Abstract
Multimodal hypersensitivity (MMH)—greater sensitivity across multiple sensory modalities (e.g., light, sound, temperature, pressure)—is hypothesized to be responsible for the development of chronic pain and pelvic pain. However, previous studies of MMH are restricted given their reliance on biased self-report questionnaires, limited use of multimodal quantitative sensory testing (QST), or limited follow-up. Therefore, we conducted multimodal QST on a cohort of 200 reproductive age women at elevated risk for developing or maintaining chronic pelvic pain conditions and pain-free controls. Pelvic pain self-report was examined over a four-year follow-up period. Multimodal QST was comprised of visual, auditory, bodily pressure, pelvic pressure, thermal, and bladder testing. A principal component analysis of QST measures resulted in three orthogonal factors that explained 43% of the variance: MMH, pressure stimulus-response, and bladder hypersensitivity. MMH and bladder hypersensitivity factors correlated with baseline self-reported menstrual pain, genitourinary symptoms, depression, anxiety, and health. Baseline self-report pain ratings were significant predictors of pelvic pain up to three years after assessment but decreased in their predictive ability of pelvic pain outcome over time. In contrast, MMH increased its predictive ability of pelvic pain outcome over time and was the only factor to predict outcome up to four years later. These results suggest that a “centralized” component of MMH is an important long-term risk factor for pelvic pain. Further research on the modifiability of MMH could provide options for future treatment avenues for chronic pain.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the National Institute of Child and Human Development (R01HD098193) and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK100368).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board of NorthShore University HealthSystem gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All code and data for this investigation is available on GitHub (https://github.com/mkmiecik14/mmh) and OSF (link will be inserted here upon publication).
