Abstract
Rift Valley fever (RVF) is a zoonotic arbovirosis which has been reported across Africa including the northernmost edge, South West Indian Ocean islands, and the Arabian Peninsula. The virus is responsible for high abortion rates and mortality in young ruminants, with economic impacts in affected countries. To this day, RVF epidemiological mechanisms are not fully understood, due to the multiplicity of implicated vertebrate hosts, vectors and ecosystems. In this context, mathematical models are useful tools to develop our understanding of complex systems, and mechanistic models are particularly suited to data-scarce settings. In this work, we performed a systematic review of mechanistic models studying RVF, to explore their diversity and their contribution to the understanding of this disease epidemiology. Researching Pubmed and Scopus databases (October 2021), we eventually selected 48 papers, which needed to provide a clear description of a mechanistic model with numerical application to RVF. We categorized models as theoretical, applied or grey, according to their will to represent a specific geographical context and their use of data to fulfill this intention. We discussed their contributions to the understanding of RVF epidemiology, and highlighted that theoretical and applied models can use different tools to meet common objectives. Through the examination of model features, we identified research questions left unexplored across scales, along with a substantial lack of justification when choosing a functional form for the force of infection. Overall, we showed a great diversity in RVF models, leading to substantial progress in our comprehension of epidemiological mechanisms. To go further, data gaps must be fulfilled, and modelers need to go the extra mile regarding transparency.
Authors summary Rift Valley fever (RVF) affects humans and livestock across Africa, South West Indian Ocean islands, and in the Arabian Peninsula. This disease is one of the World Health Organization priorities, and is caused by a virus transmitted by Aedes and Culex spp. mosquitoes, but also directly from livestock to humans. Mathematical models have been used in the last 20 years to disentangle RVF virus transmission dynamics. These models can further our understanding of processes driving outbreaks, test the efficiency of control strategies, or even anticipate possible emergence. Provided with detailed datasets, models can tailor their conclusions to specific geographical contexts and aid in decision-making in the field. This review provides a general overview of mathematical models developed to study RVF virus transmission dynamics. We describe their main results and methodological choices, and identify hurdles to be lifted. To offer innovative animal and public health value, we recommend that future models focus on the relative contribution of host species to transmission, and the role of animal mobility.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was part of the FORESEE project funded by INRAE metaprogram GISA (Integrated Management of Animal Health). HC was funded by INRAE, Region Pays de la Loire, CIRAD. We also would like to acknowledge the support of the French Ministry of Agriculture, which funded this research (AD). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵† helene.cecilia3{at}gmail.com; benoit.durand{at}anses.fr
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information.
