Abstract
Recently, interprofessional team medicine has been practiced to achieve medical safety and improve patient outcomes. This study evaluated the effects of interprofessional conferences on intensive care units (ICUs) by comparing outcomes before and after their introduction. This study was conducted at a single center and included 1,765 patients who were admitted to the ICU between April 2017 and March 2019. There were 898 patients in the group before the introduction of conferences (before group) and 867 patients in the group after the introduction of conferences (after group). The interprofessional conferences involved physicians, nurses, physical therapists, nutritionists, and pharmacists. Data were extracted from the medical records. The primary outcome measure was the ICU length of stay (LOS). The secondary outcome measures were hospital LOS and rehabilitation and nutrition started within 48 hours of ICU admission. These outcomes were compared before and after the introduction of interprofessional conferences. The adjusted variables were gender, age, body mass index, ICU readmission, outcome, Barthel index at admission, and disease (classified by the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th edition). The ICU LOS (regression coefficient: -0.08; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.13 to -0.04) and hospital LOS (regression coefficient: -2.96; 95% CI: -5.20 to -0.72) were significantly shorter in after group than in the before group. Moreover, the proportion of patients who commenced nutrition (odds ratio [OR]: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.84) and rehabilitation (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.51 to 1.17) within 48 hours of ICU admission was significantly higher in the after group than in the before group. Interprofessional conferences effectively reduced the ICU LOS and hospital LOS and improved the likelihood of commencing nutrition and rehabilitation within 48 hours of ICU admission.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Review Committee of Teine Keijinkai Hospital (no. 2-020276-00) and from the Ethics Committee of Tokyo Healthcare University of the researcher (no. 32-50). Informed consent was obtained using a form provided on the website of the Teine Keijinkai Hospital; ethical approval was given. There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript.