Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Workplace and lifestyle heterogeneity in subjective wellbeing: Latent Class Analysis of UK Time Use Survey before and during COVID-19

View ORCID ProfileJerry Chen, Li Wan
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.27.22273297
Jerry Chen
1University of Cambridge, Address: 16-21 Silver St, Cambridge CB3 9EP, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jerry Chen
Li Wan
2University of Cambridge
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lw423@cam.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Mental health in the UK had deteriorated compared with pre-pandemic trends. The impact of COVID-19 on the subjective wellbeing of working populations with distinct lifestyles is not yet studied.

Methods Combining time use surveys collected pre- and during COVID-19, latent class analysis was used to identify distinct lifestyles based on aggregated daily activity patterns and reported working modes. We provide qualitative pen portraits alongside pre-versus-during pandemic comparisons of intraday time use and wellbeing patterns. Lifestyle heterogeneity in wellbeing was quantified in relation to aggregated activity types.

Results COVID-19 impact on wellbeing varied significantly between usual working hours (6am-6pm) and rest of the day. The decline in wellbeing outside of usual working hours was significant and consistent across lifestyles. During usual working hours, the direction of impact varied in line with working modes: wellbeing of homeworkers decreased, remained relatively stable for commuters, and increased for certain hybrid workers. Magnitude of impact correlates strongly with lifestyle: those working long and dispersed hours are more sensitive, whereas non-work dominated lifestyles are more resilient.

Conclusion The direction and magnitude of impact from COVID-19 were not uniformly manifested across activity types, time of day, and latent lifestyles. Blurring work-life boundaries and general anxiety about the pandemic may be key determinants of the decline outside of usual working hours. During usual working hours, strong yet complex correlations between wellbeing and time-use changes suggested that policies aiming to enhance wellbeing of workers need to consider not only spatial flexibility but also provide wider support for temporal flexibility.

What is already known In the UK, mental health deteriorated compared with pre-pandemic trends. It is presumed that not everyone was affected equally, but there has been little evidence distinguishing population groups with distinct working modes and lifestyles.

What are the new findings Direction of COVID-19 impact strongly correlates with working mode and extent of spatial flexibility: wellbeing decreased for homeworkers, but increased for some hybrid workers. Magnitude of COVID-19 impact strongly correlates with lifestyle and extent of temporal flexibility: those working long and dispersed hours more were sensitive, whereas non-work dominated lifestyles were more resilient.

How might this impact policy Policymakers and employers need to consider the important function workplace has on mental health. As homeworking arrangements become permanent, the psychosocial function of traditional workplaces will become more pertinent. Flexibility around the established work-time regime will also benefit workers’ mental health, and give them greater control to choose and transition between lifestyles.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any external funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study used ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at UK Data Service, study DOI found here: http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-8128-1 http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-8741-3

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Email: jc2205{at}cam.ac.uk

Data Availability

All data produced are available online at UK Data Service safeguarded depository.

https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/studies/study?id=8128

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 27, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Workplace and lifestyle heterogeneity in subjective wellbeing: Latent Class Analysis of UK Time Use Survey before and during COVID-19
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Workplace and lifestyle heterogeneity in subjective wellbeing: Latent Class Analysis of UK Time Use Survey before and during COVID-19
Jerry Chen, Li Wan
medRxiv 2022.04.27.22273297; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.27.22273297
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Workplace and lifestyle heterogeneity in subjective wellbeing: Latent Class Analysis of UK Time Use Survey before and during COVID-19
Jerry Chen, Li Wan
medRxiv 2022.04.27.22273297; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.27.22273297

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Occupational and Environmental Health
  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (269)
  • Allergy and Immunology (551)
  • Anesthesia (135)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1750)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
  • Dermatology (172)
  • Emergency Medicine (311)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (654)
  • Epidemiology (10790)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (585)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2938)
  • Geriatric Medicine (286)
  • Health Economics (532)
  • Health Informatics (1920)
  • Health Policy (833)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (743)
  • Hematology (291)
  • HIV/AIDS (627)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12503)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (686)
  • Medical Education (299)
  • Medical Ethics (86)
  • Nephrology (324)
  • Neurology (2787)
  • Nursing (150)
  • Nutrition (432)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (556)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (597)
  • Oncology (1458)
  • Ophthalmology (442)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (255)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (380)
  • Pediatrics (865)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (362)
  • Primary Care Research (334)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2635)
  • Public and Global Health (5346)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1004)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (595)
  • Respiratory Medicine (725)
  • Rheumatology (329)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (289)
  • Sports Medicine (278)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (47)
  • Transplantation (149)
  • Urology (125)