

Introduction

Influenza vaccination protects against influenza infection and reduces the morbidity and mortality of seasonal influenza1. This vaccination is strongly recommended for high-risk groups such as the elderly and healthcare workers (HCWs)2. A number of studies have reported that influenza vaccination is also associated with lower risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and/or coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) morbidity and mortality3-12. However, reported apparent protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 could have arisen due to bias and may not have reflected a genuine biological effect. In particular, this protection may have been due to the healthy user effect13, whereby health-aware persons are more likely to receive an influenza vaccine, and simultaneously, to practice health behaviors that reduce their risk of acquiring the infection3,5.

Against this background, we assessed the effectiveness of influenza vaccination, using Abbott’s quadrivalent Influvac Tetra vaccine, against SARS-CoV-2 infection and against any severe (acute-care hospitalization),14 critical (intensive-care-unit hospitalization),14 or fatal15 COVID-19 among HCWs in Qatar during the 2020 annual influenza vaccination campaign, and before introduction of COVID-19 vaccination. Since variation in health behaviors among HCWs is presumably less than that among the general population, conducting this study among HCWs allowed us to minimize the influence of the healthy user effect on effectiveness estimates.

Methods

Study design

This study was conducted among HCWs at Hamad Medical Corporation, the principal provider of public healthcare services in Qatar and the nationally designated entity for COVID-19-related healthcare needs. The study analyzed the national, federated databases for COVID-19 laboratory testing, vaccination, hospitalization, and death, retrieved from the integrated nationwide digital-health information platform. These databases include all SARS-CoV-2-related data and associated demographic information, with no missing information, since the pandemic onset, documenting all polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests. Influenza vaccination data were retrieved from Hamad Medical Corporation’s influenza vaccination database. Further descriptions of these databases have been reported previously16-22.

Every PCR test conducted in Qatar is classified on the basis of symptoms and the reason for testing (clinical symptoms, contact tracing, surveys or random testing campaigns, individual requests, routine healthcare testing, pre-travel, screening at ports of entry, or other). Qatar has unusually young, diverse demographics, in that only 9% of its residents are ≥50 years of age, and 89% are expatriates from over 150 countries16. This diversity extends to the HCW population.

Effectiveness of influenza vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection was assessed using the test-negative, case-control study design, a preferred design for assessing vaccine effectiveness against influenza23,24. This design was also validated in Qatar’s population and has been repeatedly applied in previous studies in this country to assess COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness17,19,20,25-28.

All HCWs with a SARS-CoV-2 PCR test performed between September 17, 2020 and December 31, 2020 were eligible for inclusion in the study. This duration coincided with the national annual influenza vaccination campaign that typically starts in September or October, and continues for several months thereafter. Influenza vaccination is offered free of charge to all citizens and residents. During the 2020 influenza vaccination campaign, only Abbott’s quadrivalent Influvac Tetra vaccine was used. The study was concluded at the start of the mass COVID-19 vaccination campaign. During the study, SARS-CoV-2 incidence was due to the original SARS-CoV-2 virus, before introduction of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern29-32. SARS-CoV-2 incidence was also relatively low during the study with no wave materializing during this time33.

To estimate effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection, we exact-matched cases (HCWs with PCR-positive tests) and controls (HCWs with PCR-negative tests) identified during the study in a 1:5 ratio by sex, 10-year age groups, 10-nationality groups, reason for PCR testing, and bi-weekly PCR test date, to control for known differences in SARS-CoV-2 exposure risk in Qatar16,33-36. Matching by these factors was shown previously in studies of different epidemiologic designs to provide adequate control of differences in the risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infection in Qatar17,20,22,25,37.

Only the first PCR-positive test for the cases and the first PCR-negative test for the controls during the study were included in the analysis. Controls included individuals with no record of a PCR-positive test during the study period. HCWs with a PCR test within 14 days after receiving the influenza vaccine and those who received COVID-19 vaccination were excluded. These inclusion and exclusion criteria were implemented to allow adequate time for build-up of immunity after vaccination19, and to minimize different types of potential bias, as informed by earlier analyses in the same population17,25. Every control that met the inclusion criteria and that could be matched to a case was included in the analysis.

Classification of COVID-19 case severity14, criticality14, and fatality15 followed World Health Organization guidelines, and assessments were made by trained medical personnel using individual chart reviews, as part of a national protocol applied to every hospitalized COVID-19 patient. Details of COVID-19 severity, criticality, and fatality classifications are found in Supplementary Section S1.

