Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with acute leukaemia and high risk MDS on active anti-cancer therapies =============================================================================================================================== * W.Y. Chan * C. Zhu * E. Sanchez * R. Gupta * A.K Fielding * A. Khwaja * E.M. Payne * J. O’Nions ## Abstract Patients with haematological malignancies, such as acute leukaemia and high-risk MDS (HR-MDS), have significantly increased mortality and morbidity from COVID-19. However vaccine efficacy in these patients and the impact of systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) on vaccine response remains to be fully established. SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses in 53 patients with ALL, AML or HR-MDS receiving SACT were characterised following two doses of either BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1nCoV-19. All patients were tested for anti-S antibodies after 2 doses, 60% after the first dose and anti-N antibody testing was performed on 46 patients (87%). Seropositivity rates after 2 vaccine doses were 95% in AML/HR-MDS patients and 79% in ALL. After stratification by prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, naïve patients with AML/HR-MDS had higher seroconversion rates and median anti-S antibody titres compared to ALL (median 291U/mL versus 5.06U/mL), and significant increases in anti-S titres with consecutive vaccine doses, not seen in ALL. No difference was seen in serological response between patients receiving intensive chemotherapy or non-intensive therapies (HMA) but significantly reduced titres were present in AML/HR-MDS patients who received venetoclax-based regimens compared to other therapies. All ALL patients received intensive chemotherapy, with no further impact of anti-CD20 immunotherapy on serological response. Understanding the impact of disease subtypes and therapy on vaccine response is essential to enable decisions on modifying or delaying treatment in the context of either SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination. ## Introduction SARS-CoV-2 vaccination represents an important measure to protect the population from COVID-19, showing excellent rates of seroconversion and efficacy in preventing severe disease1,2. However, vaccine efficacy remains to be fully-established in patients with haematological malignancy who have significantly increased mortality and morbidity from COVID-193,4,5. Variable humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have been reported, with the lowest seroconversion rates in patients with B-cell malignancies and those receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT)6,7,8,9. Encouraging seroconversion rates in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and HR-MDS have been reported within larger cohort studies of patients with a variety of haematological cancers7,10,11,12. However, the impact of SACT on vaccine responses in patients with ALL, AML and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS) remains unclear, but has important implications for clinical management. Here we have addressed this and report SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses following vaccination in patients with ALL, AML or HR-MDS receiving SACT. ## Methods Demographics, SACT history and laboratory parameters were collected from electronic health records for patients with acute leukaemias and HR-MDS receiving or recently completed SACT, who had two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1nCoV-19) between December 2020 and July 2021 (with 8 to 12 weeks between doses as per UK vaccination programme). Serological testing was performed using the Roche Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 enzyme immunoassays. All patients were consented for excess serum to be stored and used as part of the “UCL Biobank for Studying Health and Disease, Haematology Project” (ref.NC10.13). ## Results Fifty three patients (62% AML, 11% HR-MDS, 26% ALL), underwent serological testing after receiving 2 vaccine doses (72% BNT162b2, 15% ChAdOx1nCoV-19, 13% unknown), Table 1. Median age was 53 (range 18-76) and all received or had recently completed SACT at time of vaccination; 21 patients (39.6%) received intensive chemotherapy, 37.7% venetoclax-combination therapy (with azacitidine, low-dose cytarabine or gilteritinib), 16.9% non-intensive (azacitidine) and 5.6% B-cell directed immunotherapy (blinatumomab, CD19-CART). Fourty-six (87%) underwent testing for anti-N antibodies, identifying 11 (24%) showing previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. All patients were tested for anti-S antibodies after 2 doses (median 43 days post-dose) and 60% after first dose (median 37.5 days). A trend towards higher rates of seropositivity was seen in AML and HR-MDS compared to ALL after 2 doses (95% compared to 79%, p=0.06, Figure 1A). The seropositivity rate after dose one in all patients was 75% (median anti-S titre 7.275U/ml [IQR 0.64-184]), rising to 91% following dose two (median 249U/ml [IQR 24.95-1721]), Figure 1B. There was no significant difference in anti-S seropositivity rate or median antibody titre after dose one between patients with AML/HR-MDS and ALL (74% vs 78% seropositive, median titres 5.90U/ml [IQR 0.58-56.70] versus 11.4U/ml [IQR 0.61-1380]). However, patients with AML/HR-MDS showed significantly increased titres following dose two (median 333U/mL [IQR 