Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Death by Round Numbers: Glass-Box Machine Learning Uncovers Biases in Medical Practice

View ORCID ProfileBenjamin J. Lengerich, Rich Caruana, View ORCID ProfileMark E. Nunnally, View ORCID ProfileManolis Kellis
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.30.22274520
Benjamin J. Lengerich
1Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Benjamin J. Lengerich
  • For correspondence: blengeri@mit.edu
Rich Caruana
3Microsoft Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark E. Nunnally
4NYU Langone Health
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mark E. Nunnally
Manolis Kellis
1Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Manolis Kellis
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Real-world evidence is confounded by treatments, so data-driven systems can learn to recapitulate biases that influenced treatment decisions. This confounding presents a challenge: uninterpretable black-box systems can put patients at risk by confusing treatment benefits with intrinsic risk, but also an opportunity: interpretable “glass-box” models can improve medical practice by highlighting unexpected patterns which suggest biases in medical practice. We propose a glass-box model that enables clinical experts to find unexpected changes in patient mortality risk. By applying this model to four datasets, we identify two characteristic types of biases: (1) discontinuities where sharp treatment thresholds produce step-function changes in risk near clinically-important round-number cutoffs, and (2) counter-causal paradoxes where aggressive treatment produces non-monotone risk curves that contradict underlying causal risk by lowering the risk of treated patients below that of healthier, but untreated, patients. While these effects are learned by all accurate models, they are only revealed by interpretable models. We show that because these effects are the result of clinical practice rather than statistical aberration, they are pervasive even in large, canonical datasets. Finally, we apply this method to uncover opportunities for improvements in clinical practice, including 8000 excess deaths per year in the US, where paradoxically, patients with moderately-elevated serum creatinine have higher mortality risk than patients with severely-elevated serum creatinine.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study used only openly available de-identified medical records.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • ↵† rcaruana{at}microsoft.com

  • ↵‡ mark.nunnally{at}nyulangone.org

  • ↵§ manoli{at}mit.edu

  • Added an automated method to systematically search for statistical artifacts of confounding by treatment effects. Evaluated the automated method on these datasets. Significantly expanded discussion of confounding and challenges and associated opportunities to improve healthcare by uncovering confounding from treatments. Figures 1 and 2 updated. Added descriptions of simulation studies in S1.

Data Availability

No new data are presented in the manuscript. Code to reproduce analyses are available at the following link.

https://github.com/blengerich/DeathByRoundNumbers

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 28, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Death by Round Numbers: Glass-Box Machine Learning Uncovers Biases in Medical Practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Death by Round Numbers: Glass-Box Machine Learning Uncovers Biases in Medical Practice
Benjamin J. Lengerich, Rich Caruana, Mark E. Nunnally, Manolis Kellis
medRxiv 2022.04.30.22274520; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.30.22274520
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Death by Round Numbers: Glass-Box Machine Learning Uncovers Biases in Medical Practice
Benjamin J. Lengerich, Rich Caruana, Mark E. Nunnally, Manolis Kellis
medRxiv 2022.04.30.22274520; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.30.22274520

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Informatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (228)
  • Allergy and Immunology (506)
  • Anesthesia (110)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1245)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (206)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (282)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (534)
  • Epidemiology (10032)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (500)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2464)
  • Geriatric Medicine (238)
  • Health Economics (480)
  • Health Informatics (1647)
  • Health Policy (754)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (637)
  • Hematology (250)
  • HIV/AIDS (536)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11872)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
  • Medical Education (253)
  • Medical Ethics (75)
  • Nephrology (268)
  • Neurology (2290)
  • Nursing (139)
  • Nutrition (352)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (454)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (537)
  • Oncology (1249)
  • Ophthalmology (377)
  • Orthopedics (134)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (158)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (325)
  • Pediatrics (734)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (315)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2281)
  • Public and Global Health (4843)
  • Radiology and Imaging (843)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (492)
  • Respiratory Medicine (652)
  • Rheumatology (286)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (241)
  • Sports Medicine (227)
  • Surgery (269)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (125)
  • Urology (99)