Every hospitalized COVID-19 patient underwent infection severity assessment every three days until discharge or death. We classified individuals who progressed to severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 between the time of the PCR-positive test and the end of the study based on their worst disease outcome, starting with death15, followed by critical disease14, and then severe disease14.

Laboratory methods

Details of laboratory methods for real-time reverse-transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) testing are found in Supplementary Section S2. All PCR testing was conducted at the Hamad Medical Corporation Central Laboratory or at Sidra Medicine Laboratory, following standardized protocols.

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics of cases and controls were reported using descriptive statistics. Groups were compared using standardized mean differences (SMDs), with SMD close to 0.1 indicating adequate matching38. Conditional logistic regression factoring the matched design was performed to compare the odds of influenza vaccination in cases versus controls. This analytical approach, including matching by bi-weekly PCR test date, minimizes potential bias due to variation in epidemic phase23,39 and roll-out of vaccination during the study23,39. Interactions were not considered. The resulting estimates for the adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were then used to estimate influenza vaccination effectiveness and corresponding 95% CI using the equation23,24: Embedded Image Effectiveness was estimated against SARS-CoV-2 infection, whether symptomatic or asymptomatic, and against any severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to investigate the impact of adjusting for prior infection in the conditional logistic regression, and of modifying the study inclusion and exlusion criteria on the estimate of influenza vaccination effectiveness. The latter was informed by an established analysis plan to invistigate sources of potential bias17,25, and encomapssed exclusion of individuals with prior infection, exclusion of travel-related PCR testing, or inclusion of all PCR-positive and PCR-negative tests for cases and controls. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA/SE version 17.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA).

Oversight

Hamad Medical Corporation and Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar Institutional Review Boards approved this retrospective study with a waiver of informed consent. The research was performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The study was reported following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. The STROBE checklist can be found in Table S1.

Results

Figure 1 shows the process of selecting the study population. Of 30,774 HCWs at Hamad Medical Corporation, 12,015 had one or more SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests between September 17, 2020 and December 31, 2020. Of these, 576 HCWs with a PCR-positive test and 10,033 with exlusively PCR-negative tests were egligible for inclusion in the study. Exact-matching on a 1:5 ratio yielded 518 cases matched to 2,058 controls.

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Flowchart describing the population selection process for investigating effectiveness of influenza vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Table 1 describes the demographic characteristics of cases and controls. The median age was 36 years (interquartile range (IQR), 32-44) for cases and 35 years (IQR, 32-42) for controls in the matched samples. Slightly less than half (∼ 46%) of cases and controls were males. Participants were of diverse nationalities, and nearly two-thirds were tested because of COVID-like symptoms. Matched study groups were well balanced across the matching factors. The median duration between influenza vaccination and the PCR test was 43 days (IQR, 29-62).

View this table:
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of cases (healthcare workers with PCR-positive tests) and controls (healthcare workers with PCR-negative tests).

The estimated effectiveness of influenza vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection >14 days after receiving the vaccine was 29.7% (95% CI: 5.5-47.7%). All sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results confirming main analysis results (Table 2).

View this table:
Table 2. Effectiveness of influenza vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection >14 days after vaccine administration and against any severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19.

Of the 127 PCR-positive cases who received influenza vaccination in the matched samples, only 1 progressed to severe, but none to critical or fatal COVID-19 (Figure 1). Meanwhile, of the 391 PCR-positive cases who did not receive influenza vaccination, 17 progressed to severe, 2 to critical, but none to fatal COVID-19. The estimated effectiveness of influenza vaccination against any severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 was 88.9% (95% CI: 4.1-98.7%; Table 2).

Discussion

Recent influenza vaccination was associated with a 30% reduction in the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection by the original virus, before introduction of variants of concern. Recent influenza vaccination was also associated with a 90% reduction in the risk of severe COVID-19, but the 95% confidence interval of the effectiveness estimate was wide. Incidence of severe COVID-19 was rare among those vaccinated, with only one case of severe COVID-19 documented among them.

These results for a HCW population where the influence of the healthy user effect is perhaps minimized, support the conclusion that recent influenza vaccination has a genuine biological effect in protecting against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity. The findings also corroborate findings of studies that found similar protective effects for influenza vaccination3-12, though other studies did not40,41. These findings may be explained by influenza vaccination triggering a nonspecific immune activation, or trained or bystander immunity that is protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection3-5,7,42-47.

