ABSTRACT
Integrating information from data sources representing different study designs has the potential to strengthen evidence in population health research. However, this concept of evidence “triangulation” presents a number of challenges for systematically identifying and integrating relevant information. We present ASQ (Annotated Semantic Queries), a natural language query interface to the integrated biomedical entities and epidemiological evidence in EpiGraphDB, which enables users to extract “claims” from a piece of unstructured text, and then investigate the evidence that could either support, contradict the claims, or offer additional information to the query. This approach has the potential to support the rapid review of pre-prints, grant applications, conference abstracts and articles submitted for peer review. ASQ implements strategies to harmonize biomedical entities in different taxonomies and evidence from different sources, to facilitate evidence triangulation and interpretation. ASQ is openly available at https://asq.epigraphdb.org.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the UK Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit [MC_UU_00011/4] and the University of Bristol.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Minor update on formatting and citation
Data Availability
All data produced are available online as part of the code repository https://github.com/mrcieu/epigraphdb-asq.