86.60-1971], p=0.0005, 95% seropositive), compared to ALL (median titre 8.40 [IQR 2.34-669], p=0.38, 79% seropositive). View this table: [Table 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/06/2022.04.05.22273371/T1) Table 1: Patient demographics, disease and treatment characteristics in the overall cohort and by disease subgroup. ![Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/04/06/2022.04.05.22273371/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/06/2022.04.05.22273371/F1) Figure 1: Serological responses in patients with acute leukaemia and HR-MDS after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. All figures are presented with a Log10 scale on the y-axis. A seropositive result is defined as ≥0.8U/mL, upper limit of the assay >2500U/ml **lower limit of assay, **upper limit of assay*. **1A**: Seropostivity for anti-S antibodies in all patients following two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, categorized by disease subtype. **1B:** Anti-S antibody titres following the first and second vaccine doses by disease category. **1C:** Serological response to two vaccination doses in patients with no previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. **1D:** Seroconversion rates in patients with no previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, after one and two doses of vaccine (Paired pre dose, post first dose and second dose); in patients with AML or HR-MDS **(1E)** and in patients with ALL **(1F). 1G:** Serological response in patients with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection categorized by disease subtypes. **1H:**Serological response following two doses of vaccine in AML/HR-MDS treated with venetoclax-based regimens. To define vaccine-induced seroconversion, we analysed responses in patients with no prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and negative anti-N serology (Figure 1C, Figure S1A). Anti-S seroconversion was 91% with median titre of 132U/mL (IQR 7.5-931). Seroconversion rates and median titres in SARS-CoV-2 naïve patients remained higher in the myeloid compared to lymphoid cohort (median 235U/mL [IQR 82.15-1670] versus 5.06U/mL [1.69-175.6], p=0.0079). A marked increase in titres was seen following consecutive vaccinations in the AML/HR-MDS cohort (medians post dose one and two of 1.1U/mL and 95.8U/mL, p=0.08), but only minimal increase in ALL (0.817U/ml to 4.80U/mL, p>0.99) (Figures 1D, E, F, Figures S1B, C). Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with higher antibody titres after two vaccinations in patients with AML/HR-MDS (median 2500U/mL [IQR 141-2500]) compared to ALL (median 1541U/mL [IQR 574.5-2500], although this did not reach significance (p=0.77) (Figure 1G, Figures S1D,E). This is consistent with reports of higher overall post-vaccination antibody titres in individuals with prior natural infection13,14. Next we investigated the impact of SACT type on serological responses. No significant difference in seropositivity or antibody titres was seen in AML/HR-MDS patients receiving intensive (30% patients) compared to non-intensive chemotherapy (azacitidine, 23%); however, anti-S titres were significantly reduced in patients on venetoclax-based regimens (51% of myeloid patients, median 158.5U/mL [IQR 34.85-873], p=0.04). This was independent of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (Figure 1H, Figure S2A). The majority of ALL patients (79%) received intensive treatment (as per current UKALL protocols) and had low anti-S titres post vaccination (Figure 1A,B,C,F). Anti-B cell directed therapy is associated with poor serological response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Five ALL patients received Rituximab but no effect was seen on anti-S response, albeit in small numbers (Figure S2B,C). Here we report the majority of patients with acute leukaemias and HR-MDS develop detectable anti-S antibodies following two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, with seropositivity rates of 91%. SARS-CoV-2 naïve patients with AML/HR-MDS showed significantly increased antibody responses following consecutive vaccine doses, whereas ALL patients tended towards very low titres with a minimal increase, and it remains to be established whether this is sufficient to confer protective immunity. While patients with acute leukaemias can generate robust serological responses to natural infection, this was not the case for all patients following vaccination, highlighting the importance of measuring antibody titres, not just seropositivity, and to consider prior SARS-CoV-2 infection influencing vaccine responses in this high-risk group. Understanding the impact of SACT on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine responses is essential to guide decisions on treatment choice and timing. Reduced serological responses in patients receiving B-cell directed therapy and small molecule inhibitors (particularly BTKi, venetoclax, anti-CD20 and anti-CD19 immunotherapies) have been reported in mature B-cell neoplasms and myeloma, but not acute leukaemias6,9,11,15. While we found no significant difference in antibody titres or seroconversion in AML/HR-MDS patients receiving intensive or non-intensive therapy, patients receiving venetoclax-based regimens showed reduced antibody levels. Notably, ALL with intensive chemotherapy displayed almost uniformly low antibody titres (<10U/ml) after two vaccine doses, regardless of additional