Abstract
In South Africa, demand for housing close to viable/sustained sources of employment has far outstripped supply; and the size of the population living in temporary structures/shacks (and in poorly serviced informal settlements) has continued to increase. While such dwellings and settlements pose a number of established risks to the health of their residents, the present study aimed to explore whether they might also undermine the potential impact of regulations intended to safeguard public health, such as the stringent lockdown restrictions imposed to curb the spread of COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021. Using a representative sample of 1,381 South African households surveyed in May-June 2021, the present study found that respondents in temporary structures/shacks were more likely to report non-compliance (or difficulty in complying) with lockdown restrictions when compared to those living in traditional/formal houses/flats/rooms/hostels (OR:1.61; 95%CI:1.06-2.45). However, this finding was substantially attenuated and lost precision following adjustment for preceding sociodemographic and economic determinants of housing quality (adjusted OR:1.20; 95%CI:0.78-1.87). Instead, respondents were far more likely to report non-compliance (or difficulty in complying) with COVID-19 lockdown restrictions if their dwellings lacked private/indoor toilet facilities (adjusted OR:1.56; 95%CI:1.08,2.22) or they were ‘Black/African’, young, poorly educated and under-employed (regardless of: their socioeconomic position, or whether they resided in temporary structures/shacks, respectively). Restrictions imposed to safeguard public health need to be more sensitively designed to accommodate the critical role that poverty and inadequate service delivery play in limiting the ability of residents living in temporary structures/shacks and inadequately serviced dwellings/settlements to comply. [250/250 words]
Significance of the main findings
South Africans living in temporary structures/shacks are more likely to: be poorly educated and under-employed; with fewer assets and limited access to basic household services.
Poverty and inadequate service delivery were more important determinants of compliance with COVID-19 restrictions than housing quality.
In the absence of improvements in economic circumstances and the delivery of basic household services, restrictions imposed to safeguard public health need to be more sensitively designed to take account of the structural barriers to compliance experienced by households where poverty and/or inadequate service delivery limit their ability to: stay at home; maintain hygiene; and/or practice social distancing. [100/100 words]
“This idea of the “humbling pandemic”1 does not hold for people whose lives depend on informal economy and movement in the face of heavy restrictions on their respective activities such as… street hustle and domestic work. Therefore, the pandemic response – which employs tactics that come to determine how lives are to be lived – can be seen as an exacerbator of inequalities, by the hands of which precarious circumstances of living are a larger threat than the risk of infection”2
Stefan Ogedengbe (2021: 94)3
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any external funding. The analyses presented in this paper would not have been possible without the early release of South African data from Round 8 of Afrobarometer, which will be available for analysis in due course at: http://www.afrobarometer.org/data. Afrobarometer depends on: substantive financial support from a range of external agencies; the diligence of survey teams; and the patience of survey respondents, to all of whom the authors would like to express their sincere gratitude. We are also grateful to Celimpilo Dladla, Mpfariseni Godfrey Mulaudzi, Peter Mekgwe and Tisa Viviers for kindly translating the Title, Abstract and Significance of the main findings into isiZulu, TshiVenda, Setswana and Afrikaans, respectively (see 5.1-5.4 in Section 5 of the Supplementary Materials).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The source data were generated by Afrobarometer's AB-R8 survey in South Africa, and these data are available upon request from: https://afrobarometer.org/data
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The source data are available upon request from: https://afrobarometer.org/data