This study has limitations. Effectiveness of only recent influenza vaccination was investigated. The analysis did not factor influenza vaccination from prior seasons. However, given that nonspecific immune activation may not last beyond few weeks, and in context of the relatively rapid waning of COVID-19 vaccine immunity17,25,48-50, the observed effectiveness of influenza vaccination is likely short lived. Matching was done for sex, age, nationality, reason for PCR testing, and bi-weekly PCR test date, but it was not possible for other factors, such as comorbidities. However, matching by these factors successfully controlled bias in our earlier studies17,20,22,25,37. The majority of HCWs in our sample were also young and less likely to be affected by comorbidities. Nonetheless, one cannot exclude the possibility that in real-world data, bias could arise in unexpected ways, or from unknown sources, such as subtle differences or changes in test-seeking behavior. With the young and occupational nature of our population, these findings may not generalize to the elderly population or to the wider general population.

Notwithstanding these limitations, extensive sensitivity and additional analyses were conducted to investigate effects of potential bias in this study and in our earlier studies that used the same methodology. These included different adjustments and controls in the analysis and different study inclusion and exclusion criteria, to investigate whether effectiveness estimates could have been biased17,25. These analyses showed consistent findings17,25,28,51,52.

In conclusion, recent influenza vaccination is associated with an appreciable reduction in the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity. The findings support benefits for influenza vaccination that extend beyond protection against influenza infection and severe disease.

Data Availability

The dataset of this study is a property of the Qatar Ministry of Public Health that was provided to the researchers through a restricted-access agreement that prevents sharing the dataset with a third party or publicly. Future access to this dataset can be considered through a direct application for data access to Her Excellency the Minister of Public Health (https://www.moph.gov.qa/english/Pages/default.aspx). Aggregate data are available within the manuscript and its Supplementary information.

Author contributions

ET, SA, MAA, and AAK co-conceived and co-designed the study, conducted literature review, co-developed the database, and co-wrote the first draft of the article. HC co-designed the study, co-developed the database, performed the statistical analyses, and co-wrote the first draft of the article. LJA co-designed the study, led the statistical analyses, and co-wrote the first draft of the article. All authors contributed to data collection and acquisition, database development, discussion and interpretation of the results, and to the writing of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Data Availability

The dataset of this study is a property of the Qatar Ministry of Public Health that was provided to the researchers through a restricted-access agreement that prevents sharing the dataset with a third party or publicly. Future access to this dataset can be considered through a direct application for data access to Her Excellency the Minister of Public Health (https://www.moph.gov.qa/english/Pages/default.aspx). Aggregate data are available within the manuscript and its Supplementary information.

Supplementary Appendix

Supplementary Section S1. COVID-19 severity, criticality, and fatality classification

Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease was defined per the World health Organization (WHO) classification as a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infected person with “oxygen saturation of <90% on room air, and/or respiratory rate of >30 breaths/minute in adults and children >5 years old (or ≥60 breaths/minute in children <2 months old or ≥50 breaths/minute in children 2–11 months old or ≥40 breaths/minute in children 1–5 years old), and/or signs of severe respiratory distress (accessory muscle use and inability to complete full sentences, and, in children, very severe chest wall indrawing, grunting, central cyanosis, or presence of any other general danger signs)”1. Detailed WHO criteria for classifying SARS-CoV-2 infection severity can be found in the WHO technical report1.

Critical COVID-19 disease was defined per WHO classification as a SARS-CoV-2 infected person with “acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, septic shock, or other conditions that would normally require the provision of life sustaining therapies such as mechanical ventilation (invasive or non-invasive) or vasopressor therapy”1. Detailed WHO criteria for classifying SARS-CoV-2 infection criticality can be found in the WHO technical report1.

COVID-19 death was defined per WHO classification as “a death resulting from a clinically compatible illness, in a probable or confirmed COVID-19 case, unless there is a clear alternative cause of death that cannot be related to COVID-19 disease (e.g. trauma). There should be no period of complete recovery from COVID-19 between illness and death. A death due to COVID-19 may not be attributed to another disease (e.g. cancer) and should be counted independently of preexisting conditions that are suspected of triggering a severe course of COVID-19”. Detailed WHO criteria for classifying COVID-19 death can be found in the WHO technical report2.