B-cell directed therapy. We propose that further work to define correlates of vaccine protection (humoral and T cell responses), the impact of SACT regimens on the magnitude/duration of responses, and the value of additional booster doses will have clear implications for this vulnerable group and should be priority questions for larger prospective studies. ## Supporting information supplemental figures 1 and 2 [[supplements/273371_file04.pdf]](pending:yes) ## Data Availability All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript ## Contributions JO conceived of the study, performed data collection, data analysis, literature search, and manuscript writing and revision; WC data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, and revision; CZ performed data collection, manuscript review and revision; EP conceived of study, manuscript review and revision; ES data collection, manuscript review and revision; AF, AK, RG, manuscript review and revision. ## Declaration of interest All authors declare no conflicts of interest. ## Acknowledgements We are extremely grateful to all the patients who participated in this study and to the NHS staff that provided their clinical care. EMP is supported by a CRUK Advanced Clinician Scientist Fellowship (Grant No. A24873). RG acknowledges funding from Cure Cancer@ UCL. * Received April 5, 2022. * Revision received April 5, 2022. * Accepted April 6, 2022. * © 2022, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), CC BY 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ## References 1. 1.Polack FP. et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. New England Journal of Medicine 383: 2603–15 (2020) [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa2034577&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F06%2F2022.04.05.22273371.atom) 2. 2.Voysey, M. et al. Single-dose administration and the influence of the timing of the booster dose on immunogenicity and efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine: a pooled analysis of four randomised trials. Lancet 397, 881–91 (2021) [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00432-3&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33617777&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F06%2F2022.04.05.22273371.atom) 3. 3.Vijenthira A. et al. Outcomes of patients with hematologic malignancies and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 3377 patients. Blood 136:2881–92 (2020) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F06%2F2022.04.05.22273371.atom) 4. 4.Wood WA. et al. Outcomes of patients with hematologic malignancies and COVID-19: A report from the ASH Research Collaborative Data Hub. Blood Advances 4(23): 5966– 5975 (2020) 5. 5.Passamonti, F. et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with COVID-19 severity in patients with haematological malignancies in Italy: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Haematology 7(10): e737–e745 (2020). 6. 6.Addeo, A. et al. Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccines in patients with cancer. Cancer Cell 39(8), 1091–1098 (2021) [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ccell.2021.06.009&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F06%2F2022.04.05.22273371.atom) 7. 7.Greenberger, LM. et al. Antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with hematologic malignancies. Cancer Cell 39(8), 1031–1033 (2021) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F06%2F2022.04.05.22273371.atom) 8. 8.Herishanu, Y. et al. Efficacy of the BNT162b2 MRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Blood 137, 3165–3173 (2021). [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F06%2F2022.04.05.22273371.atom) 9. 9.Fox, TA. et al. Low seropositivity and suboptimal neutralisation rates in patients fully vaccinated against COVID-19 with B-cell malignancies, British Journal of Haematology 195(5), 706–709 (2021). 10. 10.Malard, F. et al. Weak immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood Cancer Journal 11, 142 (2021) 11. 11.Tzarfati, KH. et al. BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccine is significantly less effective in patients with hematologic malignancies. Am J Hematol 96, 1195–203 (2021) 12. 12.Chung, DJ. et al. Disease-and Therapy-Specific Impact on Humoral Immune Responses to COVID-19 Vaccination in Hematologic Malignancies. Blood Cancer Discovery 2(6), 568–576 (2021) [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTI6ImJsb29kY2FuZGlzYyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo3OiIyLzYvNTY4IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjIvMDQvMDYvMjAyMi4wNC4wNS4yMjI3MzM3MS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 13. 13.Anichini, G. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Response in Persons with Past Natural Infection. N Engl J Med 385, 90–92 (2021) 14. 14.Prendecki, M. et al. Effect of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection on humoral and T-cell responses to single-dose BNT162b2 vaccine. Lancet 397(10280), 1178–1181 (2021) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F06%2F2022.04.05.22273371.atom) 15. 15.Maneikis, K. et al. Immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and early clinical outcomes in patients with haematological malignancies in Lithuania: a national prospective cohort study. Lancet Haematol 8(8), e583–e592 (2021) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F06%2F2022.04.05.22273371.atom)