Abstract
Background Human papillomavirus is one of the most important transmitted viruses that causes of cervical cancer.
In women undergoing cervical screening, it is important to be aware of ways to reduce anxiety. The present systematic review conducted to determine the reproductive health needs of women with HPV.
Methods In this systematic review, articles without time constraints searched in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Iranian Magiran, SID and Iranmedex.
Keywords used: HPV, Information, Want, Need, Know, etc. and their Persian equivalents in the title and abstract of the articles.
Papers after identification by two researchers Contradictions evaluated and discussed with the third author.
Results At first 1056articles retrieved which after removing,13articles published between2004-2021were entered. The studies were qualitative(N=9),quantitative(N=3), and one was unclear.Most qualitative studies collected data using individual interviews(N=7), two qualitative studies, narratives of HPV patients from a website of patient experiences and questions. The quality evaluation showed that good=8, Average=2, and one was of poor. There is not enough information about Friedman AL etal and Garland SM articles to check the quality, but since these studies were valuable, they included in the study according to the opinion of the research team.
Conclusion Surveys showed that the majority of women had unanswered questions about their HPV test results. The information that women thought was helpful in interpreting their test results included having a high-risk type of HPV, the risk of short-term and long-term cancer, and cancer survival statistics for the virus. Women also needed information about sexual transmission, how HPV tested positive in a long-term relationship, and the potential consequences for their partners and the risk of re-infection. Younger women had questions about whether HPV could affect fertility.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
..
Clinical Protocols
Funding Statement
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
..
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
..
Abbreviations
- HPV
- Human Papillomavirus
- COCs
- contraceptive pills
- LNG
- levonorgestrel