Supplementary Section S2. Laboratory methods

Real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction testing

Nasopharyngeal and/or oropharyngeal swabs were collected for PCR testing and placed in Universal Transport Medium (UTM). Aliquots of UTM were: extracted on a QIAsymphony platform (QIAGEN, USA) and tested with real-time reverse-transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) using TaqPath™ COVID-19 Combo Kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) on an ABI 7500 FAST (Thermo Fisher, USA); tested directly on the Cepheid GeneXpert system using the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 (Cepheid, USA); or loaded directly into a Roche cobas® 6800 system and assayed with a cobas® SARS-CoV-2 Test (Roche, Switzerland). The first assay targets the viral S, N, and ORF1ab gene regions. The second targets the viral N and E-gene regions, and the third targets the ORF1ab and E-gene regions.

All PCR testing was conducted at the Hamad Medical Corporation Central Laboratory or Sidra Medicine Laboratory, following standardized protocols.

View this table:
Table S1. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist for case-control studies.

Sources of support and acknowledgements

We acknowledge the many dedicated individuals at Hamad Medical Corporation, the Ministry of Public Health, the Primary Health Care Corporation, Qatar Biobank, Sidra Medicine, and Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar for their diligent efforts and contributions to make this study possible.

The authors are grateful for institutional salary support from the Biomedical Research Program and the Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Biomathematics Research Core, both at Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, as well as for institutional salary support provided by the Ministry of Public Health, Hamad Medical Corporation, and Sidra Medicine. The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the article.

Statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors.

References

  1. ↵
    Jackson, M. L. et al. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the United States during the 2015-2016 Season. N Engl J Med 377, 534–543, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1700153 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Pearson, M. L., Bridges, C. B., Harper, S. A., Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory, C. & Advisory Committee on Immunization, P. Influenza vaccination of health-care personnel: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 55, 1–16 (2006).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    Conlon, A., Ashur, C., Washer, L., Eagle, K. A. & Hofmann Bowman, M. A. Impact of the influenza vaccine on COVID-19 infection rates and severity. Am J Infect Control 49, 694–700, doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2021.02.012 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. Fink, G. et al. Inactivated trivalent influenza vaccination is associated with lower mortality among patients with COVID-19 in Brazil. BMJ Evid Based Med, doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111549 (2020).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Huang, K., Lin, S. W., Sheng, W. H. & Wang, C. C. Influenza vaccination and the risk of COVID-19 infection and severe illness in older adults in the United States. Sci Rep 11, 11025, doi:10.1038/s41598-021-90068-y (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. Taghioff, S. M., Slavin, B. R., Holton, T. & Singh, D. Examining the potential benefits of the influenza vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: A retrospective cohort analysis of 74,754 patients. PLoS One 16, e0255541, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255541 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    Debisarun, P. A. et al. Induction of trained immunity by influenza vaccination - impact on COVID-19. PLoS Pathog 17, e1009928, doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1009928 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. Ragni, P. et al. Association between Exposure to Influenza Vaccination and COVID-19 Diagnosis and Outcomes. Vaccines (Basel) 8, doi:10.3390/vaccines8040675 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. Marin-Hernandez, D., Schwartz, R. E. & Nixon, D. F. Epidemiological evidence for association between higher influenza vaccine uptake in the elderly and lower COVID-19 deaths in Italy. J Med Virol 93, 64–65, doi:10.1002/jmv.26120 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. Massoudi, N. & Mohit, B. A Case-Control Study of the 2019 Influenza Vaccine and Incidence of COVID-19 Among Healthcare Workers. J Clin Immunol 41, 324–334, doi:10.1007/s10875-020-00925-0 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. Pawlowski, C. et al. Exploratory analysis of immunization records highlights decreased SARS-CoV-2 rates in individuals with recent non-COVID-19 vaccinations. Sci Rep 11, 4741, doi:10.1038/s41598-021-83641-y (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    Candelli, M. et al. Effect of influenza vaccine on COVID-19 mortality: a retrospective study. Intern Emerg Med 16, 1849–1855, doi:10.1007/s11739-021-02702-2 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    Jackson, L. A., Jackson, M. L., Nelson, J. C., Neuzil, K. M. & Weiss, N. S. Evidence of bias in estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness in seniors. Int J Epidemiol 35, 337–344, doi:10.1093/ije/dyi274 (2006).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    World Health Organization. COVID-19 clinical management: living guidance. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-clinical-2021-1. Accessed on: May 31, 2021. (2021).
  15. ↵
    World Health Organization. International guidelines for certification and classification (coding) of COVID-19 as cause of death. Available from: https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/Guidelines_Cause_of_Death_COVID-19-20200420-EN.pdf?ua=1. Document Number: WHO/HQ/DDI/DNA/CAT. Accessed on May 31, 2021. (2021).
  16. ↵
    Abu-Raddad, L. J. et al. Characterizing the Qatar advanced-phase SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. Sci Rep 11, 6233, doi:10.1038/s41598-021-85428-7 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Chemaitelly, H. et al. Waning of BNT162b2 Vaccine Protection against SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Qatar. N Engl J Med 385, e83, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2114114 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. Chemaitelly, H., Bertollini, R., Abu-Raddad, L. J. & National Study Group for Covid Epidemiology. Efficacy of Natural Immunity against SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection with the Beta Variant. N Engl J Med 385, 2585–2586, doi:10.1056/NEJMc2110300 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    Abu-Raddad, L. J., Chemaitelly, H., Butt, A. A. & National Study Group for Covid Vaccination. Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 Variants. N Engl J Med 385, 187–189, doi:10.1056/NEJMc2104974 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Chemaitelly, H. et al. mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants and severe COVID-19 disease in Qatar. Nat Med 27, 1614–1621, doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01446-y (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. Abu-Raddad, L. J. et al. Effect of mRNA Vaccine Boosters against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Infection in Qatar. N Engl J Med, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2200797 (2022).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    Abu-Raddad, L. J., Chemaitelly, H., Bertollini, R. & National Study Group for Covid Vaccination. Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 Vaccines in Qatar. N Engl J Med, doi:10.1056/NEJMc2117933 (2022).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    Jackson, M. L. & Nelson, J. C. The test-negative design for estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness. Vaccine 31, 2165–2168, doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.02.053 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Verani, J. R. et al. Case-control vaccine effectiveness studies: Preparation, design, and enrollment of cases and controls. Vaccine 35, 3295–3302, doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.04.037 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Abu-Raddad, L. J., Chemaitelly, H., Bertollini, R. & National Study Group for Covid Vaccination. Waning mRNA-1273 Vaccine Effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Qatar. N Engl J Med, doi:10.1056/NEJMc2119432 (2022).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. Altarawneh, H. N. et al. Effect of prior infection, vaccination, and hybrid immunity against symptomatic BA.1 and BA.2 Omicron infections and severe COVID-19 in Qatar. medRxiv, 2022.2003.2022.22272745, doi:10.1101/2022.03.22.22272745 (2022).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. Tang, P. et al. BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in Qatar. Nat Med 27, 2136–2143, doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01583-4 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Chemaitelly, H. et al. Duration of mRNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants in Qatar. medRxiv, 2022.2003.2013.22272308, doi:10.1101/2022.03.13.22272308 (2022).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Abu-Raddad, L. J. et al. Introduction and expansion of the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 variant and reinfections in Qatar: A nationally representative cohort study. PLoS Med 18, e1003879, doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003879 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. National Project of Surveillance for Variants of Concern and Viral Genome Sequencing. Qatar viral genome sequencing data. Data on randomly collected samples. https://www.gisaid.org/phylodynamics/global/nextstrain/, <https://www.gisaid.org/phylodynamics/global/nextstrain/> (2021).
  31. Hasan, M. R. et al. Real-Time SARS-CoV-2 Genotyping by High-Throughput Multiplex PCR Reveals the Epidemiology of the Variants of Concern in Qatar. medRxiv, 2021.2007.2018.21260718, doi:10.1101/2021.07.18.21260718 (2021).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Benslimane, F. M. et al. One Year of SARS-CoV-2: Genomic Characterization of COVID-19 Outbreak in Qatar. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11, 768883, doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.768883 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    Ayoub, H. H. et al. Mathematical modeling of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in Qatar and its impact on the national response to COVID-19. J Glob Health 11, 05005, doi:10.7189/jogh.11.05005 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. Coyle, P. V. et al. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in the urban population of Qatar: An analysis of antibody testing on a sample of 112,941 individuals. iScience 24, 102646, doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102646 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. Al-Thani, M. H. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Infection Is at Herd Immunity in the Majority Segment of the Population of Qatar. Open Forum Infect Dis 8, ofab221, doi:10.1093/ofid/ofab221 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    Jeremijenko, A. et al. Herd Immunity against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection in 10 Communities, Qatar. Emerg Infect Dis 27, 1343–1352, doi:10.3201/eid2705.204365 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. ↵
    Abu-Raddad, L. J. et al. Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA BNT162b2 Covid-19 vaccine protection against variants of concern after one versus two doses. J Travel Med 28, doi:10.1093/jtm/taab083 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. ↵
    Austin, P. C. Using the Standardized Difference to Compare the Prevalence of a Binary Variable Between Two Groups in Observational Research. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 38, 1228–1234, doi:10.1080/03610910902859574 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    Jacoby, P. & Kelly, H. Is it necessary to adjust for calendar time in a test negative design?: Responding to: Jackson ML, Nelson JC. The test negative design for estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness. Vaccine 2013;31(April (17)):2165-8. Vaccine 32, 2942, doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.048 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. ↵
    Belingheri, M., Paladino, M. E., Latocca, R., De Vito, G. & Riva, M. A. Association between seasonal flu vaccination and COVID-19 among healthcare workers. Occup Med (Lond) 70, 665–671, doi:10.1093/occmed/kqaa197 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. ↵
    Kissling, E. et al. Absence of association between 2019-20 influenza vaccination and COVID-19: Results of the European I-MOVE-COVID-19 primary care project, March-August 2020. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 15, 429–438, doi:10.1111/irv.12839 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. ↵
    Erismis, B. et al. Annual influenza vaccination effect on the susceptibility to COVID-19 infection. Cent Eur J Public Health 29, 14–17, doi:10.21101/cejph.a6573 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. Horns, F., Dekker, C. L. & Quake, S. R. Memory B Cell Activation, Broad Anti-influenza Antibodies, and Bystander Activation Revealed by Single-Cell Transcriptomics. Cell Rep 30, 905–913 e906, doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.063 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. Salem, M. L. & El-Hennawy, D. The possible beneficial adjuvant effect of influenza vaccine to minimize the severity of COVID-19. Med Hypotheses 140, 109752, doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109752 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. Lee, C. H. et al. Potential CD8+ T Cell Cross-Reactivity Against SARS-CoV-2 Conferred by Other Coronavirus Strains. Front Immunol 11, 579480, doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.579480 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. Benn, C. S., Netea, M. G., Selin, L. K. & Aaby, P. A small jab - a big effect: nonspecific immunomodulation by vaccines. Trends Immunol 34, 431–439, doi:10.1016/j.it.2013.04.004 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    Netea, M. G. et al. Defining trained immunity and its role in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 20, 375–388, doi:10.1038/s41577-020-0285-6 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Andrews, N. et al. Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant. New England Journal of Medicine, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2119451 (2022).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. Feikin, D. R. et al. Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease: results of a systematic review and meta-regression. Lancet 399, 924–944, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00152-0 (2022).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    Chemaitelly, H. & Abu-Raddad, L. J. Waning effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines. Lancet 399, 771–773, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00277-X (2022).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. ↵
    Altarawneh, H. N. et al. Protection against the Omicron Variant from Previous SARS-CoV-2 Infection. N Engl J Med, doi:10.1056/NEJMc2200133 (2022).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    Ayoub, H. H. et al. Estimating protection afforded by prior infection in preventing reinfection: Applying the test-negative study design. medRxiv, 2022.2001.2002.22268622, doi:10.1101/2022.01.02.22268622 (2022).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text

References

  1. 1.↵
    World Health Organization. COVID-19 clinical management: living guidance. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-clinical-2021-1. Accessed on: May 15 2021. 2021.
  2. 2.↵
    World Health Organization. International guidelines for certification and classification (coding) of COVID-19 as cause of death. Available from: https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/Guidelines_Cause_of_Death_COVID-19-20200420-EN.pdf?ua=1. Document Number: WHO/HQ/DDI/DNA/CAT. Accessed on May 31, 2021. 2021.
Back to top
Posted May 10, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Effectiveness of influenza vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers in Qatar
Elias Tayar, Sami Abdeen, Muna Abed Alah, Hiam Chemaitelly, Iheb Bougmiza, Houssein H. Ayoub, Anvar Hassan Kaleeckal, Ali Nizar Latif, Riyazuddin Mohammad Shaik, Hamad Eid Al-Romaihi, Mohamed H. Al-Thani, Roberto Bertollini, Laith J. Abu-Raddad, Abdullatif Al-Khal
medRxiv 2022.05.09.22274802; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.09.22274802
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area